info@auctorespublishing.com
+1-(302)-520-2644
+1-(302)-520-2644

Osteoporosis and Periodontitis: The Bi-Directional Link

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Care
  4. Archives
Submit Guidelines

Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2694-0248/028

Osteoporosis and Periodontitis: The Bi-Directional Link

  • Sagar Chaudhari 1
  • Sharayu Dhande 2*
  • Sheetal Ajit Jangale 2
  • Ajit Govind Jangale 3
  • Sangeeta Muglikar 3

1 Orthopaedic Surgeon,Private Practitioner Mumbai, Maharashtra.
2 Department of Periodontology AND Oral Implantology M A Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Pune.
3 Pedodontist and Preventive Dentist Private Practitioner.
4Assistant Professor dr Vasanat Rao Pawar Medical College, Nashik.
5Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology M A Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Pune.

*Corresponding Author: Sharayu Dhande, Department of Periodontology AND Oral Implantology M A Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Pune.

Citation: Sagar Chaudhari, Sharayu Dhande, Sheetal Ajit Jangale, Ajit Govind Jangale (2022). Osteoporosis and Periodontitis: The Bi-Directional Link. J. Clinical Orthopedics and Trauma Care, 4(2); DOI:10.31579/2694-0248/028

Copyright: © 2022 Sharayu Dhande, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 10 January 2022 | Accepted: 20 January 2022 | Published: 17 February 2022

Keywords: osteoporosis; periodontitis; periodontal disease; tooth loss; fragility fractures; menopause; hormonal replacement therapy

Abstract

Periodontitis is a multifactorial disease elicited by a complex of bacterial species, variety of risk factors, bacterial plaque, calculus that interact with host tissues causing the release of a broad array of inflammatory mediators, cytokines, chemokines some of which lead to destruction of the periodontal structures, leading to tooth mobility. Osteoporosis and Osteopenia are the conditions that represent the mineral content of the bone. In addition, aspects of bone composition and structure that may not be captured by bone mineral density measurements, such as bone size and geometry, and bone structure and material, contribute to increased bone fragility. Periodontitis as well as osteoporosis could also be risk factors for each other and have a impact that requires mutual concomitant management. An interventional approach is emerging with complex treatment options. Prevention and management of both of these diseases require interdisciplinary approaches and warrant future well-controlled longitudinal and interventional studies for evidence-based clinical guidelines. 

Introduction

Increasing life expectancy and popularity of dental implants, surgeons face a larger number of osteoporotic patients who require bone augmentation. [1] In addition, the combination of risk factors such as age, menopause, race, genetics, calcium intake, family history, medications and physical activity contribute to osteoporosis. [2-5]

Remodeling of bone in these units is important not only for maintaining bone mass, but also to repair microdamage, to prevent accumulation of too much old bone, and for mineral homeostasis. The activities of osteoblasts and osteoclasts are controlled by a variety of hormones and cytokines, as well as by mechanical loading. [6] Most importantly, sex hormones are very crucial for keeping bone mass in balance, and the lack of either estrogen or testosterone leads to decreased bone mass and increased risk for osteoporosis. The prevalence of osteoporotic fractures is increasing dramatically in the Western part of the world and is a major health problem in many countries. [7-8] 

Periodontitis can be defined as the presence of gingival inflammation at sites where there has been a pathological detachment of collagen fibres from the cementum and the junctional epithelium has migrated apically. Inflammatory events associated with connective tissue attachment loss also lead to the resorption of coronal portions of tooth supporting alveolar bone. [9-10] 

Osteoporosis, "too little bone in the bones," is a condition which mainly is seen in elderly women. The postmenopausal bone loss occurring in women can be an aggravating factor for osteoporosis. In cases of severe osteoporosis, the bone mass and structure of the skeleton are altered in such a way that the risk of fractures is very high. Since loss of alveolar bone is a notable feature of periodontal disease, severe osteoporosis could be suspected of being an aggravating factor in the case of periodontal disease. However, such a relationship is may easily be confounded by other factors such as gender, hormone intake, smoking, race, and age. [11-13]

The Global Burden of Disease Study conducted in 2016 reported that severe periodontal disease was the 11th most prevalent condition in the world. [14-15] Periodontitis and Osteoporosis both are diseases that are characterized by bone resorption. Osteoporosis involves systemic degenerative bone loss that leads to loss of skeletal cortico-cancellous microstructure and result in subsequent fracture, whereas periodontitis involves local inflammatory bone loss, following an infectious breach of the alveolar cortical bone, and it may result in tooth loss. Both diseases are defined by a preponderance of bone resorption, and their progression or severity is assessed systemically and/or locally. It is reasonable to argue that systematic skeletal change inevitably impacts the jaws and alveolar bone. [11-13]

The techniques currently used to assess osteoporosis include dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA), dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA), and quantitative computerized tomography (QCT). According to World Health Organization (WHO) osteoporosis is considered to be present when the bone mineral density (BMD) is 2.5 standard deviations below the young normal. Osteopenia is defined as bone density levels 1 standard deviation and 2.5 standard deviations below normal.[16] Preferred locations for diagnosing osteoporosis with BMD are the spine and hip and femur. On the other hand, methods for assessing periodontal conditions and oral bone loss include clinical probing depth (PD), attachment levels (CAL), tooth loss, radiographic measures of alveolar crest height (ACH), absolute bone density (DXA, DPA, QCT), and computer-assisted densitometry image analysis (CADIA). The diagnosis of osteoporosis is often made by using bone density measurements. They are often expressed in relative terms (T scores and Z-scores); the Z-score is the number of standard deviations from the age matched average value of healthy women. The T-score statistic is a simple transformation of the Z-score, using sample mean and sample standard deviation rather than the population mean and standard deviation. A low Z-score indicates the bone density is lower than it should be for a patient’s age and sex. Osteoporosis is defined as a BMD loss of 2.5 standard deviations or more below the established mean. [17]A precise, accurate measure for the degree of osteoporosis in the jaws by dual-photon absorptiometry. [18-24]

