Ovarian Cystadenocarcinoma with an Osteosarcoma Component

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/184

Ovarian Cystadenocarcinoma with an Osteosarcoma Component

  • S. Sakhri esp Boulhart *

Head of Medical Oncology Department, Laghouat, Algeria.

*Corresponding Author: Selma Sakhri, Head of Medical Oncology Department, Laghouat, Algeria.

Citation: S. Sakhri esp Boulhart, (2021). Impact OF Covid-19 on Several Industries in Context with the Sperm Bank Industry. J Clinical Research and Reports, 8(4); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/184

Copyright: © 2021 S. Sakhri esp Boulhart. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 16 June 2021 | Accepted: 12 July 2021 | Published: 21 July 2021

Keywords: ovarian cystadenocarcinoma; osteosarcoma component; fibrosarcoma; MMMT; vesicouterine excavation; immunohistochemical analysis

Abstract

Ovarian cystadenocarcinoma with an osteosarcoma component, is a very rare tumor. We aimed to describe a case of an osteosarcoma arising in an ovarian squamous cell carcinoma. 

Introduction

Ovarian, cystadenocarcinoma with an osteosarcoma component (OCS) also known as malignant mixed müllerian tumor (MMMT), is a very rare gynecological malignancy accounting for 1–3% of ovarian malignancies [1]. OCS is a mixed tumor composed of carcinomatous and sarcomatous components. The sarcomatous component may be either homologous, including endometrial stromal sarcoma, fibrosarcoma and leiomyosarcoma, or heterologous.  We report a case of ovarian cystadenocarcinoma with an osteosarcoma component.

Case Presentation

A 63-year-old woman presented a tumor in the abdomen in December 2020. The tumor was restricted. Imaging findings, including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, revealed a multilocular cyst tumor. Imaging also showed that the patient had massive ascites. 

Total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, omentectomy, lymphadenectomy (pelvic and para-aorta), peritonectomy of vesicouterine excavation, resection of disseminated lesion of Douglas’ pouch and a biopsy of the colonic mesentery were performed without residual disease. 

The immunohistochemical analysis showed that the sarcomatous component was positive for vimentin, alpha SMA and CD10 and negative for AE1/AE3, CK7, CK20, desmin, CD31, CD34, AFP, hCG, HMB-45, S-100 and factor VIII; the Ki-67 (MIB-1) index was 30%. 

For cystadenocarcinoma the   immunohistochemical analysis showed positivity for AE1/AE3 and EMA and negativity for PAS, ALB, CK7, CK20, vimentin, alpha SMA, desmin, CD10, CD34, AFP, HCG, CD56 and synaptophysin, chromogranin; the Ki-67 (MIB-1) index was 25%. 

 Postoperatively, the patient was treated with six cycles of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin as adjuvant therapy. The patient was free of disease at the 7-month follow-up consultation.

Discussion

OCS is an extremely rare tumor among ovarian cancers, with a frequency of occurrence of 1–3% [1]. Carcinosarcomas of the female genital tract are often found after menopause at a median age of 60 to 70 years old. OCS has a worse survival rate than high-grade ovarian cancer at the same FIGO stage, with a median overall survival ranging from 7 to 27months [1].

Histologically, OCS contains both carcinomatous (malignant epithelial) and sarcomatous (mesenchymal) components. The sarcomatous component may consist of homologous tissue that are native to the ovary or heterologous tissue not native to the ovary. The optimal treatment of OCS remains uncertain due to this tumor’s rare occurrence. Many cases of OCS undergo surgical treatment and chemotherapy, similar to epithelial ovarian cancer [2]. In one of the larger studies, including 50 patients with OCS, the disease-free survival for patients with complete resection was 19 months. The overall survival of complete resection and optimal and suboptimal surgery is reportedly 47, 18 and 8 months, respectively [3]. Optimal surgical cytoreduction, including total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, omentectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection, and tumor debulking is important for improving the prognosis of OCS. Following debulking surgery for OCS, adjuvant chemotherapy is typically recommended. However, there is no consensus regarding the most effective regimen for such a rare malignancy [4]. In this   it was difficult to decide on the chemotherapy regimen. The prognosis of ovarian squamous cell carcinoma is extremely poor compared with that of typical epithelial ovarian cancer, which has a 5-year survival rate of 50% in stage I, 25% in stage II, 12% in stage III and 0% in stage IV [5]. In OCS, similar to epithelial ovarian cancer, platinum-based chemotherapy is considered a key drug. Combination chemotherapy, such as carboplatin and paclitaxel or ifosfamide, exhibits a higher response rate than single-agent platinum chemotherapy [5]. Several studies have described the clinical effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian squamous cell carcinoma [6,7]. Given the above findings, combination chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel was selected in the present case. 

Conclusion

This is a rare report of Ovarian cystadenocarcinoma with an osteosarcoma. Combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin may be an effective choice as adjuvant. Further study is required in order to identify the best principles of treatment and how to manage the new cytotoxic drug, targeted therapy and immunotherapy for OCS.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova