AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8965/165
1 Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, USL Toscana Centro, 50012 Bagno a Ripoli, Firenze, Italy.
2 Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department Centro di Eccellenza Donna e Bambino Nascente, Fatebenefratelli Gemelli Isola Tiberina, 00168 Rome, Italy.
3 Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
*Corresponding Author: Federica Perelli, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, USL Toscana Centro, 50012 Bagno a Ripoli, Firenze, Italy.
Citation: Perelli F., Vidiri A., Mariarosaria D. Tommaso, Bartolini C., Anna F. Cavaliere., (2023), Obstetrics Changes Caused by Covid-19, J. Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, 7(3); DOI:10.31579/2578-8965/165
Copyright: © 2023, Federica Perelli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 09 May 2023 | Accepted: 18 May 2023 | Published: 26 May 2023
Keywords: COVID-19; pregnancy; labour; breastfeeding; antibodies; vaccination
The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed on all workers in the Italian, European and World National Health System a rapid adaptation in the management of multiple clinical situations. In the obstetric-gynecological area, the care of mothers and newborns has become difficult and full of challenges. The adaptations necessary to ensure good quality obstetric care have concerned the pregnancy management, the recovery of pregnant patients and their children, the labour time and the breastfeeding and puerperal care. The present paper summarizes the impact of COVID-19 on obstetric habits based on scientific evidence and clinical experience in the context of the rapidly evolving regulations promulgated in Italy.
The COVID-19 pandemic is an ongoing global pandemic caused by a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It started in 2020 and has dramatically affected our daily lives and common habits. The most relevant changes have concerned the health care system and pregnant women have been considered one of the high-risk group of patients since the beginning of the epidemic.
The aim of the manuscript is to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on obstetric habits in the past three years, highlighting clinical and human difficulties, challenges, and changes in managing pregnancy, recovery, labor and delivery, breastfeeding and puerperal follow-up.
We have reviewed the current literature and guidelines dealing with the effect of COVID-19 on obstetric assistance of mother and child. A search of the PubMed database was carried out by two researchers independently and the following search strings were used: “pregnancy AND COVID-19”, “Labour AND COVID-19”, “breastfeeding AND COVID-19”. Only papers related to the issue of the role of COVID-19 in the context of obstetrics area and published from March 2020 to March 2023 were considered.
COVID-19 causes more severe disease in symptomatic pregnant patients with respect to non-pregnant women, due to the immunosuppressive state pregnancy-induced as well as physiological and mechanical changes [1]. Data shows that SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy is associated with specific adverse pregnancy outcomes like preeclampsia, preterm birth, and stillbirth [2].
An indirect impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes due to the effects of the pandemic on healthcare systems played an important role which caused adverse pregnancy outcomes such as increased stillbirths and maternal deaths. Therefore, to protect pregnant women from the disease and complications, it is essential to prioritize vaccination and immunization plans and, on the other hand, healthcare workers must be adequately educated about the prognoses and management of pregnant women with COVID-19 [3, 4]. As far as the pregnancy management is concerned, there are several points that healthcare workers must consider when they take care of a pregnant woman in the COVID era.
First of all, it must not be forgotten that every woman, even if SARS-CoV-2 positive, should participate in her care choices and the presence of a “care giver”, a person chosen by the woman to be present during visits, examinations, meetings and hospitalizations, should be guaranteed. In 2020 and 2021 the presence of a caregiver was not recommended by health and local authorities and many classes and information were given via online meetings, but finally in 2022, thanks to the spread of vaccines and their positive effects on COVID-19 natural history, many limitations were gradually reduced, although the use of a mask for women and for health professionals is still recommended in many medical centers [5, 6].
For low-risk pregnancies, the Italian National Institute of Health (INIH) update in February 2021 recommended to maintain a minimum of 6 face-to-face prenatal visits and, when possible, carry out the check-up, ultrasounds (US) and any other diagnostic tests in a single appointment [7]. High-risk pregnancies may require a greater number of check-ups, so international guidelines suggested that at the end of each appointment, the patient and her health care provider should decide whether the following appointment should be face-to-face or remotely. These recommendations have not been updated after the vaccination campaign, therefore leaving the indications up to the local health systems and hospitals [7].
Even in the middle of the pandemic, the guidelines underlined the importance of keeping appointments for the recommended US scans and the duty of pre-natal services for the assessment and surveillance of fetal growth during the pandemic, as in the pre-COVID era [8].
