AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8965/179
1Medical graduate, School of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Pediatrics, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Medicine, , Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Medicine, , Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
*Corresponding Author: Maryam Rabiee, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Citation: Rayhaneh Mahroo, Shiva Rafatie, Maryam Rabiee, (2023), Neonatal Complications in Mothers with Severe Complications or Near-Miss Cases, J. Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, 7(7) DOI:10.31579/2578-8965/179
Copyright: © 2023, Maryam Rabiee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 18 July 2023 | Accepted: 28 September 2023 | Published: 18 October 2023
Keywords: severe complications; near miss; neonatal; maternal
Background: Maternal complications, particularly maternal near death, may also contribute to the increase in perinatal complications. Consequently, this study investigated the correlation between neonatal complications in mothers with severe pregnancy complications and near-miss cases.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on mothers who gave birth between March 2017 and March 2019 at a Medical Training Hospital and a Private Hospital in Tehran and experienced severe maternal complications or life-threatening conditions. The characteristics of mothers and infants were recorded. Statistical tests were employed to analyze the data (p˂0.05).
Resulting: This study evaluated 138 mothers with severe complications, where 32.6% exhibited near-death conditions. The most common causes of severe maternal outcomes were preeclampsia and severe bleeding (50.7% and 36.2%, respectively). Of newborn 48.2% experienced prematurity, 35.6% had low birth weight. 59.9% of the newborns of the mothers who were studied experienced at least one complication. 61.9% infants had respiratory failure, and 14.2% had a severe infection. The neonate mortality rate was 3%, while the stillbirth rate was 3.6%. Although linear/ binomial logistic regression test was not showed the correlation between the mother’s demographic characteristics and perinatal complications but one third of mothers with the underlying disease had neonatal complications and the likelihood of prenatal complications is higher in multiparous women over 30.
Conclusion: In severe maternal complications, neonatal complications, prematurity and low birth weight, are more prevalent. Consequently, it appears necessary to equip hospitals with intensive care units and trained personnel who can provide adequate support for mothers and infants.
Pregnancy is one of the most vulnerable times in a woman’s life, and 15% of pregnant women are at risk of death [1, 2]. Typically, mothers’ and infants’ health are intertwined, and the mother’s condition during pregnancy and childbirth influences perinatal outcomes. Perinatal outcomes refer to the life events that occur to a newborn child between the age of viability (i.e., after 28 weeks of gestation) and the first week of life. According to studies, maternal complications, especially near-miss mothers, are associated with a greater likelihood of adverse perinatal outcomes [2,3].
The World Health Organization (WHO) also reported an increased perinatal mortality risk in maternal complications [4]. Severe pregnancy-related complications, potentially life-threatening conditions, are identified based on the presence of a severe complication, such as severe postpartum hemorrhage, severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, sepsis, or severe systemic infection, ruptured uterus, or receipt of a critical intervention (e.g., admission to intensive care unit, laparotomy, interventional radiography and use of blood products). Based on the identification of organ dysfunction by clinical, laboratory, and management markers, some women are categorized as “near-miss” [5]
Cases of a maternal near-miss, i.e., a complication that occurred during pregnancy, childbirth, or during the 42 days after the termination of pregnancy in which the patient was very close to death but survived, can occur up to 100times more frequently than maternal deaths and are currently used to evaluate the care provided by hospitals [6-9]. Consequently, severe maternal complications, particularly near-misses, may also contribute to the increase in perinatal complications, and its association with adverse perinatal events is anticipated. In addition to an increased risk of stillbirth, newborns of women with near misses have an increased risk of dying within the first week of life, necessitating hospitalization in an intensive care unit (ICU) and asphyxia [2, 7, 10]. However, little is known about the relationship between severe maternal morbidity, serious neonatal complications, and early neonatal death. Similarly, the predictors of neonatal mortality and the prognostic factors of neonatal near-misses remain unknown [7].
On the other hand, it is noteworthy that most life-threatening obstetrics are unavoidable and unfortunately unpredictable and depend on several variables directly related to the mother and fetus and the quality of care, particularly during prenatal periods (8, 10). In fact, race and socioeconomic status also play a significant role in the occurrence and treatment of pregnancy and newborn complications. African-American women in the United States, for instance, experience more maternal and fetal complications, such as preterm birth and lower birth weight, compared to white-American women. Significant causes of this difference include occupational factors, prenatal control delays, poverty, and language barriers [9, 11, 12] In addition to maternal complications, general socio-demographic and neonatal characteristics also contributed to neonatal survival. Therefore, many factors may be modifiable if efforts are made to improve the socioeconomic status of the community [3].
