AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2639-4162/153
College of Pharmacy, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059
*Corresponding Author: Bisrat Hailemeskel, Pharm.D., RPh, ABAACP, should be ABAAHP, Professor & Vice Chair, College of Pharmacy, Howard University, 2300 4th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20059.
Citation: Bisrat Hailemeskel, Anthea Francis, Monika Daftary, Tamara McCants, Mary Awuonda, et al, (2024), Longitudinal Exploration of Strategies Advancing Continuing Professional Pharmacy Education in a Major University: an in-Depth Study on Impact, J. General Medicine and Clinical Practice, 7(2); DOI:10.31579/2639-4162/153
Copyright: © 2024, Bisrat Hailemeskel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 21 February 2024 | Accepted: 27 February 2024 | Published: 12 March 2024
Keywords: pharmacy; students; survey; continuing education; professional development; participant satisfaction
Background: In the dynamic healthcare landscape, pharmacists contend with the challenge of staying current with evolving knowledge. Continuing Pharmacy Education (CPE) programs, play a pivotal role in addressing this need. This study focuses on a six-year evaluation of CPE programs at a College of Pharmacy, aiming to assess the impact of a multifaceted approach on various educational outcomes.
Materials and Methods: The University College of Pharmacy Office of Continuing Professional Education implemented a multifaceted approach from 2017 to 2022. Changes included hiring a full-time coordinator, offering on-site and online programs, establishing partnerships, identifying knowledge gap through surveying participants, and enhancing digital presence beyond others. Data from this period were compared with the preceding six years (2010 2016). Evaluation metrics covered attendee the number and diversity, program growth, and professional impact.
Results: The study showcased significant improvements in various aspects of CPE programs. Pharmacist attendees increased by 816.67%, with a notable rise in non-pharmacy participants. Geographical distribution saw a surge in out-of-state and international participants. Program content witnesseda shift towardsinfectious diseases and pain management. The number of CPE programsand awarded hours experienced a fivefold increase, reflecting a commitment to a diverse curriculum. Participant feedback consistently indicated high satisfaction with knowledge enhancement, applicability, and program usefulness.
Conclusion: Over the six-year period,the evaluation revealedsubstantial advancements in our CPE programs. Increased pharmacist attendance, diversified participant engagement, and expandedgeographical reach underscored the program's success.The exponential growth in program offerings reflected a commitment to diverse and extensive education. Positive participant feedback, indicating sustained impact on drug therapy management, patient safety, and public health outcomes, affirmedthe enduring effectiveness of the CPE programs. While acknowledging study limitations, this comprehensive analysis highlights the success and ongoing efforts to enhance CPE programs at major university. Future research should address these constraints for a more nuanced understanding of CPE program impact.
In today's dynamic healthcare landscape, where advancements occur at an unprecedented pace, pharmacists face the constant challenge of staying current with evolving knowledge and best practices. Continuing Pharmacy Education (CPE) program splay a vital role in equipping them with the necessary skills and expertise to deliver optimal patient care. Although there are non-academic institutions offering CPE, universities, with their vast academic resources and faculty expertise, are key players in the provision of high-quality CPE programs. However, the effectiveness of CPE programs must be continuously evaluated and improved to ensure they remain relevant and meet the evolving needs. This requires a multi-faceted approach that addresses various aspects of program design, delivery, and assessment [1].
The demand for continuous learning and professional development among healthcare professionals including pharmacists is driven by several factors: Rapidly evolving medical knowledge; Increasing complexity of healthcare sciences; Emerging technologies and patient expectations among others. These factors highlight the critical role of CPE program sin equipping them with the necessary tools and knowledge to thrive in this dynamic environment. Academic institutions with Accreditation Council of Pharmacy Education (ACPE) accredited CPE program are uniquely positioned to address the evolving needs of CPE programs through several key strengths: extensive academic resources; highly qualified faculty; diverse program offerings; collaboration and partnerships; and research and evaluation expertise. By leveraging these strengths, they can play a crucial role in ensuring that CPE programs remain relevant, effective, and accessible across diverse practice settings [2].
Several efforts have been made to improve CPE offerings. Recent studies in pharmacy education have identified key strategies for enhancing CPE programs. The integration of technology, including online platforms and e- learning modules, has emerged as a prominent approach, fostering accessibility and engagement among pharmacy professionals [3].
Personalized learning, tailored to individual learner needs, has shown promising results in increasing satisfaction and knowledge retention [4].
Furthermore, the incorporation of interprofessional education (IPE) has gained traction, emphasizing collaboration among healthcare providers to improve teamwork and communication skills [5].
Longitudinal CPE programs, extended over time, have demonstrated effectiveness in sustaining knowledge gains and promoting continuous professional development [6].
