AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/173
1 Department of Midwifery, College of Health sciences, Assosa University, Assosa, Ethiopia.
2 Jinka University, College of Health sciences, Department of Nursing, Jinka, Ethiopia.
3 Hailu Alemu college, Gojjam, Ethiopia.
*Corresponding Author: Ambaye Minayehu, Department of Midwifery, College of Health sciences, Assosa University, Assosa, Ethiopia.
Citation: Ambaye M. Zegeye, Bewket B. Tesfaw, Demeke A. Alemu, (2023), Magnitude of Immediate Adverse Newborn Outcome Between Cesarean Section Versus Vaginal Delivery and Its Associated Factors at East Gojjam Zone General and Referral Hospitals, Amhara, Ethiopia, J. Women Health Care and Issues. 6(6); DOI:10.31579/2642-9756/173
Copyright: © 2023, Ambaye Minayehu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 23 October 2023 | Accepted: 31 October 2023 | Published: 07 November 2023
Keywords: benign breast diseases; malignant breast diseases; mastalgia
Background: During the neonatal period, the most susceptible phase of life is the first 24 hours, in which immediate adverse newborn outcomes occurred. Generally, 50% of the global neonatal mortality and morbidity occurs during the first 24 hours after birth. Even though most of the causes are preventable, one million newborns died or become morbid on their first day.
Methods: Institutional-based comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among 613 participants. A systematic sampling method and census were used to select newborns from vaginally and cesarean section delivered newborns respectively. Pretested structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. The logistic regression model was used using an adjusted odds ratio with 95% Cl and P-value <0.05.
Results: Immediate adverse newborn birth outcome appeared more in C/S than in vaginally delivered group. 28.8 %( 95% CI; 23.8%, 33.8%) vs 21.8% (95% CI; 17.2%, 26.4%) (C2=3.90, p-value =0.048) respectively. Presence of meconium (AOR=12.57; 95% CI :(7.6-20.81), p-value=0.00*), Women who had no ANC (AOR=3.79; 95% CI :(1.57-9.15), p-value=0.003), Monthly household income <4654 Ethiopia birr (AOR =1.79; 95% CI: (1.05-3.08), p-value=0.033) and Low birth weight (AOR =10.0; 95% CI: (5.58-18.3), p-value=0.000*) were significantly associated with adverse immediate newborn birth outcomes.
Conclusion: Adverse birth outcomes appeared more in C/S than in a comparable group. Presences of meconium, women who had no ANC follow-up, Monthly household income <4654 Ethiopia birr, and low birth weight <2500gm were significantly associated with the adverse immediate newborn birth outcomes.
Globally, 2.4 million children morbid or die in the first month of life in 2019, with approximately 6,700 neonatal deaths every day; among them, a third of all neonatal deaths occurred within the first day after birth and the neonatal mortality rate decreased by only 37% (from 33 deaths per 1 000 live births to 21 deaths per 1 000 live births) represented 44% of the total child mortality (1).
Newborn adverse outcomes related to the mode of delivery are defined as newborns having at least one parameter among the following; death in the hospital, birth trauma, absences of primitive reflex, birth asphyxia, or admission to neonatal intensive care unit that causes an impact on newborns, parents, and the countries. In Ethiopia, the immediate newborn adverse birth outcomes in the cesarean section were 22% (2).
Cesarean delivery is a marker of obstetric services, but maternal clinical associated factors and fetal conditions lead to a risk of post-delivery morbidity and mortality (2-4). In Ethiopia, neonatal mortality has contributed significantly to the under-five mortality rate. Even though, discrepancies existed among regions the estimated neonatal deaths per 1000 live births are 20 according to EDHS 2016 (9). The rate of cesarean section in Latin America and the Caribbean shows 29.2%. However, Africa shows the lowest one, which is 3.5%. In developed countries, the proportion of cesarean is 21.1% and in the least developed countries, only 2% of deliveries are performed through C/S. Even though the operational delivery rate increases globally and saves the mother and the newborn, in 2015, WHO stated that “cesarean section rates higher than 10% are not associated with reductions in maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality; which is a strong inverse association between its rate and neonatal morbidity and mortality level (5-7).
Most of the newborns are morbid and died in the first 24 hours and the first week after birth, which accounts for 75% and 50% respectively(8). Hence, among the different neonatal age groups, special attention is needed for those newborns that are less than one week old, particularly at the time of birth and on the first day of life.
