AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2694-0248/005
Ryder Trauma Center, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, USA.
*Corresponding Author: Enrique Ginzburg, Ryder Trauma Center, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.
Citation: H. Soe-Lin, A. Sarver, J. Kaufman, M. Sutherland, E. Ginzburg.(2020) Miami-Dade County Juvenile Weapons Offenders Program (Jwop): A Potential Model To Reduce Firearm Crime Recidivism Nation-Wide. Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Care. 2(1); DOI:10.31579/2694-0248/005
Copyright: ©2020 Enrique Ginzburg, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 11 February 2020 | Accepted: 12 June 2020 | Published: 18 June 2020
Keywords: miami-dade county juvenile weapons offenders program; recidivism
In 2016, the most recent year with national statistics, the annual number of people killed or injured by firearm in the United States was 133,853. While much has been said in the developing world about the lost economic and developmental potential of youth in countries without basic health and educational infrastructure, in the United States homicide by firearm is the third leading cause of injury and death amongst youth aged 15-24, costing billions annually in combined medical and work loss costs. Factoring in suicide by firearm, gun related fatalities account for the number one cause of unintentional injury death in this age group.
In 2016, the most recent year with national statistics, the annual number of people killed or injured by firearm in the United States was 133,853 [1]. While much has been said in the developing world about the lost economic and developmental potential of youth in countries without basic health and educational infrastructure, in the United States homicide by firearm is the third leading cause of injury and death amongst youth aged 15-24, costing billions annually in combined medical and work loss costs [1]. Factoring in suicide by firearm, gun related fatalities account for the number one cause of unintentional injury death in this age group [1].
In an editorial statement earlier this year the AAST renewed its calls for the development of specific actions to stem the tide of escalating firearm violence [2]. Over the past two decades a bevy of community, school, and hospital-based programs have been developed and implemented with the aim of reducing youth firearm violence [3]. The Center for Disease Control as part of this movement named eight Comprehensive Centers as national Academic Centers of Excellence on Youth Violence and provided funding in support of their mission [4]. What has become clear from this and other efforts is that the scope of the problem, the multifactorial etiologies leading to firearm violence, and the multidisciplinary requirements of developing and measuring effective strategies to intervene on a highly complex problem have proven extremely challenging[5]. Yet despite broad efforts in developing community-specific and community-centered multidisciplinary intervention programs, it is clear from the annual statistics and disappointing individual program evaluations that much and urgent work remains to be done.
In Miami-Dade County, the Juvenile Weapons Offenders Program (JWOP) is a unique multidisciplinary educational program aimed at abrogating youth violence recidivism in juvenile weapons offenders. The program encompasses violence education, behavioral modification, and social mentoring, and has been based at Ryder Trauma Center/Jackson Memorial Hospital (RTC/JMH) for the past 18 years. The following study aims to measure and define its outcomes as one of the nation’s most effective reducers of youth firearm recidivism and a model for developing programs both state and nationwide.
Methods:
Description of the Program
The JWOP Program (originally known as the GATE program) was developed in 1999 as an educational/interventional performance-based program for non-violent juvenile weapons offenders between the ages of 13 and 17. It was developed in collaboration by a neurotrauma nurse at RTC in collaboration with the County State Attorney’s Office, supported by the Office of the Public Defender, and funded by the Miami Dade County Youth Crime Task Force.
Male adolescents convicted of non-violent weapons related offenses are referred from the Juvenile Justice System by court-mandate and come to the program after school twice weekly. The program’s long-term goal is to keep youth out of the juvenile justice system, trauma centers, rehabilitation centers, and morgues. Graduates are required to complete a total of 100 hours comprising approximately 46 classes, with a doubling of class time as a deterrent for delinquent class absences. In total it takes most graduates approximately 6 months to complete the requisite requirements.
The program is divided thematically into three segments. The first third of the program focuses on developing awareness on the traumatic consequences of firearms injury. Experiential classes include site visits to the Trauma Resuscitation Unit and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, rehabilitation center, and nursing home. Participants witness what happens to families when a child dies violently, with visits to the medical examiner’s department as well as a local funeral home. They plan their own funeral and write their own eulogy. Program participants meet victims and families of firearm injuries who have agreed to participate. Participants are also educated on the consequences a criminal record has on education, employment, travel, and even voting. The middle third of the program focuses on personal experiential awareness. Unhealthy behaviors and risk factors are addressed in all aspects of interpersonal violence, substance abuse, and relationships. Classes in this segment cover risk taking behaviors, drug and substance abuse, sexually transmitted diseases, rape, gender issues, domestic violence, gang involvement, bullying, power and control, and peer pressure. Clients visit a Rape Treatment Center and are put in stirrups to help them understand what happens if they are raped in jail or prison. They also meet adults who were sent to prison or jailed as adolescents. The third and final portion of the curriculum focuses on choices, decision-making skills, and attitudinal change. Skills-building segments encompass anger management, emotional and behavioral self-control strategies, conflict resolution skills, and personal responsibility and accountability. Participants acquire basic first aid and CPR skills, attend courses on Career Development and Resume Writing, and graduate with both a CPR certificate and a self-authored resume. Juveniles are required to prepare a written speech for their graduation, as well as complete any other sanctions assigned by the referring division including community service. Parents and more recently siblings participate in monthly family group sessions.