Regular assessments with constructive feedback, patient-centered approaches, and the utilization of active learning strategies, such as case discussions, have also been identified as critical elements for program success [7-9].
Additionally, cultural competence training, incorporation of robust evaluation metrics, and alignment with evolving pharmacy regulations contribute to the overall improvement and relevance of CPE programs [10-12].
These trends collectively underscore the ongoing efforts to enhance the quality and impact of CPE program sin pharmacy education. Despite these study results, there exists a need to enhance these programs to better address participants' knowledge and skills, accommodate diverse pharmacy practices, and effectively evaluate their impact on patient safety and public health outcomes. The focus of this study is to assess the impact of the multifaceted approach on various aspects of educational outcomes including improving participants' knowledge and skills, understanding the impact on diverse pharmacy practices, assessing participant satisfaction, and evaluating the programs' influence on patient safety and public health outcomes.
For the past two decades, the University College of Pharmacy Office of Continuing Professional Education has been dedicated to delivering high- quality and up-to-date CPE programs to the DMV area, serving pharmacy and various healthcare professionals. Distinguished as the sole Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE)-accredited College of Pharmacy- based CPE provider in the District of Columbia, the program underwent a significant transformation approximately six years ago. Initially employing a part-time staff member to oversee the office, a strategic decision led to the subsequent hiring of a full-time professional about a year later. This transition catalyzed a series of enhancements within the program, and this paper provides an in-depth exploration of the impact of these changes on the various facets contributing to the program's success.
This study aims to achieve several objectives by examining key data from the two periods representing before and after the implementation of the multifaceted approach. First, it will explore its impact on improving the diversity and demographic trends among program attendees and practice areas across the two periods, providing insights into attendee profiles. Second, the research will delve into the progression of the CPE programs, analyzing changes in the number and focus of annual educational programs and the distribution of awarded CPE hours over the study period. Third, the study will investigate the professional impact of CPE, focusing on its influence on drug therapy management, patient safety, and public health outcomes. Lastly, the research will assess the effectiveness of the CPE programs by analyzing completion rates, participant feedback on knowledge enhancement, and the perceived applicability and usefulness of the programs.
To achieve these objectives, a multifaceted approach was implanted starting in 2017 and monitored it until 2022 (Period 2). We compared the data from this period with the preceding six years, from 2010 to 2016 (Period 1). Our strategies included i) hiring a full time office coordinator, ii) offering both on-site and online program delivery, iii) establishing collaborative partnerships with other accredited healthcare professional institutions, iv) continuously surveying participants to determine in knowledge gap to tailor content to their preferences, v) assessing feedback for continuous improvement, vi) revitalizing our digital presence, vii) conducting continues literature search for new and emerging topics, viii) integrating topics required for pharmacy license renewal particularly in the DMV area, and lastly, ix) engaging students through work-study programs among various other endeavors.
The data was collected over 12 years split into two equal periods. First, we assess the improvement in its impact on the diversity of attendees in terms of overall number and practice areas across the two periods. Tabel 1 shows the attendees professional distribution. The number of pharmacist attendees in all practice areas increased by over 8-fold increase (by 816.67%) from 225 to 2064 between the two periods, indicating a significant rise. There is a shift in ratio of the professions between the two periods. In Period 1, Pharmacy Professionals constituted in almost in all programs (97.87%), whereas in Period 2, the percentage on non-pharmacy professionals increased showing a major increase (2.1% vs. 14.4% respectively). On the other hand, non-pharmacy professionals include medical doctors, nurses, social workers, lawyers, case managers, etc. Notably, there was also a substantial shift in the distribution in practice sites. The percentage of hospital vs. community Pharmacists saw a decrease by about 1.5-fold between the two Period (136.73% vs. 52.31% respectively). However, the representation of Pharmacy Technicians remained relatively stable around 5% in both periods. Overall, the table highlights significant alterations in the composition of pharmacy professionals between the two specified periods.
Tabel 1 data also included the changes in the distribution of respondents across different geographical regions during Period 1 and Period2. The data was collected from our learning management system which requires to create profile, answer questions, and complete an evaluation form for each of the program they attended. In Period 1, participants in the DMV area were the primary attendees of our programs compared to those from outside DMV area (93% vs. 73.3 respectively). However, there were major surge of out of state participants in Period 2 (6.91% to 25.57% respectively). Internationally, there was no representation in Period 1 but it reaches about one percent, although still small (n=7;1.05%) in Period 2. Another group of participants that increased significantly in Period 2 were students showing an increase in 10-folds from zero to over about ten percent.
Table 1: Demographic data of program attendeesbetween the two periods.
