AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/JNMIR.2020/001
*Corresponding Author: Biljana Ilkovska, Department of medical biochemistry, PHO Clinical Hospital dr. Trifun Panovski, Bitola, Macedonia.
Citation: Biljana Ilkovska, Bisera Kotevska, Sandra Hristovska, Petar Avramovski, Irena Kostovska, Katerina Tosheska-Trajkovska and Branimir Kanazirev, Laboratory Characteristics and Presentation of Multi-Organ Affection among Hospitalized Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Public Hospital in Bitola, J. New Medical Innovations and Research, 1(1): DOI: 10.31579/JNMIR.2020/001
Copyright: © 2020 Biljana Ilkovska. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 13 October 2020 | Accepted: 26 October 2020 | Published: 02 November 2020
Keywords: SARS – CoV 2; laboratory findings; multi organ failure;Leukocytosis;leucopenia;cardiac arrhythmias;aminotransferase;γ –glutamyl transferase;myocardial injury
Introduction: In December 2019, a highly infectious disease i.e. pneumonia caused by the coronavirus disease SARS-CoV-2, occurred in Wuhan, China, and the World Health Organization has declared its ongoing outbreak a pandemic. The clinical laboratory plays a key role in supporting the monitoring and management of SARS-CoV-2 disease.
Material and methods: Our study describes the laboratory characteristics of 103, SARS-CoV-2 patients hospitalized in the public hospital Trifun Panovski in the period April - June 2020. Only two patients died as a result of the SARS-CoV-2. The most common laboratory abnormalities were: elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Results: Leukocytosis was found in 23.3%, and leucopenia in 3% of patients with SARS – CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 infection can be associated with myocardial injury, heart failure, vascular inflammation, myocarditis, cardiac arrhythmias, and hypoxic encephalopathy. We found increased values of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and γ –glutamyl transferase (γ –GT) in 35 – 50% of patients. We detected affected renal function in 10% of our patients with SARS – CoV 2.
Conclusion:We identified potential biomarkers of disease severity. Our results provide guidance in risk assessment, clinical monitoring and therapy decision-making processes
In 2019 in China was registered first case in the world with SARS-CoV-2 viral pneumonia [1]. The geographical distribution of SARS-CoV-2 covers all continents except Antarctica. Epidemiologists in Wuhan believed the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan is the point of origin of SARS-CoV-2, due to its connection to the trading of live wild animals [2]. At the time of writing, over 21,732,472 million confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases and over 770,866 SARS-CoV-2 related deaths have been reported [3].
SARS-CoV-2 is highly contagious disease, with a basic reproduction number of between 1.4 and 6.5, and can be easily spread through coughs and sneezes, talking to infected persons, and touching the eyes, nose, or mouth after touching a contaminated surface [4].
The novel coronavirus belongs to lineage B of the genus beta coronavirus of the Coronavirus family, which includes SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV [5]. The SARS-CoV-2 is the seventh member of the coronavirus family that infects humans [6].
A recent study reported that fever, cough, myalgia or fatigue were common symptoms, and sputum production, headache, hemoptysis, and diarrhea were less common symptoms [7].
All patients had pneumonia and about half developed dyspnea [8]. Incubation duration of SARS-CoV-2 infection ranges from 2 to 14 days, and various studies demonstrate that symptoms are seen within an average of 4 to 7 days [9].
The SARS-CoV-2 clinical presentation can be: mild- the clinical symptoms were mild, and there was no or mild sign of pneumonia on imaging; moderate - showing fever and respiratory symptoms with radiological findings of pneumonia; severe- in accordance with any of the following: shortness of breath (RR ≥ 30 breaths/min); in resting state, oxygen saturation ≤ 93%; arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ≦ 300 mmHg, cases with chest imaging showed obvious lesion progression more than 50% within 24–48 h; critical - one of the following: respiratory failure, requiring mechanical ventilation; septic shock; multiple organ failure.
Clinical laboratories are very important for management of SARS-CoV-2 disease. Hematological and biochemical parameters are important for detecting disease severity and monitoring SARS CoV 2 infection.
The aim of our study was to identify most laboratory biomarkers of disease severity.
This study was carried out from April to July 2020 at the Department of Medical Biochemistry and Department of infective diseases of Public Health Organization Clinical Hospital “D-r Trifun Panovski” in Bitola. Our study describes the laboratory characteristics of 103 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients hospitalized in Department of infective diseases with moderate stage of the diseases at the age of 17 to 86.
