AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1897/049
1Division of General and Emergency Surgery, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood (Chair of General Surgery: Ph. Cucinotta E) University Hospital "G. Martino". University of Messina. Messina. ITALY.
2Division for Endocrine and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood, University Hospital G. Martino, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
*Corresponding Author: Ettore Gagliano, Division of General and Emergency Surgery, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood (Chair of General Surgery: Ph. Cucinotta E) University Hospital
Citation: Gagliano E, Querci A, Paparo D, Pontin A, Caruso E, Damiano C, Pino A, Dionigi G.(2021) Mediastinal goitre operated as transclavicular access as adjunct to cervical incision. J, Surg Case Repo and Imag 4(4); DOI: 10.31579/2690-1897/049
Copyright: © 2021, Ettore Gagliano, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 17 December 2020 | Accepted: 15 January 2021 | Published: 21 May 2021
Keywords: cervico-mediastinal goitre, transclavicular access, cervicotomy
There are cases in which resection of cervico-mediastinal goitres requires additional thoracic access as an adjunct to standard transverse cervicotomy, and typically this takes the form of sternotomy or thoracotomy. The authors propose transclavicular access as an alternative to thoracotomy or sternotomy access for the removal of such goitres. This technical variant is performed by means of resection of the middle third of the clavicle and extraperiosteal disarticulation. They report a case of cervico mediastinal or “plunged” goitre associated with mediastinal metastasis from a follicular thyroid carcinoma in a 77-year-old woman, in whom this technical variant was used. They conclude by stressing the greater effectiveness, ease of execution and relatively limited “aggressiveness” of the technique in comparison with other ways of reaching the mediastinum. The variant proves effective in solving a number of technical, functional and aesthetic problems.
There are cases in which resection of cervical mediastinal goiters cannot be carried out by a standard incision [1], but requires additional thoracic access, sternotomy, or thoracotomy [2], for total removal.
This can happen above all in the case of large, substernal goiters [2, 3] – so-called “plunged” goiters – whose dimensions impede resection by cervical incision alone and also for other masses, such as benign neoplasm, which give rise to the same technical problems because they develop in the vicinity of and below the thoracic inlet, provided there is no thoracic blood supply [4].
When removing such cervico mediastinal masses whose blood supply is only or prevalently cervical, the difficulties are primarily technical owing to the fact it is impossible to overcome the limitations imposed by the inflexible bony constraints of the upper thoracic inlet, but may also be vascular. Though the cardiotomy step is unavoidable before mobilization by another method and, in general, is enough to control hemostasis, there exists an alternative to sternotomy and thoracotomy, as an adjunct to cervicotomy, consisting in transclavicular access [5, 6].
Even if it is rarely practiced, it is extremely effective and helpful for the surgeon, both for goiters that cannot be removed in other ways, and for other cervico mediastinal masses with cervical blood supply, as in the case described here below, where the two pathologies co-exist and where this technical variant was used only to remove the second mass [7] which, later, turned out to be a microfollicular thyroid carcinoma.
Case report
The case involves a 77-year-old woman referred to our Department with a relapsing multinodular goiter. The patient underwent a right lobectomy in 1980 for multinodular goiter and a radical right mastectomy in 1998 for invasive ductal carcinoma. She had been suffering from a left anterior cervical mass since 1990, which had progressively increased in volume and was accompanied by clinostatic dyspnoea, desultory at rest, and dysphagia.
Thyroid scintigraphy showed a marked increase in the volume of the left lobe in a subgiugular site in the anterior superior mediastinum, and an extensively irregular intraparenchymal uptake of the radiolabeled drug, with several hypo functioning areas, the largest of which were located in sub jugular and left para-isthmic sites.
Needle biopsy suggested a “multinodular hyperplastic goiter”. During the patient’s stay in the hospital, further ultrasonography showed, in addition to the cervical goiter, a solid nodular, hypoechogenic mass located in a left retrosternal site, measuring approx. 57 mm in diameter, which did not seem to be continuous with the thyroid: a color Doppler assessment revealed a vascular pole from which the central vascularisation departed.
This growth could not be univocally interpreted, even though, at first, it seemed to be consistent with a non –uptaking thyroid nodule or adenomegaly.
Neck-mediastinum CT scan (Fig 1) revealed that the mass was strongly impregnated after the introduction of the contrast medium, located in the anterior superior mediastinum with tracheal compression and situated in a posterior contralateral site.
Furthermore, chest X-rays showed an osteolysis area at the level of the anterior arch of the right 7th rib, which presented as a “pathological hyperenhancement focus” at W.B. Tc99-mMDP bone scintigraphy and was accompanied by diffuse hyperenhancement which persisted in the area of the dorsal-lumbar spinal tract (vertebral bodies D7-D8-L4-L5) and which had already been detected one-year earlier by scintigraphy and targeted X-rays and interpreted as a metastasis from breast cancer.
Also, indirect laryngoscopy showed a hemiparesis of the right vocal cords, which were fixed in the paramedian position, but with sufficient space for breathing.
Oesophagography showed modest dislocation of the esophagus to the right.
Thyroid hormone and blood-chemistry values and ultrasonography findings were normal.
After removal of the previous surgical scar, the surgical access consisted of a standard transverse cervicotomy (Knocker's incision). The left anterolateral incision of the neck was occupied by a voluminous goiter extending from the thyroid left lobe and isthmus and encompassing most of the mediastinum. On the right, where the previous operation had been carried out, thyroid material was absent but an inextricable sclero cicatricial process was present, with diffuse involvement of the vasculo nervous bundle.
