AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/389
1Cardiology Unit Supervision, Hospital Clinico San Carlos. San Carlos Research Foundation, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IDISSC). Calle Martin Lagos s/n (no number), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
2Functional Area Supervision of Innovation, Hospital Clinico San Carlos. San Carlos Research Foundation, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IDISSC). Calle Martin Lagos s/n (no number), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
3University lecturer, Research Unit, San Carlos Clinical Hospital. Department of Nursing, Complutense University of Madrid. San Carlos Research Foundation, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IDISSC). Calle Martin Lagos s/n (no number), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
4Head of Cardiology Section, Hospital Clinico San Carlos. Interhospital Foundation for Cardiovascular Research; Cardiovascular Institute, San Carlos Clinical Hospital. Calle Martin Lagos s/n (no number), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
5Interhospital Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, Spain.
*Corresponding Author: Gómez Barriga Maria Dolores, Cardiology Unit Supervision, Hospital Clinico San Carlos. San Carlos Research Foundation, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IDISSC). Calle Martin Lagos s/n (no number), 28040 Madrid, Spain. ORCID: 0000-0001-5973- 0823
Citation: Gomez Barriga, MD, Pacheco Del Cerro, E., Fernández Del Palacio, E., Vila Costa, I., (2024), Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients, J Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 7(4); DOI: 10.31579/2641-0419/389
Copyright: © 2024, Gómez Barriga Maria Dolores. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 02 July 2024 | Accepted: 15 July 2024 | Published: 23 July 2024
Keywords: acute coronary syndrome, digital tools, self-care, patient experience, qualitative research
Background/Aim:
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention remains crucial despite advancements in clinical outcomes. Empowering patients with self-care skills is essential for managing ACS, and digital tools can enhance these practices. This study qualitatively evaluates patients' experiences with post-ACS digital tools to improve self-care.
Material and methods:
A qualitative phenomenological approach was employed, utilizing in-depth interviews with patients diagnosed with ACS enrolled in a telephonic follow-up program. Sampling continued until saturation was reached. Data collection included patients' perceptions of the accessibility and utility of digital tools in enhancing self-care knowledge. A descriptive analysis of age and gender was conducted to analyze potential demographic influences.
Results:
Ninety patients participated, with males predominating (70%) and a mean age of 69.2 years. Patients reported positive engagement with both educational videos and health blogs. Preferences varied, with 54% favoring videos and 36% preferring blogs. Difficulties in accessing digital tools were observed, especially among elderly patients. However, patients emphasized the instrumental role of these tools in complementing knowledge and facilitating self-care, while recognizing the irreplaceable value of direct interaction with healthcare professionals.
Conclusions:
Future interventions should focus on improving digital tools accessibility and effectively integrating them into patient care pathways to optimize self-care outcomes.
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) occurs due to the erosion or rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque, which leads to the formation of an intracoronary thrombus, causing unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, or sudden death, all of which are encompassed by ACS. [1] The term acute myocardial infarction (AMI) should be used when there is evidence of myocardial injury (defined as elevated cardiac troponins above the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit), with the presence of necrosis in a clinical context consistent with myocardial ischemia.[1] To immediately initiate treatment strategies, such as reperfusion, patients with persistent chest pain or other symptoms indicative of ischemia and ST-segment elevation in at least 2 contiguous leads are usually designated as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. In contrast, if there is no ST-segment elevation, they are designated as non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. [2]
Globally, coronary artery disease is the most common cause of death, and its frequency is increasing. In Europe, however, there has been a general trend towards a reduction in mortality from coronary artery disease over the past three decades. Coronary artery disease causes nearly 1.8 million deaths annually, accounting for 20% of all deaths in Europe, with significant variations between countries. [2] Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality despite improvements in clinical outcomes. Age-adjusted coronary artery disease mortality has decreased since the 1980s, especially in high-income regions. If prevention were practiced correctly, the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) would be greatly reduced. Therefore, it is not only about the predominant risk factors but also the poor implementation of preventive measures. [3,4]
Cardiovascular disease prevention is defined as a set of coordinated actions aimed at the population or an individual to eliminate or minimize cardiovascular disease and associated disabilities. This prevention should target the general population by promoting healthy lifestyle habits, and individuals, i.e., people at moderate-high risk of CVD or with established CVD, addressing unhealthy lifestyle habits (e.g., poor-quality diet, physical inactivity, smoking) and improving risk factors. [3] Prevention has proven effective, as eliminating health risk behaviors could prevent at least 80% of cardiovascular diseases. [5] Therefore, CVD is a significant economic burden on society, and effective preventive measures need to be implemented. There is a consensus in favor of an approach combining strategies to improve cardiovascular health across the population from childhood, with specific actions aimed at improving cardiovascular health in people at high risk of CVD or with established CVD. A report by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) estimated that a national program in the United Kingdom that reduced the population's cardiovascular risk by 1% could prevent 25,000 cases of CVD and save 40 million euros per year.[5-6]. Cardiovascular disease mortality rates could be halved with just a small reduction in risk factors, and it has been noted that eight dietary priorities alone could halve CVD mortality. [6]
