AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/452
1 Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Wuhu Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Specialized Master's and Graduate Training Base, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China.
2 Wuhu Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China.
*Corresponding Author: Shui Wan, Wuhu Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China.
Citation: Yuanyuan Ma, Shui Wan, Kai Jiang, (2025), Observations on the efficacy of Surgical Treatment of mixed Hemorrhoids using the “Jiang Style Improvement” Procedure, J Clinical Research and Reports, 18(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/452
Copyright: © 2025, Shui Wan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 03 January 2025 | Accepted: 24 January 2025 | Published: 27 February 2025
Keywords: “jiang style improvement” surgical approach; traditional external stripping and internal ligation; mixed hemorrhoids
Objective: This study aims to explore the clinical efficacy of the "Jiang Style Improvement" surgical approach in treating mixed hemorrhoids. Methods: A total of 120 patients with mixed hemorrhoids requiring surgical intervention were admitted to the Department of Anus and Intestines at Wuhu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2023 and June 2023. Participants were randomly assigned to either the study group or the control group using simple random allocation, with 60 cases in each group. The study group underwent the "Jiang Style Improvement" surgical procedure, while the control group received the traditional surgical treatment of external stripping and internal ligation. The outcomes measured included wound healing time, postoperative pain, edema, and anal stenosis in both groups.
Results: Both the study group and the control group achieved effective cure rates, with a statistically significant difference in wound healing time (P<0.01); the control group exhibited a slower healing time compared to the study group. Additionally, the differences in postoperative pain, edema, anal stenosis, and recurrence rates between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05), indicating that the clinical efficacy of the control group was inferior to that of the study group.
Conclusion: The "Jiang Style Improvement" surgical approach demonstrates favorable clinical efficacy, effectively reducing recurrence rates, shortening wound healing times, conserving medical resources, and alleviating postoperative pain and edema while preventing anal stenosis. Therefore, it is recommended for broader adoption.
The 'Jiang Style Improvement' technique enhances the traditional methods of external peeling and internal ligation, drawing from numerous clinical cases and the extensive surgical experience of Jiang Kai, the director of the Department of Anus and Intestines at Wuhu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. This innovative approach has been clinically applied to over 3,000 patients, demonstrating accurate and safe efficacy. It significantly reduces recurrence rates, alleviates postoperative pain, prevents postoperative edema, and effectively mitigates the risk of anal stenosis without incontinence. Additionally, it promotes rapid wound healing and normal anal function. The present study encompasses 120 cases of patients with mixed hemorrhoids requiring surgical intervention, admitted to our department between January 2023 and June 2023. The results are summarized and reported as follows.
The study population comprised 120 cases of mixed hemorrhoids requiring surgical intervention, admitted to the Department of Anus and Intestines at Wuhu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2023 and June 2023. These cases were randomly and evenly divided into two groups: the study group and the control group. Patients in the study group underwent the "Jiang Style Improvement" surgical procedure, which includes external stripping and internal ligation, while those in the control group received the traditional surgical procedure of external stripping and internal ligation. The study group consisted of 60 patients, including 34 males and 26 females, aged 19 to 66 years, with a mean age of (43.30±12.21) years. The duration of the disease among these patients ranged from 1 to 10 years, with a mean duration of (4.43±1.92) years. In the control group, there were also 60 patients, comprising 29 males and 31 females, aged 20 to 64 years, with a mean age of (42.93±11.31) years. The duration of the disease in the control group varied from 1 to 8 years, with a mean duration of (3.83±1.75) years. The data for both groups were comparable, and none of the differences were statistically significant (P>0.05).
Inclusion criteria: using meet the clinical diagnostic criteria of mixed hemorrhoids1 ,understand and voluntarily participate in this project. Exclusion criteria: accompanied by other diseases of the anus and intestines, previous diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coagulation abnormalities and other inoperable, mental illness can not cooperate with the patient.