Ethics Committee of Health Organization Clinical hospital “d-r Trifun Panovski” approved the study, and all of the procedures were performed in accordance with ethical approval institutional guidelines. The study protocol followed the ethical guidelines of the most recent Declaration of Helsinki. Written consent was obtained from the participants prior to the start of the study.
Clinical and laboratory measurements - Patient respiratory samples, including nasopharyngeal swabs were collected and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to confirm 2019-nCoV infection. Data includes: medical history, a physical examination, questionnaire information and laboratory findings of each patient. A confirmed case was defined by a positive result to RT-PCR of nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Blood samples were collected and drawn from an antecubital vein.
Complete blood count (CBC) was determined in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (K-EDTA) blood samples -using Sysmex XP 300/ Sysmex XS 1000 (Sysmex Co, Kobe, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The obtained indicators were as follows: white blood cell count (WBC x10⁹/L), neutrophil percentage (NEUT %), neutrophil count (NEUT(x10⁹/L), lymphocyte percentage (LYMPH %), lymphocyte count (LYMPH(x10⁹/L)), red blood cell count (RBC x10¹²/L), hemoglobin (HGB (g/l)), and platelets (PLT (x 10⁹ /L).
Biochemical analyses - Biochemical analyses were performed on Abbot Architect CI 4100 according to the manufacturer's instructions. We determined: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBILI), direct bilirubin (DBILI), creatinine (CREA), urea (UR), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatin kinase (CK), creatin kinase MB fraction (CK-MB), glucose(GLUK), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) andiron.
The data are presented as mean± standard deviation (SD). The results were done with the SPSS version 13.
A total of 103 patients confirmed with SARS-CoV-2 infection were included in this study, of whom 61 (59.22%) were males and 42 (40.78%) were females. The median age was 53 years, the youngest patient was 17 years old and the oldest was 86 years of age. Study patients were divided in seven age groups presented in Table 1:
Hematological and biochemical features of COVID-19 patients are presented in Table 2 and Table 3.
The results are presented as: N (number), % (percent), Mean (min - max); WBC, white blood cells; Neut, neutrophils; Lymp, lymphocyte; RBC, red blood cells; HGB, hemoglobin; PLT, platelets.
The results are presented as: N (number), % (percent), Mean (standard deviation) (min - max); Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Total bilirubin (TBILI), Direct bilirubin (DBILI), Creatinine (CREA), Urea (UR), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Creatin kinase (CK), Creatin kinase MB fraction (CK-MB), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Haematological parameters
Compared with the reference range our results showed that 24 SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients (23.3%) had increased WBC levels (6 females and 18 males), 3 SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients (2.9%) had decreased WBC count (2 females, 1 male) and 76 other patients had normal WBC count.
Compared with the reference range, 25 SARSCoV-2 infection positive patients (24.27%) had increased neutrophil levels (4 females and 21 males), 4 SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients (3.8%) had decreased neutrophil levels (2 female, 2 males) and normal neutrophil levels were found in the 69 other patients.
Additionally, investigations revealed 19 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection (18.4%) had increased lymphocytes (1 female and 18 males), 31 SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients (30.1%) had lymphopenia (13 females and 18 males) and 53 other patients had normal lymphocyte levels.
Compared with the reference range, 25 SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients (24.27%) had increased neutrophil levels, 4 SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients (3.8%) had decreased neutrophil levels and 69 other patients had normal neutrophil levels.
Compared with the reference range, 3 SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients (2.9%) had increased red blood cell count levels (3 males), 4 SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients (3.8%) had decreased red blood cell count (1 female, 3 males) and normal red blood cell count levels were found in the 96 other patients.
Seven SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients (6.8%) had increased hemoglobin levels (7 males), 19 SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients (18.4%) had decreased hemoglobin concentration (11 females, 8 males) and normal hemoglobin levels were found in 77 other patients. Increased platelets levels were found in 25 SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients (24.27%) (12 females and 13 males), 9 SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients (8.7%) had decreased platelets (1 female, 8 males) and normal platelets count was found in the 69 other patients.
Biochemical tests:
Liver enzymes:
Activity of ALT was increased in 34 patients (10 females and 24 males), of AST in 46 patients (17 females and 29 males) and 26 patients (52%) had increased γ-glutamyl transpeptidase activity (10 females and 16 males). Over 66 patients had normal activity of ALT, 55 patients had normal values of AST and 28 patients had normal γ-glutamyl transpeptidase values.
