AUCTORES
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8808/062
1Radiology Department, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto.
2Radiology Department, Gombe State University, Gombe.
3Radiology Department, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto.
*Corresponding Author: Sule Muhammad Baba; Department of Radiology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto.
Citation: Sule MB, Umar AU, Gele IH, Umar FK, Yunusa M, Sani MT, Obi FC and Olatunji AK (2021 Nonimmune hydrops fetalis with intrauterine fetal demise presenting at 41-weeks gestational age: the ultrasonographic findings and case report. J. of Clin Case Rep and Stu 2(1); DOI: 10.31579/2690-8808/062
Copyright: © 2021: Sule Muhammad Baba. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 02 February 2021 | Accepted: 26 February 2021 | Published: 11 March 2021
Keywords: intrafetal gas; fetal death; antenatal care; fluid
Hydrops fetalis is the abnormal accumulation of fluid in two or more different fetal compartments and most times associated with polyhydramnios and placental edema, and has an estimated incidence of about 1 in 3000 pregnancies.
A 27-year-old multigravida; G8P7, was referred for the first ultrasonography in the Index pregnancy on account of not feeling/observing fetal movement for about two-weeks. The obstetric ultrasonography demonstrated a single fetus with absent fetal heartbeat, in hyper-flexed position, accumulation of fluid in the abdominal cavity; right sub-diaphragmatic region and in the right pleural cavity in keeping with fetal ascites and fetal effusion. There is overriding of fetal skull with Thickened/edematous placenta with a thickness of about 7cm, and fetal skin thickness of about 10mm. There is associated intrafetal gas. The estimated femoral length gave a gestational age approximating 41-weeks.
A diagnosis of hydrops fetalis most likely non-immune form with fetal demise presenting at 41-weeks gestational age in a multiparous woman with features anemia presumably from sepsis and urinary tract infection (bilateral pyelonephritis and cystitis) in a setting of poor antenatal care was entertained.
The fetus was expelled following induction of labor at the peripheral centre, the patient had transfusion done with commencement of antibiotics for correction of anemia and sepsis with plans of further clinical and laboratory evaluation.
We present the ultrasonographic features of hydrops fetalis with intrauterine fetal demise due to its unique presentation
Hydrops fetalis (HF) is a term for the abnormal accumulation of fluid in at least two different fetal compartments [1, 2]. The condition is often characterized by subcutaneous edema, effusions in two or more serous cavities including pericardial or pleural effusions and ascites, with associated polyhydramnios and increased placental thickness [1, 3].
Hydrops fetalis is most times regarded as a fatal condition and diagnosed following ultrasonography, and in most cases occurs in rhesus alloimmunization especially before prophylactic anti-D administration in the developed countries, although an entirely different scenario may be encountered in the developing nations [4].
Anti-D immunoglobulin, has reduced the incidence of the immune form of HF, though the non-immune HF has increased in incidence and seen in about 90% of cases [4-6]. The incidence of HF is between 1 in 1500 and 1 in 3000 pregnancies [4, 7].
Hydrops fetalis occurs following an imbalance in the regulation of fluid leading to an increase in interstitial fluid production or a decrease in lymphatic drainage, these leads to accumulation of fluid in fetal soft tissues and serous cavities [8].
Hydrops fetalis has been classified into two forms; the iso-immune HF and the non-immune HF. The immune-HF arises from fetal hemolysis that is caused by circulating maternal antibodies to antigens of fetal red blood cells, the incidence of which has tremendously declined due to the advent of anti-D gamma globulin prophylaxis [9-11].
Etiologically, the nonimmune-HF can occur from varying mechanisms, these may include cardiovascular in 21.7%, idiopathic in 17.8%, genetic in 13.4%, hematological in 10.4%, metabolic in 1.1% and gastrointestinal causes in about 0.5%, to mention but a few [2,8,9,12] .
The mortality rate of non-immune HF is relatively high during fetal or neonatal period making prediction of survival rate challenging, despite improvements in diagnosis and management [9, 13 and 14].
Ultrasonography plays a role in detecting the prenatal cause and diagnosis of non-immune HF, though detection of prenatal cause is less common and often requires regular ultrasound follow ups. Etiologies like cardiovascular diseases, anatomic abnormalities and congenital infections are often diagnosed following prenatal and postnatal ultrasonography [15-17].
Intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) is defined by the American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists as death of a fetus past 20 weeks of gestation and or weight of 500grams and above [18,19] .
The cause of death of a fetus are basically classified as fetal causes in 25-40%, placental causes in 25-35%, maternal causes in about 5-10%, and idiopathic causes in about 25-35% [18].
In IUFD, vaginal delivery is preferred except for specific indications, the induction of labor by oxytocin and prostaglandins induction or augmentation given by various routes is applicable [20].
The aim of this study is to present the ultrasonographic features of non-immune hydrops fetalis and intrauterine fetal demise.
A 27-year-old multigravida, she had seven successful pregnancies and vaginal deliveries; all alive. She is currently pregnant at term coming for the first ultrasonography in the index pregnancy on account of not feeling/observing fetal movement for about two-weeks.
She admitted not to have attended any antenatal visit with the current pregnancy, intake of over-the-counter medications and local herbs and concussions.
No family history of fetal death, sickle cell disease or any congenital malformation/anomaly in the other children and had uneventful prenatal, perinatal and postnatal period for the seven children.
The mother appears not well fed and not ill-looking, not disoriented, not dehydrated, anicteric, acyanosed, not in respiratory distress, no finger-clubbing, and also appeared moderately pale.
The mother had normal blood pressure of 90/60mmHg, pulse rate of 86 beats per minute, and respiratory rate of about 15 cycles per minute.
The mother has packed cell volume of about 27%, white blood cell count of 13500 per microlitre and erythrocyte sedimentation rate of about 8mm/hour. The blood group is A with a positive rhesus factor; A+.
The mother had an abdominal and pelvic ultrasound scan that demonstrated mild-moderate liver enlargement, with an enlarged span having a length of 165mm. the kidneys showed increase in cortical reflectivity most likely from pyelonephritis, the urinary bladder showed mobile echoes in urine in keeping with cystitis, no ascites or mass demonstrated, and the remaining abdominal organs appeared normal.
The obstetric ultrasonography demonstrated a single fetus with absent fetal heartbeat and hyper-flexed position, accumulation of fluid in the abdominal cavity; right sub-diaphragmatic region and in the right pleural cavity in keeping with fetal ascites and fetal effusion (figures 1&2). There is overriding of fetal skull with thickened/edematous placental with a thickness of about 7cm with skin thickness of about 10mm (figures 1&2). The estimated femoral length gave a gestational age approximating 41-weeks.
A diagnosis of hydrops fetalis most likely non-immune form with fetal demise presenting at 41-weeks gestational age in a multiparous woman with features anemia presumably from sepsis and urinary tract infection (bilateral pyelonephritis and cystitis) in a setting of poor antenatal care was entertained.
The fetus was expelled following induction of labor at the peripheral centre, the patient had transfusion done with commencement of antibiotics for correction of anemia and sepsis with plans of further clinical and laboratory evaluation.
Good antenatal care with adequate laboratory and imaging evaluation are vital in detecting cases of hydrops fetalis, so as to institute adequate and appropriate management to reduce antecedent complication and fetal demise.
Hydrops fetalis is the abnormal fluid collection in two or more fetal compartments such as skin, ascites, pleural and pericardial effusion [1-3]. The index case had accumulation of fluid in the pleural and peritoneal spaces with the overlying skin, thereby conforming to what is reported in the literatures.
The condition (HF) is often characterized by subcutaneous edema, effusions in two or more serous cavities including pericardial or pleural effusions and ascites, with associated polyhydramnios and increased placental thickness [1, 3]. The index case had subcutaneous edema with a skin thickness of about 10mm, had fluid collection in the abdominal and pleural cavities, the placental thickness was about 7cm, conforming to these literatures.
Hydrops fetalis has been classified into two forms; the iso-immune HF and the non-immune HF. The immune-HF arises from fetal hemolysis that is caused by circulating maternal antibodies to antigens of fetal red blood cells, the incidence of which has tremendously declined due to the advent of anti-D gamma globulin prophylaxis [9-11]. The mother of the index case never had administration of anti-D gamma globulin prophylaxis ruling out the possibility of the immune-HF, thereby conforming to these literatures.
Non-immune HF is a term that defines an edematous fetus that does not have erythroblastosis fetalis from isoimmunization [21]. The index case is most likely the non-immune type, no history or features to suggest isoimmunization was gotten from the mother, she happens to be of the Rhesus positive group, thereby conforming to this literature.
The mortality rate of non-immune HF is relatively high during fetal or neonatal period making prediction of survival rate challenging, despite improvements in diagnosis and management [9, 13 and 14]. The index case was diagnosed in the prenatal/fetal stage and presented as a case of fetal demise, conforming to these literatures.
Etiologically, the nonimmune-HF can occur from varying mechanisms, these may include cardiovascular in 21.7%, idiopathic in 17.8%, genetic in 13.4%, hematological in 10.4%, metabolic in 1.1% and gastrointestinal causes in about 0.5%, to mention but a few [2,8,9,12]. The case under review is most likely from the idiopathic cause, however maternal sepsis and urinary tract infections are been entertained, thereby conforming to these literatures.
Hydrops fetalis been a serious fetal condition, is usually diagnosed following ultrasonography, this can also detect some of the possible causes, the index case was also diagnosed following ultrasound examination, thereby conforming to these literatures.
The death of a fetus that occurs after the 20th week of intrauterine life is regarded as intrauterine fetal death/demise, prior to which is termed a miscarriage. About 1% of normal uncomplicated pregnancies end in fetal death while 15% of IUFD has no identified cause [22].
The ultrasound features of IUFD are absent fetal heartbeat, absent fetal movements, overlapping skull bones (Spalding sign), soft tissue edema (skin thickness greater than 5mm), distorted fetal anatomy, intrafetal gas and echogenic amniotic fluid [22]. The index case has almost all of these features, thereby conforming to this literature.
The incidence of intrauterine fetal death is higher in the developing nations and often associated with maternal anemia, pregnancy-induced hypertension, illiteracy, congenital malformations and low socioeconomic status [23], the index case had association of most of these conditions, thereby conforming to this literature.
The treatment of HF is directed at the cause, the index case was diagnosed as a case of fetal demise, the fetus was expelled from induction of labor as reported by Bhatia, et al [20].
Good antenatal care with adequate laboratory and imaging evaluation are vital in detecting cases of hydrops fetalis, so as to institute adequate and appropriate management to reduce antecedent complication and fetal demise.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.