In Ethiopia, the estimated neonatal deaths were 20 per 1000 live births. This is similar to the global rate of neonatal deaths according to Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey 2016 reports. Even though several health programs targeted to the optimal reduction of the neonatal adverse birth outcome, neonatal morbidity and mortality were still high (9). The neonatal phase, especially the immediate one, is the most vulnerable time for adverse outcomes. Changes in early neonatal mortality and morbidity were less evident in Ethiopia.
Factors contributing of immediate adverse newborn outcomes are presences of meconium, had no ANC follow-up, Low fetal weight, monthly household income <5200>=35 years in cesarean section group but there is no study on vaginally delivered newborn adverse birth outcome associated factors (2).
In Ethiopia according to the study conducted at Harer newborn mortality in C/S was 11.1%, which is high in magnitude. Even though cesarean sections minimize neonatal death, it is still high in newborn adverse birth outcomes, which account for 22%, in cesarean mode and in vaginal delivery mode, the overall adverse birth outcome is unknown (2, 10).
The magnitude of newborn immediate adverse outcomes like; low birth weight, prematurity, congenital anomalies, and others are well researched in different parts of Ethiopia. However, the magnitude of adverse immediate newborn outcomes related to the modes of delivery with their associated factors not addressed. Cesarean section rate without improving newborn outcomes will increase the delivery services resources which the country would be unable to handle(11). Therefore, this study will fill this gap by assessing the magnitude of the immediate adverse newborn outcome and its associated factors.
The study conducted in East Gojjam zone Comprehensive specialized and General Hospital from April 1/2021 to April 30/2021. There is one Comprehensive Specialized Hospital and one General Hospital in the study zone. Debre markos Comprehensive Specialized Hospital and Motta General Hospital are the two hospitals in the study zone, which provide comprehensive obstetric care including NICU services.
Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized Hospital is found in East Gojjam zonal administrative city, which is 304.4 km far from Addis Ababa (the capital city of Ethiopia) and 254.2 km from Bahairdar (Administrative town of Amhara region), which is the only Specialized Hospital in East Gojjam Zone, serves the East Gojjam population and nearby Zone which is West Gojjam. Motta General Hospital found in the East Gojjam zone, located in Motta Wereda, which is 83 km far from Debre Markos and 119.3 km from Bahairdar (12, 13).
In the two East Gojjam Hospitals, on average around 5,011 (836 per months) mothers delivered vaginally, which includes spontaneous and instrumental assisted delivery, and 1849(308 per months) by cesarean section based on the six- months service delivery report in each hospital.
2.2. Study Design: - The institutional-based Comparative cross-sectional study design conducted
Source and Study Population. The source population of this study was all singleton newborns delivered through vaginal and cesarean section at >=28th weeks of Gestational age with in East Gojjam zone Referral and General Hospitals and the Study Population was The singleton newborn delivered through vaginal and cesarean section at >=28th weeks of Gestational age with in Debre markos Compressive Specialized and Motta General Hospital, from 1/04/2021 to 30/04/2021.
2.3. Sample size determination
Stata SE (64-bit) version 14 and Epi Info used to calculate the number of study participants included in the study. A study conducted at Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, which was related to my study, used to determine the sample size for the first objective based on the first minutes Apgar score that is the only significant value shows a significant difference in the two modes of delivery.
For association factors, use the study conducted at Harer on the Magnitude and Determinants of Immediate Adverse Newborn Outcome among newborns delivered by Cesarean Section in Public Hospitals. Because Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized and Motta General Hospitals are the same extent in emergency and newborn care with other Referral and General Hospitals. The following assumptions used to calculate sample sizes for the first objective, two-sample means test of the first minutes Apgar score with their standard deviation (SD).
Power = 0.8000,
Mean1 for cesarean section = 6.83,
SD for cesarean section = 1.31
Mean 2 for vaginal delivery = 7.19,
SD for vaginal delivery =1.18 and
Mean differences = 0.36
The sample size calculation formula of Stata version 14 by using the mean of the two population, which is power two means, diff (d) SD(value) power (0.8) then enter (2, 14).The larger sample size calculated with 10% none response rate was 613 (307 for vaginally delivered group and 306 for C/S group) (Table 1).