Cardiac markers:
CK activity was increased in 13 patients (1 female and 12 males), 39 patients (11 females and 28 males) had increased activity for CK- MB fraction, 73 patients had normal CK values, and 48 patients had normal CK- MB fraction values.
Other biomarkers:
LDH
In laboratory practice was found that elevated LDH and CRP are the most frequent present in SARS CoV 2 infected patients. LDH activity was slightly elevated in 64 patients (26 females and 38 males), which represents 70% of examinee patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Only 27 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients had normal LDH values.
CRP
CRP was increased in 74 % of SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients (27 females and 47 males). Twenty six patients had normal vales.
Kidney biomarkers:
Ten patients (4 women and 6 males) had increased values of urea and creatinine.
Iron
About iron homeostasis, 60% of examinee patients had decreased iron levels (11 females and 33 males) and 32 patients had normal values of iron.
The laboratory medicine is of crucial importance in diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 patients. Routine hematological and biochemical tests are critical in process of diagnosis and management of COVID -19 patients. Inflammatory, hematological, cardiac, renal, hepatic and hematological markers can be used in process of assessment of severity status. Serum, plasma or whole blood specimens could be used for performance of different biochemical tests.
Our study was made in 103 patients with SARS CoV 2 infections who were hospitalized in our hospital in the period of April-June 2020.
Of total 103 admitted patients with SARS CoV2, two patients died. One patient was 47 years old male, hospitalized with chest pain, and increased cardiac markers. After initial treatment, all laboratory results were normalized, but on the 20th day of hospitalization, the virus has affected his kidneys and he died as a result of kidney damage. Second patient was 66 years old male, with previous liver damage, and after 10 days of proper medical treatment there was no improvement in his medical condition and he passed away.
Although respiratory symptoms dominate in the clinical picture in COVID-19, it is clear that virus can cause multiorgan failure.
Hematological findings implicate that lymphopaenia is a distinguishing characteristic of SARS – CoV-2 infection. Magnitude of lymphopaenia correlates with severity of disease. Lymphopenia was frequently detected on the hemogram (3%–83.2%) in studies of Lin [10] and Lippi [11].
In our study we found leukocytosis in 23.3%, leucopenia in 3%, lymphopenia was confirmed in 30% of patients with SARS – CoV-2. High neutrophil count is associated with poor outcomes and it may be result of secondary bacterial infection, On the other hand, low eosinophil count is commonly seen in patients with SARS – CoV-2 infection [12].
There was no significant change in hemoglobin levels of SARS-CoV-2 infection positive patients and healthy subjects in our study. Previous studies reported that patients with severe disease have significantly lower hemoglobin values compared with patients with mild conditions [13].
The liver appears to be the second organ involved, after the lungs. The cause of liver damage induced by SARS-CoV-2 is not fully understood, and the elevation of liver enzymes may result from cytokine storm or drug-induced liver damage. The SARS-CoV-2 infection is considered to be capable of infecting endothelial cells in the bile duct of the liver and causing inflammatory damage to the liver; the cellular damage in the liver may be the direct consequence of viral infection. Additionally, the virus may result in liver damage and testicular damage at varying levels [14].
SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with mild elevation in ALT, AST and bilirubin. Elevated levels of AST, ALT and LDH has been firstly reported this year in 43% of the 99 SARS-CoV-2 cases from Wuhan [15].
We found increased ALT in 34%, AST in 46% and γ –glutamyl transferase in 52% of patients. Our results are in a correlation with study of Henry BM et al [16].
In addition, patients with abnormal liver tests had higher risks of progressing to severe disease [17].
Abnormal liver tests (AST, ALT, total bilirubin and γ –glutamyl transferase) were present in 76.3% of patients and 21.5% of respondents showed liver injury during hospitalization, in particular during the first two weeks after admittance [18].
Liver damage increases upon the prolongation of hospitalization, which could be associated with therapy protocols[19]. Patients on potential hepatotoxic therapies or previous liver damage should be monitored at least twice a week.
Recommendations of the IFCC task group is that monitoring of liver functional tests should be considered in hospital in patients with COVID-19.
Bilirubin increased by 5% associated with hepatocellular damage and cholestatic liver diseases could be seen SARS-CoV-2 patients. Hyperbilirubinemia was observed in studies of Guan, Lippi and Santoso [20-22].