The second objective was to assess the impact of the multimodal faucet on changes in the number educational programs and awarded CPE hours over the study periods. Table 2 presents the distribution of CPE programs categorized by disease states across the two periods. Notable shifts in emphasis on specific disease states are observable between the two periods, providing insights into the evolving focus of CPE programs over time. The 3 areas that dominated during both periods were topics related to infectious diseases including HIV/AIDS. This may be influenced by continuously emerging infectious threats and the importance of staying updated on relevant practices, especially considering global events such as the COVID- 19 pandemic.
The jump in pain management and opioids related topics during Period 2 is because our office received funding from REMS Producing Companies (RPC) through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) at 3 different times to increase awareness in recognizing and management of the opioid epidemic.
Table 2: The CPE programsby disease states between the two periods
As illustrated in Table 3, the comparison betweenthe 53 programs presented in Period 1 and the 340 programs in Period 2 reveals a remarkable exponential increasein the overall number of CPE programs. This signifies a 5-fold growth (541.51%) in the offerings. Notably, the average CPE programs per year also has shown a significant surge from around 9 during Period 1 to approximately 57 in Period 2.
Table 3. Total Numberof Educational Programsprovided by year
Table 4 provides data on the total number of CPE hours provided and CPE hours awarded across the two study periods. During Period 1, a total of 334.5 CPE hours were awarded (Average 47.8/Year). Subsequently, in Period 2, the number of CPE hours provided and awarded increased each year, reaching a total of 548.25 CPE hours (Average 91/year). The total number of CPE hours awarded was 7,097 CPE hours which is a 12-fold increase.
Table 4: Total number of CPE HoursProvided and CPE HoursAwarded.
Table 5 demonstrates a significant increase in the number of participants who received completion certificates between Period 1 and Period2. In Period 1, there were 675 total attendees, while in Period 2, this number surged to 3681, indicating a substantial difference of 3006 (445.3%). Table 5a provides a more detailed breakdown of participants participated during Period 2, organized by year. Across Year 1 to Year 6, the cumulative total for Period 2 is 3681, with varying numbers in each year: 369, 522, 708, 641, 739, and 702, respectively with an average of 614 attendees per year. These figures reflect the distribution of completion certificates over the specified years within Period 2
Table 5a provides a more detailed breakdown of participants participated during Period 2, organized by year. Across Year 1 to Year 6, the cumulative total for Period 2 is 3681, with varying numbers in each year: 369, 522, 708, 641, 739, and 702, respectively with an average of 614 attendees per year. These figures reflect the distribution of completion certificates over the specified years within Period 2
Table 5: Participants who received a completion certificate between the two periods.
Table 5a. Participants who received a completion certificate in Period 2 by year.
The third objective was to assess the effectiveness of the CPE programs by analyzing completion rates, participant feedback on knowledge enhancement, and the perceived applicability and usefulness of the programs. For the sake of comparison, only the data from 2022 was selected as a representative, given that the averages for each year in period 2 were consistently similar. Table 6 presents evaluation data on whether the attended program enhanced participants' knowledge. In both Period 1 and Period 2, the majority of respondents indicated that the program likely or very likely enhanced their knowledge. Specifically, in Period 1, 95.6% of participants responded affirmatively (combining "Very Likely" and "Likely" categories), while in Period 2, this positive response increased slightly to 96.0%. The data suggests high level of perceived knowledge enhancement among attendees, with a consistent positive trend between the two periods
Table 6: Evaluation data if the programenhanced knowledge.
Table 7 presents evaluation data regarding the applicability and usefulness of the program to participants' practices in both Period1 and Period 2. While Period 1 shows a higher percentage, it is noteworthy that both periods received high ratings, indicating the perceived applicability and usefulness of the program.
Table 7: Evaluation data on the applicability and usefulness of the program
Finally, the study assessed the professional impact of CPE, focusing on its influence on drug therapy management, patient safety, and public health outcomes. In both periods most participants had a very positive outlook, with over 85% considering it very likely or likely. This indicates that participants continue to believe in the positive impact of these program son patient safety.
Table 8: Participant's Rating on the Impactof the Education Programs on Patient Safety.
Table 9 focuses on the impact of the programs on drug therapy management in participants' practices during both Period 1 and Period 2. The data indicates a similarity in the responses between the two periods. In Period 1, 73.1% of participants found the programs to be very likely or likely to have an impact on drug therapy management. Similarly, in Period 2, this positive impact was reported by 70.3% of participants. Despite slight variations, the combined percentages suggest a consistent perception of the programs positively influencing drug therapy management across both periods.
Table 9: Effects on Drug Therapy Management in Participants' Practice
The next table demonstrates a similarity in maintaining the high satisfaction of participants on the programs' impact on publichealth in their practice sites in both periods. The combined percentages suggest a consistent perception that the programs are likely to positively influence public health across both periods.