*NRR- Non-Response Rate SD --- Standard Deviation
Table 1: Sample size determination to compare immediate newborn outcome between a cesarean section versus vaginal delivery and its associated factors based on the first minute Apgar score of the newborns in each modes of delivery
*NRR- Non-Response Rate
Table 2: Sample size determination of the second objective by using associated factors of adverse newborn birth outcome based on the significant factors
2.4. Sampling techniques
First estimating monthly average number of delivery services in East Gojjam zone General and Referral Hospital for the last six months, then dividing the sample size proportionally based on their monthly services. In Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized and Motta General Hospital, the six-months services delivery of C/S in average from registered data was 1849, monthly 308 and for vaginal delivery 5,011, monthly 835 the calculated value of k for c/s is one and for vaginal delivery is two, (N/n).
All delivered newborns through C/S included in the study unit based on the inclusion criteria and for vaginally delivered newborns, a systematic sampling technique used every kth value.
The first study unit for vaginally delivered newborn was selected from the last delivered mother’s newborn on the starting day of data collection, and then every second newborn included in the study unit. Fulfilling the inclusion criteria used to select the study unit from all vaginally and cesarean section delivered newborns (figure 1).
Key: -
MGH Motta General Hospital
DMCSH Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized Hospital
N1 6 months C/S delivery services
n 1 Sample taken from C/S delivery group
N2 6 months’ vaginal delivery services,
n2 Sample taken from vaginal delivery group
C/S Cesarean Section
VD Vaginal Delivery
Figure 1: - Flow chart that shows sampling technique in East Gojjam zone Referral and General Hospitals, allocation proportionally at DMCSH and Motta General Hospital in 2021.
2.5. Study variables
2.5.1. Dependent variable: Immediate Newborn adverse birth Outcome (Yes or No)
2.5.2 Independent variables
Maternal socio-demographic and economic characteristics: - Age, Residences, Educational status, marital status, Occupation, Body mass index (BMI) and Monthly average household income.
Obstetric related factors: - Premature rupture of membrane, Cord accident, Hypertensive diseases (pre-eclampsia eclampsia), Preterm labour, Ante partum hemorrhage
Antenatal care, Iron folate supplementation, fetal factors (birth weight, GA), Parity and Gravidity.
Maternal medical-related factors: - Renal disease, Cardiac disease, Anemia, Diabetes and Hypertension.
2.6. Operational definitions
Immediate adverse newborn birth outcome: when at least one of the neonatal parameter occurs: neonatal death from the hospital before NICU admission, birth trauma, primitive reflexes absent, birth asphyxia or admission to the intensive care unit after the procedure(2, 15, 16).
Favorable immediate newborn birth outcome: outcome of a newborn has no adverse birth outcome parameters in the time of delivery or delivery procedure(2).
Absent Primitive Neonatal reflex: After delivery when three or more neonatal primitive reflexes are absent among; Sucking, Babinski, Moro, and Grasp reflexes (2, 15, 16).
Respiratory Depression at Birth: at birth fast breathing (> 60 Breaths/Minuit) or low breathing (< 30>
Birth asphyxia: based on APGAR: score: 7-10 --- No birth asphyxias, <=6 Birth asphyxias (17).
2.7. Data collection methods and tools
Primary data and record review of the newborns outcomes and factors collected by structured questioner. Newborn delivered by C/S classified as a case and all vaginal deliveries as a comparable group. The case records of the two comparable groups and primary data were used. Pretested structured questionnaire prepared in English language, then translated to Amharic to collect some primary data from the mother and re-translate to English to keep the consistency of the questionnaire by language experts. Six data collectors (both BSc Degree midwives) and two supervisors (MSc) participated in the data collecting activities. All the data collectors and supervisors can speak and write in Amharic. In addition to this, the data collectors and supervisors are not as a staff in the hospital in which the data were collected.
2.8. Data quality control issues
The quality of the data was assured through 5% of the sample size pretest of the tools was done at Finote Selam General Hospital, proper training of the data collectors and supervisors for a one-day training in each Hospital and proper handling of the data. Moreover, during data collection period, supervisors were checked in the field how the data collectors done their task.
The principal investigator was checking the completeness of the questionnaires, but did not interfere with the data collection process. Besides this, the principal investigator carefully entered and cleaned the data before the commencement of the analysis done.