A robust association of osteoporosis and periodontal disease has been noted. Osteoporosis of the alveolar bone may lower the resistance of the periodontium to infectious challenge and may result in a local infection of the periodontium that first invades the cortical bone and results in a dimensional change in the alveolar ridge. [24-25]  Another possible mechanism involves increased production inflammatory cytokines, in that osteoporosis patients have elevated systemic levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α. These cytokines account for osteoclastogenic bone resorption-inducing cytokines and are also involved in the tissue response to periodontal disease. [26] Both osteoporotic as well as osteopenic conditions predispose an individual to loss of attachment eventually resulting into loss of tooth. [27-30] 

Genco and Grossi proposed a model, based on elevated levels of cytokines associated with post-menopausal oestrogen deficiency. [31] Deficiency in estrogen causes upregulation of macrophages and osteoblasts, which in turn produce inflammatory mediators such as interleukins, TNF-α and GM-CSF. This results in generalized collagenolysis and bone resorption. On the other hand, Yoshihara et al, found weak association between periodontal disease and BMD. The influence of estrogen upon bone remodelling like upregulation of osteoprotegrin is known to inhibits receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) results in breakdown of alveolar bone. Thus, it could be postulated that accelerated periodontal breakdown in osteoporotic patients is possibly a result of combination of elevated inflammatory responses and locally increased resorptive potential. [31]

In a study by Taguchi et al, a significant difference in BMD at the third lumbar vertebrae and posterior tooth loss was found. Similar results were found by Earnshaw et al in their study on early post-menopausal women with BMD and tooth loss. [32] Another retrospective study by Astrom et al demonstrated a positive correlation between tooth loss and incidence of hip fracture. [33]

WHO definition of osteoporosis based on BMD:

RISK FACTORS : 11 Periodontitis is an inflammatory disease characterized by loss of connective tissue attachment and alveolar bone.  Like osteoporosis, it is a silent disease, not causing symptoms until late in the disease process when mobile teeth, abscesses, and tooth loss may occur. While the etiologic agent in periodontitis is a pathogenic bacterial plaque in a susceptible patient, periodontitis and osteoporosis have several risk factors in common. They include an increased prevalence with increasing age, smoking, and influence of disease or medications that may interfere with healing. The rate of progression of periodontitis sharply increases immediately after menopause.

Osteoporosis :Sex, Age, Low bone mass, Early menopause, Thin, small-framed body, Race

Lack of calcium intake, Lack of exercise, Smoking, Alcohol and/or caffeine, Heredity, Certain medications (e.g., steroids), Propensity to fall.

Periodontitis :Bacterial plaque, calculus, Age, Smoking or medications that inhibit healing and/or immune response, History of previous bone loss. Osteoporosis has been proposed as a risk factor for periodontal disease. These established or potential risk factors also provide significant information regarding differential etiology and contributing factors that will assist clinicians in preventing or managing these two diseases simultaneously.

Common Risk factors : Cigarette smoking, Nutritional deficiency, Increased age, Corticosteroid use, Immune dysfunction

UNIVERSAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ALL PATIENTS : Numerous interventions like adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, regular weight-bearing and muscle-strengthening exercise, cessation of tobacco and alcohol, treatment of other risk factors.

THE ROLE OF FRAX IN MAKING THE DIAGNOSIS OF OSTEOPOROSIS :  FRAX is a World Health Organization-sponsored, country specific fracture risk assessment tool that combines BMD at the femoral neck (or total hip) with a group of well-validated and weighted clinical risk factors for fracture that are largely independent of BMD. Finally, for individuals who have an elevated fracture risk based on FRAX, the term osteoporosis can be used for diagnosis. [34] It is based upon epidemiological data from 60,000 women and men studied prospectively to correlate risk factors for fracture with fracture outcomes and then validated in independent cohorts including more than 230,000 patients. It is useful as a way of predicting the risk of hip fracture and major osteoporotic fractures, i.e., clinical spine, hip, proximal humerus, and distal forearm fractures, in previously untreated men and women aged 40–90 years. Its use in the USA allows the assessment of fracture risk in both genders and four ethnic groups and is recommended primarily for individuals with a BMD finding of osteopenia. 

As a result, the reduced BMD, characterizing osteoporosis and further alteration of trabecular pattern may lead to a more rapid jawbones resorption caused by periodontal disease, resulting in the invasion of periodontal bacteria. Invading bacteria, in turn, may alter the normal homeostasis of bone tissue, increasing osteoclastic activity and reducing local and systemic bone density by both direct effects (release of toxins) and/or indirect mechanisms (release of inflammatory mediators; in particular, interleukin-1 and interleukin-6). [35-42]

POSSIBLE MECHANISMS OF THE BI-DIRECTIONAL LINK BETWEEN OSTEOPOROSIS AND PERIODONTAL DISEASE (PD) :

The relationship between osteoporosis and PD may be supported by the following mechanisms : [43]

Systemic to local bone resorptive disease : Other than the hormonal effect, the systemic to local bone resorptive disease is considered for describing the link between osteoporosis and periodontitis. Osteoporosis of the alveolar bone may lower the resistance of the periodontium to infectious challenge and may result in a local infection of the periodontium that first invades the cortical bone and results in a dimensional change in the alveolar ridge. On the other hand, it also causes altered bone density in maxilla as well as mandible and further leads to increased alveolar porosity, microarchitectural deterioration of trabeculae, reduced remodelling rate, reduction in volume of the residual ridge, and decrease in the cortical thickness following invasion by periodontal pathogens.