In recent years, the maternal mortality rate in Iran, a middle-income Asian country, has decreased significantly to 23 per 100,000 live births, and reproductive health indicators have improved. The total fertility rate is 1.9% per woman, antenatal care coverage and skilled attendance at birth are both at 98%, and institutional delivery is prevalent (14). In Iran, studies on maternal mortality and near-death have been conducted, but studies on these mothers’ fetal and neonatal complications are scarce. This study investigated the relationship between neonatal and fetal complications in mothers with severe pregnancy complications and a near miss due to the importance of socioeconomic and other factors. Such communication may serve as a basis for prioritizing the implementation of measures and allocation of financial resources to improve the health of mothers and infants in Iran and other countries with similar conditions.
The present study was a retrospective and cross-sectional study. After receiving written approval from the hospital director, data were extracted from the files of patients admitted to Shahid Mostafa Khomeini Hospital and Khatam Al-Anbia Hospital between April 2017 and March 2017 for termination of pregnancy. Mostafa Khomeini Hospital is a general educational and semi-governmental hospital affiliated with Shahed University with over 2,000 births per year, while Khatam Al-Anbia Hospital is a private general hospital with over 3,000 births per year. Inclusion criteria included cases with severe maternal outcomes (Table 1), including severe postpartum hemorrhage and severe preeclampsia (persistent systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg or greater or diastolic blood pressure of 110 mm Hg or greater), proteinuria of at least 5 g per 24 hours; oliguria of over 400 ml per 24 hours, HELLP syndrome and pulmonary edema and eclampsia, severe systemic infection or sepsis (presence of fever [a body temperature higher than 38 °C]), confirmed or suspected infection (e.g., chorioamnionitis, miscarriage, endometritis, pneumonia),at least one heart attack greater than 90, a respiratory rate less than 20, leucopenia (white blood cell decrease less than 4000), leukocytosis (white blood cells more than 12000),and rupture of the uterus and the other life-threatening disorders are listed in Table 1 (15):
This evaluation also examined demographic characteristics such as maternal age, number of pregnancies, gestational age, stillbirth, abortion, and ectopic pregnancy, underlying maternal diseases such as diabetes and anemia, type of previous deliveries, prenatal care, premature rupture of the bladder, and induction of labor. The condition of these mothers’ fetuses and infants was evaluated. Apgar score, birth weight, gestational age based on last menstrual periods and obstetric ultrasonography, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, jaundice, neonatal seizures, sepsis, respiratory failure syndrome, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality were recorded from the infant and fetus records of mothers with severe pregnancy complications.
Data were recorded in SPSS (v. 22) software. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed using the chi-square test, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and the t-test, where a statistical significance level of p<0>
Ethical consideration
This research was part of a doctoral research project and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Shahed University (IR.SHAHED.REC.1398.059).
Between 2016 and 2018 (three years), Mostafa Khomeini Hospital (M.KH.H) performed 8302 deliveries, and Khatam Al-Anbia Hospital performed 9243 deliveries (KH.AN.H).
According to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for severe complications and the near-death maternal approach, 138 mothers qualified to participate in the study. The participants’ ages ranged from 17 to 44 years (there was a 60-year-old woman who became pregnant through assisted reproductive technology [ART]), with a mean of 33.95±5.56years. The average age of mothers in the two hospitals did not differ significantly (p>0.05). Of the total population, 105(81.39%) have undergone a cesarean delivery, 55(39.9%) of the mothers were first-time mothers, and 2(1.4%) did
not receive prenatal care. Other case characteristics are shown in Table 2. In total, 44 (32.6%) mothers with severe maternal complications demonstrated near-death complications. Meanwhile, 64(46.4%) mothers in M.KH.H. suffered from severe maternal complications, of which 18(28.1%) were near-miss. In addition, 74 mothers (53.6%) in KH.AN. H. exhibited severe maternal complications, of which 27(36.5%) were near misses, and one woman died. It was determined that the prevalence of severe maternal complications in M.KH.H was 7.7 per 1000 live births and that in KH.AN.H, it was 8 per 1000 births. In this study, heavy bleeding (36.2%) and preeclampsia (50.7%) were the most common causes of severe complications in mothers (Figure 1).
Figure1: Frequency of maternal complications
In addition, there were 4(2.9%) abortions and 5(3.6%) ectopic pregnancies. A total of 45 (32.6%) of the near miss mothers were transferred to the intensive care unit, 31 (22.5%) of them required critical interventions, and blood disorders were the most common organ dysfunction (Table 2).
Table 2: Comparing the characteristics of the mothers studied in the two hospitals under study
The mean weight of neonates in the study group was 2719.27±711.57 grams, and the mean weight of neonates in the two hospitals did not differ significantly (p=0.198) (Figure 2).
