AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9392/098
1 Antalya Provincial Health Directorate, Antalya –TURKEY
2 Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Halk Sağlığı Anabilim Dalı
*Corresponding Author: Oya Dirican, M.D.Antalya Provincial Health Directorate, Korkuteli District Health Directorate Uzunoluk Mahallesi, 447. Sk. No:16, 07800 Korkuteli/Antalya
Citation: Oya Dirican, Özge Abacı Bozyel, Dilek Öztaş (2022). Mobbing in the Case of Primary health Care Providers. J. Archives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study, 5(1); DOI:10.31579/2692-9392/098
Copyright: © 2022 Oya Dirican, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 19 November 2021 | Accepted: 27 December 2021 | Published: 05 January 2022
Keywords: mobbing; primary health care employees; harrasment in workplace
Objectives: Primary healthcare workers are the main drivers of the population-oriented health education programs. In this work, we aim to offer an account of the conditions that lead to mobbing in Primary Health Care Employees, and of the ways to address this problem and its consequences.
Methods: This study has been conducted on the medical staff in primary health care units in the province of Antalya, with the permission of the Provincial Health Directorate and the approval of the ethics board of the Antalya Education and Research Hospital. It was planned as a cross-sectional study; survey forms were filled out by 752 employees during an internal training for primary health care in 2017. After informing the subjects regarding the aims of the study, we gave them a survey of 21 questions. The average time for the individuals to answer the questions was 30 minutes. The survey was designed to ask the individuals their age, gender, educational background and occupation, whether they know of any case of mobbing, whether they were subjected to mobbing themselves and for how long, the position and the gender of the perpetrator, and whether and how they addressed the issue. The answers of the participants were analyzed with descriptive statistical analysis, the frequencies were determined and chi-square test was used.
Results: 72.2% (543) of the participants declare that they heard the words "mobbing" or "psychological harassment" before. In our study, the rate of exposure to mobbing was found to be 30.4% among primary care providers. We have found that mobbing exposure was significantly higher among females and midwives and nurses. Our study reveals that in every occupational group perpetrators are mostly in management positions; that 36-45 age group was the most victimized group by both genders; that the most common method in order to handle mobbing is the loss of communication which is a new problem between the perpetrator and the victim and that the most common response to mobbing is to share it with friends; and our study finds that the period of mobbing in the midwife-nurse group is mostly 19 months and more, while this period takes to 9-12 months in the case of doctors.
Discussion: One of the most important steps in preventing mobbing is to take timely measures in organizations and to prevent the problem from harming the organization and employees. Educating employees about emotional assault within their working environment is proposed as an important solution for them to protect themselves when they are subjected to harassment.
Mobbing is a set of systematically sustained, malicious attitudes and actions carried out in the workplace by one or more individuals, intending to intimidate and pacify certain other co-workers or force them to quit and damaging their personal values, professional status, social relations and health. [1-13]Mobbing is a public health issue, with its increasingly frequent occurrence having direct and indirect social costs such as loss of labor and increase in the use of medication and leave among its victims, and should be addressed as such. The purpose of mobbing is thought to be to force individuals to quit their jobs by putting systematic pressure on them that would undermine their work performance and stamina. [13-16]The parties to mobbing are victims, perpetrators, and by-standers. [17,18] The victim experiences difficulty in defining the problem they are going through and identifying its causes mostly because of the slow onset of the process of psychological violence they are subjected to. The victim’s behavior is mocked and insulted, and their communication with co-workers is intercepted for a long period of time (minimum six months) and periodically (minimum once a week). However, the victim struggles to stand firm against these hostile actions and feels helpless. They fail to defend themselves against the accusations directed at them because of various reasons such as the personality of the individual, the lack of job security, and the powerful status of the perpetrators within the organization. This defenseless state of the victim furthers the psychological violence and its effects. The effects of the psychological violence on the status of the victim in the workplace and their mental and physical health thus escalate. [19]Mobbing can be committed by peers or even subordinates as well as senior management. It is argued that those who are engaged in mobbing have excessively controlling, cowardly, neurotic, and power hungry personalities and their behaviors stem from insecurity, fear and jealousy. [3,7,8,13,18,20,21]
Mobbing has a negative impact on the general productivity, interpersonal relations and peace within the workplace. It causes disharmony between management and employees, increases absenteeism and medical leaves, undermines loyalty to the organization, leads to the loss of competent and experienced employees, increases the employee turnout, and damages the reputation of the institution when it is publicized.
The economic burden of mobbing is also significant. It leads to an increase in the medical expenses of the victims and loss of productivity in the workplace due to time spent for their medical control and treatment. Thus, mobbing harms the victim’s relationship with the society and places a burden on the employer and the government. According to the October 2000 report of the International Labor Organization (ILO), in Germany absences due to psychological health problems cost $ 2.2 million every year.[3]
Today, mobbing is a leading cause of poor performance and failure in private and public organizations in the world and in Turkey today.[22,23]
It is widely accepted that some form of mobbing is present in the workplace all around the world.[24]Primary healthcare workers are the main drivers of the population-oriented health education programs. They have to be equipped with accurate and adequate information to be able to serve as trainer and consultant in the preventive healthcare services not only against physical welness but also psychological wellness. It is important to raise consciousness about this issue in order to find an effective solution for it through new studies. In this work, we aim to offer an account of the conditions that lead to mobbing in Primary Health Care Employees, and of the ways to address this problem and its consequences.
