AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8868/203
1 Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences - Verona University, Verona, Italy
*Corresponding Author: Sheila Veronese, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Verona University – 10 Sq. A.Stefani, Verona 37134, Italy
Citation: Sheila Veronese, Marco Cambiaghi, Andrea Sbarbati (2021) New Protocol for Auditory Brainstem Implant Positioning. J. Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. 9(5); DOI:10.31579/2578-8868/203
Copyright: © 2021 Sheila Veronese, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Received: 20 August 2021 | Accepted: 29 September 2021 | Published: 12 October 2021
Keywords: ABI; EABR; intraoperative monitoring; electrodes positioning
Background: Surgery for applying the auditory brainstem implant is an otoneurosurgery that requires careful intraoperative monitoring to optimize the placement of the electrode paddle. This study aimed to validate a new method capable of increasing the accuracy of electrode array placement, reducing channel interaction, electrical artefacts, and saturation effects, and providing the largest number of electrodes that can be activated with the lowest possible electric charge.
Materials and methods: Thirty-six subjects aged between 1.42 and 69.92 years were tested during surgery for auditory brainstem implantation. We recorded auditory electrical responses of the brainstem using the implant supplier's suggested stimulation protocol and the new protocol.
Results: Saturations effects and electric artefacts were noticed respectively in 81.85% and 53.25% of recordings using implant supplier's method, while in 70.34% and 24.75% of recordings using the new method, with a percentage variation of 11.51% and 28.50%. Considering the amount of charge required to activate the electrodes, with the implant supplier's method an average charge of 14 nC was needed, while with the new protocol an average charge of 8 nC was necessary.
Conclusions: The new method improves the coupling between the auditory brainstem implant and the surface of the cochlear nucleus.
The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) represents a device that effectively restores auditory sensations in patients with NF2 and acoustic neuromas. Its application was extended to children and adults with injuries or malformations of the cochlea and cochlear nerve, who are not eligible for a cochlear implant [1], [2].
The use of electrophysiology, in particular of the electrical auditory brainstem responses (EABR), is known to facilitate electrode plate placement during ABI implant surgery [3], [4], [5].
Waring optimized pacing and recording parameters to achieve efficient EABR monitoring during surgery [6], [7]. Achieving efficient monitoring means being able to recognize the waveforms of auditory responses and distinguish them from the current of stimulation and other evoked potentials that could result from stimulation of nearby non-auditory anatomical structures.
Many authors have tried to define the optimum EABR monitoring procedure and to correlate its results with the auditory outcomes [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].
Nevison et al. [8] demonstrated that achieving good intraoperative EABRs is not related to the performance of implanted patients, but subjects who achieve good EABRs also have postoperative auditory sensations. Furthermore, they reported the presence of non-auditory sensations during ABI programming in 92.3% of cases. This means that the number of usable electrodes varies significantly between subjects, and that an imperfect coupling of the electrodes with the cochlear nuclei can more easily induce the excitation of non-auditory stimulations.
This study aimed to validate a new method capable of increasing the accuracy of electrode array placement, reducing channel interaction, electrical artefacts, and saturation effects, and providing the largest number of electrodes that can be activated with the lowest possible electric charge.
Surgical and electrophysiological procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of Verona Hospital. For these procedures, an informed written consent was acquired from the patients and children’s parents. This study
was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Thirty-six ABI subjects aged between 1.42 and 69.92 years were tested during ABI implantation surgery. They presented different aetiologies (Figure 1). The chosen implant was the Cochlear Nucleus ABI24M (Cochlear Ltd., Sydney, Australia), for all the patients.
The amplitudes analysis of EABRs recorded from the edge electrodes of the array (Figure 3b) permits to quantify both the rotational shift and the transversal axis of the array respect to the cochlear nucleus surface. Instead, EABR recordings from the lateral electrodes of the array (Figure 3c) clarifies the longitudinal axis of the array respect to the axis of the cochlear nucleus.
Software parameters are reported in Table 1. All electrode combinations were stimulated with alternate current so to cancel the stimulus artefact.
In order to evaluate only the acoustic response (without components of other cranial nerve stimulation, usually presented after the first 4 – 4.5 ms), patients were anesthetized with curare (Figure 5).
