AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1053/094
*Corresponding Author: Ashfaq Chandio, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Luton & Dunstable University Hospital, UK.
Citation: A Chandio, A Rai, M Chandio, R Asirvatham, K Brown. (2021) Outcome of Colorectal cancer in Geriatric Patient. J. Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics. 5(4); Doi: 10.31579/2640-1053/094
Copyright: © 2021 Ashfaq Chandio, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 11 August 2021 | Accepted: 20 August 2021 | Published: 30 August 2021
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Geriatric Patient; emergency surgery
Background: Older surgical patients remain at increased risk of adverse postoperative outcome when undergoing both elective and emergency surgery. The needs of the older surgical patient are often substantially different from those of younger patients. As a surgeons we have dilemmas in appropriately treating elderly patients. Specifically, those with cancer have been shown to receive inappropriate care, being either undertreated or overtreated based on their chronological age rather than their degree of frailty.
Aim:To evaluate outcome of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in patients aged 80 years and over.
Methods:Retrospective study of all patients 80 years and above managed with colorectal cancer at the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital UK from January 2015 through December 2019
Results: In the study period 278 patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer, Male 143 Female 135 ratio 1:1.05. Age range from 80 to 101years. 54.31% patients underwent surgical intervention. 15.10% had complications after surgery. 36.69% patients deemed unsuitable for resection surgery were treated with best supportive care palliatively. 57.19% patients were in ASAIII, 24.10% ASAII and 12.23% ASAIV. 46.40% patients died during the study period.
Conclusion:Age on its own would not be taken as for less aggressive therapy; Careful assessment of the patient taking into consideration comorbidities, functional status and patient wishes are essential in decision making and choosing appropriate management plan. Curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma in the geriatric patients are well tolerated. Management of comorbidities preceding surgery may impact postoperative outcome.
Older surgical patients remain at increased risk of adverse postoperative outcome when undergoing both elective and emergency surgery. This may be due to patient or procedural factors, or both. The needs of the older surgical patient are often substantially different from those of younger patients. There is lack of consensus about the definition of age to be considered as the cut off for geriatric patients (65 vs 70 vs 75 years old), though there is consensus that patients should not be treated based on their age alone [1]. As a surgeons we have dilemmas in appropriately treating elderly patients. Specifically, those with cancer have been shown to receive inappropriate care, being either undertreated or overtreated based on their chronological age rather than their degree of frailty [2]. Prompt identification of high risk and frail patients helps to establish an appropriate care pathway, reduce morbidity and mortality and direct hospital resources [3]. Colorectal cancer is a major health problem. In the UK, it is the second most common cause of cancer death. 5% of UK population is at risk of colorectal carcinoma during lifetime, more than nine out of ten new cases (94%) are diagnosed in people over the age of 50, and nearly six out of ten cases (59%) are diagnosed in people aged 70 or over [4]. Bowel cancer can affect anyone of any age, incidence and mortality rates vary markedly around the world. Care of elderly surgical patients is complex and patients are often treated inappropriately based on their age, degree of frailty, or both. It is therefore crucial to assess frailty and identify areas of intervention before surgery is undertaken. Advances in surgical, anaesthetic, and intensive care techniques have consequently led to a larger proportion of this increasing elderly population presenting to undergo surgical procedures [5,6].
To evaluate outcome of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in patients aged 80 years and over.
All patients 80 years and above managed with colorectal cancer at the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital UK from January 2015 through December 2019 were retrospectively identified from the referral database maintained by the colorectal specialist nurses in the colorectal service. Data were retrieved by detailed review of the hospital case notes on ICE and Evolve (Computer database for investigations and correspondence) including endoscopy; radiographic imaging; operative course and cancer follow up. The following parameters were recorded: age, gender, and source of referral, presentation, stage of the disease, MDT discussion, intervention, and outcome. Tumour locations were classified as the right colon (i.e. caecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, transverse colon, and left colon (i.e. spleenic flexure, descending colon, sigmoid, Recto sigmoid, and rectum. Inclusion: All patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer 80 years and above
Exclusion: Patients under 80 years of age, Colo Rectal Cancer of unknown primary site. Anal cancer, Appendix, Small bowel carcinoma
Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 26). Patient age was normally distributed, and the mean and standard deviation was calculated. Survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis (as recorded in the MDT discussion) to the date of death or last confirmed survival. Kaplan Meier survival curves were constructed and significance tested using the log-rank test. The level of significance was set at a p<0>t test. Univariate analysis of categorical variables was performed by the chi-square test. Pearson’s chi squared test was used for comparing two proportions. An OR with corresponding 95% confidence interval >1 implied a positive association where as an OR with corresponding 95% confidence interval <1>p values < 0>
In the study period 278 patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer, Male (143) Female (135) ratio 1:1.05. (Fig: 1)The mean age of 85.44 years (range, 80 to 101years). 151 (54.31%) patients underwent surgical intervention. 102 (36.69%) patients deemed unsuitable for resection surgery were treated with best supportive care palliatively. (Table 1) American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA grade) 57.19% (159) patients were in ASAIII, 24.10 %( 67) ASAII and 12.23% (34) ASAIV. (Table 2) In the Right colon subset of patients there was a total of 43.16% patients 70 Female and 50 Male, (Table 3) in 38.48% patients with Left Colon cancer there were 64 Male and 43 Female. (Table 4) Of 17.26% Rectal cancer patients there were 25 Male and 23 Female. (Table 5). 42 (15.10%) had complications after surgery (Table). 129 46.40% patients died during the study period. Incidence of colorectal cancer was greater for cancers of the left side of colon than right colon. (55.75% vs 43.16%).