A controversial aspect about pregnancy management is the need for further US because the evidence supporting an increased risk of fetal underdevelopment is still not conclusive. Many of the clinical practice guidelines suggest performing a fetal growth US scan in women who have been seriously or critically symptomatic for COVID-19 within the first 14 days following recovery and to consider further US monitoring on individual basis. A recent multicentric prospective observational study conducted by Researcher from “Careggi University Hospital” in Florence and “S. Stefano Hospital” in Prato from 2020 to 2022, showed that fetal growth appears to be affected by COVID-19 with a higher incidence of impaired growth velocity compared to the general population [12].
Other important aspects about COVID-19 that should be discussed during a counseling with the pregnant patient are the risk of vertical transmission and the vaccination plans during pregnancy., Maternal-fetal infection transmission is possible but generally low and fetal invasive procedures are considered to be safe also in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection [9]. Counsel a pregnant woman about vaccination plans other than only COVID-19 vaccination is also mandatory because flu and pertussis vaccination are recommended also for COVID-19 positive women.
Regarding the vaccination against COVID-19, primary vaccination against COVID-19 and booster doses (third and fourth dose) with mRNA vaccines are recommended for all pregnant women at all times of pregnancy, especially if there is an increased risk of developing a serious disease [7]. In fact, now severe COVID-19 in pregnancy is almost exclusively limited to unvaccinated women [13].
Primary vaccination and booster doses (third and fourth dose) can be administered at the same time as the vaccinations recommended during pregnancy against flu and pertussis.
An Italian survey from Cavaliere et al. showed that the COVID-19 experience may positively change attitudes toward immunization in pregnancy [14]. The obstetric and medical staff has an important role during prenatal care in recommending and organizing COVID-19, flu and Tdap vaccination but also in reducing vaccination hesitancy in pregnancy [15].
The management of SARS-COV-2 infection in pregnancy is described in a systematic review published in May 2022 which analyzed 28 clinical practice guidelines. None of the above-mentioned guidelines recommended maternal hospitalization only for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic women, and in many guidelines, authors agree that their admission to hospital should be restricted to women with severe infection or rapidly worsening clinical conditions. Therefore, pregnant women should be made aware by physicians of maternal and neonatal signs, including signs of worsening COVID-19 symptoms and reduced active fetal movements, which require assistance [10].
When hospitalization is required, local protocols need to ensure that pregnant women with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection are identified and isolated upon arrival at the hospital before proceeding with the visit. Therefore, hospitals have provided separate spaces, clean and protected pathways, physical distancing but also instructions to sanitize settings and equipment, using appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), both for pregnant women and for workers.
In case of infection and room isolation of the patient, routine, in-person visits in hospitals should be postponed if possible, using alternative means of communication to reduce access to hospitals. Once the isolation period is over, visits could be rescheduled following national and international guidelines and recommendations.
According to United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) data, overweight or obese foreign pregnant women with pre-existing comorbidities (such as diabetes and chronic hypertension), aged >35 years or with socio-economic difficulties, appear to be at greater risk of hospitalization and severe pneumonia when affected by the Sars-CoV-2. Pregnant women with suspected pneumonia or severe illness due to COIVD-19 should not be denied imaging diagnostic based on chest radiography, or computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) where indicated [16, 17]. Concerns and misconceptions about potential radiation-related risks for the embryo or fetus are still widespread among clinicians and can lead to excessive anxiety among patients, but evidence has showed the safety of these procedure and it’s a medical duty to reassure women that the radiation dose during single chest CT or even CT pulmonary angiogram is much lower than the one potentially causing fetal complications [18, 19].
It is proven that SARS-CoV-2 infection can be a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and pregnancy is a known hypercoagulable state, which can be even higher due to the immobility during the isolation and hospitalization of the woman. In fact, an important issue during the hospital recovery is the thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), that was recommended for symptomatic women by many guidelines, even if its prescription should be assessed on a case-by-case basis, taking into account several factors including hospitalization, comorbidities, severity of the disease and the timing of delivery [9, 10].
In case of severe complications from COVID-19, patients should be treated by a multidisciplinary team. It should include an expert in the treatment of VTE during pregnancy, in order to correctly define the dosage of LMWH to be delivered.
COVID-19 may be also associated with thrombocytopenia, so acetylsalicylic acid prescribed for pre-eclampsia prophylaxis should be stopped during the period of illness to reduce the risk of bleeding in case of low platelets count (<50000>
About corticosteroids, none of the guidelines recommends their administration only for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in preterm gestation, so corticosteroid therapy should only be used specifically for fetal lung maturity [10]. However, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) guidelines produced in 2021 and updated in December 2022, suggested the use of corticosteroid in case of severe maternal infection that requires oxygen therapy for ten days, in association with PPE cover. In this scenario, the most appropriate choices of corticosteroids include oral prednisolone 40 mg once daily or intravenous hydrocortisone 80 mg twice daily [11]. If steroids are indicated at the same time for fetal lung maturity, the intramuscular dexamethasone 12 mg twice (24 hours apart), should be followed by oral prednisolone 40 mg once a day, or IV hydrocortisone 80 mg twice daily for 10 days [11].
