AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2643-6612/023
1 Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sirte University, Libya.
2 Department of Oral Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Sirte University, Libya.
*Corresponding Author: Abdalmawla Alhussin Ali. Department of Orthodontics; Faculty of Dentistry; Sirte University; Libya.
Citation: Abdalmawla Alhussin Ali, Karima Ali Belgasem. (2022). Maximum Mouth Opening among Libyan Population, J. Dentistry and Oral Maxillofacial Surgery. 5(1); DOI: 10.31579/2643-6612/023
Copyright: © 2022 Abdalmawla Alhussin Ali, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 28 September 2021 | Accepted: 24 December 2021 | Published: 01 January 2022
Keywords: gender; age; maximum mouth opening; sirte city
Restricted mouth opening may be associated with musculoskeletal disorder or due to orofacial infections and trauma, as well as chronic condition such as disorders of the temporomandibular joint and tumors.
Aim This study was aimed to measure the maximum mouth opening among the young healthy patients of Sirte city.
Methods A total of 100 participates, 42 males and 58 females, in the age range of 12-20 years attending the orthodontic clinic in Sirte city were studied. The Participates were asked to open their mouth maximally until no further opening was possible. The distance from the incisal edge of the upper incisor teeth to the incisal edge of the lower incisor teeth was measured using a digital calibrated. All data were analyzed using SPSS program and simple descriptive statistics of MMO with regard to gender and age were reported.
Results The mean maximal mouth opening for males was 49.35(4.5) mm and mean maximal mouth opening for females was 47. 11(4.7) mm. Mouth opening differences among different gender was compared which showed male had wider mouth opening but the difference was not statistically significant. Statistically significant differences were found between age groups.
Conclusions
The results of this study indicated that the positive relationship between MMO and age and the base line data was achieved in our study which needs to be validated further by conducting study in larger population.
Mouth opening is an everyday activity which plays a vital role for mastication and speech and it is a clinical parameter, which we encounter routinely in our daily practice. A known normal range of mouth opening is necessary to enable the clinician conduct a thorough oral examination conveniently. Maximum mouth opening (MMO) has been defined as “the greatest distance between two central incisors (maxillary and mandibular) at the midline when measured from their incisal edges during the possible wildest opening of the mouth” [1]. A reduced mouth opening capacity may be one of the first clinical signs of pathological changes and traumatic conditions in the masticatory system [2].
Limitation of mouth opening is associated with a number of clinical conditions ,such as dental infections, advanced stage of malignancies, fractures and myopathies in the head and neck region, TMJ dysfunction syndrome and many other reasons may contribute to the cause of reduced mouth opening [2] . Reduction in mouth opening may cause masticatory and social problems, it can also be an obstacle in the dentist's office [3].
As an important step, before diagnosing that a person is suffering from limited mouth opening, it is necessary to acknowledge normal opening of the population [4, 5]. Previous studies [6-10] examined the possible relationships between MMO and gender, age, weight, height or facial types. These studies investigated MMO among different populations; the variation in the range of MMO was reported. Further, most of these studies revealed that the females have a decreased mouth opening compared to males and the mouth opening increases with age until adulthood.
Clinical measurement of normal range of MMO is an important diagnostic tool for evaluation of stomatognathic system, especially in those who have suspected temporomandibular dysfunctions and neurogenic dysfunctions. Early recognition of decreased or limited mouth opening is necessary for a prompt and efficient approach to diagnosis and to plan out the treatment options judiciously. [4] We planned this study to measure the maximum mouth opening among the young patients in Sirte, Libya, because we do not have baseline data related to young patients as well as the importance of this subject derived us to this study.
A cross-sectional study, a total of 100 healthy participants (42 males and 58 females) aged 12-20 years with a (mean 15.8 ± 1.8 years) were randomly selected and examined. Participants having fully erupted maxillary and mandibular central incisors and able to understand and cooperate with the investigators were included in the study while the patients with missing maxillary or mandibular incisors, history of bruxism , attrition incisors or fractured crowned, participants with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders were excluded from the study. Verbal consent was obtained from both parents and patients before initiating the study. The participants were informed that no incentives would be provided for participation in the study and that their personal data would not be disclosed. A preform containing the socio-demographic (age, gender) information of the participants was filled (Table1).
Record Analysis:
The examination and measurements were performed while the subjects were seated comfortably in the dental chair in an upright position. Maximum opening, right-left excursion, protrusive movement were determined with electronic digital caliper by only one operator who was previously calibrated to do these procedures of same manner (Figure 1).
MMO was recorded by asked each subject to open his or her mouth as wide as possible while the examiner measured the maximum distance from the incisal edge of the maxillary central incisors to the incisal edge of the mandibular central incisors at the midline incisor during maximal mouth opening up to the painless limit (Figure 2).