2.9.Data processing and analysis
Completeness and consistency of the data checked, cleaned by the principal investigator, and entered into Epi Data 3.1 and then exported to SPSS Version 25 for analysis. Descriptive statistics were generated with frequencies and proportions used to summarize categorical data and means were used for continuous variables. The chi-square test was used to compare immediate adverse newborn birth outcome in cesarean section and vaginal delivery mode. Bivariable and multi variable analysis were conducted. A p-value <0>=0.05) (0.765). Variables with a p-value of <0>
Ethical consideration
Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical review committee of Debra Markos university, college of health science. A permission letter granted from Debre Markos specialized Comprehensive Hospital, and Motta General Hospital. Confidentiality related to the information recorded in the datasheet and no need of recording the name or identification medical number of the study unit.
3.1. Socio-demographic and economic characteristics for the new born mothers
On average, ~38 women are giving birth daily in the two Hospitals. Among 306 cesarean sections delivered newborns and 307 vaginally, delivered newborns with their mothers were included in the study giving a response rate of 100%. The mean age (±SD) of mothers, were 27.28(±5.6) and 26.97(±4.78) years old for vaginally and cesarean section group respectively. In both groups’ majorities of the newborn’s mother were under the category of primary educational status. The majority of the newborn delivered vaginally were from married mothers it is also the same in the cesarean section group. One hundred eighty-three (59.6%) of vaginally delivered mothers were multi Para and 174(56.9%) in cesarean section group. The majority of the newborn mothers among the vaginally delivered groups had a monthly average household income <4655>).
Characteristics | VD (n=307)
| C/S (n=306)
|
Chi square test p-vale | |
| Frequency (%) | Frequency (%) | |||
| Maternal age | <=20 | 54(17.6) | 23(7.5) | 0.000* |
| 21-34 | 211 (68.7) | 249(81.4) | ||
| ≥35 | 42(13.7) | 34 (11.1) | ||
| Marital status | Marriage | 295(96.1) | 278(90.8) | 0.002 |
| Single | 4(1.3) | 15(4.9) | ||
| Divorced | 8(2.6) | 13(4.3) | ||
| Educational status | can't read and write | 38(12.4) | 52(37.13) | 0.005 |
| No formal education | 11(3.3) | 10(3.3) | ||
 education | 148(48.2) | 128(41.8) | ||
2 and preparatory | 30(9.8) | 20(6.5) | ||
| college | 80(26.10) | 96(31.4) | ||
| Occupational status | House wife | 192(62.5) | 159(52) | 0.002 |
| Daily laborer | 12(3.9) | 10(3.3) | ||
| Government employee | 66(21.50) | 89(29.1) | ||
| Merchant | 21(6.8) | 27(8.8) | ||
| Farmer | 5(1.6) | 11(3.6) | ||
| Other | 11(3.60) | 10(3.3) | ||
| Residence | Urban | 205 (66.5) | 177(57.8) | 0.284 |
| Rural | 102 (33.2) | 129(42.2) | ||
| Monthly house hold income | <4654Ethiopian> | 170(55.4%) | 206(67.3%) | 0.001 |
| >=4654Ethiopian birr | 137(44.6%) | 100(32.7%) | ||
| BMI | Normal BMI Abnormal BMI | 235(76.5%) 72(23.5%) | 238(77.8%) 68(22.2%) | 0.307 |
Table 3: Socio-demographic and Economic characteristics between vaginally vs C/S delivered mother, East Gojjam Referral and General hospitals, Amhara, Ethiopia, 2021 (n=613)
3.2. Medical related factors of immediate newborn adverse birth outcome in the two modes of delivery
Among the study participants of 307 newborns, mother delivered vaginally, around 13(4.2%) of them had a history of previous chronic medical disease. In a cesarean section group, 1.3% and 0.6% of them had previously and newly diagnose medical disease respectively. Among cesarean section and vaginally delivered mother 4.9% vs 2.9% of them had a positive HIV status respectively (table 4).
Table 4. Show the chronic medical disease factors for adverse birth outcome in the two modes of
Delivery, East Gojjam General and Referral hospitals, Amhara, Ethiopia, 2021.
| Characters | VD | C/S | Chi square test |
| Frequency (%) | Frequency (%) | p-value | |
| Chronic medical disease | Heart disease | 2(0.7) | 1(0.3) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 4(1.3) | 2(0.7) | |
| Hypertension | 2(0.7) | 0 | |
| Kidney disease | 3(1.0) | 2(0.7) | |
| Others | 2(0.7) | 0 | |
| Total | 13(4.2%) | 5(1.3%) | |
| HIV status | Positive | 15(4.9) | 9(2.9) |
| Negative | 292(95.1) | 297(97.1) | |
| Total | 307(100) | 306(100%) |
Table 5. Immediate newborn birth outcomes between cesarean section vs vaginal delivery groups at East Gojjam zone General and Referral Hospitals, Amhara, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021.