One aspect that enhances any model of chronic patient care is promoting individuals' autonomy and boosting their ability to care for their lives, well-being, and health, promoting self-care. This aspect can be extrapolated to patients who have suffered from ACS, by controlling cardiovascular risk factors, such as overweight/obesity, high blood pressure, hypercholesterolemia, and physical inactivity, among others. [6]
Prevention is greatly influenced by the information a person perceives from the outside; in this regard, healthcare professionals can intervene with educational programs that incorporate the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) as means to facilitate the reach of content directed at risk groups. (7) Digital health incorporates information and communication technologies (ICTs) into healthcare products, services, and processes. In this sense, eHealth is defined as the set of Information and Communication Technologies used in the healthcare environment for prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, as well as health management, improving the efficiency of these processes. These new technological tools, better known as eHealth, with changes in perception as they have evolved, encompass various health products and services, such as mobile applications (Apps), telemedicine, and the use of social networks like YouTube or the creation of patient-adapted blogs as support in cardiovascular education. [8]
In 2022, a prospective observational study was initiated in a cardiology unit in Madrid to evaluate the impact of telephone follow-up on patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Digital tools were used, such as educational YouTube videos and a blog about diet, medication, symptoms, and other relevant topics. Patients have responded positively to these resources, but their experience and access difficulties have not been evaluated. A qualitative study is proposed to understand patients' perceptions of these tools. The goal is to describe and understand the usefulness of digital tools, not to predict or control. [9]
Evaluate the experience of patients with digital tools, such as educational videos and a blog, after being admitted for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) in 2022. The aim is to identify the access difficulties to these tools and understand their perceptions of their usefulness in improving self-care.
Population and Study Area: Patients diagnosed with ACS and admitted to the Cardiology unit of the tertiary hospital during the year 2022 who were included in the telephone follow-up program for acquiring skills to manage their disease will be included.
Techniques to be Used: Based on the stated objectives, a qualitative approach with a phenomenological framework is proposed, following the principles outlined by Merleau-Ponty in his "Phenomenology of Perception." (10) In-depth interviews will be the technique used, [11] as they facilitate the subjective and intimate elucidation of human experience and bring us closer to understanding the phenomenon.
Sampling and Profiles to be Investigated: Interviews will be conducted with patients included in the telephone follow-up to understand their perceptions of the digital tools. The sample will be completed when a sufficient diversity of ideas has been heard, and no new elements appear with each additional interview or observation, known as saturation in qualitative research. However, as Denzin notes, the complexity of reality can never be fully captured, meaning saturation may never be fully achieved. [12] Mayan suggests that the researcher should continue investigating until they believe they can say something important and novel about the phenomenon in question. [12] A semi-structured interview, preferably conducted by phone and lasting approximately 20-30 minutes, will emphasize the usefulness of digital tools for understanding the disease and the participants' knowledge of diet, physical activity, sexuality, and the contribution of these tools due to the possibility of repeated viewing and reading. Additionally, questions will be asked about the ease of access to these tools and which of the two tools (videos or blog) they found easier to use. As a semi-structured interview, all opinions expressed by the patient will be recorded. (11)
It is important for the proper development of the research to establish profiles during data collection. Age and gender variables will be collected, understanding initially that differences in access to tools may exist across these variables. It is important to anonymize the patients, using the same identities used throughout the previous project. Information and consent, whether verbal or written, from the patient is fundamental for the development of the research. The videos and the blog can be accessed through the following links:
Youtube Chanel (created by the healthcare professionals of the hospitalization unit, with content authored by the primary researcher of this project) :
• https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2uFSK3IQtPTRRTu_0fF5RA
Health blog(created by the primary researcher of this project) :
• https://cuidandodetusaludes.wordpress.com/
Statistical Analysis: In this study, a comprehensive statistical analysis was conducted to understand and contextualize the data collected in the qualitative research. Through a series of techniques and methodological approaches, the experiences, perceptions, and opinions of participants regarding the studied phenomenon were explored.
First, a descriptive analysis was performed to characterize the qualitative data obtained. Frequency distributions for categorical variables were presented, providing an overview of the distribution of responses among participants.
Subsequently, the qualitative data were coded and categorized. This process identified emerging themes, patterns, and relationships in the data, facilitating a deeper analysis of participant responses.
