Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/350
Dept of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, NH SRCC Children's Hospital.
*Corresponding Author: Gaurav Kumar, Department of Pediatric Cardiac Sciences, NH SRCC Children's Hospital, 1-1A, Keshavrao Khadye Marg, Haji Ali, Haji Ali Government Colony, Mahalakshmi, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400034.
Citation: Ameya Kaskar, Supratim Sen, Hiren Paanwala, Gaurav Kumar, (2024), Levoatrial Cardinal Vein: A Rare Differential, J. Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 7(1); DOI:10.31579/2641-0419/350
Copyright: © 2024, Gaurav Kumar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 02 February 2024 | Accepted: 13 February 2024 | Published: 19 February 2024
Keywords: fatigue; cognitive fatigue; motor fatigue; depression; post-covid; sars-cov2
Levoatrial cardinal vein is a rare congenital anomaly characterised by an anomalous connection between left atrium or pulmonary veins and systemic veins. This abnormal connection is usually found in cases of left sided obstructive lesions. In this report we present a case of ventricular septal defect and severe pulmonary hypertension. The suspicion of a levocardinal atrial vein was raised was on echocardiography and confirmed on computed tomography. A mulitimodality diagnostic approach is mandatory for the correct diagnosis and surgical repair of this anomaly as this can also be a contributing factor for causing severe pulmonary hypertension.
Levoatrial cardinal vein is a rare congenital anomaly characterised by an anomalous connection between left atrium or pulmonary veins and systemic veins. This abnormal connection is usually found in cases of left sided obstructive lesions. In this report we present a case of ventricular septal defect and severe pulmonary hypertension. The suspicion of a levocardinal atrial vein was raised was on echocardiography and confirmed on computed tomography. A mulitimodality diagnostic approach is mandatory for the correct diagnosis and surgical repair of this anomaly as this can also be a contributing factor for causing severe pulmonary hypertension.
A 7 month-old (4kg) boy presented with history of failure to thrive with recurrent respiratory tract infections. On echocardiography, he was diagnosed to have a perimembranous ventricular septal defect (VSD), with an anomalous left-sided vessel, with ascending flow, communicating with the brachiocephalic vein. Possibility of a vertical vein consistent with anomalous pulmonary venous drainage was considered. Computed Tomography (CT) confirmed the existence of levoatrial cardinal vein from the left atrium to left brachiocephalic vein. He underwent surgical repair constituting VSD enlargement with intraventricular tunnel repair and simple ligation of the levoatrial cardinal vein. Post-operative echocardiography did not show any residual lesions and the patient made an uneventful recovery.

Figure 1A &1B: CT and 3D reconstruction image showing levoatrial cardinal vein from pulmonary vein to brachiocephalic vein

Figure 1A 2A: Echo image showing anomalous collateral vein from left atrium to brachiocephalic vein
Figure 1A 2B: Echo image showing all four pulmonary veins draining in the left atrium
Levoatrial cardinal vein is a rare congenital anomaly usually described in association with severe left heart hypoplasia or obstruction [1]. This vessel has also been described in association with other more common congenital heart defects without left ventricular hypoplasia [2] or rarely as an isolated lesion [3]. It is often argued to be a venous collateral channel between the pulmonary and the systemic venous channels which will be providing an overflow in the setting of left sided obstructive lesions, however with the advent of computer tomography more of these collateral channels are being diagnosed without left heart obstructive lesions [4]. ‘Levoatrial cardinal vein’ has been described broadly as a pulmonary to systemic venous collateral. This entity also includes collateral venous channel between the left atrium and the coronary sinus and coronary sinus defect providing interatrial communication [4]. Embryologically, this collateral venous channel is a remnant of the splanchnic venous plexus (which is present before the appearance of the definitive pulmonary vein), providing communications between the developing lungs and the systemic venous channels. The commonest site of drainage from the left atrial wall or one of the pulmonary veins has been into either the left brachiocephalic vein or the superior caval vein. Rarely, it may drain into the jugular and bronchial veins, coronary sinus, and left ventricular sinusoids. It may be easily missed on echocardiographic assessment due to its tortuous course in the superior mediastinum, close relationship with the main stem bronchus and pulmonary artery, and/or difficulties in imaging because of low flow and small size [5]. Differential diagnoses include a partial/total anomalous pulmonary vein connection, as the levoatrial cardinal vein can be confused with a vertical
vein draining the left pulmonary veins, and persistent left superior vena cava. The latter can be differentiated on echocardiography by the direction of the
flow, which is descending into the coronary sinus in left superior vena cava and ascending in a levoatrial cardinal vein. A levoatrial cardinal vein may be a source of persistent left-to-right shunt and cause clinical manifestations of chronic right heart volume overload later in life causing pulmonary hypertension. A mulitimodality diagnostic approach is mandatory for the correct diagnosis and surgical repair of this anomaly.
Acknowledgements: None
Conflicts of Interest: None
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,