  1. Hormonal impact on bone homeostasis inflammation : A major risk factor following menopause is estrogen deficiency that inevitably acts as a risk factor for osteoporosis. [44] Deficiency of estrogen affects systemic bone homeostasis that further compromises absorption of calcium and increases excretion of calcium which increases overall requirements of the human body a marked decrease in levels of estrogen induces osteocyte apoptosis that is known to abruptly affect homeostasis of bone. On the other hand, estrogen is known to alter inflammatory responses. Higher levels of estrogen impair IL-6 secretion and oxidative stress while lower levels stimulate IL-1 mRNA expression. [45, 48] Studies carried out on animal models have shown deficiency of estrogen aggravates the severity of experimental periodontitis by increasing expression of IL-6, RANKL, osteoprotegrin (OPG) along with downregulation of IL-10 within the periodontal tissues. [49]

Few studies conducted on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) carried out in humans have reported improved mandibular bone density by reducing gingival bleeding and mobility of the teeth. Another hormone associated with homeostasis of bone is Parathyroid hormone (PTH), which increases resorption of bone to ensure sufficient levels of calcium within the blood. Thus, intermittent PTH application also aids to improve healing of the periodontium thereby promoting bone regeneration. Further PTH is also known to promote homeostasis of bone by regulating pro-resolving lipid mediators that are known to promote macrophage efferocytosis. [50, 51]

Together, these interactions suggest a possible link of interaction of hormones related to bone remodeling and inflammation may be a mechanism that links osteoporosis and periodontitis. [52-53]

  1. Inflammation and bone homeostasis : Individuals suffering from osteoporosis are known to have increased systemic levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1, IL-6 and TNF- α. These cytokines in turn are associated with induction of bone resorption and altered tissue response to periodontal disease. Moreover, the cycle of bone remodeling involves “physiologic inflammation” that further recruits non-phlogistic macrophages for the clearance of osteoclastic apoptotic cells. Interestingly, the specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators (SPMs) have been unveiled as contributors to an active process of inflammation and are involved in bone homeostasis. Therefore, it is encouraging to understand the role of SPMs in bone homeostasis to disentangle the links between osteoporosis, inflammation, and periodontal disease.[54-58]
  2. Low bone density in the oral bone associated with low systemic bone : Osteoporosis results in loss of BMD throughout the body, including the maxilla and the mandible. The resulting low density in the jawbones leads to increased alveolar porosity, microarchitectural deterioration of trabeculae, reduced remodelling rate, reduction in volume of the residual ridge, and decrease in the cortical thickness following invasion by periodontal pathogens. [59, 60] ORAL IMPLICATIONS OF OSTEOPOROSIS : Estrogen used in hormone replacement therapy of postmenopausal women is known to cause reduced gingival inflammation and a reduced frequency of gingival attachment loss in osteoporotic women in early menopause. [61] Radiographic alterations seen in post-menopausal osteoporotic women is usually the cortex at the angle of the mandible that is seen to get thinner while in maxilla there is minimal cortical bone seen along the alveolar crest as well as anterior margin of ramus. [62]
  3. EFFECT OF GENETICS ON ORAL AND SYSTEMIC BONE LOSS : 

Genetics is known to have a major role in periodontal disease pathogenesis. Certain twin studies and family based studies conducted by Krall & Dawson-Hughes, 1993; Gueguen et al. 1995 have indicated that 60–85% of the variance in bone mineral density (BMD) is genetically determined, while Arden et al. 1996; Garnero et al. 1996 assessed the effect of other risk factors for osteoporotic fractures, such as quantitative ultrasound properties of bone, femoral neck geometry and bone turnover markers range, have also been shown to have a strong heritable component. Cummings et al. 1995; Torgerson et al. 1996 conducted a study on family history of fracture and reported it to be a risk factor for fractures independently of BMD. Candidate gene association studies have shown several polymorphisms that are associated with BMD, bone loss or osteoporotic fractures.

Deng et al 2000 carried out a study on post-menopausal women to assess heritability of wrist fracture which was estimated about 25%, whereas compared to another study of twins carried out by Andrew et al 2005 suggested that the heritability of wrist fracture may be as much as 54%. Nevertheless, the heritability of wrist fracture in both these studies was shown to be largely independent of BMD, suggesting that predisposition would be affected due to genetic influences on other factors such as bone turnover, bone geometry or even perhaps the risk of trauma. [63-64]

GENETIC IMPACT ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY:

