AUCTORES
Chat with usCase Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1897/087
*Corresponding Author: Srivatsa M Shet, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Burns Surgery, Baby Memorial Hospital, Mavoor road, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Citation: Srivatsa M Shet, Subin Joseph, Kader Kalathingal, Hafiz Muhammed Koyappathody, Srikant Aruna Samantaray and Sameer Latheef (2021) Lateral Plantar Arch Reconstruction Using Vascularized Fibula Osteocutaneous Flap. J. Surg Case Repo and Imag. 4(6); DOI:10.31579/2690-1897/087
Copyright: © 2021 Srivatsa M Shet, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 27 July 2021 | Accepted: 20 August 2021 | Published: 28 August 2021
Keywords: foot crush injury, lateral plantar arch, one-stage reconstruction, microsurgical fibula flap
A Sixteen-year-old male had a road traffic accident resulting in crush and loss of lateral two metatarsals of the left foot. The Lateral plantar arch was reconstructed with a vascularized fibula osteocutaneous flap. Flap survived and partial weight-bearing was started by 3 months and full weight-bearing was started 6-months post-surgery. At a 16-month follow-up patient had a normal gait and integrity of the lateral plantar arch was maintained. Vascularized fibula osteocutaneous flap is an excellent option for one-stage reconstruction of the lateral arch of the foot and gives satisfactory results in terms of functions of foot and in avoiding long-term morbidity.
Plantar arches of the foot are a very essential part of the normal gait mechanism. Its dynamicity can particularly be appreciated in dancers and artistic gymnasts. Unfortunately, foot and leg are the most common parts to be injured in a road traffic accident (RTA). Restoration of the function of the foot becomes the priority for a plastic and reconstructive surgeon. Bony defects particularly pose a huge challenge for reconstruction owing to the complex nature of foot skeleton and limited availability of soft tissue in the foot. The most common cause of these injuries being road traffic accidents, they are always contaminated. The resulting soft tissue infection and osteomyelitis complicate the situation making reconstruction more challenging.
The lateral metatarsals (4th and 5th) are an integral part of the three-point support and balancing of the foot, hence its reconstruction is very essential for a near-normal gait. Inadequate reconstruction leads to uneven pressure
on the sole further leading to pressure callosities and ulcers. We present a case with a lateral plantar arch defect of foot managed with bony and soft tissue reconstruction.
A 16-year-old boy sustained extensive soft tissue crush injury of left Foot following RTA, with amputation of 5th toe and doubtful vascularity of 4th toe (Figure 1a-c). There was a segmental loss of the 4th and 5th metatarsals of about 8 cm and Fracture of the 3rd metatarsal which was fixed with k wire. He underwent multiple debridements and Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressings supported by culture-sensitive antibiotics. With the improvement of wound bed, 15 days following injury (Figure 1d-e), lateral plantar arch reconstruction by Vascularized fibula osteocutaneous flap (VFOC) was planned and a pre-op Doppler scan was done to locate the perforator vessel providing the skin.
Wound bed prepared and markings for flap made on the contralateral leg. Dissection was carried out to preserve the perforators; osteotomy was done 10 cm above lateral malleolus and 8 cm below the head of the fibula. Peroneal vessel dissected and ligated at the level of the distal osteotomy. Flap harvested, positioned between the cuboid and proximal phalanx of 4th toe and fixed with K wire. Flap pedicle anastomosed to anterior tibial pedicle end to side. Skin paddle inset was given and residual raw areas grafted while flap donor area was primarily closed.
Video 1. Full weight bearing gait at the end of 16 months
The standard post-operative care was given like any microvascular flap involving hydration, antiplatelet drugs, and wound care. Flap survived and all wounds healed uneventfully (Figure 2). Splinting was continued for 3 months, K wires were removed and gait training was started with partial weight-bearing. Full weight-bearing was achieved at 6months. The patient could return to his previous routine completely within 8 months of surgery. Offloading footwear and silicone sheets were used. At a 16-month follow-up, the patient had normal gait (Video) without any donor or recipient site functional limitations. The X-ray showed good bony union and integrity of lateral arch (Figure 3). A dynamic pressure sensing pedobarogram showed no adverse pressure points (Figure 4). His Foot and Ankle Ability Measure – Activities of Daily Living scale (FAAM-ADL) score1 was 82.14% and he rated his overall current level of function to be 80% considering his pre-injury function as 100%.
Approach and selection of flap for the complexity of wound:
Wounds of Road traffic accidents have very high chances of infection due to severe crushing of tissues and contamination. Thorough debridement and NPWT help in achieving healthy granulation. Attention to be paid to retain as much plantar skin as possible. The wound in this patient had a loss of the fifth toe and more than 6cm defect of fourth and fifth metatarsal bones (part of the lateral arch and lateral aspect of transverse arch of the foot), longitudinal crush laceration of plantar skin along with loss of skin over the lateral half of the dorsum of the foot.
