AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/IJBR-2021/024
*Corresponding Author: Azab Elsayed Azab, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Sabratha University, Libya
Citation: Marwan T. M. Abofila1&, Azab Elsayed Azab, Imam U. M, M. H. Ng, Ramasamy R, Chen H. C, Ganabadi S. (2021) Heart Failure: Symptoms, Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment with Special Reference to African-Americans, International J. of Biomed Research 1(4); DOI: 10.31579/IJBR-2021/024
Copyright: © 2021 Prabir Mandal, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 02 June 2021 | Accepted: 05 June 2021 | Published: 16 June 2021
Keywords: mesenchymal stem cells, bone marrow, new zealand white rabbit, cell morphology, multipotency, immunophenotyping
Background: Stem cells are defined as cells that can self-renew indefinitely and able to differentiate into various mature cells when induced appropriately. It have many other properties bring attention to use in regenerative medicine. Stem cell therapy has attracted much interest in this 21st century, not only because of the controversy surrounding the ethics involving pluripotent stem cells, but their potential for clinical use.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to isolate and characterize mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow of New Zealand white rabbits by its morphological, multipotential differentiation and immunophenotypical analysis.
Materials and Methods: Three rabbits were euthanized with pentobarbital, an incision was made through the skin at thigh region and all muscles related to femoral bone were removed. The two epiphysis ends were cut ant the bone marrow was flushed to be cultured for series of passages.
Results: The bone marrow cells were shown to adhere to the plastic surface and started to form fibroblastic-like colonies after 3 to 7 days of initial seeding. Further characterization was conducted using cells from passage two onward by analyzing their surface protein expression and ability to differentiate into mesodermal lineages under a relevant inductive condition. Flow cytometer analysis showed that the adherent bone marrow cells were expressing CD44 and CD90 but not CD34 which is a standard profile of mesenchymal stem cells. Besides, the bone marrow cells which were subjected to adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation exhibited differentiation into adipocytes and osteoblasts when cultured in appropriate inductive differentiation media.
Conclusion: Based on our observation, the bone marrow adherent cells from New Zealand white rabbits had reflected common mesenchymal stem cells characteristics which have been confirmed via morphological, multipotential ability and immunophenotyping analysis.
Stem cells are defined as cells that can self-renew indefinitely and able to differentiate into various mature cells when induced appropriately [1]. It have many other properties bring attention to use in regenerative medicine. Stem cell therapy has attracted much interest in this 21st century, not only because of the controversy surrounding the ethics involving pluripotent stem cells, but their potential for clinical use [2].
Stem cells are classified according to their sources into two main types, the embryonic and non-embryonic. Embryonic stem cells (ESC) are pluripotent and can differentiate into all germ layers [3]. Non-embryonic stem cells (Non-ESC) can be sub-classified into fetal stem cells (FSCs) and adult stem cells (ASCs) [2]. Both of them are multipotential. Their potential to differentiate into different cell types appears to be more limited [3]. The capacity of these cells for potency (power) and relative ease to isolate and expand are valuable properties for regenerative medicine [4].
Mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to adhere to cell culture flask and exhibit fibroblastic-like shape. Many studies have been demonstrated the effects of different culture protocols on the cell phenotype. The reports show little and no significant differences among the cells isolated by any protocol [5-7].
Differentiation is the process by which matured cells change to a specialized type. During differentiation, certain genes are turned on and become activated while others are switched off and become inactivated; a complex process tightly regulated, resulting in cell development of specific structures, which perform certain functions. Cultured cells can be made to differentiate into exclusive lineages by providing Selective media components that can be identified by histochemical staining and quantified by quantitative Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) [8]. The standard test to confirm the mesenchymal stem cells is differentiation of the cells into other specific cells such as osteoblasts, adipocytes, chondrocytes, myocytes and neurons. MSCS have been seen to even differentiate into neuron-like cells. The process of differentiation normally will occur with the aid of influencing factors and it is considered the test for multipotency of MSCs [9].
Immunophenotyping is using a flow cytometry technique to enable identification of specific cell types from complex biological samples according to the cell surface antigen expression. Mesenchymal stem cells can be identified based on the expression of specific proteins called surface antigen phenotype of mesenchymal stem cell markers. Some of these markers are present on undifferentiated MSCs and disappear during differentiation [10].
The aim of this study was to isolate and characterize mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow of New Zealand white rabbits by its morphological, multipotential differentiation and immunophenotypical analysis.
3.1 Experimental animals
The use of animals were approved and in accordance to the guide by the Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University Putra Malaysia (Ref.UPM/FRV/PS/3.2.1.551/ AUP-R94). Three New Zealand White rabbits, 3 to 4 months old, weighing 1.3 ± 0.3 kg were used in this experiment to take stem cells derived bone marrow. All rabbits were healthy based on physical and blood profile examinations. , on 9th April 2010
3.2 Isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from rabbit bone marrow (BM-MSCs)
The isolation of MSCs was performed on euthanized rabbits as illustrated by Braga-Silva et al. [11]. This included anesthetizing the rabbits with ketamine-xylazine and subsequently euthanizing them with sodium pentobarbital (Dolethal). An incision was then made through the skin on the cranial thigh region and all muscles attached to the femur were removed to allow for a brief immersion of the femoral bone in 70% alcohol. The femoral bone was later placed in a 50 ml falcon tube containing media and both ends of the epiphysis cut using a bone cutter. Finally, bone marrow was flushed out into a 15ml falcon tube with 5ml media.
The collected bone marrow was immediately mixed with 5 ml of 83% Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium Ham’s F12 (DMEM F12) that contained high glucose supplemented with 15
4.1 Characterization of Rabbit BM-MSCs
The isolated cells were pre-characterized by their morphology, differentiation capacity and expressed CD markers to ensure that the isolated cells were MSCs in nature.