  1. Vitamin D receptor gene (VDR) : The first candidate gene to be studied in relation to BMD regulation was the VDR gene was and most attention has focused on polymorphisms situated on the 30 flank of VDR recognised by the restriction enzymes BsmI, ApaI and TaqI. Fang et al 2005 carried out a study on assessment of VDR alleles in relation to osteoporosis that has been commonly referred to as Rotterdam study in which haplotype-tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms of VDR were assessed in 6418 patients. The promoter region 30 untranslated region was identified for alleles that were shown to be associated with an increased risk of fracture, and a subgroup of individuals who carried risk alleles at both sites were found to have an increased risk of fracture when compared with control subjects. [65]
  2. Collagen type I αI ( COLIA1) : The COLIA1 gene encoding the αI chain of type I collagen is an important functional candidate for the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, as type I collagen is the major protein of bone. Grant et al 1996 assessed a polymorphism that lies within intron 1 of the COLIA1 gene at a Sp1 binding site. Grant et al 1996 along with Uitterlinden et al 1998 studied the thymidine containing allele of this COLIA1 gene polymorphism and reported it to be associated with reduced bone density and also few others like Harris et al 2000; MacDonald et al 2001 studied  other osteoporosis-related phenotypes such as post-menopausal bone loss, bone geometry (Qureshi et al 2001), bone quality (Mann et al 2001) and bone mineralization (Stewart et al 2005). Mann et al 2001 carried out functional analysis of osteoporosis-associated T allele (‘s’) of the Sp1 polymorphism and reported it to be associated with increased DNA– protein binding, increased transcription from the T allele and abnormally increased production of the collagen type I α1 mRNA and protein. Stewart et al 2005 noted that the resulting imbalance between the αI and α2 chains of collagen type I may contribute to impairment of bone strength and reduced bone mass in carriers of the T allele by subtly affecting bone mineralization. [66-69]
  3. Estrogen receptor gene : The estrogen receptor a, encoded by the ESR1 gene, is another important functional candidate for the regulation of bone mass. Ioannidis et al in 2004 carried out prospective analysis in the Genetic Markers for Osteoporosis Project and has confirmed that XX homozygotes have shown a reduced risk of fracture, whereas no association with BMD was found, indicating that ESR1 might influence fracture risk by mechanisms that are independent of BMD. Another study carried out by Albagha et al 2005 assess the effects on bone quality or bone turnover, since ESR1 alleles have been associated with ultrasound properties of bone and rates of post-menopausal bone loss. [70-72]
  4. Transforming growth factor β-1 : Langdahl et al. 1997 and Yamada et al. 2001 studied polymorphisms of the TGFβ-1 gene that encodes the growth factor TGFβ-1 have been studied and few of them have been associated with BMD and/or increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. Shah et al 2005 studied C/T polymorphism that resulted in substitution of proline to leucine amino acid in the transforming growth factor b-1 signal peptide at position 10 and that has been associated with circulating TGFβ-1 levels. However, this polymorphism shows strong linkage disequilibrium within other polymorphisms in the TGFB-1 promoter and effects on transcription are also possible. [73]
  5. Lipoprotein receptor related protein-5 : Gong et al 2001 assessed activating mutations and reported them to be associated with Lipoprotein receptor related protein-5 result in bone mass aggregations whereas inactivating mutations of the similar gene predispose individual to rare autosomal recessive disorders, for eg., osteoporosis pseudoglioma syndrome (Little et al 2002). Van Meurs et al 2006 studied amino acid substitution of alanine to valine amino acid at position 1330 (A1330V). Interestingly, this mechanism is known to interact between the LRP5 A1330V variant and a coding polymorphism of LRP6 (1062V) is been studied in the Rotterdam study,  this is commonly known to interact and affect fracture susceptibility. Ferrari et al 2004; Koay et al 2004 reported LRP5 alleles are known to show strong association related to BMD in males, this suggests these alleles act in gender-specific manner. [74-76]
  6. Sclerostin :  Balemans et al 2001, 2002 ; Brunkow et al 2001 studied mutations affecting the SOST gene that encode sclerostin and further lead to sclerosing bone dysplasia’s like Van Buchem disease, Sclerosteosis. Uitterlinden et al 2004 studied association of sclerostin with BMD in men and women and reported it to increase with age. These study mechanisms show SOST polymorphisms regulate BMD in aged individuals. [77-80] Nevertheless, longitudinal studies along with randomized controlled trials in combination with technological advances such as genome-wide association, assist in identifying and validating the role of candidate gene polymorphisms with the regulation of BMD and few other markers of osteoporosis susceptibility. [81]

STUDIES LINKING OSTEOPOROSIS AND PERIODONTAL DISEASE :

Kribbs et al 1990 was the first one to study the association between osteoporosis and periodontal disease in which he compared the mandibular bone mass of 85 osteoporotic women with 27 normal women. They concluded that the osteoporotic group showed less mandibular bone mass and density and a thinner cortex at the gonion compared the normal group. No significant differences in clinical periodontal measurements were found between osteoporotic and normal groups. [82] 

Klemetti et al 1994 conducted a study on women aged 48-56 years. They reported greater number of tooth loss in post-menopausal women from low bone density category. The authors also concluded, women from the higher bone density category were known to retain their teeth inspite of deep periodontal pockets better than those underlying osteoporosis. [83]

A case-control study carried out by Von Wowern and colleagues 1994 comparing 12 female patients having osteoporotic fractures and 14 normal women, reported significantly greater clinical attachment loss in the osteoporotic women compared with normal women. The authors concluded that the osteoporotic women has less mandibular bone mineral content, as measured by dual photon absorptiometry, than the 14 women. The mandibular bone mineral density values found were less than 2 SD for mandibular bone content for young normal women in 92% of the osteoporotic group and in 64% of the control group that also suffered from mandibular osteopenia. The relationship between osteopenia and severity of periodontal disease also examined in a sample from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) of 11,247 participants ranging from 20-90 years of age. Osteopenia of hip was significantly associated with severity of periodontal disease (mean attachment loss ≥ 1.5 mm) in females and males independently of the confounding effects of age, gender, smoking or intake of dietary calcium. This association was increased even further within the post-menopausal women. [25]