Data were analyzed from the morphological point of view, in terms of number and amplitudes of the peaks in each recording, and considering the presence of saturation effects and of electric artefacts.
Activation occurred from 27 to 67 days from the surgery. The amount of charge needs to elicit the acoustic response was compared.
n all patients, intraoperative EABR were recorded, obtaining 507 waveforms with Cochlear electrodes combination and 917 waveforms with the new procedure. Table 2 summarized the characteristics of both protocols’ waveforms. Respectively, in 6.13% (Cochlear pr.) and 6.67% (new pr.) of cases, it was impossible to obtain an acoustic response. Most frequently a 2-peaks wave was obtained with both procedures. A significant reduction (3.54%) of 1-peak waves was noticed with the new protocol, while there was an increase of 2.29% in 3-peak waves presence.
In Figure 6, peaks in each waveform are shown, considering the standard latencies of 0.7 ms (0.6 ms – 1.1 ms) for the first peak, of 1.6 ms (1.2 ms – 1.9 ms) for the second peak and of 2.7 ms (2.2 ms – 3.7 ms) for the third peak [7]. Peak II was the most dominant and reliable peak for both methods. Peak I was detected 31.08% of times with the new protocol with a decrease of 6% respect to Cochlear protocol. Using the new protocol peak III was identified in 71.76% of recordings (10.81% more than using Cochlear protocol).
Examples of EABR recordings of the same subject are shown in Figure 7. In Table 3, mean amplitude values of different peaks are presented. Magnitude of these waves is larger using Cochlear method. Particularly, this is evident for peak I. In Figure 8 is shown the EABRs recorded with an electrode combination in witch distances between the active and reference electrodes are progressively reduced. It is clear that shorter is the distance, lower is the magnitude. This means that enlarging the distance between the electrodes a larger number of fibers are elicited and so in the recorded response a sizeable component of other electrodes is presented.
Figure 9 describes the percentage of EABRs presenting saturation effects and/or electric artefacts. Saturations effects and electric artefacts were noticed respectively in 81.85% and 53.25% of recordings using Cochlear method, while in 70.34% and 24.75% of recordings using the new method, with a percentage variation of 11.51% and 28.50%.
Tuning of the implants was performed in intensive care unit. Patients were seated in a comfort position and connected to ECG monitoring equipment to supervise their heart rhythm.
At activation of ABI, the amount of charge required resulted of 14 nC (SD = 30, max = 137 nC, min = 3 nC) for the patients tested with the Cochlear method, and of 8 nC (SD = 8, max = 29 nC, min = 2 nC) for the patients tested with the new method.
In order to increase the accuracy of the evaluation of the electrodes array placement a new procedure was developed. Aim of this procedure was to reduce channel interaction, electric artefacts and saturations effects. At the same time, it was intended reduce the amount of electrical charge needed to activate the electrodes post-operatively.
During ABI insertion EABR were recorded with both Cochlear suggested electrodes combination and a new combination of electrodes.
Responses were obtained in the same percentage for the two methods. It is interesting the reduction of 1-peak waves noticed with the new protocol and the increase of 3-peak waves. That is, waveforms appear to be more evident.
Analyzing the different peaks, peak II was the most dominant and reliable for both methods. A significant reduction of peak I detection was observed as an increase of peak III detection. But data didn’t confirm this hypothesis. On the contrary, they underlined the reductions of both these interferences. Changing perspective, it might be interested to evaluate waveforms obtained with Cochlear electrode combination. Enlarging the distance between the electrodes a larger number of fibers were elicited and so in the recorded response a sizeable component of other electrodes was presented. At this point the question was: was it possible that the first peak was due to channel interaction? Looking at the effect of channel interaction on peak magnitude (Figure 8) it can be assumed that other electrode components determined the more extensive presence of peak I in Cochlear protocol recordings.
The increase in peak III detection observed with the new procedure was explained by the saturation effect reduction.
The new procedure appears to ensure that the electrodes are stimulated with a lower current charge. And this means that the coupling obtained with the cochlear nucleus surface is better with the new procedure, being the ABI implant closer to the nucleus itself.
Conclusion
The new procedure appears to ensure that the electrodes are stimulated with a lower current charge. And this means that the coupling obtained with the cochlear nucleus surface is better with the new procedure, being the ABI implant closer to the nucleus itself.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
