AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-5194/050
1 Profesor Consultante en Cirugía General, Profesor Auxiliar e Investigador Auxiliar, Jordan.
2 Especialista I Grado en Cirugía General Profesor Asistente , Jordan.
3 Especialista I Grado en Cirugía General , Profesora Auxiliar e Investigadora Auxiliar , Jordan.
4 Especialista I Grado en Cirugía General , Profesor Auxiliar , Jordan.
5 Especialista I Grado en Cirugía General , Profesor Asistente. , Jordan.
*Corresponding Author: Pedro Rolando López Rodríguez, Department of Legal Medicine, Toxicology and Forensic Medicine, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Jordan.
Citation: Pedro R. L. Rodrìguez, Eduardo G. Castillo, Dra. Olga C.L. Gonzàlez, Jorge A.S. Rocha, Marrero L. (2022) Outpatient Care and Short Hospitalization for the Elderly patient with Inguinal Hernia. J. Gastroenterology Pancreatology and Hepatobilary Disorders 6(2) DOI:10.31579/2641-5194/050
Copyright: © 2022 Pedro Rolando López Rodríguez, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 27 September 2021 | Accepted: 15 November 2021 | Published: 10 January 2022
Keywords: inguinal hernia; ambulatory treatment; elderly patients
Introduction. The surgery of hernial disease of abdominal wall and especially of the inguinofemoral hernia has increase but in fact its prevalence is unknown. The objective of present study was to assess the result of surgical treatment of the inguinofemoral region hernia in third-age patients seen in the "Dr. Enrique Cabrera" Teaching General Hospital.
Methods: A study was conducted in 2186 third-age patients operated on of inguinofemoral hernia from January, 2000 to December, 2020 in the above mentioned hospital. In all cases patients had the alternative to be operated on in ambulatory way or with a short hospital stay. Also, were included the patients operated on as an urgency. From the patients operated on in an elective way were excluded those suffering of associated, cardiopulmonary or thromboembolic ASA-III type diseases (classification of the American Society of Anesthesiology).
Results: The great incidence of the inguinal hernia was found in ages from 60-69 years (59, 3%). The indirect right inguinal hernia was the more frequent. The Desarda's anatomical surgical technique was the more applied one in the inguinal hernia and theLichtenstein's prosthetic technique with the 32% was the following in frequency. There were 20 relapses (0, 9%). Local anesthesia was applied in the 75, 4% of patients, in ambulatory way in the 76, 4%. The total of complications was of 78 (7, 1%).
Conclusions: The surgical treatment of inguinofemoral hernias, ambulatory or with a short hospital stay is a suitable procedure in third-age patients since to increase the comfort of patients, to decrease the hospital infection risk, to reduce the waiting lists and the hospital costs.
Old age is a natural process that begins at birth. For many is a disease and conceive it as the conclusion of the useful life, forced retirement and the loss of physical functions and mental. This concept is only valid for those who mistreated their health with excesses of drinks, food or cigarettes and have been sedentary. In Cuba, the increase in the health levels of the population has achieved life expectancy of 78 years for the for women and for men 1. Every time our population achieves a greater possibility of life and with it appears the risk of suffer from numerous diseases, whose only form of Curative treatment is surgery and these should not be deprived sick of the benefit of this. Age as such cannot and should not be a surgical contraindication. Surgery for the disease hernia of the abdominal wall and especially the hernia inguinofemoral has undergone an increase, but in reality its prevalence is unknown.
However, taking into consideration different parameters, it is concluded that said prevalence fluctuates between 10 and 15% of the population, with a age variation: it is 8% in the group of patients between 25 and 40 years and 45% in patients older than 75 years.1-3 This study presents the accumulated experience in the Hospital General Teaching «Enrique Cabrera», regarding the treatment ofelderly patients, cared for since January 2000 until December 2020.
An observational, descriptive and retrospective study was carried out in 2186 elderly patients, operated on for inguinofemoral hernia, in the period from January 2000 to December 2020, at the «Enrique Cabrera» General Teaching Hospital. All the patients who underwent elective surgery were studied and selected preoperatively in the programming consultation, where the patients sent by the consultations of the basic working groups and in other cases directly from the consultations of the polyclinics of the area. In all cases, the patient the alternative of being intervened on an outpatient basis or with short stay. Also included were patients operated on for urgency. Some of the selection criteria that were taken into account in electively operated patients were: no coexistence of associated systemic diseases, cardiopulmonary and thromboembolic events that exceed class ASA-III (American Society of Anesthesiologists); complicated surgical interventions, non-existence of psychological and adaptation obstacles on the part of the patient, domicile located in Havana, among others.4,5 All the patients were examined in the anesthesia consultation, where performed a surgical risk assessment and, upon completion of the assessment preoperative, received verbal and written instructions on home preoperative. The patients came to the hospital with their companion the same day of the intervention. The type of anesthesia The most used was local, according to the method recommended by L. Flánagan and J. L. Ponka. 6-8 Spinal anesthesia followed, general endotracheal (ETG) and in a smaller number of patients, analgesia acupuncture. Regarding the operative technique, the criterion is based on the anatomical type of hernia found in the physical examination and that was confirmed during the surgical act, the alterations of the deep inguinal orifice and the state of the fascia transversalis. In general, the most commonly used surgical incisions were transverse, approximately 6 cm, in the inguinal region correspondent. It was observed that prophylaxis was not used with antibiotic in patients operated on a scheduled basis, but yes it was an absolute indication in emergency interventions.