Further, Taguchi et al 1999 assessed relationship between bone mineral density and tooth loss in elderly women. Studies revealed reduced bone mass when susceptible to greater occlusal forces for a longer period of time has been suggested as one of the cause for increased molar tooth loss. [84] Furthermore, teeth with furcation involvement are at a significantly greater risk of premature tooth loss. Therefore, one may expect more multi-rooted teeth to be lost in patients with osteoporosis if there is a correlation between periodontal disease and osteoporosis. [84-86] Females with osteoporosis are three times more likely to experience loss of teeth. Techniques used to assess oral bone loss include radiographic measures of alveolar crestal height (ACH), residual ridge resorption (RRR), and probing measures to assess clinical attachment level (CAL) and measures of tooth loss. Oral bone density is measured through absolute bone density (DXA, DPA, QCT, RA) and CADIA (computer assisted densitometric image analysis) to assess approximate alteration in density over time. [87-90]

Taguchi et  al 1999 found a significant difference in BMD at the third lumbar vertebrae and posterior tooth loss. [91] 

Wactawski - Wende et al  2001 in their study conducted on 70 post-menopausal women, found a significant relationship between alveolar crest bone height as a measure of periodontitis and skeletal osteopenia (femur and lumbar spine) measured by DXA. This relationship was found as a result of combination of all associated risk factors like bacterial plaque, years of menopause and smoking. Interestingly, a confirmed co-relation was found between osteopenia at the hip and clinical attachment loss within the same group participants. [90]

Bollen et al 2004 studied the association between osteoporotic fracture and tooth loss. A positive co-relation was seen between residual alveolar ridge height and incidence of osteoporotic fractures. Although, reduced BMI remains the primary cause for fractures. [92]

Darcey et al 2013 carried out a study to assess whether there is a relationship between the osteoporotic status of patients and the number of their teeth. Total of 359 patients were scanned and their data was collected on osteoporotic status, smoking status, alcohol consumption, age and the use of hormone replacement therapy. Dental panoramic tomographs were advised for each patient and the total number of teeth present were assessed. The authors concluded a statistically significant relationship between molar loss and osteoporotic status of all the scanned individuals. [93]

D C Penoni et al 2018 conducted a Longitudinal Study and study included retrospective follow-up of 6-10 years to assess effects of Bone Fragility and Antiresorptive Drugs on Periodontal Disease and Tooth Loss. This study aimed to assess effect of systemic bone fragility over severe periodontal clinical attachment loss (CAL) and tooth loss over the years and to check the influence of anti-resorptive medications and periodontal maintenance. Elderly women were assessed for bone mineral density (BMD) and for fracture risk assessment (FRAX) in a cross-sectional analysis. The authors concluded that the use of bisphosphonates not only improved the bone condition but also the periodontal status. On the other hand, periodontal maintenance also minimized the negative impact of low BMD on periodontal tissues in the studied population. [94]

Hsin-Hua Chou 2021 studied association between Bone Mineral Density and Periodontal Disease in Middle-Aged Adult. A total of 7298 patients aged between 40 to 44 underwent oral screening. Data as collected on quantitative ultrasound for the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) and Community Periodontal index was assessed for periodontal disease. The results showed prevalence of 39.8% of periodontal disease in adults with osteoporosis, followed by 33.3% of periodontal disease in osteopenic patients. The authors thus concluded, low bone mass was associated with the increased risk of periodontal disease. [95]

Conclusion

The authors thus recommend that postmenopausal women and also men over the age of 50 years should be undergo BMD testing on regular intervals in order to diagnose a marked risk of future fractures. However, there may be a disruption of the homeostasis involving bone remodelling, hormonal balance, as well as inflammation progression and resolution. Nevertheless, both of these diseases warrant for a interdisciplinary management. 