Graduates are encouraged to remain in contact with the program in a longitudinal fashion, and those interested are developed as Peer Mentors. A graduated 3-step peer mentor model affords ongoing skill development beyond program graduation. These Peer Mentors not only teach parts of the curriculum but are also heavily involved in community outreach education.
Evaluation of the Program
The program was independently evaluated via retrospective analysis of participants in the GATE/JWOP program over a 10-year period from 1999-2009. IRB approval was obtained through the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) institutional review board. By the inclusion criteria of the program the examined cohort consisted of males aged 13 to 17 at time of enrollment convicted of a non-violent firearm related offense. This cohort was followed prospectively for 6 and 12 months from time of graduation or last class, and records were cross referenced with the Florida Department of Justice criminal record system to quantify any individual re-arrested over this time period. Recidivism was defined as any re-arrest and stratified for both overall criminal charges as well as firearm specific criminal charges. This cohort was then stratified by those who completed the full 100 hour requirements of the program and successfully graduated, versus those who completed anything less and who were then deemed non-completers. Fisher’s exact test was used for comparing rates of recidivism amongst program completers versus non-completers.
Results:
A more contemporaneous interim analysis of the global accomplishments of the program revealed a total of over 600 clients who were enrolled with an overall 85% completion rate. 43% of graduates returned to engage with the program following successful completion of its curriculum, and 39 program graduates were eventually trained as peer mentors who lead subsequent group classes, 12 of whom continued in this role for a duration between two and fourteen years.
In terms of recidivism, 215 participants of the JWOP program were analyzed in the DJJ criminal record database for a new criminal offense within 6 months of program completion, and 163 youth were included for analysis of a new criminal offense within 12 months of program completion. In the 6-month cohort, 139 of 215 (64.6%) enrolled had completed the program with (35.3%) deemed non-completers. Results were near identical in the 12-month cohort, with 107 of 163 (65.6%) enrollees had completed the program with 56 clients (34.4%) deemed non-completers.
The 6-month recidivism rate for any criminal charge was 28/139 (20.1%) for program completers versus 25/76 (32.9%) for those who did not complete the program (p=0.047). When excluding unarmed criminal offenses, the recidivism rate dropped to 14/139 (10.1%) versus 17/76 (22.4%), respectively (p=0.008). At 12 months, recidivism for any class of offence was 36/107 (33.6%) for the program completion cohort vs 28/56 (50.0%) for the incomplete cohort (p=0.045). When excluding unarmed offences, the recidivism rates were 20/107 (18.6%) vs 19/56 (33.9%) respectively (p=0.035).
Discussion:
In 2018, if you live in the United States of America, it takes neither a physician, surgeon, statistician, nor epidemiologist to know that firearm related violence is a major problem for individual health and public safety. Over the past twenty years multiple calls for action at the national, state, and community levels have occurred including backing from major institutions such as the CDC [6], the AAST [2], and the OJJDP [7]. On the basis of these and other efforts, hundreds of publications and programs have attempted to either analyze or address the problem of firearm violence, and more specifically firearm related violence in youth populations [3].
The choice to select youth populations as a target demographic for our intervention is based both on the statistical prevalence of violence among this age group, the ethical intolerability of seeing victims of violent crimes incurred at such a would-be innocent age, and the considerable sociological evidence that this age group represents a higher risk for violent action due to developmental predilections toward increased impulsivity and incompletely developed sense of self risk [8].
Firearm related deaths represent the number one cause of unintentional injury death in this population. As our knowledge of the underlying risk factors driving firearm related violent behavior grow in sophistication and breadth, a model has emerged that is not dissimilar to those of any number of high prevalence diseases affecting older adults such as cancer. Risk factors related to socioeconomics, geographics [9], peer groups, family dynamics, school infrastructure, and the aforementioned developmental factors can all result in the same phenotype of violence [5]. Mitigation of one set of risk factors does not guarantee prevention of violence given myriad alternate routes to arrive at the same set of behaviors.