Out of 131 births (departure of pregnancy after 20 weeks), 46 (35.11%) infants weighed less than 2500 g, of which 13 (30.95%) were born to mothers who were close to death (Table2). Furthermore, 57 (44.5%) infants were born prematurely (55.1% of neonates in M.KH.H and 41.2% of neonates in KH.A.H) with a birth age of 37 weeks or less. There were 13 (32.5%) cases of preterm births among women belonged near-miss mothers. Overall, 50% of neonates of near-miss mothers were preterm.
Table 3: Prevalence of neonatal complications in mothers with severe pregnancy complications
There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.21; Table3) between the two hospitals (does not calculate the rate of abortion and ectopic pregnancy). Forty-two infants (31.8%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, with 17.4% and 14.4%at M.KH.H and KH.A.H, respectively. Of these infants, 17 (42.5%) were related to near miss mothers. Notably, there were 4 cases of neonatal death (3%) and 5 cases of intrauterine death (3.6%), resulting in a prenatal mortality rate of 58.2 per 1000 births. Eighty-eight (59.9%) of the fetuses and newborns of the mothers who were studied experienced at least one complication. Twenty-six (61.9%) infants had
respiratory failure, and 6 (14.2%) had a severe infection. Figure2 depicts the other complications of these infants. The correlation between average maternal age and gravidity with fetal complications was compared with the correlation between maternal background factors and fetal complications using t-tests and linear regression. The average age of mothers whose fetus-newborn experienced complications was 33.5±0.98, and the average number of pregnancies was 2.06±1.11. Although it was demonstrated that the likelihood of prenatal complications is higher in multiparous women over 30, this correlation was not statistically significant.
Table 4: The relationship between some pregnancy characteristics and neonatal complications using Fisher's exact test and binomial logistic regression
As shown in Table 4, Fisher’s exact test and binomial logistic regression test were used to assess the relationship between mode of delivery, prenatal care, premature rupture of amniotic fluid, and labor induction with fetal complication; 34% of mothers with the underlying disease had fetal-neonatal complications, and the cesarean rate among these women was 48.3%. However, there was no correlation between the mother’s demographic characteristics and perinatal complications.
In the past several decades, the world has made progress in reducing maternal and child mortality [15]. A possible correlation between maternal morbidity/mortality and potential adverse effects on child health may serve as a basis for establishing action execution priorities and allocating financial resources to support these actions [16] This study investigated the causes and perinatal outcomes of severe maternal complications and near-miss cases. This study estimated the prevalence of severe maternal complications to be approximately 8 per 1000 live births. In a few studies conducted in Iran, this index ranges from 25.2 cases per thousand live births in Kerman to 4.97 cases per thousand births in Alborz [5,17]. This difference may be attributable to the study population, the quality of hospitals (private versus public) and training, and the quality of midwifery care. This study was conducted in a semi-private teaching hospital (M.KH .H) and a private hospital (KH.AN.H).Almost all patients are immediately seen by a midwife and gynecologist, and if they are in distress, decisions are made more quickly. It should be noted, however, that because the cost of hospitalization in these centers is higher than that of government education centers, some complicated pregnancies are not referred to this hospital; therefore, if more research is conducted in these hospitals, the index figure above will likely change. This study revealed that preeclampsia and severe bleeding are among the most common causes. This is comparable to the findings of other Iranian and international studies [14, 17-19]. About one-third of mothers were hospitalized in the intensive care unit (a relatively high rate), the most common complication of their organ disorders is blood and coagulation disorders, and one in five mothers in this study required critical interventions such as blood transfusion and returned to the operating room for laparotomy.
These results are comparable to those of other studies. Obviously, economic and cultural factors must always be considered [5, 17, 20]. Unfortunately, approximately 60% of the newborns in the study population had prenatal complications. In the studies by Nakimoli et al.in Uganda [6] and Firdawek et al. (10), conducted in developing countries, 63.3% and 72.9% of infants and fetuses, respectively, had complications. The incidence of infants with complications is significantly higher than the incidence of infants without complications. In general, the risk factors for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes are remarkably similar. Efforts to ensure maternal health will therefore have a multiplier effect on reducing infant mortality and neonatal and fetal complications [2, 21, 22]. Prematurity and low birth weight were our greatest perinatal complications. According to statistics, the incidence of prematurity and low birth weight infants ranges between9.5%-12%. [22, 23].
Approximately half of the neonates in this study were premature, and more than a third of them weighed less than 2500 grams, which is nearly five times higher than the average and demonstrates the significance of these complications among infants of mothers with severe complications. Identical to these findings, other studies found that between 45 and 54% of infants were born prematurely before 37 weeks of age [3, 20, 21, 24]. This high rate and similarity between societies are typically attributable to maternal complications, particularly preeclampsia. To save the lives of the mother and fetus, termination of pregnancy were performed prior to 37 weeks, which increases the risk of preterm and premature birth. Two-thirds of infant deaths occur in infants with low birth weight, and approximately 36% of infant deaths occur in premature infants. In premature infants, respiratory and necrotizing enter colitis are more prevalent [3, 25]. Various comparable studies have reported neonatal mortality rates ranging from 25 to 162 per thousand live births [7, 26, 27].