Other therapeutic strategies include the use of interleukin-6 receptor antagonists that has been shown to improve outcomes in hospitalized patients with hypoxia and systemic inflammation; neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (n MAB’s) in pregnant and breastfeeding women strongly symptomatic in hospital settings, particularly if they are unvaccinated or have additional risk factors for develop severe illness; Remdesivir should only be considered in pregnant women with COVID-19 who are not improving or who are deteriorating [11].
Labour and delivery management
Since the early beginning of the pandemic, the management of women in labor has been a great challenge for healthcare workers. Appropriate health care of COVID-19 pregnant women represented a priority for governments and local health authorities, needing to re-organize birth centers worldwide in order to provide the best care possible for the mother and the newborn, but at the same time limiting the spread of SARS-COV-2 and keeping health workers safe.
At first, hospitals had implemented policies to limit the number of people allowed in the delivery room during childbirth and this has led to some hospitals restricting the presence of care givers during labour. This restriction caused the woman fear of being left alone, adding it to the concerns about exposure to the virus, which led to an increase in the number of home births [20]. Thus, the World Health Organization (WHO) stated that every birth center should guarantee to the woman the presence of a single, asymptomatic, support person during labour and delivery and possibly during the whole hospitalization time. In Italy, the Italian Obstetric Surveillance System (It OSS) study found that, during the first phase of the pandemic, more than 50% of mothers were able to have a support person of their choice during labour and delivery [7]. Several Italian experiences about extensive re-organization of inpatient and outpatient services has been reported by Simeone et al [21] where optimal care has been provided thanks to a multidisciplinary group, and by Barchi et al [22] who showed that centralization of birth centers did not worsen perinatal diseases as far as concerns stillbirth, perinatal asphyxia and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy rate but it seems to have improved patients’ outcomes.
It has become a routine practice to perform a quick triage for Sars-CoV-2 exposure before the admission to a maternity ward both for the woman and the care giver, asking if they have had signs or symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 in the previous 14 days, and to give them instructions on the importance of precautionary measures (including the use of PPE) to be used during labour, childbirth and hospitalization.
At the admission for delivery, it’s still required by most centers an antigenic SARS-COV-2 test, and the choice of a rapid versus a molecular nasopharyngeal swab is up to the hospital protocol. In case of a positive result, specific measures must be taken: first the woman should be transferred to the nearest birth center that has a dedicated COVID-ward and delivery room; the latter must have a dedicated pathway for COVID-19 positive patients and a multidisciplinary team to provide care for the pregnant woman [8, 11]. Specific issues and decisions regarding the labour and the delivery phase such as the preference of a birth position, the observation and fetal monitoring using cardiotocography, and the induction of labour or an operative vaginal delivery should be made on an individual basis as it was before COVID-19 era. Particular attention should be paid to the use of fluid management to avoid the risk of fluid overload which could expose pregnant women with moderate to severe clinical presentations to an increased risk of respiratory distress syndrome [7, 11]. The physicians should inform the patients that epidural anesthesia isn’t contraindicated in case of SARS-COV-2 positivity and that COVID-19 positivity does not constitute an indication for an elective caesarean section but in case of worsening of the woman's respiratory conditions it might be required for her to deliver urgently and thus with a risk of caesarian section or operative vaginal delivery [8, 23].
About water birth, it is not contraindicated for women who are asymptomatic of COVID-19, (providing adequate PPE for healthcare workers), but women with symptomatic COVID-19 should not labour or give birth in water [11, 24]. Delayed umbilical cord clamping (1-3 minutes after birth) is recommended because the known health and nutrition benefits to mother and infant outweigh any theoretical and unproven harm [8], and it’s demonstrated to be safe in mothers with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection [25].
Breastfeeding and follow-up
In the last decade for all newborns, skin-to-skin contact and rooming-in practices have been highly encouraged from the WHO to increase breastfeeding rates and duration but, at the very beginning of the pandemic, some birth centers didn’t allow these practices for the hypothetical risk of infection transmission [26]. Nowadays, many studies have been performed and evidence has proven no difference in the risk of infection of the newborn even when the mother has suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and protected rooming-in practice has proven to be safe and effective in supporting breastfeeding [27]. Therefore, international organizations including WHO and UNICEF have continued to support breastfeeding and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends rooming-in combined with safety measures to minimize the risk of transmission, such as wearing a mask and practicing hand hygiene before any contact with the newborn [8, 28].