3.3. Magnitude of immediate newborn adverse birth outcome
In this study there were a significant difference in the magnitude of immediate newborn adverse birth outcome between cesarean section vs vaginal delivery group; 28.8 % (95% CI; 23.8%, 33.8%) vs 21.8% (95% CI; 17.2%, 26.4%) respectively (C2=3.90, p-value =0.048). The overall immediate adverse birth outcome in this study was 25.3 % (95% CI; 21.9%, 28.7%). In addition to that, there were significant differences between C/S vs vaginal delivery group in adverse birth outcome parameters; birth asphyxia 24.8% vs 17.3 % (C2=5.138, p-value =0.023), RDS 17% vs 10.7% (C2=4.881, p-value =0.027), NICU admission 22.5% vs 11.7% (C2=12.460, p-value =0.00*), absent primitive reflex 22.9% vs 12.7% (C2=9.914, p-value =0.002) respectively (table 5).
| Variables | V/D Frequency (%) | C/S Frequency (%) | Chi square p-value | ||
| Sex of the new born | Female | 170(55.4%) | 156(51%) | 0.506 | |
| Male | 137(44.6%) | 150(49%) | |||
| Newborn birth weight | <2500gm> | 38(12.4%) | 22(7.2) | 0.000* | |
| 2500-3999gm | 264(86.0%) | 259(84.6) | |||
| >=4000gm | 5(1.6%) | 25(8.2) | |||
| Immediate adverse newborn outcome | Yes No | 67(22.8%) 240(77.2%) | 88(28.8) 218(71.2) |
0.048 | |
| Absent primitive reflex | Yes No | 39(12.7%) 268(87.3%) | 70(22.9%) 236(77.1%) | 0.184 | |
| Birth asphyxia | Ye No | 53(17.3%) 254(82.7%) | 76(24.8%) 230(75.2%) | 0.023 | |
| RDS | Yes No | 33(10.7%) 274(89.3%) | 52(17%) 254(83%) | 0.027 | |
| NICU Admission | Yes No | 36(11.7%) 271(88.3%) | 69(22.5%) 237(77.5%) | 0.001 | |
| Newborn status | Died Alive | 10(3.26%) 297(96.74%) | 8(2.6%) 298(97.4%) | 0.637 | |
| Injury | Yes No | 14(4.6%) 293(95.4%) |
Table 5: Immediate newborn birth outcomes between cesarean section vs vaginal delivery groups at East Gojjam zone General and Referral Hospitals, Amhara, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021.
3.4. Immediate adverse birth outcome between the two groups
Among vaginally delivered newborn’s mother, the majority of them delivered through SVD, which accounts 77.9%, and 18.9% assisted by Instruments whereas in cesarean section group, 4.2 % of the mother delivered by emergency cesarean section (table 6).
| Mode of delivery | Frequency (%) | Immediate adverse birth outcome Yes No | Chi square test p-value | ||
| vaginal delivery | SVD | 236(77.9) | 67(22%) 240(78%) |
0.048 | |
| Assisted breach | 10(3.3%) | ||||
| Instrumental delivery | Forceps | 32(10.4%) | |||
| Vacuum | 26(8.5%) | ||||
| Total | 307(100%) | ||||
| C/S delivery | Emergency | 293(95.8%) | 88(28.8%) 218(71.2%) | ||
| Elective | 13(4.2%) | ||||
| Total | 306(100%) | ||||
Table 6: Result of immediate adverse birth outcome between the two groups, East Gojjam Referral ad general hospitals, Amhara, Ethiopia, 2021.
3.5. Obstetric related factors of immediate newborn adverse birth outcome in the two modes of delivery
The birth weight recorded in the vaginal delivered newborn was raging through 1100 - 4,000 gm and in C/S groups, 1400 – 4600 gm. Majority of newborns had a weight between 2500-3999 gm which in both groups. Antenatal care at least one visit was 89.3% and 91.8%, respectively (See table 7).
