Opinion | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1053/113
1 Senior consultant oncologist EMCH Dhaka
2 Pediatrician Bangalore
3 Consultant oncologist Bangladesh
4 Student Bangalore
*Corresponding Author: Shravana kumar Chinnikatti, Senior consultant oncologist EMCH Dhaka.
Citation: Shravana k Chinnikatti, S shravan, H.N A Rahaman, Shraavya, et al. (2022). New treatments for synovial cell sarcoma with genetically modified T-cell?. Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics. 6(3); Doi:10.31579/2640-1053/113
Copyright: © 2022 Shravana kumar Chinnikatti, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 09 March 2022 | Accepted: 16 March 2022 | Published: 11 April 2022
Keywords: Keywords
Synovial cell sarcoma is rare but very aggressive tumour if not treated early, due to the painless nature of this tumour patients normally come in late and advances stage, can occur in bones, muscle cells, cartilages, ligaments and de-novo from pleuripotent stem cells from asnywhere in the body but most commonly arm, leg, or foot, and near joints such as the wrist or ankle and possibly from any joints in the body, even from soft tissues of lung and abdomen, the other name for this tumour is called malignant synovioma.The 5 year survival after the effective primary treatment is 30-75% and the survival rate is less than 5% if the tumour recurred within 1 year of primary treatment and that’s why new treatments are explored continuously. Due to late recognition and diagnosis of this rare tumour leads to many problems in treatment and in disease course. This tumour can occur at any age but is most common in growing periods like teen agers and adolescents. This tumour can spread to any organ in the body but most commonly distant metastases occur in lungs. Synovial sarcomas actually a misnomer as previously thought, now with advances in cell structure advances, These tumours can occur not only from synovial cells but from any cell of bone, muscle, tendon, ligaments and cartilage forming cells and supporting cells. These tumours occur with equal propensity in both men and women of younger age. If diagnosed early and treated early with surgery alone patients can be cured completely without any morbidity and mortality [1]. In a recently published phase 2 clinical trial 40%of advanced synovial cell sarcomas shown good response after single injection of afamitresgene autoleucel, a modified T cell infusion. This may me the future best treatment for these types of tumours and possibly other tumours as well. The durability of response is still under investigation and the early results ready to be presented in the upcoming ASCO meeting. As we all know these synovial cell,myxoid and round sarcomas(MRCLS) are very aggressive and have propensity to recur both locally and systemically with available effective therapies.IHC over these tumours shown that above mentioned tumours over express the MAGE A4,a melanoma associated antigen 4.This new treatment mentioned above is a genetically modified autologous melanoma associated antigen 4 specificTcelltherapy. Afamitresgene autoleucel comprised of autologous cells collected by leukapheresis, this is processed to isolate CD4 and CD8 cells.by using lenti-viral vector, these T cells are genetically altered to express a MAGE-A4–specific T-cell receptor, and These MAGE-A4 antigens are highly expressed in many tumours, which could suggest broad spectrum applicability in multiple cancer therapies. After modification, these cells are expanded using CD3/CD28 beads and followed by cryopreservation for stabilisation and maturation of modified cells before being the administration of this to the needy patients who underwent a lympho-depleting treatment. With data from phase 1 ADP-A2M4 trial showed that 44% (n = 7/16) patients with synovial sarcoma achieved a partial response (PR) as per RECIST criteria, 94% of patients (n = 15/16) experiencing good disease control, median duration of response was 28 weeks, 2 PRs beyond 72 weeks at the time of data presentation, 11/16 patients were alive , the median overall survival (OS) had not yet been reached. The phase 2 trial conducted after phase 1 results done to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Afamitresgene autoleucel in patients with synovial sarcoma and MRCLS,This treatment targets MAGE A4 antigens. The trial mentioned above included 15-75 aged patients of synovial sarcoma and HLA2 positive with MAGE A4 over expression in at least 30%of cells. All these patients had received 1st line chemotherapy with Anthracycline or Ifosfamide based chemotherapies, then undergo leukopheresis for T cells and these extracted T cells reengineered and genetically modified outside the body, once ready this genetically modified bag of blood to be reinfused to the same patient. Of the 37 patients received this therapy, 32 are synovial sarcoma, 5 are myxoid-round cells sarcoma, the overall response rate (ORR) was 39%. this treatment was well tolerarated with minimal, and manageable side effects [2]. The ORR achieved with the this agent was slightly higher in patients with synovial sarcoma (n = 12/29), at 41.4% and in patients with MRCLS, the ORR with afami-cel was 25.0% (n = 1/4). Objective responses observed across a wide range of cell doses and MAGE-A4 antigen expression levels, the responses achieved with the agent appear to be more durable, with a median DOR that has not yet been reached. Afamitresgene autoleucel treatment was determined to have a favourable safety profile, most treatment related adverse effects be consistent with those typically experienced by patients with cancer who are receiving chemotherapy and immunotherapy.About 95% of patients experienced any-grade adverse events, 92% had toxicities that were grade 3 and higher. Few of the adverse effects experienced with the agent and were decreased lymphocyte count (84%, any grade; 84% grade 3 or higher), decreased neutrophil count (73%; 68%), decreased white blood cell count (68%; 62%), cytokine release syndrome (59%; 3%), and decreased platelet count (27%; 16%). Phase 3 trial result waited in the near future. Along with doxorubicin and Ifosfamide based treatments, the newer treatments available are tyrosine kinase inhibitors, epigenetic modulators, molecules interfering with DNA damage response, and immunotherapeutic drugs and combination of these molecules have produced excellent responses [3, 4].
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,