The lack of statistically demonstrable efficacy in many other youth violence prevention programs is therefore likely attributable to an inability of programs, either due to design restriction or funding limitations, to fully address a sufficient quantity of the myriad risk factors leading to this phenotype of violence to make a statistically measurable impact. A family dynamic intervention may not save a youth from the peer pressures of gang violence even with an intact support structure at home [5] whereas the school based intervention abrogating gang behavior may not provide sufficient rehabilitation of a broken family dynamic and absence of appropriate role modeling. These examples are admittedly broad as the correlating interactions between risk factors and violence are subject to the vicissitudes of human behavior. But fundamentally, gun violence in America is a problem of societally and socioeconomically driven human behavior and even fully funded programs with major academic-community collaborations tasked with this Herculean task of behavioral modification have struggled to produce meaningful results.
The JWOP program is uniquely positioned for several reasons. It is one of the oldest active programs in the country targeting youth violence prevention. Its existence spanned periods of sociodemographic decay and rebuilding in the Miami-Dade community, swings in gang violence and cocaine fueled drug wars that contextualize the 10-year efficacy of our currently reported retrospective results.
Recidivism – a metric commonly used in the evaluation of interventional programs for juvenile offenders – is defined most basically as the repetition of a criminal behavior. However, a recidivism rate could reflect a variety of measures of repeat offence or even recalcitrant attitudes (self-report, arrest, court referral, conviction, etc.) within a given period of time. The Center for Violence Prevention provides a comprehensive compendium on data collection for use in program evaluation via self-reported questionnaires [10]. This program previous to this publication, as well as other programs have collected or reported self-reported questionnaire data as a marker for program efficacy, with important results but also obvious limitations.
In the current study we instead chose re-arrest data as a primary endpoint of recidivism due to its objective superiority over self-reported data previously collected at this and other intervention programs. While this endpoint does not differentiate between conviction and arrest, a documented goal of the JWOP program is to prevent youth from re-interfacing in any fashion with the DJJ system, and thus this broad definition of recidivism captures a stricter marker of success for those youths successfully completing the program.
Recidivism also requires a chosen time period for repeat offence, and here we followed the fates of program participants over a 6 and 12 month span with robust results when confined to this time period. The lack of a longer follow-up period for this retrospective cohort is an admitted limitation for objectively defining the long-term efficacy of the program. This timeframe was chosen in part due to the limitations of the DJJ arrest database, which tracks arrest data in juveniles only. As the database does not follow adult (age 18 and greater) arrests, and the program clients were aged 13 to 17 at the time of their enrollment in the program, a longer follow-up period would represent a major confounder of not tracking arrests of those juveniles who crossed into adulthood at the time of re-arrest.
A follow-up analysis cross-referenced to an adult re-arrest database may be required to better define longer-term efficacy. However this analysis would require use of a national arrest database to capture those adults who subsequently move to other states. In addition the effect size of the program as adults get farther out from program completion may also be more difficult to measure statistically. As many psychosocial and developmental studies have defined particular risk for violent behavior in youths due to developmental factors influencing impulsivity [8], so to have these risks been defined as becoming smaller as individuals mature into young adults. This is reflected in decreasing incidents of intentional firearm violence in adult cohorts of increasing age [1]. We therefore consider the short-term efficacy defined here as a critical finding of effective intervention during a developmentally high risk period in these individuals’ lives. The long-term efficacy of the program is defined more subjectively by the high completion rate of the program over its 18-year lifespan as well as the number of graduates who remain in contact with the program and who participate as peer instructors, some of whom have remained with the program for over a decade after graduation.
Why is the JWOP program arguably more effective in preventing recidivism than myriad other well supported and structured programs? As compared to more traditional “boot-camp” or “scared straight” programs, our method of rehabilitation and delivery of educational content is focused on skill development, decision-making and introspection. Program directors, peer mentors and instructors tailor the classes to each group of clients in order to understand their backgrounds and teach in a way that reflects this culture. The program adapts to the needs of the boys which changes from week to week and individual to individual. A meta-analysis of juvenile rehabilitative programs noted that there was no significant correlation between the level of supervision/surveillance and reduced recidivism [11]. In fact, there was a negative association between increased discipline and recidivism, a finding which further supports the less structured and more individualized model of the classes within the JWOP curriculum.
In summary, we demonstrate a unique multidisciplinary intervention which over a 10-year period has shown an objective statistically significant decrease in arrest recidivism in particular for firearm or violence related charges. This program could potentially serve as a model for expansion in other communities in the ongoing effort to abrogate violent injury and death by firearm in this country.
Authorship Contributions:
H. Soe-Lin – Manuscript drafting, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation
A. Sarver – Manuscript editing, background, data acquisition
J. Kaufman – Manuscript editing, data analysis
M. Sutherland – Program founder, background, manuscript editing, interpretation
E. Ginzburg – Corresponding author, study design, manuscript editing, interpretation
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