4.1.1 Morphology
In this study, the isolated cells suspended in media were regularly rounded in shape, evenly distributing, albeit occasional cells clumping (Figure .1). Cells adhered to tissue culture flasks after 3 days -7 days of seeding, and it exhibited a fibroblast-like shape. The population became more homogeneous after subsequent passages (Figures .2-4).
4.2 Differentiation Potential
Pellet culture of rabbit BM-MSCs in adipogenesis media after 21 days showed positive deposition of fat droplets by using Oil Red Stain and the cells’ nuclei were stained purple with hematoxylin stain. This indicated the differentiation of MSCs to adipocytes containing the intra-cytoplasmic lipid vacuoles (fat droplet). Meanwhile the cultured cells of rabbit BM-MSCs in control media did not stain positive for Oil Red Stain (Figure .5).
The rabbit BMSCs cultured in osteogenesis media for 21 days showed positive deposition of calcium as detected by Alizarin Red S stain. This indicated the differentiation of MSCs to osteocytes. While the rabbit BM-MSCs cultured in control media did not stain positively for Alizarin Red S Stain (Figure 6). Overall, the rabbit BM-MSCs showed multi-potential ability.
4.1.3 Immunophenotyping of Stem Cells
The second passage of rabbit BM-MSCs was utilized for detection of the cell surface epitopes. Those cells were positive in the expression of MSCs marker related to cell adhesion CD44 (Pgp-1, HCAM) (Figure 3.7) and
multipotency CD90 (Thy-1) (Figure 8). While the same cells showed negative in the expression of hematopoietic stem cells marker CD34 (Figure 3.9), they also showed negative even in the presence of second (2ed) antibody only (negative control), (FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG1 antibody) (Figure .10).
The Morphological Characteristic: the present study demonstrated that BM-MSCs adhered to tissue culture flasks after 3 to 7 days of seeding and exhibited fibroblast-like shapes. BM-MSCs were isolated based on their adherence to tissue culture flasks and survival through the cultivation period. These may be possible because they maintained their proliferative capacity, as reported previously [18, 19]. Two populations of cells in primary passage (P0) were identified including small round cell (non-adherent cells) and spindle-shaped stromal stem cells (adherent cells). The small rounded cells decreased in size rapidly and disappeared with repeated passages in a culture of regular media, while the fibroblastic cells maintained their proliferative characteristics similar to those in the primary passage (P0). The cells required up to 14 days to reach 90% confluence, at the first passage (P1), and showed complete confluence at day 5 of subculture. In the second passage (P2), cells achieved confluence on day 2, and by the third and fourth passages (P3 and P4), cells became morphologically homogeneous with more than 95% showing fibroblastic shapes. All these heterogeneous and homogeneous changes in morphology observed were in agreement with previous reports (12, 18-20].
The Immunophenotyping Characteristic: the present result demonstrated that BM-MSCs derived from rabbits exhibited a similar expression profile as MSC surface markers (cell adhesion marker CD44 and multipotency marker CD90) and lacked hematopoietic markers (CD34). However, previous studies investigating MSCs isolated from various tissues have indicated that cell surface phenotype can vary from that of BM-MSCs [21, 22], most notably using a panel of antibodies used to define MSCs [23]. In BM-MSCs, the surface markers have clearly been defined, the success of which has depended largely on their ability to adhere to tissue culture flasks that separate them from cells of hematopoietic stem cells [24].
The Multipotential Character: the differentiation potential of BM-MSCs derived using two different techniques (by way of anesthesia or euthanasia) demonstrated similar differentiation capacities in comparison with most previous studies [20, 25]. The isolated cells incubated in adipogenic induction medium were able to differentiate into adipocytes with accumulation of intracellular lipid droplets detected by staining with Oil Red O. This result is consistent with previous reports [20, 25, and 26]. Also, BM-MSCs incubated in an osteogenic induction medium were able to differentiate into osteocytes with intracellular calcium deposit as demonstrated by red coloration of Alizarin S, in agreement with what has been reported previously [20, 27, 28]. Other studies have reported that BM-MSCs are multipotent cells that can differentiate into different cell types, including adipocytes and chondrocytes [29]. Besides that, these cells have the ability to Trans-differentiate into cells of endoderm and ectoderm lineages such as hepatocytes and neurons [30].
Overall, The confirmation and identification of MSCs through morphology, multipotency and immunophenotyping characteristics have proven that the isolated cells from rabbit bone marrow were MSCs in nature, which is consistent with reported findings [12, 18-20, 23-26].
In general, the morphological, multipotency and immunophenotypical characteristics for the isolated MSCs from euthanized rabbit bone marrow have proven that those cells were stem cell in nature. The isolated MSCs from euthanized rabbit bone marrow illustrated similarities in morphological characteristics and multipotential ability compared with other research work which were isolated MSCs from anesthetized rabbit, even though variations existed in the sample harvesting, materials and required skills in the two methods. Euthanized rabbits were subsequently used as the method of choice for harvesting the bone marrow cells. Further comparative study should be made to study cell viability and proliferation capacity between bone marrow derived stem cells from anaesthetized and euthanized animals, moreover study the advantage and disadvantage for each method.
Researchers appreciate the effort and the assistance that was offered by the University Putra Malaysia and University Kebangsaan Malaysia as well as Zawia University and Sabratha University - Libya. In addition, the researchers are grateful to Dr. Rajash Ramasamy and Dr. Angel Ng for their help, guidance, and inspiration in carrying out this work". Instead of the way it was written in this article.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