According to the chronological principle of old age, in the first phase,known as maturity, which ranges from 60 to 69 years of age, here were 1298 patients (59.3% of the total). Old age followed (between 70 and 79 years old) with a total of 718 patients (32.8%), the phase of senescence (80 and 89 years) with 144 patients (6.5%) and the longevity (90 years or more) with only 26 patients (1.4%). In the Table 1 shows that the most frequent location of the hernia inguinal was the right side, with 1028 patients for 47% of the total, of which 54.2% were indirect. There were 130 hernias recurrent
(5.9%) and 50 femoral hernias that constituted the 2.4% of all hernias. According to Nyhus's classification, there was a total of 958 patients with hernias belonging to types I and II (43.8%), the most frequent in the sample.
Table 2 shows the operative techniques most used in the inguinal hernia. Non-prosthetic techniques were applied in 1454 of the 2136 inguinal hernias operated and of these the one that was performed the most was the Modified Mohan P. Desarda technique (450 patients; 31.0%).Prosthetic techniques were performed in 682 patients and the most applied was that of Lichtenstein (220 patients; 32.2%). In this table the application of other surgical techniques can be observed in the treatment of this disease. In addition, it shows the total of relapses in both groups of techniques, anatomical and prosthetic.
Table 3 shows the most anesthetic procedures used. Local anesthesia was applied in 1648 patients (75.4% of the total), followed by spinal or spinal anesthesia in 364 patients (16.6%).
Table 4 shows the hospital stay. Most of the patients (76.4%) were operated on an outpatient basis and only the 2.4% of all patients had a long stay.
Table 5 shows the complications. The morbidity rate Overall it was 6.0% in those over 70 years of age and 2.0% in those who did not exceed this age, and did not register major complications in neither group.
In the research, a predominance of the male sex was observed, which is in correspondence with the literature reviewed.9 The values According to age, they agree with that reported by other authors, 9 in regarding the decrease in incidence at the extremes of life. In the present work, the ages ranged between 60 and 69 years, with an average age of 73 years, which is similar to that reported in the literature reviewed.10 Right inguinal hernia was the most frequent, as well as the indirect variety on both sides (table 1), which coincides with what other authors document.11,12 It is also observed that recurrent inguinal hernia accounted for 5.9% of the patients and femoral hernia by 2.4%, data that are also similar to those found in the literature reviewed.11,12 The highest number of hernias corresponded to Nyhus variety I and II, with 958 patients and variety IIIa with 870 patients. Any surgeon who frequently intervenes on patients with herniated the inguinal region knows that there are innumerable techniques describedsurgical procedures, to which advantages and disadvantages are pointed out, always in search of reducing complications and, above all, to avoid recurrences. There are the so-called classical techniques (anatomical) that repair the defect of the inguinal wall with the own tissues of the patient, and the so-called prosthetic techniques, which use synthetic materials that have had a great development in the last decades, and whose application always carries the same aims than anatomical ones. In this review it was observed that the technique. The most widely used anatomy was that of Mohan P. Desarda Modified, followed by the Zimmerman I technique. It should be noted that since a few years ago a basic working group of our service of Surgery applies the anatomical technique of Professor Desarda and has obtained good results. This technique, as the creator of it has pointed out, It has some advantages, among which are its easy learning and execution, available to residents and surgeons not specialized in the treatment of this disease. The technique provides a wall posterior inguinal canal strong, mobile and physiologically active. To the do not use mesh (foreign body) fibrosis is minimal or does not exist, no foreign body rejection and postoperative pain on the fifth day of the operation is less than with the techniques that use prosthesis. The author also points out that it can be done in a ambulatory, with local anesthesia or spinal anesthesia, and lately proposes to use a resorbable suture material and continuously, which results in greater benefit economical and reduces surgical time.13-15 The technique The most frequent prosthetic in this sample was that of Lichtenstein, and Rutkow-Robbins followed in order. The rest of the techniques are shown in the corresponding table. The most common complication was recurrence (6, 0.8% in patients operated on by techniques prosthetic and 14 (0.9%) in the group of anatomical techniques). The Wound sepsis and bradycardia after local anesthesia occupied the second place. The observed complications do not differ from those found by other authors.12,16,17 Local anesthesia was the more frequent anesthetic procedure, followed by spinal anesthesia, but other types of anesthesia were also used in a number minor of patients. Like other authors, 4,18 we believe that the Local anesthesia gives good results and should be applied to all patient who is to be operated on for an inguinofemoral hernia will not complicated, and that age alone should not be a contraindication for its use, as pointed out by Asuar López. 18 in in this case, outpatient surgeries were more frequent, followed by short-stay and long-stay interventions. The average cost of an elective herniorrhaphy, in a patient hospitalized, is 979.50 in national currency (MN), while For the same operation on an outpatient basis, the cost is 279.06 MN, with a saving in each patient of 700.44 MN. We can affirm that surgical interventions in aambulatory and short-stay patients constituted a high percentage among all elderly patients operated on in the general surgery service of our hospital. The results were good, which is consistent with the literature reviewed.
Surgical treatment of hernias inguinofemoral, on an outpatient basis or with short hospitalization, is an appropriate procedure in elderly patients, since which increases patient comfort, decreases the risk of hospital infection, reduces waiting lists and costs hospitable.
The authors do not declare any conflicts of interest.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