References

  1. Tayeb Y, Goultschin J, Fogel M, Schwartz Z. The relationship between osteoporosis, osteopenia and periodontitis. Refu'at ha-peh veha-shinayim (1993). 2003 Jan 1;20(1):8-22.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  2. Horner K, Devlin H, Alsop CW, Hodgkinson IM, Adams JE (1996) Mandibular bone mineral density as a predictor of skeletal osteoporosis. Br J Radiol 69(827): 1019–1025.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  3. Drozdzowska B, Pluskiewicz W, Tarnawska B (2002) Panoramic-based mandibular indices in relation to mandibular bone mineral density and skeletal status assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31(6): 361–367.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  4. Patel SH, Murphy KP (2006) Fractures of the proximal femur: correlates of radiological evidence of osteoporosis. Skeletal Radiol 35(4): 202–211.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  5. Cakur B, Dagistan S, Sahin A, Harorli A, Yilmaz A (2009) Reliability of mandibular cortical index and mandibular bone mineral density in the detection of osteoporotic women. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38(5): 255– 261.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  6. Reddy MS. Oral osteoporosis: is there an association between periodontitis and osteoporosis?. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995). 2002 Oct 1;23(10 Suppl):21-8.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  7. Lerner UH. Bone remodeling in post-menopausal osteoporosis. Journal of dental research. 2006 Jul;85(7):584-95.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  8. Hildebolt CF. Osteoporosis and oral bone loss. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 1997 Jan;26(1):3-15.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  9. Carranza FA, Newman MG, Takei HH, Kleokevold PR (2007) Clinical Periodontology. 10 ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Inc.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  10. Savage A, Eaton KA, Moles DR, Needleman I (2009) A systematic review of definitions of periodontitis and methods that have been used to identify this disease. J Clin Periodontol 36(6): 458–467.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  11. Riggs BL. Pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 156:1342-1346.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  12. Melton JL, Chrischillis EA, Cooper C, Lane AW, Riggs BL. Perspective: How many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 1992; 7:1005-1010.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  13. Genco RJ, Löe H. The role of systemic conditions and disorders in periodontal disease. Periodontology 2000 1993; 2:98-116.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  14. Vos, T.; Abajobir, A.A.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abbas, K.M.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdulkader, R.S.; Abdulle, A.M.; Abebo, T.A.; Abera, S.F.; et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017, 390, 1211–1259. [CrossRef]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  15. Nazir, M.; Al-Ansari, A.; Al-Khalifa, K.; Alhareky, M.; Gaffar, B.; Almas, K. Global Prevalence of Periodontal Disease and Lack of Its Surveillance. Sci. World J. 2020. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  16. WHO. Assessment of fracture risks and its applications to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Technical Report Series. Geneva; WHO:1994.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  17. Jeffcoat M (2005) The association between osteoporosis and oral bone loss. J Periodontol 76(11 Suppl): 2125– 2132.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  18. Von Wowern N. Dual-photon absorptiometry of mandibles: In vitro test of a new method. Scand J Dent Res 1985; 93:169-177.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  19. Von Wowern N. In vivo measurement of bone mineral content of mandibles by dual-photon absorptiometry. Scand J Dent Res 1985; 93:162-168.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  20. Von Wowern N. Bone mass of mandibles. In vitro and in vivo analyses (Thesis). Danish Med Bull 1986; 33:23-44.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  21. Von Wowern N. Bone mineral content of mandibles: Normal reference values rate of age related bone loss. Calcif Tissue Int 1988; 43:193- 198.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  22. Von Wowern N, Storm TL, Olgaard . Bone mineral content by photon absorptiometry of the mandible compared with that of the forearm and the lumbar spine. Calcif Tissue Int 1988; 42:157-161.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  23. Von Wowern N, Worsaae N. Bone mineral content of the maxilla estimated by dual-photon absorptiometry after augmentation with bone or hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 1988; 67:1405-1408.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  24. Kribbs, P.J. Comparison of mandibular bone in normal and osteoporotic women. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1990, 63, 218–222. [CrossRef]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  25. Wactawski-Wende, J. Periodontal diseases and osteoporosis: Association and mechanisms. Ann. Periodontol. 2001, 6, 197–208. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  26. Brincat, S.D.; Borg, M.; Camilleri, G.; Calleja-Agius, J. The role of cytokines in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Minerva Ginecol. 2014, 66, 391–407. [PubMed]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  27. Krall E A, Dawson-Hughes B, Papas A, Garcia R I. Tooth loss and skeletal bone density in healthy postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 1994; 4: 104–109.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  28. Taguchi A, Tanimoto K, Suei Y, Otani K, Wada T. Oral signs as indicators of possible osteoporosis in elderly women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80: 612–616.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  29. Inagaki K, Kurosu Y, Kamiya T et al. Low metacarpal bone density, tooth loss, and periodontal disease in Japanese women. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 1818–1222.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  30. Tezal M, Wactawski-Wende J, Grossi S G, Ho A W, Dunford R, Genco R J. The relationship between bone mineral density and periodontitis in postmenopausal women. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 1492–1498.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  31. Genco R J, Grossi S G. Is estrogen deficiency a risk factor for periodontal disease? Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl 1998; S23–S29.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  32. Taguchi A, Suei Y, Ohtsuka M, Otani K, Tanimoto K, Hollender L G. Relationship between bone mineral density and tooth loss in elderly Japanese women. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 1999; 28: 219–223.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  33. Aström J, Bäckström C, Thidevall G. Tooth loss and hip fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72: 324–325.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  34. Kanis J (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary healthcare level.World Health Organization Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  35. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. http://nof.org/hcp/resources/913. Accessed 18 Oct 2013.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  36. Siris ES, Chen Y, Abbott TA et al (2004) Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 164(10):1108–1112.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  37. Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Camacho PM et al (2010) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Pract 16(Suppl 3):1–37