Figure 2: The resected left middle third of the clavicle.
An extracapsular left lobectomy was then carried out. Later, in the left anterior superior mediastinum and a prevascular site, we found a voluminous encapsulated, clearly delimited, oval-shaped mass which immediately proved to be extrathyroidal in origin and nature. It was impossible to remove the mass by standard finger dissection and lift-up through the thoracic inlet.
Because of the condition of the thoracic bones, with coastal metastasis contraindicating an additional transthoracic or trans-sternal access, we decided to carry out a left mid-clavicular resection and extraperiostal disarticulation [2]. On enlarging the thoracic inlet, the mass was located in the cervical region and easily removed [3]. Then, taking into account the right chordal paralysis as a result of the previous operation, we carried out a precautionary tracheo fissure and placed two Redon drains in the thyroid space and the mediastinum.
The postoperative histological examination confirmed the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid goiter and clarified the nature of the mediastinal mass, which proved to be a voluminous metastasis from follicular thyroid carcinoma. This explained the recent osteolytic focus, as an alternative to the earlier interpretation of metastasis from mammary carcinoma.
Thyroglobulin assay (859 ng/ml n.v. 50) provided further confirmation of this hypothesis
In our opinion, transclavicular access to the superior mediastinum as an adjunct to cervicotomy is a valid alternative to thoracotomy and sternotomy for the easy removal of transcervical mediastinitis goiters, as proved by the results achieved in this case.
This technical variant proves to be more effective than sternotomy or thoracotomy, since it is easy to perform and less “aggressive”, particularly for “plunged” goiters which cannot be removed by cervicotomy alone.
“Plunged” goiters are cervical goiters which, in 0.3 to 30% of cases, expand in a subjugular and retrosternal site because of the progressive increase in volume. They are firmly located, with the largest diameter, below the thoracic inlet in the anterior or posterior mediastinum, and account for 20% of masses located in that area [8-11]. However, these goiters maintain a cervical vascularisation in contrast to “ectopic” goiters, which have a mediastinitis blood supply, originating from embryonal thyroid residues in the mediastinum [8-12-14]. Consequently, in ectopic goiter, sternotomy or thoracotomy are and remain the only access routes currently practicable, as in the case of malignant pathologies, infiltrative processes, and posterior “plunged” goiters [10].
Transclavicular access proves capable of solving several problems – technical, functional, and aesthetic – achieving excellent results.
Technically, this access route allows us to overcome the problem of the “mechanical” incongruity between the size of the goiter and the diameter of the thoracic inlet, not only because it enlarges the inlet by breaking it at the clavicular level but particularly because it makes it “extendable” [4-5]. In other words, this access provides the surgeon with the necessary space to go on with blunt finger dissection of the distal part, which would otherwise be unreachable.
Moreover, this type of access allows light to penetrate the operative field and provides the surgeon with a visual check on hemostasis when problems arise that have not been foreseen (as, in our case, during removal of the mediastinal mass). At present, in most cases, hemostasis can be checked and is checked at cervicotomy, in that these are masses that are cervically vascularized.
On the contrary, sternotomy can be more complicated from a technical point of view [6-8] and, as regards the removal of mediastinal plunged goiters, it forces the surgeon to work behind structures such as the left brachiocephalic trunk, without being able to take advantage of the natural cleavage planes, such as that between the thyroid capsule and the mid-cervical aponeurosis, and of the natural protection the latter affords.
Lastly, it is obvious that sternotomy and particularly thoracotomy are more “invasive” than partial clavicular resection, and that they are often out of all proportion to the problem and a bad choice for elderly patients, where the operation is performed on a “senile” skeletal apparatus, even without having to deal with extreme cases of bone metastases, as found in our patient.
As regards the clavicular resection procedure adopted, we performed a periosteal dècollement and resection of the middle third of the clavicle (Fig 2), after disarticulating it from the sternum. Indeed, we agree with other authors [4-5] who believe that it is not important to resect a longer or smaller section but to break the sternoclavicular joint and not reposition the clavicular end on the sternal manubrium to prevent postoperative clavisternal osteochondritis from arising. We have no experience with clavicular repositioning using “myocutaneous flaps” [4].
Finally, the extraperitoneal route and mid-clavicular solution allowed us to spare the insertions of the sternocleidomastoid and greater pectoral muscles, which, lying on the periosteum, ensure the antagonistic action of the two muscle groups in the stabilization of the scapular cingulum.
At a postoperative check-up after four weeks, the patient was in no pain, the static status and mobility of her scapular cingulum were satisfactory, and no evidence of marked shoulder asymmetry was observed from the aesthetic point of view.
In our opinion, additional trans clavicular access is a real and indeed a preferential alternative to sternotomy and thoracotomy for the resection of “plunged” goiters that cannot be removed by cervicotomy alone. This opinion is based on our experience, which is admittedly limited to just a single case, but we are convinced that almost all mediastinitis goiters originating from the cervical area – including even the bulkiest ones – can be easily dislocated to the cervical area and then removed by cervicotomy.
This opinion is supported by several technical variants in solving the “mechanical” and “hemostatic” problems which tend to arise during the removal of cervicomediastinal masses with a cervical blood supply, the relative ease of execution, and the reduced “aggressive-ness” of the procedure compared to other ways of reaching the mediastinum which
may give rise to mechanical respiratory problems, particularly in the postoperative phase, in addition to technical difficulties.
This latter feature makes the technique more “proportional” to the goal and also more suitable for the elderly because it is less destructive, especially with a view to an in-hospital and post-discharge postoperative course characterised by rapid, complete functional recovery.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