This study has been conducted on the medical staff in primary health care units in the province of Antalya, with the permission of the Provincial Health Directorate and the approval of the ethics board of the Antalya Education and Research Hospital. It was planned as a cross-sectional study; survey forms were filled out by 752 employees during an internal training for primary health providers in 2017. This internal training is planned all of employees in primary care providers including doctors, nurses-midwives, medical secretaries, environmental health technicians, laboratory technicians, X-ray technicians, data manager, health officers from Provincial Directorate (PC), Public Health Center (PHC), Family Health Center (FHC) and Public Health Laboratory (PHL). Sixty-four employees (7.8%) who did not participate in training were not included in the study. Non-participants were had same distribution with participants according to job and workplace, and their reason about not participating to the internal training was that they had a training about mobbing already. After informing the subjects regarding the aims of the study, we gave them a survey of 21 questions. A questionnaire was prepared to determine the knowledge attitude and behaviors of primary health care workers about exposure to mobbing and what to do if necessary. The survey was designed to ask the individuals their age, gender, educational background and occupation, whether they know of any case of mobbing, whether they were subjected to mobbing themselves and for how long, the position and the gender of the perpetrator, and whether and how they addressed the issue. Also, they were asked not to write their names because they had to be kept confidential. The average time for the individuals to answer the questions was 30 minutes. A total of 752 individuals participated in the study. The answers of the participants were analyzed with descriptive statistical analysis, the frequencies were determined and chi-square test was used. The obtained data were presented with descriptive tables.
The average age of 752 primary health care workers that participate in the study is 39.8 ± 7.7 (minimum 18 and maximum 64). 70.3% of them are women (529 participants) and 29.7% men (223 participants). 110 participants (14.6%) are employed in the PD, 388 (51.6%) in the PHC, 232 (30.2%) in the FHC and 22 (2.9%) in PHL. 2.3% (17 participants) are primary school graduates, 2.7% (20 participants) secondary school graduates, 14.8% (111 participants) high school graduates, 31.3% (235 participants) technical college graduates, 41.6% (313 participants) university graduates and 7.4% (56 participants) hold masters or doctorate degrees. 20.7% (156) of the participants are doctors, 46.2% (348) of them are nurse-midwives (241 midwives and 107 nurses), the remaining 33% are Environmental Health Technicians, Laboratory technicians, X-ray technicians, data managers, health officers. 72.2% (543) of the participants declare that they heard the words "mobbing" or "psychological harassment" before.When the participants are provided with the definition of “mobbing” or “bullying” and asked if they have been subjected to it, 30 of them did not respond, 16.8% (126) responded that they were subjected to mobbing, 13.6% (102) responded that they have been partially subjected to mobbing and 65.7% (494) of them responded that they have not been subjected to any form of mobbing. 35.3% (184) of women responded that they have been fully or partially subjected to mobbing; 84.1% (126) of those who have been fully subjected to mobbing and 76.4% (102) of those who have been partially subjected to mobbing are female employees. This difference is statistically significant (χ2 = 19.08, p= 0.0001) (Table 1).
While age, level of education and place of duty do not appear to be factors statistically associated to the exposure to mobbing, 52.3% of those who report to have been subjected to are PHC employees, 84.9% of them are university graduates and 53.2% of them are between 36-45 years of age, and 54.9% of those who reported to have been partially subjected to mobbing are PHC employees, 76.4% of them are university graduates and 56.8% of them are between 36-45 years of age. When the relationship between occupation and exposure to mobbing is considered, we observe that the midwife-nurse group is the largest among those who report to have been fully (54.8%) and partially (47.1%) bullied. This is statistically significant (χ2 = 10.29, p= 0.03). It was found that those who had previously heard of the word “mobbing” report more frequently that they have been subjected to mobbing (χ2 = 34.22, p= 0.0001) (Table 1).35.9% of those who think that they have been subjected to mobbing have not done anything to solve the problem; 45.2% state that they have preferred to talk with their friends about the problem, 30.7% state that they have reported it to SABIM / BIMER (Government Communication Centers) and 21.4% to their supervisor. 16.7% of them have demanded to be assigned to another unit or institution, 8.3% of them have reported the problem to their union and 5.7% of them have filed a lawsuit. The least observed reactions are calling 170 (Labor and Social Security Call Center), seeking advice from a counselor, reciprocating the physical and/or psychological assaults of the perpetrators and contacting labor associations against mobbing (Table 2).
**Presidency’s Communication Center (CIMER), which operates under Presidency’s Directorate of Communications make resolution of the questions and problems of every citizen.