Table 10: Impact of publichealth on participant practice.
Over the course of six years, in Period 2, we conducted an extensive evaluation, implementing novel strategies to enhance the impact of our programs. This evaluation covered various outcome measures, providing a multifaceted analysis of our initiatives. These measures included:
i) The number of attendees, showcasing the reach and inclusivity of our programs;
ii) Diversity in practice areas, indicating the varied professional backgrounds of our participants;
iii) The number of CPE programs; iv) Expansion in the diversity of topics covered, demonstrating responsiveness to a broad spectrum of professional interests;
vi) Improvement in the applicability of programs, ensuring practical relevance to participants' professional contexts: Satisfaction of participants regarding the knowledge gained, reflecting the overall positive experience; vii) Enhancement of the applicability of the program to participants' practice sites, ensuring real-world effectiveness;
v) Enhancement of participants' knowledge, assessing the tangible impact on individual learning outcomes;
viii) Satisfaction with drug therapy, evaluating the perceived impact on participants' practices; and ix) Increased impact on public health relevant to participants' practice, measuring the broader societal influence.
This comprehensive approach allowed us to gain valuable insights into the evolving success and effectiveness of our programs over the evaluated period. To gauge its effectiveness, a comparative analysis was performed with a similar timeframe preceding its implementation, explicitly encompassing data in Period 1. Our comprehensive evaluation over two distinct 6-year periods highlighted substantial shifts and improvements in various aspects of our CPE programs. Notably, there was a remarkable increase in attendees, with a noteworthy 816.67% rise from 225 to 2064, reflecting a significant impact. The altered composition of pharmacy professionals, including an increase in non- pharmacy participants (2.1% to 14.4%), signifies a more diverse and interdisciplinary engagement. Geographical distribution demonstrated significant changes, particularly with a surge in out-of-state and international participants during Period 2 (6.91% to 25.57%). Additionally, students' participation increased tenfold, emphasizing a positive influence on the future generation of healthcare professionals.
In terms of program content, a pronounced shift in emphasis on specific disease states occurred, exemplified by a surge in infectious diseases including HIV/AIDS and pain management and opioids-related topics during Period 2. This change was influenced by targeted funding initiatives to address the evolving landscape of healthcare, particularly in managing the opioid epidemic. The number of CPE programs and awarded hours experienced an exponential increase, growing fivefold (541.51%) from 53 to 340 programs and showcasing a commitment to providing a more diverse and extensive educational curriculum. The average CPE programs per year surged from around 9 in Period 1 to approximately 57 in Period2, indicating a significant expansion of educational offerings. Participant feedback affirmed the positive impact of the programs, with high ratings for knowledge enhancement, applicability, and usefulness. The perceived positive influence on drug therapy management, patient safety, and public health outcomes remained consistently high across both periods, underscoring the enduring effectiveness of the CPE programs.
This study's insights into the impact and evolution of our continuing professional education (CPE) programs are subject to several limitations. Firstly, there is a potential selection bias as the data primarily relies on voluntary participant attendance, potentially excluding perspectives of non- participants. Data accuracy is contingent on the completeness and precision of participant records, posing a risk of introducing inaccuracies. Participant feedback on knowledge enhancement, program applicability, and impact on practice is self-reported, introducing subjective elements and potential response bias. External factors influencing program content, such as emerging healthcare policies or advancements, are not extensively explored. The study also acknowledges the potential influence of funding sources on program content, particularly in specific topics related to opioids. Awareness of these limitations is crucial for a nuanced interpretation of findings, and future research should address these constraints for a more comprehensive evaluation.
In summary, our six-year evaluation of CPE programs highlights significant advancements and positive shifts in various aspects. Compared to Period 1, Period 2 showed notable improvements, including a substantial increase in pharmacist attendees, a diversified engagement with non-pharmacy participants, and an expanded geographical reach. The exponential growth in the number of CPE program sand awarded hours reflects our commitment to providing a diverse and extensive educational curriculum. Participant feedback consistently affirms the positive impact of the programs, with high ratings for knowledge enhancement, applicability, and usefulness. The perceived positive influence on drug therapy management, patient safety, and public health outcomes remained consistently high across both periods, highlighting the enduring effectiveness of the CPE programs. Despite these achievements, the study acknowledges limitations such as potential selection bias and data accuracy concerns. These constraints should be considered when interpreting the findings. Overall, our evaluation underscores the success of our initiatives in advancing and diversifying educational offerings, positively impacting healthcare professionals and their practices over the assessed six-year period. Future research should address these limitations for a more comprehensive understanding of the evolving landscape of CPE program impact.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