Colorectal cancer is a common and lethal cancer worldwide, more than nine out of ten new cases (94%) are diagnosed in people over the age of 50, and nearly six out of ten cases (59%) are diagnosed in people aged 70 or over, bowel cancer can affect anyone of any age, 30% of patients with Colorectal cancer present with a metastatic disease [7, 8].
The elderly and frail Geriatric patients are exposed to high risks of morbidity and mortality when undergoing both emergency and elective surgery. This is due to patient or procedural factors or both. Identification of these factors in the elective setting through multimodal structured assessment preoperatively, through multidisciplinary input, allows optimisation of pre-existing medical conditions and appropriate multidisciplinary pre, peri and postoperative care. Older patients are more likely to present with co-existent age-related frailty, co-morbidities and age related disorders. As age increases, the rates of surgical complications remain fairly static, though medical complications are more often observed [9]. These medical complications include organ specific, for example acute kidney injury, respiratory tract problems , atrial fibrillation, and geriatric disorders including delirium, falls, dysphagia, this encounters challenges when considering whether to operate or not. Patients and family are expected to query: What happens if I don’t have a operation? Certainly, all patients should now expect a full explanation of all the possible treatment options available to them, and clinicians are legally bound to present these equably [10].
Management of colorectal cancer in the aged population poses its unique challenges. An increasingly elderly population combined with colon cancer rates increasing 1.4 – 2.5 fold with each consecutive decade of life will considerably increase the prevalence of colorectal cancer in in the coming years [11].Furthermore, improved awareness, better access to investigations and the appreciation that chronological age is no longer a barrier to individualised treatment renders colorectal cancer increasingly important in this age group. It is therefore, better to speak of biological age rather than chronological age whilst evaluating risk factors for surgery, which focuses more on the overall patient condition. As management options in colonic cancer increase, literature shows a decrease in the rate of resection comparing younger patients and the elderly [12]. Colorectal cancer survival is considerably better when the diagnosis is made at an early stage, making a convincing case for early detection through screening programs [13]. However, most patients with colorectal cancers are diagnosed after the onset of cancer-related symptoms [14] and it is imperative that frontline providers recognize early diagnostic clues to colorectal cancer. Studies have shown that rectal bleeding as an initial presentation of colon cancer and are associated with an early stage of the disease and better survival [15, 16] Colorectal Cancer incidence can be separated into 72% for the colon and 28% for the rectum, but colon and rectal cancer mortality are generally reported together [17] The location of colon cancer is also changing. The colonic distribution of cancer has had a relative rightward shift over the past 3 decades [18]. In our study we found 82.85% of cancer were in the colon and 17.14% were in the rectum. Waldron and Donovan revealed that 23% of colorectal tumours were right sided [19] Crerand S, Freely TM, Waldron RP, et al study in Dublin revealed that approximately 28% of colorectal tumours were right sided [20] and Hayne D, Brown RS, McCormack M, et al study on the current trends of colorectal cancer in England and Wales concluded that approximately 29% of colorectal cancers were right sided [21].this is in contrast to our study, we found Right colon cancer was 44.64%. The findings from our study suggest Left colon cancer was 38.21% and 17.14% of cancer were in the Rectum this is similar to other published studies [22, 23]. Our study show that age is not a predictor of post-operative complications. This is similar to other published studies [24-27]. The choice of treatment is based on several factors, including conditions of the patient stage at presentation, and the location of tumour. Surgery remains the core in curative treatment for colorectal cancer. Because of the steadily increase in the elder population, surgeons will be confronted with more and more elderly patients. While choosing treatment options, quality of life and function may be at least as important for the elderly as the cancer specific or surgical outcome [28]. In our study surgery was performed in (53.92%). Specific problems associated with geriatric patients are, multiple comorbidities, prolonged hospital stay, and a delayed presentation. In our study 92.85% of the patients at the time of surgery had one or more comorbidity, most of the patients were ASA III grade (56.78%), this is similar to other published studies [29, 30]. The elderly frail may be good candidates for palliative care, which can provide a better quality of remaining life. It is a troublesome to decide when to begin palliative care but when frailty is severe, delivery of palliative care focused on relief of discomfort and enhancement of quality of life.
One of the strengths of our study is that the sample size is not small, Patients admitted as an emergency and scheduled for elective surgery for confirmed colorectal cancer aged 80 and above were included and long follow-up period. The limitations of this study is single center, retrospective
Elderly patients are the largest group of cancer patients, and there is rapidly increasing number. In spite of the high incidence of Colorectal cancer and the high prevalence of colorectal cancer related morbidity and mortality, elderly patients are under-presented in clinical trials [31]. When managing geriatric patients with comorbidity and poor performance status, oncologists have a limited number of treatment options. Several published reports have shown that a colorectal cancer resection in elderly patients is associated with neither higher postoperative mortality, complications, nor worse short term oncological outcome [32, 33]. In our study 15.10% had complications after surgery 46.40% patients died during the study period. The outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery in geriatric patients could be comparable to those in younger patients without in- creasing the postoperative morbidity and mortality rates.
Assessment of fitness for surgery in the elderly need more holistic than in the general population, involves consideration of cardiorespiratory fitness, other comorbidities, frailty and quality of life.
Age on its own would not be taken as for less aggressive therapy; Careful assessment of the patient taking into consideration comorbidities, functional status and patient wishes are essential in decision making and choosing appropriate management plan. Curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma in the geriatric patients are well tolerated. Management of comorbidities preceding surgery may impact postoperative outcome.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