Ethical Considerations: The study strictly adhered to ethical guidelines established by Law 3/2018 and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 regarding personal data protection. It also complied with the Declaration of Helsinki to ensure the integrity and respect of participants. Participants were informed about data handling and the management of the generated database, which was disaggregated and accessible only to the principal investigator. Upon completion, all databases were deleted according to protocols. Anonymity was protected following Law 41/2002, ensuring confidentiality for comments about patients and third parties. Informed consent was obtained via a detailed form, and the study was approved by the hospital's ethics committee. Data were stored securely with unique codes, and identifying information was destroyed after the study, limiting access to the principal investigator.
A semi-structured interview was conducted with a total of 90 patients who had completed the 12-month telephone follow-up, all of whom criteria with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) as their primary medical diagnosis. Within this group, 70% were men and 30% women, with an average age of 69.2 years. The age distribution was as follows: 11% were between 40 and 55 years old, 40
The research conducted through semi-structured interviews with 90 patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presents revealing results that provide a comprehensive view of patient interaction with digital tools in the self-care of this medical condition. These findings are not only significant in themselves but also underscore the critical need to understand and address patient needs and preferences in the context of current healthcare. [13] In this in-depth analysis, we explore the key points of this research, highlighting the most significant aspects emerging from the collected data.
A notable aspect of this study is the sociodemographic distribution of the sample, which reflects trends consistent with previous research on ACS. The predominance of men in the sample, compared to women, aligns with the general understanding that ACS affects men more than women, a trend observed in various epidemiological and clinical studies. Additionally, the significant presence of patients over 55 years old is consistent with the understanding that ACS is more common in older adults, an observation supported by numerous studies identifying advanced age as a significant risk factor for this cardiovascular disease. [14]
An important finding of this study is the patients' overall preference for videos over the blog as a medium for education and support in self-care. This preference highlights the importance of using information formats that cater to patient preferences and needs to maximize the impact of educational interventions. Moreover, it underscores the potential of audiovisual media to enhance patient understanding and engagement in managing their disease, an observation consistent with scientific literature demonstrating the efficacy of educational videos in promoting health and self-care in various populations. [15-17]
The identification of technological barriers, especially among older patients, presents significant challenges in the effective implementation of digital tools in healthcare. This observation highlights the urgent need for educational and training programs specifically designed to address the digital divide and improve technological literacy among older patients. Overcoming these barriers would not only facilitate access to digital tools but also promote equity in healthcare and improve health outcomes across the population. [18]
The study's results suggest a positive patient perception of the usefulness of digital tools in managing their disease. This conclusion underscores the transformative potential of technology in empowering patients and improving health outcomes. The ability of digital tools to provide continuous information and support to patients, even when access to healthcare is limited, is particularly noteworthy. [19, 20] However, it is essential to recognize that patients deeply value direct contact with healthcare professionals, emphasizing the importance of integrating these digital tools as a complement, rather than a substitute, for conventional healthcare. [21]
These findings shed light on the nuanced experiences of patients with digital tools in the context of self-care for ACS. They underscore the importance of user-friendly interfaces and the role of social support networks in ensuring accessibility. Additionally, they highlight the complementary nature of digital tools alongside traditional health services in promoting the well-being of ACS patients.
Possible study limitations include the sample size and composition, as the research relied on interviews with 90 patients, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to a broader population. The predominance of men in the sample could also bias results, not accurately reflecting the gender distribution in the general population affected by ACS. Additionally, while semi-structured interviews provide detailed insights into patient experiences, they are susceptible to biases in interpretation from the interviewer and responses from participants. The generalization of results is another concern, as findings may vary across different cultural, socioeconomic, and healthcare contexts. The study could have also benefited from more rigorous control of variables influencing patient preferences and perceptions of digital tools, such as access to technology and prior health education. Finally, while focusing on the patient perspective, the study could have included insights from other stakeholders, such as healthcare professionals and technology developers, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in using digital tools for ACS self-care.
This study offers a comprehensive view of patient experiences with digital tools in ACS self-care, aiming to improve care and self-management for ACS patients. It identifies areas for future research, including evaluating interventions to overcome technological barriers and enhance the accessibility of digital tools. The study emphasizes the need to effectively integrate these tools into clinical practice and advocates for a patient-centered approach in designing self-care interventions to meet individual patient needs and preferences for better health outcomes.
There are no conflicts of interest among the authors of the work
The study has not received any funding
The data has been obtained following the data protection and patient privacy law and endorsed by the Ethics Committee for Research at the Hospital Clínico San Carlos, with the approval of the study protocol.
Of the authors, two have specialized training in statistics. Specifically, Professor Pacheco del Cerro, Enrique, has conducted the analysis.
Affirm that methods used in data analyses are appropriately applied within the study design.
Agree to take responsibility for the statistical approach's appropriateness, conduct, and interpretation.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