2. Treatment
The study group opted for the "Jiang-style improved" operation. All subjects were placed under lumbar-rigid anesthesia, and the procedure was performed by Dr. Jiang, the deputy chief physician of our department, utilizing the "Jiang-style improved" external stripping and internal ligation technique. The surgical procedure commenced after achieving the effects of lumbar anesthesia, with the patient is in the lithotomy position and routinely disinfected and draped. The mixed hemorrhoids were fully exposed, beginning with an incision along the posterior midline (with adjustments made based on the patient's specific condition to excise a portion of the internal sphincter). The first excision involved the left hemorrhoid nucleus at the 6 o'clock position, preserving a small amount of skin on the right side. The second excision targeted the hemorrhoid nucleus at the 11 o'clock position, followed by the third excision of the right hemorrhoid nucleus at the 6 o'clock position, which retained a small amount of skin on the left side. The fourth excision was performed on the hemorrhoid nucleus at the 9 o'clock position, and the fifth on the hemorrhoid nucleus at the 3 o'clock position. Following these excisions, the entire surgical site was thoroughly inspected, and electrocautery was employed to address any small hemorrhoidal nuclei and ensure complete hemostasis. Throughout the procedure, strict adherence to aseptic principles was maintained, with efforts made to preserve the perianal skin and the skin bridges between incisions. Additionally, ligation points were strategically scattered across different planes, and meticulous inspection of the surgical incisions was conducted to prevent any overlooked bleeding points.
In the control group, traditional external stripping and internal ligation was used, and the preoperative preparation was equivalent to that of the study group. Lift the corresponding position of external hemorrhoids, make a V-shaped incision to 0.5 cm above the dentate line, clamp the bottom of the corresponding position of internal hemorrhoids with hemostatic forceps, and then ligate the base of the internal hemorrhoids with a silk thread, excise the hemorrhoidal stumps, and trim the tissues so as to make the traumatic surface smooth 2.
Postoperative treatment: the two groups of patients with postoperative wound pressure bandage, postoperative resumption of daily dietary habits, postoperative defecation with traditional Chinese medicine “ten flavors of rhubarb powder” anal sitz bath (Wuhu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in-hospital preparation), postoperative routine intravenous infusion of anti-inflammatory drugs treatment for 3 days, postoperative drug change 1 time / day, regular re-examination and 1 year outpatient follow-up.
3 Observational Indicators and Assessment Criteria
They were categorized into: wound healing time; pain score at 3 days postoperatively; wound edema score at 7 days postoperatively; and anal stenosis score at 1 month postoperatively; and the patients were followed up for one year to observe the recurrence of the disease within one year after the surgery.
0 points: no pain;
1-3 points: slight pain, but tolerable;
4-6 points: obvious pain, will affect the quality of sleep, still tolerable;
7-10 points: the pain is strong, difficult to bear, seriously affecting the impact of appetite and sleep.
3 points: swelling >2 cm in diameter, severe bulging of traumatic tissue, shiny skin, loss of skin texture;
2 points: swelling diameter 1-2 cm, trauma moderately bulging, skin texture present but not obvious;
1 point: swelling <1>
0 points: no edema seen.
0 points: no anal stenosis;
1 point: mild stenosis, meaning that the index finger can barely be inserted into the anal canal during anal finger examination;
2 points: moderate stenosis, where the index finger requires force to insert into the anal canal and causes pain;
3 points: severe stenosis, when the little finger requires force to insert the anal canal, or when it cannot be inserted at all.
SPSS 27.00 statistical software was used to analyze the data, and the measurement data were tested by t-test, and the count data were tested by χ2 test, and expressed as rate (%), and the result of P<0>
1. Healing Time
Both groups of patients improved, but the healing time of the wound in the study group was significantly shorter than that of the control group, the healing time of the control group was 22-35 days with a mean of (27.95±2.83) days, while that of the study group was 18-30 days with a mean of (22.95±2.66) days, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0>Groups Number of Examples Healing Time (days) Research Group 60 22.95±2.66 Comparison Group 60 27.95±2.83 T value -9.96 P value <0>
Table 1: Comparison of differences in healing times (
)
Comparison of patients' scores for wound pain on the 3rd postoperative day, wound edema on the 7th postoperative day, and anal stenosis on the 1st postoperative month, there was a significant difference in the scores of postoperative complications occurring by using the two surgical modalities, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0>Groups Number of Examples Wound Pain Wound Edema Anal Stenosis Research Group 60 3.97±1.99 0.87±0.65 0.57±0.65 Comparison Group 60 5.43±2.12 1.38±0.78 1.08±0.80 T value -3.91 -3.93 -3.86 P value <0> <0> <0>
Table 2: Comparison of postoperative complication scores between the two groups ()
3.3 Comparison of Recurrence 1 year after surgery
The 1-year recurrence rate of patients in the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0>Groups Number of Examples Relapse Rate Research Group 60 0（0.00） Comparison Group 60 6（10.00） χ2value 4.386 P value 0.036
Table 3: Comparison of 1-year postoperative recurrence rates between the two groups n (%)
Statistics show that hemorrhoids are the most common type of anal and intestinal diseases in China, and the incidence of internal hemorrhoids is the highest, reaching 59.86%; the incidence of external hemorrhoids is 16.1%; and the incidence of mixed hemorrhoids is 24.13% 3. Hemorrhoids, also known as “hemorrhoids”, the main symptoms of bleeding, pain, prolapse and anal swelling, internal hemorrhoids can be divided into four degrees, when it develops to Ⅲ degree and above is easy to form mixed hemorrhoids. Mixed hemorrhoids, i.e., internal hemorrhoids and the corresponding position of external hemorrhoids at the same time fusion, forming a whole, when the seriousness of the ring hemorrhoid nucleus can be prolapsed1.
