Editorial | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2643-6612/003
Department of Periodontal and Oral Mucosa Diseases, Medical, Israel.
*Corresponding Author: Migdal HaEmek, Department of Periodontal and Oral Mucosa Diseases, Medical, Israel.
Citation: Migdal HaEmek, Nonsurgical Repair for Prognosis of perforation. J Dentistry and Oral Maxillofacial Surgery . DOI: 10.31579/2643-6612/003
Copyright: © 2018, Migdal HaEmek,. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 12 May 2019 | Accepted: 31 May 2018 | Published: 10 June 2018
Keywords: nonsurgical repair; prognosis of perforation; tooth; root perforation; gingiva
Root perforation is an artificial opening occurs in the pulp wall creating communication between the pulp and the exterior. Traumatic (iatrogenic) perforations are due to lack of attention given to details of dental anatomy and failure to consider its variations by the clinician. Perforation of a pulp chamber floor usually occurs due to inattentive access opening or the bur is not properly angulated in relation to the long axis of the tooth.
Root perforation is an artificial opening occurs in the pulp wall creating communication between the pulp and the exterior. Traumatic (iatrogenic) perforations are due to lack of attention given to details of dental anatomy and failure to consider its variations by the clinician. Perforation of a pulp chamber floor usually occurs due to inattentive access opening or the bur is not properly angulated in relation to the long axis of the tooth [1].
Existing perforating can be detected as the presence of serous exudate in the perforation site, sensitivity of the involved tooth to percussion, and chronic inflammation of the gingiva. The presence of a sinus tract or the appearance of localized problems such as pocket formation or furcation involvement following an apparently adequate endodontic therapy may indicate the existence of perforation [1].
Prognosis of perforation depends on time elapsed before filling the defect, location and size of the perforation, adequacy of seal, and repair material. Different materials have been used for nonsurgical repair of perforation defects such as amalgam, gutta percha, calcium hydroxide, and MTA (Mineral trioxide aggregate). Repair material extrusion into the periodontal space can be controlled using bioinert matrices such as indium foil, dentin chips and calcium hydroxide. In addition, perforations to be filled with blood or Teflon discs whereas hydroxyapatite or tricalcium phosphate matrix can be used without internal matrix [2].
The objectives of repairing furcation perforations are to seal the dentin defect and provide suitable conditions for formation of a new periodontal attachment. Some materials may provide adequate seal but may interfere with the formation of periodontal reattachment due to their extrusion into the furcation area. Periodontal reattachment did not occur when materials like amalgam, gutta percha, or calcium hydroxide were used for perforation repairs. Materials such as hydroxyapatite or plaster of Paris may initiate formation of new bone and periodontal attachment but cannot adequately seal the dentin defect. This may result in leakage of bacteria and then by-products into the lesion and failure, especially the perforation is connected to the oral cavity [3].
Since the furcation perforation involves different types of inter-related tissues, each tissue within the defect should be considered separately. Alhadainy et al. [3,4] suggested the use of artificial floor technique for repairing furcation perforations considering the periodontal wound and the dentinal wound as separate identities. Calcium sulfate (plaster of Paris) was used under glass ionomer to repair furcation perforations. Plaster of Paris is stable, biocompatible, readily available, easily sterilizable, and shows rapid rate of resorption coinciding with the rate of new bone growth. It also accelerates the rate of mineralization of the new bone by providing a ready source of calcium ions for early mineralization process. Calcium sulfate acts as bone barrier, aids guided bone regeneration and excludes epithelial tissue from the site of bone formation. This may help in avoiding the formation of periodontal pockets and allows for periodontal reattachment.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,