LDH is a nonspecific marker of tissue damage. Many studies have shown elevated LDH activity, ranging from 27% to 76% [21, 22].
In our study, LDH was slightly elevated in 70% of examinee patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Only 27 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients had normal LDH values.
In the study of Chen et al. it was observed that advanced age, hypertension and high LDH levels at admission in the hospital were associated with the elevation in hospital mortality rates. LDH activitywas higher in severe cases than in mild and moderate cases [23].
SARS-CoV-2 infection affects cardiovascular system, too. SARS CoV2 infection is associated with myocardial injury, vascular inflammation, heart failure, myocarditis [17]. Underlying pathophysiology is not well understood but it can be a result of direct viral effect on a myocard, immune-mediated effect or as a result of respiratory failure or hypoxemia [24].
The authors suggested close monitoring of the cardiac functioning of all patients, especially the severe and critical ones, and to seek possible interventions for patients evincing features of abnormal cardiac injury.
Hence, it was concluded that heart injury signs arise in SARS-CoV-2, especially in older patients, hypertensives, and male patients with current smoking habits. Elevated levels of heart injury indicators are associated with higher mortality and shorter survival days [25].
Additionally, the discovery that SARS-CoV-2 patients had a simultaneous increase in α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, myoglobin, CK, or CK- MB fraction suggested that we should pay attention to patients with different degrees of skeletal muscle injuries.
The muscle-induced creatine kinase provides an insight, especially into the assessment of myocardial damage. Creatin kinase MB fraction was found to be high at 45%; higher rates were noted in patients with severe disease course [26].
Renal function was affected in 10% of Sars CoV2 positive patients. The kidneys are one of the most frequently affected extra-pulmonary organs in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2; especially, in those patients who are severely ill [8, 23, 27].
There are inconsistent results regarding the association of SARS – CoV-2 infection and acute kidney injury. Acute kidney injures are reported to vary from 1% to 42% [28]. Main causes of AKI can be: direct viral infection, haemo dynamic changes, thrombotic vascular processes, glomerular pathology or hypovolemia of kidneys.
Previous studies of patients affected by the 2013 SARS outbreak have shown that kidney damage is mainly characterized by tubular injury (as reflected by abnormal urine test results) and increased serum creatinine and urea nitrogen concentrations.
Although the underlying virologic mechanisms are not completely understood, it is plausible to speculate that there is binding of the virus to the ACE2 receptor, which is highly expressed in kidney tubules, causing glomerulopathy, acute tubular necrosis and protein leakage in the Bowman’s capsule [26].
Kennet found serum creatinine levels higher than 133 µmol/L amongst patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 [26].
In our study 60% of the patients had a decreased value of serum iron. Seventy four percents had an increased value of C-reactive protein. The high percentage of these indicators indicates the involvement of the immune response in patients, which correlates with previously published studies [29].
High levels of C-reactive protein were noted in the vast majority of SARS-CoV-2 patients (3%–91%) and shown to be associated with disease severity [21, 22].
C-reactive protein levels give an idea for disease severity and prognosis. Additionally, it is considered to be a potential early marker for sepsis and mortality. It is suggested that C-reactive protein level, especially at admission, may be critical for grading disease severity [30].
The prevention and control of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak is well underway around the world and efforts must continue to target this virus.
This viral infection appears to adversely affect not only the respiratory system but also several other organ systems, including the urinary, liver, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and neurological systems.
The Clinical Laboratory plays a key role in supporting the monitoring and management of SARS-CoV-2 disease
In the meantime, we believe that the front-line multidisciplinary team should carefully monitor multi-organ functions, which may also be the key to the survival of infected patients. We suggest an improved knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 related extra-pulmonary complications will help to develop better medical management strategies for these patients.
We suggest that CBC should be performed in each patient with COVID-19 infection, because lymphopenia is a hallmark in symptomatic patients and elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is associated with bad clinical outcomes. We recommend CRP or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ERS) to be monitored in COVID-19 patient because their increased levels are associated with worse clinical outcomes.
Increased levels of AST, ALT and bilirubin, LDH, Urea and creatinine are associated with poor prognosis. Albumin levels should be monitored because they reflects an acute inflammatory state or synthetic liver dysfunctions.
Biochemical and hematological tests are very important for clinical monitoring and therapy protocol for the patients.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