Characteristics | VD | C/S | Chi square test | |
| Frequency (%) | Frequency (%) | p-value | ||
| Gravidity | Primi gravid | 117(38.1%) | 128(41.8) | 0.008 |
| 2-4 | 154(50.2) | 152(49.7) | ||
| >=5 | 33(10.7) | 26(8.5) | ||
| Total | 307(100) | 306(100%) | ||
| Parity | Para one | 122(39.7) | 130(42.5) | 0.001 |
| 2-4 | 154(50.2) | 155(50.7) | ||
| >=5 | 31(10.1) | 21(6.9) | ||
| Total | 307(100) | 306(100%) | ||
| parity category | Primi Para | 124(40.4) | 132(43.1) | 0.004 |
| Multi Para | 183(59.6) | 174(56.9) | ||
| ANC follow-up | Yes | 274(89.3) | 291(91.8) | 0.000* |
| No | 33(10.7) | 25(8.2) | ||
| Total | 307(100) | 306(100%) | ||
| previous obstetric problem | Yes | 48(44.0) | 85(27.8) | 0.817 |
| No | 135(15.6) | 90(29.4) | ||
| Total | 183(59.6) | 175(54.2%) | ||
| current obstetric problem | Yes | 76(24.8) | 89(29.1) | 0.005 |
| No | 231(75.2) | 217(70.9) | ||
| Total | 307(100) | 306(100%) | ||
| Is LNM known | Yes | 243 (79.2) | 258 (84.3) | 0.939 |
| No | 64 (20.8) | 48 (15.7) | ||
| Total | 307(100) | 306(100%) | ||
| Iron folate supplementations intake | Yes | 254(82.7) | 259(84.6) | 0.001 |
| No | 53(17.3) | 47(15.4) | ||
| Total | 307(100) | 306(100) | ||
| for how money months iron taken | <3months> | 165(53.7) | 187(61.1) | 0.004 |
| For 3 months | 89(29.0) | 72(23.5) | ||
| Total | 254(82.7) | 259(84.6) | ||
| hemoglobin | <11> | 6(1.95) | 20(5.6) | 0.013 |
| >=11 | 301(98.05) | 286(94.4) | ||
| Total | 307(100) | 306(100) | ||
| Gestational age | <37weeks> >=37weeks | 107(34.9) 200(65.1) | 68(22.2) 238(77.8) | 0.125 |
Table 1: Obstetric related factors of newborn adverse birth outcome in the two modes of delivery, East Gojjam Referral and General hospitals, Amhara, Ethiopia, 2021.
3.6. Associated factors for immediate newborn adverse birth outcome
The table below shows; bivariable and multi variable analyses were factors associated with immediate adverse newborn outcome. Marital status, Occupation, Educational status, ANC, Parity, Current Obs history, Iron folate, Maternal age, MHI, Hgb at admission, newborn weight, Meconium, Newborn gestational age was candidate for multi variable analyses by using p-value <0>
outcome, who had meconium in delivery process were 13 times greater compared to their counterpart (AOR=12.57; 95% CI: (7.599, 20.806), p=0.000*). The odds of immediate newborn adverse outcome 3.8 times greater among those newborn who delivered from mother had no ANC follow-up (AOR = 3.79; 95% CI: (1.572, 9.151), p=0.003). The odds of immediate newborn adverse birth outcome newborns delivered from mother’s who had monthly household income <4654 xss=removed p=0.033). xss=removed p=0.000*)> Single Divorced Married(ref) 11 7 137 8 14 436 4.374(1.725-11.099) 1.591(0.629-4.022) 1.246(0.261-5.952) 1.927(0.434-8.559) 0.782 0.388 Farmer Merchant Housewife Daily laborer Other Government employee(ref) 5 15 93 9 5 29 9 33 268 11 8 128 2.45(.765-7.863) 2.006(0.965-4.169) 1.532(0.960-2.443) 3.61(1.374-9.515) 2.759(0.845-9.048) 0.465(0.083-2.624) 0.988(0.378-2.579) 0.828(0.434-1.582) 1.704(0.407-7.143) 3.671(0.795-16.951) 0.386 0.980 0.564 0.466 0.096 can't read and write No formal education 2 Collage(ref) 20 7 84 13 32 72 11 193 37 144 1.25(0.668-2.338) 2.864(1.03-7.958) 1.959(1.235-3.105) 1.58(0.755-3.31) 0.443(0.082-2.379) 0.862(0.13-5.71) 0.636(0.14-2.887) 0.604(0.114-3.200) 0.342 0.878 0.558 0.553 No Yes(ref) 28 128 14 443 Multi Primi(ref) 76 80 281 176 Yes No(ref) 54 102 111 346 No Yes(ref) 37 119 57 400 <=20 years 21-34 years(ref) >=35 36 106 14 41 354 62 