72.7% (136) of the victims were married during the mobbing practice, 88.8% (151) were employed in the institution for 5 years and less, 49.1% of the perpetrators (81) were supervisors, and 53.8% (122) of them were male. 25.5% (46) of the victim had more than one perpetrators, and the mobbing lasted generally 19 months and more. 38.2% (87) of the victim stopped communicating with the perpetrators as a result of mobbing. Predominantly seen among those who have at least a high school education, the midwife-nurse occupational group, 36-45 age group, and PHC employees (Table 3).
As far as the perpetrators of mobbing are concerned, superiors constitute the largest group, but the victims under the age of 36 have been mostly harrassed by their subordinates. Multiple exposures to mobbing are more common among doctors, and the university graduates and the employees of the PHC and FHC are more often subjected to mobbing by their subordinates. There are more men than women among perpetrators. However, in the midwife-nurse group, more of the perpetrators are women. The most victimized group in both genders is the 36-45 age group. Male perpetrators harrass mosty university graduates and female perpetrators harrass high school and lower level school graduates (Table 4).
In the midwife-nurse group mobbing lasts mostly longer than 18 months. But this period shortens to 6-11 months in the case of doctors. Employees under 36 years of age are usually subjected to mobbing for more than 1 year. The most victimized group in both educational level is the 19 months and more group (Table 5).
The problem of mobbing (psychological violence in workplace), which can result in quitting if not solved, is frequently encountered in recent years. For this reason, studies on mobbing are expanding.[24]In our study, the rate of exposure to mobbing was found to be 30.4% among primary care providers. Other studies show that 18 to 37% of health professionals are exposed to mobbing.[16,25] Considering these results, we can say that we have found a similar result.We have found that mobbing exposure was significantly higher among females and midwives and nurses, which is also consistent with other studies on this subject.[26,27] In contrast to these results, two studies show that male employees are more exposed to intimidation than female employees.[28,29] However, there is also a study showing that gender does not make a difference in exposure.[30]Studies show that health care professionals are more than 16 times more likely to suffer from mobbing than other service sector workers, and show that nurses are at three times more risk among other health workers.[13,31,32] Among the health care professionals, psychological violence is more common in nursing than in other occupations.[13,15,33-39]While a statistically significant relationship between the exposure to mobbing and the level of education is not observed, the literature suggests that employees with higher education suffer from mobbing more.[11,40]Our study reveals that in every occupational group perpetrators are mostly in management positions. Other studies also show similar results. This suggests that managers do not work towards the personnel satisfaction. One study finds that the rate of nurses exposed to mobbing by managers is 36.7%. In the literature research, 81% of the employees stated that they were exposed to mobbing by their managers and 58% by their peers. In a study conducted by ANF (Australian Nursing Federation) in Australia with registered nurses (442 individuals), nurses first identified their managers and supervisors, then their peers, patients and employers as responsible for mobbing.[40]Our study finds that 36-45 age group was the most victimized group by both genders. Mobbing victims are mostly 41-50 years old people, but in our country people between 25-30 years of age are reported to suffer intense mobbing.[13,41,42] A study on mobbing practices and work stress finds that those in the 20-35 age group are exposed to more mobbing.[43]Studies do not reveal a statistically significant relationship between nurses' average years of experience and their exposure to mobbing. This is consistent with our findings. Similarly when the mobbing exposure status of the nurses who participated in the study in the literature was examined, no statistically significant relationship is found. The findings in our study are also in this direction.[39,40,44]Our study finds that the most common problem resulting from mobbing is the loss of communication between the perpetrator and the victim (38.2% of the cases). Some studies suggest that insulting one’s professional skills, excessive task assignment, personal attacks are used as mobbing methods in general.[45,46]Our study finds that the most common response to mobbing is to share it with friends. This response is most common in the 36-45 age group, university graduates, midwife-nurse group and PHC employees group. Other studies also reveal that the most common response to mobbing is to share it with friends and family.[39,40,47-49]A study on nurses finds that those who are exposed to mobbing tend to have passive, and those who perpetrate mobbing tend to have aggressive personalities.[33] Our study finds that the period of mobbing in the midwife-nurse group is mostly longer than 18 months, while this period shortens to 6-11 months in the case of doctors. Another study conducted on nurses shows that the people involved in the act of intimidation are insecure, jealous, suspicious and generally in a managerial position, and their behavior occur systematically and continuously between three weeks and three years. Against this, victims of mobbing may not want to reveal their situation too much.[34]One of the most important steps in preventing mobbing is to take timely measures in organizations and to prevent the problem from harming the organization and employees. Tendencies of mobbing in the workplace and the factors affecting these trends should be determined; clear job descriptions should be made, duties and responsibilities of employees should be determined, the importance of communication should be emphasized and a physical environment where employees can communicate face to face should be created.[25]Emotional harassment and aggression in the workplace can result in costly problems such as disease, low morale, decreased productivity, high labor turnover, intensive work stress and low job performance. In this context, educating employees about emotional assault within their working environment is proposed as an important solution for them to protect themselves when they are subjected to harassment.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