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  38. Sweet MG, Sweet JM, Jeremiah MP, Galazka SS (2009) Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am Fam Physician 79(3):193–200.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  39. Lewiecki EM, Laster AJ, Miller PD, Bilezikian JP (2012) More bone density testing is needed, not less. J Bone Miner Res 27(4):739–742
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  40. Wainwright SA,Marshall LM, Ensrud KE et al (2005) Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90(5):2787–2793
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  41. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C et al (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285(3): 320–323
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  42. Gehlbach S, Saag KG, Adachi JD et al (2012) Previous fractures at multiple sites increase the risk for subsequent fractures: the global longitudinal study of osteoporosis in women. J Bone Miner Res 27(3):645–653.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  43. Wang, C.-W.; McCauley, L.K. Osteoporosis and Periodontitis. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2016, 14, 284–291. [CrossRef].
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  44. Tomkinson A, Gevers EF, Wit JM, Reeve J, Noble BS. The role of estrogen in the control of rat osteocyte apoptosis. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 1998; 13(8):1243–50.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  45. Pfeilschifter J. Role of cytokines in postmenopausal bone loss. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2003; 1(2): 53–8. [PubMed: 16036065]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  46. McLean RR. Proinflammatory cytokines and osteoporosis. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2009; 7(4):134– 9. [PubMed: 19968917]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  47. Pacifici R. Estrogen, cytokines, and pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 1996; 11(8):1043–51.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  48. Brincat SD, Borg M, Camilleri G, Calleja-Agius J. The role of cytokines in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Minerva Ginecol. 2014; 66(4):391–407. [PubMed: 25020058]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  49. Straub RH. The complex role of estrogens in inflammation. Endocr Rev. 2007; 28(5):521–74. [PubMed: 17640948].
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  50. Mancini A, Di Segni C, Raimondo S, Olivieri G, Silvestrini A, Meucci E, et al. Thyroid hormones, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Mediat Inflamm. 2016; 2016:6757154.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  51. McCauley LK, Dalli J, Koh AJ, Chiang N, Serhan CN. Cutting edge: parathyroid hormone facilitates macrophage efferocytosis in bone marrow via proresolving mediators resolvin D1 and resolvin D2. J Immunol. 2014; 193(1):26–9. [PubMed: 24890726]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  52. Recker R, Lappe J, Davies KM, Heaney R. Bone remodeling increases substantially in the years after menopause and remains increased in older osteoporosis patients. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 2004; 19(10):1628–33.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  53. Mori S, Burr DB. Increased intracortical remodeling following fatigue damage. Bone. 1993; 14(2): 103–9. [PubMed: 8334026]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  54. McCauley LK, Dalli J, Koh AJ, Chiang N, Serhan CN. Cutting edge: parathyroid hormone facilitates macrophage efferocytosis in bone marrow via proresolving mediators resolvin D1 and resolvin D2. J Immunol. 2014; 193(1):26–9. [PubMed: 24890726]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  55. Scheidt-Nave C, Bismar H, Leidig-Bruckner G, Woitge H, Seibel MJ, Ziegler R, et al. Serum interleukin 6 is amajor predictor of bone loss in women specific to the first decade past menopause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86(5):2032–42. [PubMed: 11344203]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  56. Barbour KE, Lui LY, Ensrud KE, Hillier TA, LeBlanc ES, Ing SW, et al. Inflammatory markers and risk of hip fracture in older white women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 2014; 29(9):2057–64.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  57. Golub LM, Payne JB, Reinhardt RA, Nieman G. Can systemic diseases co-induce (not just exacerbate) periodontitis? A hypothetical “two-hit” model. J Dent Res. 2006; 85(2):102–5. [PubMed: 16434727]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  58. Serhan CN. Pro-resolving lipid mediators are leads for resolution physiology. Nature. 2014; 510(7503):92–101. [PubMed: 24899309].
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  59. Reddy MS, Morgan SL. Decreased bone mineral density and periodontal management. Periodontol 2000. 2013; 61(1):195–218. This article specifically reviews the imaging test and therapies for osteoporosis and periodontitis. Relationship and risk factors of both diseases are also addressed with proposed management for shared patients. [PubMed: 23240950]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  60. Jeffcoat MK. Osteoporosis: a possible modifying factor in oral bone loss. Ann Periodontol. 1998; 3(1):312–21. [PubMed: 9722715]
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  61. Krall EA (2001) The periodontal-systemic connection: implications for treatment of patients with osteoporosis and periodontal disease. Ann Periodontol 6: 209-213
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  62. Narayanan VS, Ashok L (2011) Osteoporosis: dental implications. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicne and Radiology 23: 211-215.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  63. Andrew T, Antioniades L, Scurrah KJ, MacGregor AJ & Spector TD (2005) Risk of wrist fracture in women is heritable and is influenced by genes that are largely independent of those influencing BMD. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 20, 67–74.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  64. Deng HW, Chen WM, Recker S, Stegman MR, Li JL, Davies KM, Zhou Y, Deng H, Heaney R & Recker RR (2000) Genetic determination of Colles’ fracture and differential bone mass in women with and without Colles’ fracture. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 15, 1243–1252.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  65. Fang Y, van Meurs JB, D’Alesio A, Jhamai M, Zhao H, Rivadeneira F, Hofman A, van Leeuwen JP, Jehan F, Pols HA & Uitterlinden AG (2005) Promoter and 30 -untranslated-region haplotypes in the vitamin D receptor gene predispose to osteoporotic fracture: the Rotterdam Study. American Journal of Human Genetics 77, 807–823.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  66. Mann V, Hobson EE, Li B, Stewart TL, Grant SF, Robins SP, Aspden RM & Ralston SH (2001) A COL1A1 Sp1 binding site polymorphism predisposes to osteoporotic fracture by affecting bone density and quality. Journal of Clinical Investigation 107, 899–907.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  67. Mann V & Ralston SH (2003) Meta-analysis of COL1A1 Sp1 polymorphism in relation to bone mineral density and osteoporotic fracture. Bone 32, 711–717.