Letter to Editor | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/163
Biochemical Physiopathology Medicine Faculty of University of São Paulo, Laboratory of Biochemical and Biophysical Butantan Institute, Brazil.
*Corresponding Author: José Artur Medina, Pediatrician, MD degree, Doctoral student in Biochemical Physiopathology Medicine Faculty of University of São Paulo, Laboratory of Biochemical and Biophysical Butantan Institute, Brazil.
Citation: Jose A Medina. (2021). Multiple Sclerosis and Chlamydia. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 9(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/163
Copyright: © 2021 Jose Artur Medina, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 11 August 2021 | Accepted: 29 October 2021 | Published: 09 November 2021
Keywords:
Dear Editor, In 2002 Hawkes realized that epidemiologically multiple sclerosis (MS) behaves like an STD [1]. Although the epidemiological similarity between the two diseases is true, this thesis was not discussed extensively, perhaps because it implied that some children might have been victims of abuse, which sounds false and potentially unfair. We believe that transverse myelitis and MS are the result of an infectious disease, eventually sexually transmitted by chlamydia/gonococcus, which is caused by a subclinical bacterial urethritis/inflamatory pelvic disease (IPD) among adults. In children it is the same disease but caused by common uropathogens/enterobacteria. Both UTI and MS are much more common in girls than in boys [2, 3]. These UTIs would favor herpetic proliferation via toll-like receptors (TLRs), since the virus is endemic and always present, and it is not possible to eradicate it completely [4, 5, 6]. Herpes viral load is counteracted by interferon alpha 1 (IFN alpha-1), present in different cell types, from macrophages to lymphocytes passing through endothelia and fibroblasts. Interferon alpha 1, when interacting with its specific receptors, produces in the intracellular the action of antiviral RNAse and the inhibition of viral protein synthesis [7, 8]. TLR2/4 when stimulated by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) from bacteria reduce the production of IFN alpha increasing the viral load [9, 10, 11]. Viral proliferation can be stimulated via LPS, ie, pathogen-associated molecular protein (PAMP), which by stimulating inflammation, by interacting with TLR2/4, would reduce IFN-alpha1 and, consequently, increase viral load. On the other hand, the stimulation of these same receptors by fibronectin or hyaluronic acid, tissue “chunks”, damage associated protein (DAMP), would increase the biosynthesis of IFNalpha1 reducing the viral load [12, 13]. Herpes proliferation would favor the exteriorization of MHC type 2 complexes [14, 15, 16], which characterizes transverse myelitis and MS, favoring the chemotaxis of Th17 and Th1 CD4s. Intestinal parasites and dysbiosis - transmissible by water - produce chronic elevations of Th17 CD4 [17], which by itself reduce the blood-brain barrier [18]. Urine infections in childhood are caused by enterobacteria, [19] which are epidemiologically important agents, as they cause diarrhea [20] that occur anywhere in the world, although more frequent in the third world [21]. Transmissible through water, enterobacter are the main responsible for infant mortality in poor regions and among the elderly they determine longevity [22, 23, 24], are more prevalent than imagined and both positively affect rheumatoid factors (25, 26) and produce reactive arthritis [27, 28]; when asked if there would be a cause/effect relationship between dysbiosis and rheumatic diseases, it is heard: “cross reaction” [29]. The choice of assigning an obscure origin to autoimmune diseases is to opt for the uncertain, since the positivity of the test is attributed to an obscure origin, to the detriment of what the test actually measured and in what clinical conditions the test is positive. I ask: It would not be possible for enterobacteria, according to the magnitude of the intestinal dysbiosis that they produce, to increase the levels of Th17 and that - in the same individual - there is a subclinical urethritis/itu/IPD, whose magnitude would favor the inhibition of IFNalpha1 and consequently would favor the proliferation of herpes in the tissues previously affected? Could this unfortunate encounter be the cause of MS and transverse myelitis? Bacterial urethritis is often asymptomatic, elevating the same interleukins that MS, IL-8 and IL-18 [30, 31, 32, 33], in addition to Th17 and Th1 [34, 35]. Outpatient treatment of a possible post coital cystitis, for example, would not eradicate bacterial vaginosis or chlamydia, making them potentially resistant, perpetuating the IPD/UTI insidiously [36, 37]. The pathophysiology of transverse myelitis in MS could be explained as a result of neurodegeneration dependent on lymphocyte infiltration of Th17 and Th1, which when interacting with local type II MHC [38, 39, 40] would release IL-17A causing IL-6 and TNF alpha release with subsequent neurodegeneration, of course inflammatory and demyelinating [40]. The thesis proposed by Haewek explains absolutely all aspects of the disease, covering epidemiological, biochemical and clinical aspects such as the topography of the lesions, specifically lymphocytic infiltration, in MS. If this text is correct, the neurodegeneration of MS could be stopped through dewormers, antibiotics, beta glucan, probiotics and by far the most difficult: to avoid reinfection, since the health factors linked to intestinal dysbiosis persist, after all, they are linked to socio-economic aspects, which are difficult to change. After resolution of urethritis/cystitis/pyelonephritis/DIPA garlic capsules, perhaps via organo sulfur molecules, would favor the release of IFN-alpha1 and IFN-gamma [41, 42, 43]. The patients with increased levels of antinuclear autoantibodies would be infected with vaginosis bacterial, and receive diagnosis of lupus [44].
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,