In the present study, 3% of newborns died, resulting in a neonatal mortality rate of 30 per one thousand live births. Although the infant mortality rate in our study was not particularly high, the overall infant mortality rate is 8.9 per thousand live births [23], which has nearly tripled in this study. On the other hand, the infant’s death has numerous psychological effects on the parents; therefore, efforts are being made to reduce this mortality rate [7, 28]. In this study, 3.9% of intrauterine deaths were also accompanied by a major complication. In the study by Mohammadi et al. at a public hospital in Iran, the rate of stillbirths was 12%, which is higher than the current study [14] . The study which was done in Nigeria by Adeoye and his friends, the result showed that the odds of still birth was around 5 times higher in those who developed maternal near miss when compared to those who delivered without complication [2] and there were 20.3% of stillbirths among women with severe maternal complications in Ethiopia(11). The lower rates of stillbirth and infant mortality in this study were likely due to the semi-private and private nature of the hospitals analyzed in this study. In these hospitals, the decision to terminate the pregnancy and save the life of the mother and fetus was made more quickly due to the higher quality of infant care and the NICU staff’s training and experience. Delays in obstetric care increase the risk of neonatal near-miss morbidity events and death [16].
Of the born infants, 31.3% were transferred to the intensive care unit, which is consistent with other studies such as Mohammadi et al. (31%) [14], and Adeoye I et al. (29.4%) [2]. Although approximately 30% of infants were transferred to the care unit, only 6.1% of infants had a low Apgar score; thus, it appears that low birth weight and prematurity are important causes of being in the NICU.
Relationship between maternal demographic characteristics and perinatal complications
Low maternal education, lack of family support, marital status, maternal age, and lack of health service confidence are risk factors for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes [10, 17, 22]. Historically, these factors have been responsible for the worst neonatal outcomes. However, the factors were insignificant in our analysis, most likely due to the population’s homogeneous socioeconomic status [16]. A significant factor is the absence of inadequacy of prenatal care. Researches have shown that adequate prenatal care is an effective intervention in improving pregnancy outcomes and provides opportunity for consulting and reducing complications associated with pregnancy and child birth. A lot of percentage of maternal and fetal mortality, preterm births, or low-weight births is due to inadequate and inappropriate prenatal care during pregnancy [29, 30]. Our research was conducted, however, in two private and semi-public hospitals. The patients referred to these two hospitals were individuals with moderate and high social status, and more than 98% of them had prenatal control).
The prenatal care situation in Iran has significantly improved and now exceeds the global average. One of the specific objectives of the National Maternal Health Program was to increase the coverage of pregnancy care providers (at least six times) by more than 93% by the end of 2015. The improvement in the trend of pregnancy care coverage over the past two decades is the result of efforts and interventions made in the country’s health system in recent years [14, 30-32]. Sixty percent of our mothers were multiparous and over 35. This demonstrates the significance of monitoring older pregnant women, who are more likely to develop gestational hypertension and preeclampsia [17]. In developing countries such as the United Kingdom
also understand a strong association between emergency caesarean section and near misses therefore they concluded the increased odds of closed to death may be associated with the outcome or survival of mother rather than being a risk factor due to the temporal sequence of the accidents. This is because such treatment modalities are employed after the occurrence of a complication and not vice-versa. In spite of, this increased risk associated with emergency caesarean section may be related to the dislike of women and their family members towards caesarian delivery [2]. However, the complications of cesarean section and its role in increasing maternal complications in a country like Iran, where the statistics of cesarean section, especially requested cesarean section, are very high, may be even more important.
The present study had some limitations. The most important limitation is that the study was carried out in two hospitals (private and semi-private) in Tehran, the capital of Iran. Therefore, it does not represent cases of sever maternal complications occurring in other childbirth facilities in Iran.
Neonatal complications, particularly prematurity and low birth weight, are more likely in the presence of severe maternal complications. Due to the high prevalence of preeclampsia, training mothers to control blood pressure and preparing the necessary hospital facilities to assess and care for at-risk patients should be a priority in health planning. Additionally, due to the high prevalence of severe postpartum hemorrhage, it appears necessary to provide the necessary facilities for the care of these mothers. Consequently, it appears necessary to equip hospitals (level 3) with intensive care units for mothers and infants and trained personnel who can provide adequate support for mothers and infants.
This research was supported by Shahed University. We appreciate the cooperation of the staff at the Archive Offices of the Mostafa Khomeini and Khatam Al-Anbia hospitals.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
