Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2768-2757/019
*Corresponding Author: Manouc Manoucheher Aghajanzadeh, Inflammatory Lung Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Citation: H G Vinay, Ramesh G Reddy, Shwetha R Chandra, M Mary. (2021). Masson’s tumor of the neck: A rare case report. Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research. 2(4); DOI: 10.31579/2768-2757/019
Copyright: ©2021 H G Vinay, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 22 June 2021 | Accepted: 29 July 2021 | Published: 06 August 2021
Keywords: masson’s tumor; endothelial cells; trauma; haemangioma
Masson’s tumor is a rare, benign, vascular lesion, commonly affecting the head, neck and peripheries. It is usually asymptomatic and can be confused with malignant tumors. We report a 56-year-old male who presented with a solitary swelling in the right side of neck which was clinically diagnosed as a benign cystic lesion, hence complete excision of the lesion was done. Histopathology demonstrated the papillary proliferation of endothelial cells, in favour of Masson’s tumor.
Masson’s tumor also known as intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia [1] was is a rare benign tumor constitutes 2% of all soft tissue tumors [2]. It is an benign, vascular lesion characterised by papillary fronds lined by proliferating endothelium. Clinically it mimicks other vascular lesions such as pyogenic granuloma, haemangioma and angiosarcoma and hence diagnosis by clinical examination alone is difficult. Pathogenesis is thought to be as a response to blood vessel injury or vessel wall thrombosis [3,4]. Prognosis is excellent if complete excision is done, but may recur if incompletely excised.
A 56 year old man presented with a swelling on the right side of neck of 6 months duration. Clinically asymptomatic with no significant medical past history. It was 3 X 4 cm in size, firm, non-tender and not fixed to any underlying structure. Clinical diagnosis of benign cystic lesion was done. In view of its location, adjacent to major vascular structure a MRI scan was done. It was reported as a well-defined hyper-intense lesion with hypo intense rim showing diffusion restriction, which was restricted to the subcutaneous plane [Fig. 1 & 2]. With the working diagnosis of benign lesion, complete excision of the lesion was done under local anesthesia, with no local complications. On gross examination, well capsulated cystic lesion with internal septations containing dark brown fluid. Microscopic examination showed thick wall with fibro-collagenous tissue, anastomosing vascular channels, plump endothelial cells with central thrombi [Fig. 3 & 4]. No evidence of mitosis or necrosis was noted. Post-operative surgical outcome was uneventful.

Intravascular papillary endothelium hyperplasia was first described by Pierre Masson and called “Hemangio endotheliomegetant” [5]. Later Clerkin and Enzinger coined the term IPEH in 1976[1]. Masson’s tumor accounts for 2-4 % of benign and malignant vascular tumor of the skin and soft tissue. It involves mainly the lower extremities (77%), skin and subcutis of the head and neck(23%), and fingers(16%) [6]. Clinically, IPEH appears as small, firm, superficial nodules, with red to blue discolouration of the overlying skin or mucous membrane and are asymptomatic. The exact pathogenesis of IPEH is unclear, but trauma has been postulated as one of the predisposing factor. The release of Beta-fibroblast growth factor from macrophages attracted to the site may trigger endothelial cell proliferation inturn induces the release of more fibroblast growth factors, leading to a vicious cycle [7]. Because the clinical signs and symptoms are non-specific and variable, preoperative diagnosis is challenging. The patients history of trauma, clinical examination and imaging, MRI scan can help differentiating IPEH from other malignant lesions.
Histologically the following findings are confirmative of Masson’s tumor:
The papillary projections result from endothelialisation of fragmented thrombotic material and the ingrowth of anastomosing capillaries. IPEH must be distinguished mainly from angiosarcoma which is clinically identical [8]. The treatment is complete surgical excision, prognosis is excellent unless excised completely, or recurrence can occur. It is a locally growing tumor with no metastatic lesions reported [9].
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,