Statistical Analysis:
Statistical analysis was conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Version 16.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), mean and standard deviations were determined. Simple descriptive statistics of MMO with regard to gender and age groups were reported independent “t” test one-way ANOVA. P < 0>
Among the participants, 42 (42.0%) were male while 58 (58.0%) were female. Among the participants, 27 (27.0%) were 12-14 years, 59 (59.0%) fall under 15-17 years and 14 (14.0%) fall under 18-20 years old group. The mean maximum mouth opening seen was 49.35(4.5) mm 47.11(4.7) mm in male and female respectively. Mouth opening differences among different gender were compared which showed male had wider mouth opening but the difference was not significant P- value = 0.019. Descriptive statistics of the subjects are shown in (Table 2) and (Figure 3).
Regarding the age of participates, the mean maximum mouth opening in 12 to 14 years age group was 45.10 mm, 15 to 17 years age group was 47.37 mm, and 18 to 20 years age group was 51.60 mm is illustrated in (Table 3, Figure 4). There was significant difference in the mouth opening of different age groups.
Mouth opening is the marker for a number of pathological entities affecting the masticatory system. Patients with dental infection, temporomandibular joint diseases, craniofacial syndromes, maxillofacial trauma, oral malignancies and those who have been treated for these conditions often have complaint of restricted mouth opening. Limited mouth opening makes it difficult to perform various dental treatment procedures. It may also cause discomfort to patients undergoing prolonged dental treatment.
MMO has been measured either as inter-incisal distance [7, 11, 12] or as inter-incisal distance plus overbite[3] There are various methods to measures MMO Further, MMO has been determined either by using a ruler/caliper [7, 13] or by using the width of three/four fingers [10, 14] Wood et al. [1] Compared different measurement types and suggested that direct measurements using a ruler or caliper were more accurate and precise . Some studies [11, 15], performed MMO measurement more than once and recorded the highest value while other studies [12, 13] performed it once. In contrast, Yao et al. [11] displayed that the first measurement of MMO was generally the greatest among the three measurements taken for each subject, and this is due to decreasing muscle power with succeeding measurements. Hence, MMO was measured in the present study with an electronic digital caliper between the incisal edge of the maxillary central incisors and the incisal edge of the mandibular central incisors (inter-incisal distance) during MMO, and the first measurement of MMO was recorded.
In this study, all subjects were placed in a vertical position for measuring in order to eliminate the possible influence of different head positions, because the most important factor in measuring MMO is the head position. Higbie et al. [16] described short-term alterations in head position have a significant effect on the amount of MMO in a normal population.
Studies have reported that gender and age were significant factors associated with the MMO. The present study showed that the means of maximum mouth opening seen in male is 49.35(4.5) mm and in female is 47.11(4.7) mm which indicated it is not much difference among the gender. There was no statistically significant difference of MMO according to gender .These findings were like to the results of other studies [5, 9], assessed the MMO among different populations. Only few researches performed on maximum mouth opening have shown differences between male and females in their studies [17, 18]. These variations could be due to the differences in sample size, conducted methodology, age, or could be explained by the existence of differences in anatomic characteristics of these populations.
Previous studies [2, 11, 14, 19] documented a gradual increase in MMO with age, Müller et al. [19] pointed out that the increase of MMO with age in children and adolescents is partly explained by mandibular growth and sexual maturity. This may explain the results of the present study, which show that the means MMO at the age of 12-14 years, 15-17 years, and 18-20 years were 45.10 mm, 47.37 mm, and 52.60 mm, respectively. However, we observe there was a significant increase in MMO with age, regardless of gender. This is in agreement with the findings of previous studies [2, 11] conducted in young population.
It is important to establish normal MMO for each specific population in order to be able to make a diagnosis of reduced mouth opening. Therefore, the results of the present study will be of a useful guide for diagnosis of numerous diseases related to the function of the masticatory system affecting mouth opening.
Despite the response rate in the present study, there were some potential limitations that should be taken in consideration. The limitation of the study is the sampling technique as we are using convenience sampling method here and the sample was restricted to those coming into the our private clinic. So the sample size was small and that’s why we cannot generalize the results. Therefore, population-based studies are needed to assess, in greater detail. Nevertheless, despite these limitations, this study provides valuable baseline information on the MMO among young population in Sirte, Libya.
The maximum mouth opening in males were slightly large than females, also the MMO, increased significantly with age The base line data was achieved in our study which needs to be validated further by conducting study in larger population.
We would like to express our gratitude to all individuals, who agreed to participate in the study.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