2.932(1.783-4.822) 0.754(0.406-1.401) 1.901(0.983-3.711) 0.627(0.293-1.346) 0.056 0.231 <4654Ebirr> >=4654Ebirr(ref) 123 33 244 213 <11gm> >=11gm/dl(ref) 12 144 14 443 <2500> 2500-3999(ref) >=4000 62 88 6 36 397 24 7.770(4.850-12.446) 1.128(0.448-2.841) 10.103(5.578-18.299) 0.705(0.218-2.282) 0.000* 0.560 Yes No(ref) 102 54 67 390 Preterm Term(ref) 52 104 123 334 Vaginal delivery(ref) Cesarean section 67 88 240 218 1.446(1.002-2.087) 1.021(0.566-1.842) 0.942 Variables Adverse birth outcome Odds Ratio (95% CI) Adjusted Odds Ratio(95% CI) p-value Yes No Marital status Occupation Educational status education and preparatoryANC 6.922(3.538-13.541) 3.793(1.572-9.151) 0.003 Parity 0.595(0.413-0.858) 0.914(0.517-1.618) 0.759 Current Obs hx 0.606(0.409-0.898) 1.221(0.724-2.061) 0.454 Iron folate 2.182(1.375-3.462) 0.967(0.462-2.027) 0.93 Maternal age MHI 3.254(2.125-4.982) 1.794(1.047-3.075) 0.033 Hgb at admission 2.637(1.192-5.833) 2.009(0.698-5.788) 0.196 Newborn weight Meconium 10.995(7.228-16.72) 12.574(7.599-20.806) 0.000* Newborn gestational age 1.346(0.909-1.991) 1.021(0.566-1.842) 0.945 Modes of delivery
Table 8: Associated factors for immediate newborn adverse birth outcome, East Gojjam Referral and General hospitals, Amhara, Ethiopia, 2021.
3.7. Comparison between cesarean section versus vaginal delivered immediate newborn adverse birth outcome
Compare the immediate adverse birth outcome between the two modes of delivery were conducted using a chi-square test. In addition; birth asphyxia, NICU admission, newborn reflex problem, RDS, Birth trauma and newborn death are major comparison outcome parameters between C/S and vaginally delivered newborns. The observed adverse birth outcome was more in C/S than in comparable groups 28.8% vs 22.8% (c2 =3.900, P=0.048).
There were significant differences in mean score at the first minute. Newborn delivered through C/S (mean =6.21, standard deviation =1.986) 95% CI (5.988-6.433), in the vaginal delivery group (mean =6.54, standard deviation =1.792, 95% CI (6.34-6.74), p=0.030). In addition, there was an observed mean score difference between the two groups at the fifth minute for C/S (mean 7.44, standard deviation =2.093), in the vaginal group (mean 7.87, standard deviation = 2.022) the results were statistically significant (P=0.01).
RDS were more in neonates delivered through the rout of C/S than that in comparable group (c2 =4.079, P=0.043). Similarly, among 152 newborns that had an adverse birth outcome at birth, 17.3% were NICU transferred. Among newborns transferred to the NICU for further management C/S delivered accounts 65.1%, which, had significantly associated (c2=12.460, p=0.01). Birth asphyxia also more in cesarean section 76 Vs 53 (c2=5.138, p=0.023). Regarding to birth trauma the only protective mode of delivery was a cesarean section
A healthy life start is central to the human life course, with birth holding the highest risk of death, disability, and leading to major effects (1). In Ethiopia, neonatal mortality and morbidity has contributed significantly to the under-five mortality and morbidity. Estimated neonatal deaths are 20 per 1000 live births. It shows a 62.9% reduction in 2016 Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey. Health programs targeted to the optimal reduction of neonatal mortality and morbidity rates and improving newborns health quality. Providing integrated maternal, newborn, health and clean and safe delivery services in health facilities prevents most of the new born immediate adverse birth outcome (9).