For the World Health Organization and the Italian National Health Institute, all mothers, including COVID-19 positive ones and their babies, should be enabled to stay together, practice skin-to-skin contact and rooming-in day and night, especially at birth and during breastfeeding, except when the mother’s or infant’s clinical conditions are severe, taking preventative measures for COVID-19 positive cases [8, 29].
Breastfeeding short and long-term health benefits, both for the mother and the child, definitely exceed the risks of passing infection from mother to infant so, according to the standards outlined by WHO and UNICEF, breastfeeding must be encouraged and the medical and obstetrician staff have the duty to inform the family that COVID-19 infection is not a contraindication to breastfeeding but the consequences of its failure and the separation of the mother from the child can be important [8]. Also, it is important to aid start breastfeeding as soon as possible in case of mothers who couldn't start breastfeeding within the first hour after delivery, and to help them hand-express their breastmilk safely.
Another important aspect about breastfeeding is its role in passing antibodies from the mother to the newborn and actively help to develop the autoimmune system, protecting him from infection in the first months of life. The specific antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 have been proved in breastmilk from infected or vaccinated mothers and can be transferred to and protect the infants from COVID-19 infection without significant adverse effects can protect infants against COVID-19 infection [30, 31, 32]. So, breastfeeding may be protective to the infant, offering passive immunity against SARS-CoV-2, and vaccination against COVID-19 is safe and effective for pregnant and lactating women, who should be submitted to COVID-19 vaccination at the same time as the general population, with no need to interrupt breastfeeding in order to receive a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine [11].
About postnatal care of the mother and the baby, the pandemic has also affected the number and mode of post-partum visits, in fact, in the Italian reality, in order to reduce the access to the hospitals, many centers stopped offering the regular one-month-after-delivery visit, inviting the woman to do the check-up privately with her gynecologist or in the local public health districts where the service is provided.
It is important, though, to keep providing the best postnatal care to the woman as in the pre-COVID era, following the local and international recommendation and arrange for further assessment and follow up, even with the use of telemedicine [33].
The present paper analyzed the impact of COVID-19 on obstetric habits from 2020 to 2023, highlighting clinical and human difficulties, challenges, and changes in managing pregnancy, recovery, labor and delivery, breastfeeding and puerperal follow-up. COVID-19 related obstetric care issues were summarized in Table1. Pregnant women represent hospital users who has unique characteristics that they don’t share with any other patient. They are not sick individuals and often the birth event is not burdened by maternal or fetal problems, therefore pregnant women enter the hospital without a real illness and have the risk of contracting an infection during hospitalization following the contagion from Sars-CoV-2. For that reasons, pregnant women have had reduced access to the utilization of medical services and facilities at the beginning of the pandemic, with a negative impact on maternal and child health [34]. Moreover, the pandemic has led the health personnel of some hospitals heavily affected by the contagion to a state of mind of great stress which has sometimes resulted in the deterioration of the quality of care [35, 36].
Table 1: COVID-19 related obstetric care issues.
The review of the literature and the clinical experience impose therefore a balance between the excessive restrictions and the loosening of a protective path for pregnant women after the COVID era. Obstetricians should not impede caregiver presence, skin-to-skin contact, rooming in, and breastfeeding. However, screening of pregnant women by nasopharyngeal swab and the use of PPEs by health professionals should still be used. The success of the vaccination must also be evaluated with caution in pregnant patients due to the physiological changes that pregnancy exerts on the maternal immune system.
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced healthcare workers to make rapid changes to their work routine.
Some realities have seen healthcare workers and patients come to a good mutual understanding and acceptance of the rapid changes that may be necessary in cases of health emergency, leading towards mutual aid and the implementation of safety measures such as the use of PPE and undergoing vaccinations.
Overall, the COVID-19 spread has led to significant changes in obstetric habits and, with the gradual loosening of restrictions that many countries have lived in the last year, thanks to the global vaccination campaign, it will be interesting to see how long-lasting these changes will be.
Conceptualization, F.P.; Methodology, F.P., AF.C.; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, F.P., C.B.;
Writing – Review & Editing, F.P.; Visualization, AF.C., M.DT.; Supervision, AF.C., M.DT. All
authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Acknowledgment
Not applicable.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