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  68. Stewart TL, Jin H, McGuigan FE, Albagha OM, Garcia-Giralt N, Bassiti A, Grinberg D, Balcells S, Reid DM & Ralston SH (2006) Haplotypes defined by promoter and intron 1 polymorphisms of the COLIA1 gene regulate bone mineral density in women. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 91, 4112–4117.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  69. Stewart TL, Roschger P, Misof BM, Mann V, Fratzl P, Klaushofer K, Aspden RM & Ralston SH (2005) Association of COLIA1 Sp1 alleles with defective bone nodule formation in vitro and abnormal bone mineralisation in vivo. Calcified Tissue International 77, 113–118.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  70. Ioannidis JP, Ralston SH, Bennett ST, Brandi ML, Grinberg D, Karassa FB et al. (2004) Differential genetic effects of ESR1 gene polymorphisms on osteoporosis outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association 292, 2105–2114.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  71. Ioannidis JP, Stavrou I, Trikalinos TA, Zois C, Brandi ML, Gennari L, Albagha O, Ralston SH & Tsatsoulis A (2002) Association of polymorphisms of the estrogen receptor alpha gene with bone mineral density and fracture risk in women: a meta-analysis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 17, 2048–2060.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  72. Albagha OM, Pettersson U, Stewart A, McGuigan FE, MacDonald HM, Reid DM & Ralston SH (2005) Association of oestrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms with post-menopausal bone loss, bone mass, and quantitative ultrasound properties of bone. Journal of Medical Genetics 42, 240–246.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  73. Shah R, Rahaman B, Hurley CK & Posch PE (2005) Allelic diversity in the TGFB1 regulatory region: characterization of novel functional single nucleotide polymorphisms. Human Genetics 119, 1–14.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  74. Gong Y, Slee RB, Fukai N, Rawadi G, Roman-Roman S, Reginato AM et al. (2001) LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell 107, 513–523.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  75. Little RD, Carulli JP, Del Mastro RG, Dupuis J, Osborne M, Folz C et al. (2002) A mutation in the LDL receptor-related protein 5 gene results in the autosomal dominant high-bone-mass trait. American Journal of Human Genetics 70, 11–19.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  76. Ferrari SL, Deutsch S, Choudhury U, Chevalley T, Bonjour JP, Dermitzakis ET, Rizzoli R & Antonarakis SE (2004) Poly-morphisms in the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) gene are associated with variation in vertebral bone mass, vertebral bone size, and stature in whites. American Journal of Human Genetics 74, 866–875.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  77. Balemans W, Ebeling M, Patel N, Van Hul E, Olson P, Dioszegi M et al. (2001) Increased bone density in sclerosteosis is due to the deficiency of a novel secreted protein (SOST). Human Molecular Genetics 10, 537–543.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  78. Balemans W, Foernzler D, Parsons C, Ebeling M, Thompson A, Reid DM, Lindpaintner K, Ralston SH & Van Hul W (2002a) Lack of association between the SOST gene and bone mineral density in perimenopausal women: analysis of five polymorphisms. Bone 31, 515–519.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  79. Balemans W, Patel N, Ebeling M, Van Hul E, Wuyts W, Lacza C et al. (2002b) Identification of a 52 kb deletion downstream of the SOST gene in patients with van Buchem disease. Journal of Medical Genetics 39, 91–97.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  80. Uitterlinden AG, Arp PP, Paeper BW, Charmley P, Proll S, Rivadeneira F et al. (2004) Polymorphisms in the sclerosteosis/ van Buchem disease gene (SOST) region are associated with bone-mineral density in elderly whites. American Journal of Human Genetics 75, 1032–1045.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  81. Ralston SH. Genetics of osteoporosis: symposium on ‘genetic polymorphisms and disease risk’. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2007 May;66(2):158-65.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  82. Kribbs PJ. Comparison of mandibular bone in normal and osteoporotic women. J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Feb;63(2):218-22.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  83. Klemetti E, Vainio P, Lassila V. Mineral density in the mandibles of partially and totally edentate postmenopausal women. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 1994 Feb;102(1):64-7.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  84. Taguchi A, Suei Y, Ohtsuka M, Otani K, Tanimoto K, Hollender L G. Relationship between bone mineral density and tooth loss in elderly Japanese women. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 1999; 28: 219–223.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  85. Ong G. Periodontal disease and tooth loss. Int Dent J 1998; 48(Suppl 1): 233–238.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  86. König J, Plagmann H C, Rühling A, Kocker T. Tooth oss and pocket probing in compliant periodontally treated patients: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29: 1092–1100.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  87. Hirschfeld L, Wasserman B. A long-term survey of tooth loss in 600 treated periodontal patients. J Periodontol 1978; 49: 225–237.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  88. Mohammad AR, Brunsvold M, Bauer R (1996) The strength of association between systemic postmenopausal osteoporosis and periodontal disease. Int J Prosthodont 9: 479-483.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  89. Anil S, Preethanath RS, AlMoharib HS, Kamath KP, Anand PS (2013) Impact of osteoporosis and its treatment on oral health. Am J Med Sci 346: 396-401.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  90. Wactawski‐Wende J. Periodontal diseases and osteoporosis: association and mechanisms. Annals of periodontology. 2001 Dec;6(1):197-208.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  91. Taguchi A, Suei Y, Ohtsuka M, Otani K, Tanimoto K, Hollender L G. Relationship between bone mineral density and tooth loss in elderly Japanese women. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 1999; 28: 219–223.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  92. Bollen A M, Taguchi A, Hujoel P P, Hollender L G. Number of teeth and residual alveolar ridge height in subjects with a history of self-reported osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis Int 2004; 15: 970–974
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  93. Darcey J, Horner K, Walsh T, Southern H, Marjanovic EJ, Devlin H. Tooth loss and osteoporosis: to assess the association between osteoporosis status and tooth number. British dental journal. 2013 Feb;214(4):E10-.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  94. Penoni DC, Leão AT, Torres SR, Farias ML, Fernandes TM, Crivelli M, Vettore MV. Effects of bone fragility and antiresorptive drugs on periodontal disease and tooth loss: a longitudinal study. JDR Clinical & Translational Research. 2018 Oct;3(4):378-87.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  95. Chou HH, Lu SL, Wang ST, Huang TH, Chen SL. The association between bone mineral density and periodontal disease in middle-aged adults. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021 Jan;18(6):3321.
    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
a