The modern medical community has a deeper understanding of the pathology and pathogenesis of hemorrhoids, and the doctrine of anal cushion subsidence has gained general acceptance. The common treatment methods for mixed hemorrhoids include drugs, injections, instruments and surgery, etc. When conservative treatment is basically ineffective, surgery is a more recommended treatment option for such patients, and external stripping and internal ligation (MM) is one of the widely used surgical methods for a wide range of hemorrhoid types, which is simple to operate and can effectively get rid of hemorrhoidal nuclei 4.MM is a variation on hemorrhoidectomy, which has gradually become a classic procedure with some therapeutic benefits and is considered the gold standard of traditional surgery in the treatment of hemorrhoids 5. Although this surgery is simple and easy to operate, it has some potential shortcomings: the surgery involves a larger trauma, which increases tissue damage and causes anal pain, which in turn causes anal contraction, leading to poor perianal blood circulation, which in turn leads to edema of the trauma; this surgery is more severe in the destruction of the anal cushion, which leads to slow healing of the wound, and also raises the likelihood of recurrence, which can seriously affect the normal life of the patient 6. Moreover, this surgical method has a certain degree of destruction of the dentate line, and patients may experience anal incontinence after surgery.In recent years, anorectal scholars have continued to study and optimize the improvement of surgical treatment modalities for mixed hemorrhoids, all of which have their own advantages and limitations and still have significant room for improvement 7.
According to the above data, both the “Jiang Style Improvement” surgical approach and traditional MM treatment of mixed hemorrhoids can achieve very good efficacy. In the study group, the “Jiang Style Improvement” surgical approach of wound healing time is shorter, which can be seen that the study group has more advantages, the main reason is that the traditional external stripping and internal ligation using a V-shaped incision, the destruction of the larger, anal canal skin and mucous membrane loss is more, and thus slow healing of wounds; and the “Jiang Style Improvement” surgical approach will retain a small amount of skin on the side of the hemorrhoidal nucleus, to minimize the damage to the perianal skin, and according to the patient-specific circumstances to cut off some of the internal sphincter, by reducing the tension of the internal sphincter, to relieve the contraction and spasm of sphincter. By reducing the tension of the internal sphincter, the contraction and spasm of the sphincter can be relieved and postoperative pain can be reduced, which also helps to promote the reflux of hemorrhoidal veins and lymph, improve blood circulation, and thus help the healing of the wound8.Since the trauma healed faster in the study group, the patients' hospitalization time was relatively shorter; in addition, the cost of surgery was the same for both groups, and the rest of the treatments were also the same, which means that the hospitalization cost in the study group was reduced compared to the control group, which could benefit the patients to a greater extent and also help to conserve healthcare resources.
This study also found that the postoperative complication (pain, edema, anal stenosis) scores of both groups were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0>
The traditional external stripping and internal ligation is simple and easy to perform, and is a classic procedure, which is widely welcomed and used by anorectal surgeons, however, the limitation of this procedure is that the maximum number of hemorrhoid cores can only be excised in a single operation is three 10, and it is not possible to cure mixed hemorrhoids in a single operation, and the recurrence rate is higher, and the patients are more suffered. From the analysis of the above data, it is concluded that the “Jiang Style Improvement” surgical approach greatly reduces the recurrence rate, which adopts the method of staggered excision of hemorrhoidal nuclei according to the sequence of 6-point left side-11-point right side-6-point-9-point-3-point, effectively removing all hemorrhoidal nuclei and reducing the possibility of recurrence.
In summary, the principles that should be followed in treating mixed hemorrhoids are to minimize damage to the anal cushion tissues and anal canal skin and to preserve as much normal tissue as possible 11, which were achieved by the “Jiang Style Improvement” procedure. Compared with the traditional external stripping and internal ligation, the Jiang-type modified procedure not only effectively reduces the recurrence rate, shortens the wound healing time, and saves medical resources, but also shows obvious clinical effects in reducing postoperative pain and edema and preventing anal stenosis, which is worthy of popularization and use.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