This institutional-based comparative cross-sectional study conducted at East Gojjam Comprehensive Specialized and General Hospital, tried to assess the magnitude of immediate newborn adverse birth outcome in the two modes of delivery and its associated factors. In this study, the magnitude of immediate newborn adverse birth outcome for newborn delivered through C/S vs vaginal were 28.8 %( 95% CI; 23.8%, 33.8%) vs 21.8% (95% CI; 17.2%, 26.4%) respectively. The overall immediate adverse birth outcomes in this study were 25.3 %( 95% CI; 21.9%, 28.7%). The overall immediate adverse birth outcomes in this study higher than the study conducted in harer (2, 14). The possible explanation for this might be due to the study design effects, sample size deference, in this study included vaginally delivered newborns immediate adverse birth outcome and most of the study units taken from comprehensive specialized hospital.
The magnitude of immediate adverse birth outcome showed statistically significant differences between cesarean section and vaginally delivered newborns. The observed mean score difference between the two groups at first and fifth minute is less in cesarean section group. The mean Apgar score at first minute lower than the study conducted at Bahairdar Felege Hiwot referral hospital retrospective comparative cross-sectional study (14). This may be due to the sources of data through observational and record review in this study may be the reason for the differences than that of record review only.
The observed Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Birth asphyxia, low Apgar score and newborns transfer rate were more in newborns delivered by C/S than vaginally in agreement with several studies (7, 14, 18-23). This is due to most decisions usually made after trial of vaginal delivery, fetal distress may occur giving rise to increased risk of persistent postpartum respiratory difficulty among newborns delivered through cesarean section.
Regarding to birth trauma the only protective mode of delivery in this study was cesarean section. Consistent to the study conducted in harer and Bahairdar (2, 14). This is the nature of cesarean section mode of delivery.
The presence of meconium was significantly associated with the immediate adverse newborn outcome. With meconium, thirteen times more likely to develop immediate newborn adverse birth outcome than clear amniotic fluid. These results consistent with the study conducted in harer and Jimma (2, 24). This could be related to the fact that meconium is an indicator of fetal Hypoxia, placental insufficiency, predisposes the fetus to aspiration and persistence breathing problem in the immediate neonatal period (2, 16).
Newborns whose mother who had no ANC follow-up four times more likely to develop immediate adverse birth outcome than who had ANC services. consistent with the study conducted in harer (2, 8). This similarity is due to ANC services is the same protocol for all Ethiopian health institution and improve newborn outcomes. This study showed that newborn delivered from women whose estimated household income less than 4654 Ethiopian birr were two times more likely to develop immediate adverse birth outcome than those had higher incomes. These results consistent with the study conducted in harer (2). This may be a higher restrain on financial freedom in the household that would hinder health priorities to pregnant women. This may include expenditure for nutrition and difficulty accessing health care in emergencies (25, 26). Thus, the expectation is that low income women are more prone to have delays in seeking care (8).
Low birth weight was ten times more likely to develop immediate adverse birth outcome than newborns in normal birth weight. Many preterm newborns in this study sample had low birth weight and respiratory depression as well. The finding also agrees with other studies that found prematurity was significantly associated with an increased risk of NICU admission and neonatal mortality (2, 14, 27, 28).
Strength and Limitations of the study
This study tried to incorporate the magnitude of adverse birth outcomes among caesarian delivery versus vaginal delivery. The study does not show temporal relationship or causality between immediate newborn adverse birth outcome and significant factors; gestational age by ultrasound scanning at near term and fundal height measurement prone to measurement error and BMI does not show the nutritional status during pregnancy.
Newborn Adverse birth outcome significantly appeared more in C/S than in vaginal delivery group. Cesarean section delivery does not confirm the safety of newborn outcomes unless appropriately applied. Had no ANC follow-up, birth weight <2500gm>
For health workers: - Educate the mother about the advantage of ANC follow up in order to minimize adverse birth outcome and low birth weight.
Decision to perform C/S should have been based on clear, well-supported justifications and timely perform as indicated.
Give an attention during the labour process when there was meconium to minimize newborn adverse birth outcome.
For Researchers: - Further follow-up study needed to address newborn outcomes after NICU admission in both modes of delivery.
The authors are very grateful to Debra Markos university and Jinka general hospital for giving chance to conduct this study.
We would like to acknowledge the study participants for their time and willingness to participate.
Not applicable
The original data for this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
No fund
A.M. conceptualization, methodology, manuscript writing.
B.B. data analysis, result writing, discussion writing. A.M. and B.B. data collection, entry and processing, analysis and result writing, manuscript reviewing.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