The three arches of foot form a support triangle which is essential for weight-bearing standing and stability of the body. First and fifth metatarsal heads, in particular, take the brunt of weight among the transverse foot arch component, comprising all 5 metatarsal heads [2]. Lateral longitudinal arch has a small arc and is relatively flat when compared to the medial longitudinal arch which has a large arc. Yang et al [2] suggest straight fibular graft for the lateral arch and iliac bone (curved) graft for medial arch reconstruction. There are case reports of medial arch reconstruction also by straight fibular transfer either by pedicled3 or free tissue transfer [4, 5].
Metatarsal bone has obvious similarity with fibula [6]. As the bone defect was more than 6 cm, vascularized bone graft was indicated [7, 8]. Bringing a vascularized fibula with a cuff of muscle and skin paddle, improves the blood supply of the recipient area, making the surrounding structures also to heal better as well as covering the dorsal skin defect. Plantar skin loss also warrants focus on sensory recovery, often needing a sensate skin flap transfer and neurorrhaphy. As there was no plantar skin loss, these options were not applicable in our case.
Combined soft tissue and bony defects make microsurgical reconstruction more challenging, especially in the foot. The idea of a one-stage reconstruction of bone and soft tissue defect has been propagated owing to its advantages. Yazar et al [8] studied these complex defects with 62 cases reconstructed with composite flaps. The average duration from injury to one stage reconstruction was 27.1days which is comparable in our case where reconstruction was done after 15 days of the injury.
Intra op customization:
VFOC flap planning should be meticulous to have appropriate bone length and skin cover. Having said this, the authors opine it is rather good to take a larger chunk of bone with the flap, as intraoperative customization is possible. Similar customizations are described in literature [2, 9]. Maximum possible vascular pedicle inclusion is critical as vessels in the recipient site might be at a proximal level than the bone. After positioning the flap in the recipient area adjusting the vessel reach, the excess bone can be osteotomised and used for reconstruction of transverse plantar arch [2, 9]. Because of the loss of 5th toe, only a single bone segment for the lateral arch was retained and bridged the gap between the 4th toe proximal phalanx and cuboid bone. One axial k wire to the tarsals and one horizontal to the heads of adjacent metatarsals usually fixes the bone flap. But in our case, horizontal k wire appeared to potentially disturb the critical blood supply to the surviving toes compelling us to avoid it.
Post-op care and Rehabilitation:
Dressing changes and Assessment of the vascularity of flap are necessary like in any free tissue transfers. Splint maintains the position of the flap and avoids undue external force. Active movements of the ankle are encouraged at 2 weeks or after wound healing to avoid joint stiffness.
Assessment of the functionality of the reconstructed foot involves multiple parameters. The range of motion of the ankle and the great toe were acceptable with the epicritic sensory recovery of the plantar skin by 16 months. To assess the 3-point support structure, a weight-bearing lateral foot X-ray was obtained as shown (Figure 3). Gait is the common indicator of the adequacy of the procedure, and a near-normal bipedal gait has been shown (Video), which is comparable with results shown by authors who have done fibula flap for lateral plantar arch reconstruction [2, 9].
One of the long term complications of any kind of foot injury and reconstruction is the undue pressure on the plantar skin, leading to painful callosities. Yang et al reported that early enthusiastic weight-bearing and activity lead to pressure ulcer and they suggested optimizing the activities [2]. A static and dynamic pedobarogram showed near-normal pressure distribution (Figure 4). Clinically the patient was having a normal bipedal gait and there were no pressure callosities during the 16-month postoperative period (8 months of active uninhibited walking). Additionally, we suggest preventive measures like offloading footwear and timely paring of the callosities if any. The early indication for such preventive measures includes painful gait and localized high-pressure points on Static and dynamic pedobarogram.
A VFOC flap is a potential option for salvage of foot and to restore function. This is one of the rare cases of lateral plantar arch reconstruction. With this article, the authors intend to sensitize (i) plastic surgeons towards use of vascularized fibula flap for foot arch reconstruction;
(ii) orthopaedicians and general surgeons for identification and timely referral of similar cases;
(iii) all reconstructive surgeons for continued research in this aspect to strengthen the scientific evidence.
Lateral plantar arch reconstruction is essential for normal gait and support of the body. Vascularized fibula graft is an excellent option for one-stage reconstruction of the lateral arch of the foot and gives satisfactory results in terms of functions of foot and in avoiding long term morbidity.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner