AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8892/363
1Shahid Behesti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2Ministry of Education of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Isfahan.
*Corresponding Author: Ali Mohammad Beigi, Shahid Behesti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Citation: Ali Mohammad Beigi, Zahra Saberi, (2026), Investigating the Relationship and Tendency of Individuals with Psychopathic Traits to Prescriptive Intergenerational-Tension Ageism, Psychology and Mental Health Care, 10(2): DOI:10.31579/2637-8892/363
Copyright: © 2026, Ali Mohammad Beigi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 02 February 2026 | Accepted: 17 February 2026 | Published: 25 February 2026
Keywords: elderly; psychopathy; personality; intergenerational-tension; ageism
The associations between psychopathic traits and its dimensions and intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions were examined. The participants in the research were 835 people from Iran, of whom 388 were male (46.5%) and 447 were female (53.5%). The age range of the participants was from 17 to 66 years, with an average of 30.40 and a standard deviation of 9.59. We used two questionnaires: the 29-item Self-Report Psychopathy Short Form (SRP-SF) and the prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism scale (SIC). The results showed that there was significant relationship between psychopathic traits and its dimensions with prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions. This relationship was almost the same between men and women. The results of multiple regression showed that psychopathy and its dimensions predicted intergenerational tension and its dimensions. According to the results of this study, it can be said that people with more psychopathic traits and characteristics view the elderly through a competitive and hostile lens to achieve their own interests. This issue can play an important role in the emergence of ageism and intergenerational tension among people with more psychopathic traits. Using its results, we can further examine the role of personality factors, especially in people with psychopathic traits, in ageism and use them to help the elderly. The results of this type of research can be of great help to the elderly, who are actually considered spiritual assets of society.
Psychopathy:
Psychopathy is often described as a complex set of dimensions that make it very difficult to diagnose and define the disorder [1], and there is no single definition of this disorder1. Psychopathy is defined by a complex set of personality and behavioral traits, including callousness, irresponsibility, impulsivity, and antisocial behavior [2,3]. Psychopathy is made up of emotional, interpersonal, and behavioral traits [4]. Psychopathy has long been associated with aggression, and aggression has been considered one of the most consistent and core features of the disorder [5]. Characteristics of these individuals include incomplete emotional experience, an arrogant and deceptive interpersonal communication style, and behaviors that are characterized by impulsivity and irresponsibility [2]. The most important traits in psychopaths are superficial charm, inability to love, self-centeredness, a sense of innocence, lack of remorse and shame, lack of insight, and failure to learn from [6]. Psychopathy is a controversial topic among clinicians and researchers, with psychiatrists placing an overemphasis on criminal behavior, but non-criminal psychopaths may be just as exploitative, deceptive, and irresponsible [6-8]. Psychopathy has a long and significant history in clinical and forensic psychology and is a personality construct associated with a cold personality and antisocial behavior. This construct has recently received attention in non-clinical fields as well [9-11]. There has been extensive research on psychopathy [12]. It is estimated that 1% of the general [13,14] and between 10 and 15% of the criminal population [14] have psychopathic traits. Various models have been proposed to better understand the construct of psychopathy, which use different factor structures to measure psychopathy [15]. The four-facet model is one of these models, in which personality traits (including interpersonal and emotional personality traits) are contrasted with behavioral traits (including deviant lifestyles and antisocial behaviors). Despite current debates about the structure of psychopathy [16], an important development is the application of structural models of personality to understanding psychopathy [17]. The structure of psychopathy was originally defined by Hare [13,14] as a four-factor model, which is also known as facets [13]. These factors include F1) interpersonal factors, which include traits of charm, egotism, lying, and manipulation. F2) Emotional factor, which includes traits of lack of remorse, superficial affection, callousness, and failure to accept responsibility. F3) Lifestyle factors, which include need for stimulation, parasitic lifestyle, lack of realistic goals, impulsivity, and irresponsibility. And finally, F4) antisocial factor, which includes poor behavioral controls, early behavioral problems, juvenile delinquency, parole revocation, and criminal adaptive traits [13,14]. Therefore, the debate about which traits play a central role in the structure of psychopathy continues [16,18].
Ageism:
According to the World Health Organization, the world's population is aging faster than ever before. The number of people over 60 is expected to double worldwide between 2015 and 2050 [19]. The elderly were often considered a social problem throughout the 20th century [20,21]. The emphasis of those who discriminate against the elderly is on the costs of maintaining health and the worn-out and unhealthy bodies of the elderly [20,21]. According to Butler, ageism is defined as a form of social and interpersonal discrimination accompanied by stereotypes based on age [22,23]. Ageism has become a socially accepted form of discrimination and generally harms the elderly and worsens their quality of life [24]. Negative age-based attitudes deprive older people of opportunities and negatively impact their health [25]. Ageism is also a strong predictor of poor mental health [26,27]. According to a World Health Organization study of 83,000 people in 57 countries, the results showed that 60% of the elderly do not receive the necessary respect [24,28]. Ageism increases the risk of death. It slows down the recovery from illness and increases mental health problems [29,30]. In a study conducted in 45 countries, the results showed that in 95.5% of cases, ageism led to negative mental health outcomes [31]. In particular, the results showed that ageism was associated with lifetime depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and post-traumatic stress [31]. Ageism is a subtle and complex phenomenon that puts everyone at risk if people live long enough [32]. In fact, age-based prejudice potentially targets people of all ages. It takes many forms, each with subtle differences, but empirical research has focused primarily on attitudes toward the elderly [33]. An important and influential factor that plays a significant role in creating ageism is intergenerational competition. Younger people often perceive older people who have power and status and have somehow occupied the place of young people as a great threat to consume resources and an obstacle to young people achieving their goals and plans. This can lead to intergenerational tension and conflict [33]. Especially in the context of population aging, which causes older people to be perceived as consumers of a large portion of social resources and as burdens on their families and society, intergenerational conflicts can even intensify [34]. Studies have shown that negative stereotypes about the elderly lead to discrimination [35] with an aging population, scarce resources, and a social age structure that is almost certainly changing in some way from the status quo, the situation ahead poses a risk of bias and intergenerational tension, particularly from younger generations who may shoulder the burden of caring for a growing older population [3]. There is an inherent unpleasant fact in changing age dynamics: most of the elderly will inevitably increase social influence and consumption of resources, and the older population may increase traditional youth activities [32]. However, journalists, experts, and other speculators may exaggerate the competition between generations and illustrate the elderly as rich but expensive people [36]. Numerous evidence also shows areas for intergenerational pessimism: threat of resources, benevolent prejudices, prescription stereotypes, and age advances [32]. But issues such as increasing life expectancy, delayed retirement, and economic realities indicate that the elderly are not going away quietly [37-39]. The recent perspective on ageism that emphasizes the elderly's use of social resources refers to imposed or prescriptive beliefs and is based on should [40]. According to this view, if older people do not step aside in time and hand over their resources, they can become a burden on the ambitious younger generation. The growing elderly population necessitates a greater focus on aging and intergenerational relationships. One issue of increasing importance is ageism and its risks to older people [32]. Age bias, despite the importance of age in interpersonal judgments, has not been widely studied [32].
Overview and Predictions
Considering the characteristics of psychopathy (which, as mentioned, are often stressful and accompanied by aggression and impaired interpersonal communication, lack of empathy, and lack of understanding of the status of individuals), it is necessary to examine the relationship between psychopathy and intergenerational tensions and ageism. The results of this study can have valuable achievements for improving the situation of the elderly, whose population is increasing day by day. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether psychopathic traits and its dimensions, which include interpersonal, affective, lifestyle, and antisocial, were associated to prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions its (consumption, succession, and identity).
We formulated the following hypotheses for the present study:
Hypothesis 1:
We expected that the significant associations between psychopathic traits and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions.
Hypothesis 2:
We expected that the significant associations between interpersonal manipulation and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions.
Hypothesis 3:
We expected that the significant associations between affective callousness and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions.
Hypothesis 4:
We expected that the significant associations between erratic lifestyle and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions.
Hypothesis 5:
We expected that the significant associations between antisociality and its dimensions and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions.
Methods
Participants and Procedure
The participants in the research were 835 people from Iran, of whom 388 were male (46.5%) and 447 were female (53.5%). The age range of the participants was from 17 to 66 years, with an average of 30.40 and a standard deviation of 9.59. In women, the age range is between (17 to 66) with a mean of 31.41 and a standard deviation of 9.66. In men, the age range is between (18 to 64) with a mean of 29.20 and a standard deviation of 9.35. The research design used is the correlation research method with a cross-sectional approach. The data collection method was done online and through social media. The method of work was as follows: participants were contacted, and the objectives of the research were explained to them. After expressing their consent, a link to the questions designed in Google Forms software was sent to them, and the participants answered the test questions. We used three online self-report questionnaires, which were carefully translated from the original English version under the supervision of linguists. The statistical method used in this study was the Pearson correlation test. Data were analyzed using SPSS 27 software.
Measures Assessment of Psychopathic Traits
Psychopathic traits were assessed using the 29-item Self-Report Psychopathy Short Form [41,42]. a self-report measure of psychopathy derived from and shown to correlate highly with the Psychopathy Checklist Revised [42,43]. The items are grouped into four dimensions of psychopathy: affective callousness (e.g., “I never feel guilty over hurting others”), interpersonal manipulation (e.g., “I think I can beat a lie detector”), antisociality (e.g., “I have tried to hit someone with a vehicle”), and erratic lifestyle (e.g., “I’ve often done dangerous things just for the thrill of it44. Participants rated these items based on the extent to which they thought the statements reflected their own beliefs using a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = disagree strongly to 5 = agree strongly). Each factor of the SRP-SF showed high internal consistency in the current study (interpersonal, α = .95; affective, α = .92; lifestyle, α = .87; antisocial, α = .88; total scores, α = .98), similar to previous studies of the SRP-SF41,45. In the present research, Cronbach’s alphas for the subscales (categories) are as follows: the affective callousness subscale was (7 items; α = .73); the interpersonal manipulation subscale was (7 items; α = .71); the erratic lifestyle subscale was (7 items; α = .77); the antisociality subscale was (7 items; α = .89); and the total Psychopathic Traits Scale was (29 items; α = .91).
Prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism scale (SIC)
The SIC contains 20 items and three subscales: Succession, Identity, and Consumption. Although prior scales focus mainly on what older people allegedly “are” (descriptive stereotypes), the current analysis centers on the role of more controlling, “should”-based, prescriptive beliefs. This approach proposes three prescriptive dimensions that younger generations are particularly likely to endorse: [1] active succession of enviable positions and influence, [2] age-appropriate, symbolic identity maintenance, and [3] minimizing passive shared-resource consumption. The Succession subscale contains eight items; an example item from this scale is, “It is unfair that older people get to vote on issues that will impact younger people much more.” The Identity subscale contains five items; an example from this scale is, “Older people shouldn’t even try to act cool.” The Consumption subscale contains seven items; an example from this scale is, “Older people shouldn’t be so miserly with their money if their younger relatives need it.” All the items on the SIC are measured on a 6-point scale, where 1 = strongly disagree and 6 = strongly agree. Items on the scale are averaged to give an overall score of prescriptive stereotype endorsement. North and Fiske [46] found that the SIC prescriptive ageism scale had strong reliability (.91) as well as strong divergent and convergent validity. In addition, they found that the SIC significantly predicted ratings of warmth and competence for violating targets. In this investigation, the SIC scale also achieved high internal consistency (α = .93) [46]. In the present research, Cronbach’s alphas for the subscales (categories) are as follows: the succession subscale was (8 items; α = .71); the identity subscale was (5 items; α = .83); the consumption subscale was (7 items; α = .54); and the total prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism scale was (20 items; α = .77).
Descriptive statistics and zero-order correlations
The descriptive statistics and zero-order correlations are presented in Table 1.
As shown in the M-column (Table 1), the mean "intergenerational-tension ageism" is (M = 61.99, SD = 11.36). Also, the means of the subscale’s "consumption" (M = 20.66, SD = 4.82), "succession" (M = 30.32, SD = 6.02), and "identity" (M = 11.01, SD = 4.98) are given. Moreover, the mean of men's "intergenerational-tension ageism" was (M = 64.42, SD = 11.19). Also, the means of the subscales for men " Consumption" (M = 21.37, SD = 4.98), "Succession" (M = 31.06, SD = 6.25), and "Identity" (M = 11.99, SD = 5.16) are given. The mean for women for "intergenerational-tension ageism" was (M = 59.87, SD = 11.10). Also, the means of the subscales for men "consumption" (M = 20.04, SD = 4.60), "succession" (M = 29.68, SD = 5.73), and "identity" (M = 10.15, SD = 4.65) are given. As the results show, the mean scores of intergenerational tensions in women were lower than the mean scores of men in both the total test score and the subscales. According to these results, intergenerational tension towards the elderly is less among women than among men. The correlations between interpersonal manipulation and consumption (0.27), succession (0.26), identity (0.31), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.39) were positive and significant. In the women, the correlations between interpersonal manipulation and consumption (0.22), succession (0.18), identity (0.30), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.31) were positive and significant. In the men, the correlations between interpersonal manipulation and consumption (0.29), succession (0.31), identity (0.25), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.42) were positive and significant. The correlations between affective callousness and consumption (0.34), succession (0.21), identity (0.43), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.44) were positive and significant. In the women, the correlations between affective callousness and consumption (0.32), succession (0.21), identity (0.42), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.42) were positive and significant. In the men, the correlations between affective callousness and consumption (0.32), succession (0.16), identity (0.39), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.41) were positive and significant. The correlations between erratic lifestyle and consumption (0.31), succession (0.12), identity (0.43), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.39) were positive and significant. In the women, the correlations between erratic lifestyle and consumption (0.30), succession (0.13), identity (0.40), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.36) were positive and significant. In the men, the correlations between erratic lifestyle and consumption (0.28), identity (0.43), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.36) were positive and significant. But the correlation between erratic lifestyle and succession (0.07) was not significant. The correlations between antisociality and consumption (0.27), identity (0.52), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.30) were positive and significant. But the correlation between antisociality and succession (-0.08) was negative and significant. In the women, the correlations between antisociality with consumption (0.30), identity (0.53), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.35) were positive and significant. But the correlation between antisociality and succession (0.00) was not significant. In the men, the correlations between antisociality with consumption (0.22), identity (0.49), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.22) were positive and significant. But the correlation between antisociality and succession (-0.19) was negative and significant. The correlations between psychopathic traits and consumption (0.35), succession (0.14), identity (0.50), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.44) were positive and significant. In the women, the correlations between psychopathic traits and consumption (0.33), succession (0.15), identity (0.48), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.41) were positive and significant. In the men, the correlations between psychopathic traits and consumption (0.33), identity (0.48), and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (0.41) were positive and significant. But the correlation between psychopathic traits and succession (0.08) was not significant.
| G | M | Sd | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
| ||
| 1 | Consumption | T | 20.66 | 4.82 | ||||||||
| M | 21.37 | 4.98 | ||||||||||
| W | 20.04 | 4.60 | ||||||||||
| 2 | Succession | T | 30.32 | 6.02 | .35** | |||||||
| M | 31.06 | 6.25 | .32** | |||||||||
| W | 29.68 | 5.73 | .37** | |||||||||
| 3 | Identity | T | 11.01 | 4.98 | .38** | .10** | ||||||
| M | 11.99 | 5.16 | .29** | .01 | ||||||||
| W | 10.15 | 4.65 | .45** | .17** | ||||||||
| 4 | Prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism | T | 61.99 | 11.36 | .78** | .72** | .65** | |||||
| M | 64.42 | 11.19 | .75** | .70** | .59** | |||||||
| W | 59.87 | 11.10 | .79** | .74** | .69** | |||||||
| 5 | Interpersonal manipulation | T | 16.29 | 4.59 | .27** | .26** | .31** | .39** | ||||
| M | 17.56 | 4.23 | .29** | .31** | .25** | .42** | ||||||
| W | 15.18 | 4.62 | .22** | .18** | .30** | .31** | ||||||
| 6 | Affective callousness | T | 14.62 | 4.10 | .34** | .21** | .43** | .44** | .69** | |||
| M | 15.95 | 4.64 | .32** | .16** | .39** | .41** | .66** | |||||
| W | 13.47 | 5.02 | .32** | .21** | .42** | .42** | .68** | |||||
| 7 | Erratic lifestyle | T | 14.42 | 5.02 | .31** | .12** | .43** | .39** | .67** | .76** | ||
| M | 15.51 | 4.86 | .28** | .07 | .43** | .36** | .64** | .74** | ||||
| W | 13.48 | 4.96 | .30** | .13** | .40** | .36** | .67** | .76** | ||||
| 8 | Antisociality | T | 11.38 | 5.61 | .27** | -.08* | .52** | .30** | .42** | .66** | .70** | |
| M | 12.9 | 5.77 | .22** | -.19** | .49** | .22** | .34** | .60** | .66** | |||
| W | 10.75 | 5.40 | .30** | .00 | .53** | .35** | .47** | .71** | .73** | |||
| 9 | Psychopathy | T | 56.71 | 17.40 | .35** | .14** | .50** | .44** | .80** | .90** | .91** | .83** |
| M | 61.11 | 16.37 | .33** | .08 | .48** | .41** | .76** | .89** | .91** | .81** | ||
| W | 52.89 | 17.37 | .33** | .15** | .48** | .41** | .80** | .91** | .91** | .85** | ||
| Note: *p < .05; **p < .01.T= Total (men and women, N= 835), M= men,N= 388 W= women, N= 447 | ||||||||||||
Table 1: Intercorrelations and descriptive statistics of study variables
In order to explain and predict prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions as an outcome variable, a multiple regression model was used on psychopathy and its dimensions as a predictor variable. Multiple linear regression was performed to examine the variance of prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism scores and its dimensions. The total psychopathy score and its dimensions as predictor variables, with the total score of prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions as outcome variables, were entered into the model separately using the Enter method (given that we had 4 outcome variables [which included the total score of prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its 3 dimensions], each of them was entered into the model separately with the total psychopathy score and its 4 dimensions as predictor variables). The software assumed the antisocial predictor variable as (Excluded variable) and did not include it in the regression model and calculated the other variables. For this reason, in (Table 2), 3 psychopathy dimensions are listed as predictor variables. According to Table 2, regarding the relationship between the total psychopathy score and its dimensions with the total score of prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism, the model is able to explain 21.1 variance of the outcome variable (adjusted R² square = 20.7), which significantly predicts the outcome variable. (p=0.000, F=(4,830)=55.349). Also, interpersonal manipulation was associated with the total score of prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (p=0.007, t=2.698, β=0.353). Affective callousness was also associated with the total score of prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism (p=0.000, t=3.650, β=0.654). The other two variables, erratic lifestyle and total psychopathy score, did not significantly contribute to the variance of the total score of prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism. According to Table 2, regarding the relationship between the total psychopathy score and its dimensions with identity, the model is able to explain 28.4 variance of the outcome variable (adjusted R² square = 28.1), which significantly predicts the outcome variable (p = 0.000, F = 4, 830 = 82.496). Also, interpersonal manipulation was associated with identity. (p=0.000, t=-5.743, β=-.313). Affective callousness was associated with identity. (p=0.000, t=-3.595, β=-.269). Erratic lifestyle was associated with identity. (p=0.000, t=-3.832, β=-.301). Total psychopathy score was associated with identity. (p=0.000, t=9. 161, β=0.357). According to Table 2, regarding the relationship between psychopathy and its dimensions and succession, the model is able to explain 14.4 variance of the outcome variable (adjusted R² square = 14.8), which significantly predicts the outcome variable (p=0.000, F=(4,830)= 36.019). Also, interpersonal manipulation was associated with succession. (p=0.000, t=9.169, β=0.659). Affective callousness was also associated with succession. (p=0.000, t=8.000, β=0.789). Erratic lifestyle was associated with succession. (p=0.000, t=4.217, β=0.437). The total psychopathy score was associated with succession. (p=0.000, t=-7.977, β=-.410) According to Table 2, regarding the relationship between psychopathy and its dimensions and consumption, the model is able to explain 12.4 variance of the outcome variable (adjusted R² square = 11.9), which significantly predicts the outcome variable. (p=0.000, F= (4,830)= 29.292). None of the variables contributed significantly to the variance of consumption.
| Predictor variable | R² square | Adjusted R² square
| F | p | Constant value
| β | t | p | |
| prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism | |||||||||
| .211 | .207 | 55.349 | 0.000 | 44.327 | |||||
| Interpersonal manipulation | 0.353 | 2.698 | 0.007 | ||||||
| Affective callousness | 0.654 | 3.650 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Erratic lifestyle | 0.144 | 0.764 | 0.445 | ||||||
| Psychopathy | 0.005 | 0.051 | 0.959 | ||||||
| Identity | |||||||||
| 0.284 | 0.281 | 82.496 | 0.000 | 4.112 | |||||
| Interpersonal manipulation | -.313 | -5.743 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Affective callousness | -.269 | -.3.595 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Erratic lifestyle | -.301 | -3.832 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Psychopathy | 0.357 | 9.161 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Succession | |||||||||
| 0.148 | 0.144 | 36.019 | 0.000 | 25.021 | |||||
| Interpersonal manipulation | 0.659 | 9.169 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Affective callousness | 0.789 | 8.000 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Erratic lifestyle | 0.437 | 4.217 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Psychopathy | -.410 | -7.977 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Consumption | |||||||||
| 0.124 | 0.119 | 29.292 | 0.000 | 15.194 | |||||
| Interpersonal manipulation | 0.007 | 0.114 | 0.909 | ||||||
| Affective callousness | 0.134 | 1.678 | 0.094 | ||||||
| Erratic lifestyle | 0.008 | 0.097 | 0.922 | ||||||
| Psychopathy | 0.058 | 1.379 | 0.168 | ||||||
Table 2: Multiple linear regression analysis of prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism scores and its dimensions
We found support for the prediction (Hypothesis 1) that the significant associations between psychopathic traits and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions. Multiple regression results showed that total psychopathy as a predictor variable predicts identity and succession. According to personality psychologists, certain characteristics can make people prone to prejudice, discrimination, and aggressive behavior toward others [47]. For example, in a study by Mohammad Beigi and Saberi, there was a relationship between narcissistic personality traits and attitudes toward aging [48]. Psychopathy is a good predictor of aggression; this could also help prevent violence [49]. Hostility, as the cognitive component of aggression, is characterized by having a negative view of others [50]. According to social information processing theory, individuals are influenced by personal biases and beliefs when interpreting social cues. This leads to varied and flawed interpretations of ambiguous situations, sometimes leading to hostile attributions [51]. Therefore, it can be said that people who have more psychopathic characteristics, according to the theory of social information processing, make flawed interpretations of situations under the influence of personal biases and beliefs, which sometimes lead to hostile attributions. These hostile attributions can create prejudiced behaviors and ultimately more ageism against the elderly. unfair allocation of resources leads to retaliatory punishments, and the extent to which this occurs depends on the degree of anger that the punisher feels towards the other person [51]. Therefore, according to the theory of intergenerational tension [32,46]. We can say that younger people (especially those with more psychopathic tendencies) are in competition with older people because they feel they have fewer resources and benefits. They also perceive more threat, feel more frustration, and feel that resources are divided unfairly among them. Therefore, they choose anger because expressing anger is a communication way to transmit information [52,53]. And people use anger to dissuade others from their current behavior [53]. Therefore, these feelings and beliefs cause the formation of anger and, as a result, negative stereotypes, prejudice, ageism, and even intergenerational tension in people towards the elderly. According to all these views and considering the characteristics of psychopaths mentioned, it can be said that people with higher psychopathic traits have a greater desire to do things that lead to greater ageism. We found support for the prediction (Hypothesis 2) that the significant associations between interpersonal manipulation and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions. Multiple regression results showed that interpersonal manipulation as a predictor variable predicts prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism, identity and succession. Given that one of the main factors in psychopathy is the interpersonal dimension and factor, people with higher psychopathy have more problems in this dimension, in accordance with the research [2]. Which says that psychopathy is characterized by an arrogant and deceptive interpersonal communication style and behaviors that are accompanied by impulsivity and irresponsibility. For this reason, they are more likely to resort to behaviors that lead to harassment of the elderly and bias against them. We found support for the prediction (Hypothesis 3) that the significant associations between affective callousness and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions. Multiple regression results showed that affective callousness as a predictor variable predicts identity, succession and total score of prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism. One of the most prominent characteristics of psychopaths is emotional and interpersonal deficits, for example [54]. It can be said that emotional problems, especially interpersonal problems, have led to the formation of cognitive biases and even stereotypes in the minds of psychopaths, since stereotypes are resistant to change [55]. And intergroup contact is a strategy for promoting and improving the stereotypes that individuals have towards other groups [56]. Therefore, it can be said that younger people with psychopathic traits do not communicate well with other groups, such as the elderly, to improve the stereotypes they have and engage in ageist behaviors and choose sexism. In support of this [57], believes that ageism is perpetuated by social segregation in such a way that children, young and middle-aged adults, and older adults are transferred to school, the workforce, and retirement or nursing homes for care, respectively, and there are restrictions on communication between groups. We found support for the prediction (Hypothesis 4) that the significant associations between erratic lifestyle and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions. Multiple regression results showed that erratic lifestyle as a predictor variable predicts identity and succession. In explaining the results of the research, it can be said that attitudes and hypotheses about health and aging are strongly rooted in social cognitions. A fixed and normative assumption is that with increasing age, physical and cognitive decline becomes inevitable. Physical and cognitive problems increase with increasing age [58]. On the other hand, considering the prejudices and attitudes that psychopaths have, it can be said that these cognitions are intensified under the influence of psychopathic characteristics. According to Golub & Langer [58], this hypothesis can lead to a "self-fulfilling prophecy of decline." Therefore, individuals with higher psychopathic traits, influenced by biased social cognitions, tend to engage in ageism and greater intergenerational tension with the elderly, as if they are somehow influenced by a self-fulfilling prophecy of decline pattern. We found support for the prediction (Hypothesis 5) that the significant associations between antisociality and its dimensions and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions. According to life history theory, it is assumed that people with higher psychopathy choose a fast-paced life strategy in their lives. Important characteristics of these people include early sexual relations, choosing a partner or spouse for a short period, risk-taking, sexual deviance, violence, delinquency, and aggression [59,60]. This contrasts with the slower-paced life strategy, which attributes personality traits such as honesty-humility (avoiding exploitation of others) in which resources are spent on producing fewer children in later stages of development, greater parental care, risk aversion, and greater physical and psychosocial health [61]. Therefore, in explaining the results of this study, it can be said that choosing this lifestyle by people with psychopathic characteristics means quickly achieving their desires, which in some cases, considering that some resources are at the disposal of the elderly, leads to tension, conflict, and anger between them and the elderly and intergenerational tension. In fact, it can be said that most of the anger, violence, and antisocial behaviors between younger people and the elderly, according to this theory and considering the characteristics of psychopathic people, are about obtaining the resources and status of the elderly and envying them.
The results of this research showed that there was a relationship between psychopathic traits and its dimensions (interpersonal manipulation, affective callousness, erratic lifestyle, and antisociality) and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism and its dimensions (consumption, succession, and identity). These connections and correlations between men and women were almost the same and did not make much difference. The results of multiple regression showed that psychopathy and its dimensions in some cases predicted intergenerational tension and its dimensions. According to the results of this study, it can be said that people who have more psychopathic traits and characteristics are likely to be influenced by these traits and characteristics and view the elderly through a competitive and hostile lens. This issue could play an important role in the emergence of ageism and intergenerational tension among young people with more psychopathic traits. The literature of this research and its results can be used in order to have a new look at ageism and factors related to it. Using its results, we can address the role of personality factors, especially regarding people with psychopathic characteristics, in ageism more than before, and we can use them to help the elderly. The results of this type of research can be of great help to the elderly, who are actually considered the spiritual capital of society. This study has limitations that include the following: The focus of this study was on the factors of personality and prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism, and it is important that other issues related to intergenerational tension (such as cultural, social, and economic factors, etc.) should be examined more carefully in future studies. Another limitation of this research was that, due to the logical design of this research, it was not possible to investigate causality between variables. Future studies may provide a better understanding of the relationships between these variables using experimental manipulations or holistic approaches. A limitation of this study was that we focused exclusively on data that were collected on self-report questionnaires and that participants may have responded blindly. This topic can affect the results of the research. This research did not receive any specific funding from funding organizations in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
I would like to thank great professors such as Dr. Michael S. North, Professor and Ellen Langer and. Reading their works and understanding their perspectives helped me a lot in writing this article.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator of the journal - Psychology and Mental Health Care. " The process of obtaining publication of my article in the Psychology and Mental Health Journal was positive in all areas. The peer review process resulted in a number of valuable comments, the editorial process was collaborative and timely, and the quality of this journal has been quickly noticed, resulting in alternative journals contacting me to publish with them." Warm regards, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. I appreciate the journal (JCCI) editorial office support, the entire team leads were always ready to help, not only on technical front but also on thorough process. Also, I should thank dear reviewers’ attention to detail and creative approach to teach me and bring new insights by their comments. Surely, more discussions and introduction of other hemodynamic devices would provide better prevention and management of shock states. Your efforts and dedication in presenting educational materials in this journal are commendable. Best wishes from, Farahnaz Fallahian.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. I am delighted to have published our manuscript, "Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO): A rare but serious complication following caesarean section." I want to thank the editorial team, especially Maria Emerson, for their prompt review of the manuscript, quick responses to queries, and overall support. Yours sincerely Dr. Victor Olagundoye.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. Many thanks for publishing this manuscript after I lost confidence the editors were most helpful, more than other journals Best wishes from, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The entire process including article submission, review, revision, and publication was extremely easy. The journal editor was prompt and helpful, and the reviewers contributed to the quality of the paper. Thank you so much! Eric Nussbaum, MD
Dr Hala Al Shaikh This is to acknowledge that the peer review process for the article ’ A Novel Gnrh1 Gene Mutation in Four Omani Male Siblings, Presentation and Management ’ sent to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was quick and smooth. The editorial office was prompt with easy communication.
Dear Erin Aust, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice. We are pleased to share our experience with the “Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice”, following the successful publication of our article. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, helping to improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. We are especially thankful to Ms. Erin Aust, the Editorial Coordinator, for her prompt communication and continuous support throughout the process. Her professionalism ensured a smooth and efficient publication experience. The journal upholds high editorial standards, and we highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a credible platform for their work. Best wishes By, Dr. Rakhi Mishra.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. The peer review process of the journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions was excellent and fast, as was the support of the editorial office and the quality of the journal. Kind regards Walter F. Riesen Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Walter F. Riesen.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. Thank you for publishing our article, Exploring Clozapine's Efficacy in Managing Aggression: A Multiple Single-Case Study in Forensic Psychiatry in the international journal of clinical case reports and reviews. We found the peer review process very professional and efficient. The comments were constructive, and the whole process was efficient. On behalf of the co-authors, I would like to thank you for publishing this article. With regards, Dr. Jelle R. Lettinga.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, I would like to express my deep admiration for the exceptional professionalism demonstrated by your journal. I am thoroughly impressed by the speed of the editorial process, the substantive and insightful reviews, and the meticulous preparation of the manuscript for publication. Additionally, I greatly appreciate the courteous and immediate responses from your editorial office to all my inquiries. Best Regards, Dariusz Ziora
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation, Auctores Publishing LLC, We would like to thank the editorial team for the smooth and high-quality communication leading up to the publication of our article in the Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. The reviewers have extensive knowledge in the field, and their relevant questions helped to add value to our publication. Kind regards, Dr. Ravi Shrivastava.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, Auctores Publishing LLC, USA Office: +1-(302)-520-2644. I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the efficient and professional handling of my case report by the ‘Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies’. The peer review process was not only fast but also highly constructive—the reviewers’ comments were clear, relevant, and greatly helped me improve the quality and clarity of my manuscript. I also received excellent support from the editorial office throughout the process. Communication was smooth and timely, and I felt well guided at every stage, from submission to publication. The overall quality and rigor of the journal are truly commendable. I am pleased to have published my work with Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, and I look forward to future opportunities for collaboration. Sincerely, Aline Tollet, UCLouvain.
Dear Ms. Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. “The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews represented the “ideal house” to share with the research community a first experience with the use of the Simeox device for speech rehabilitation. High scientific reputation and attractive website communication were first determinants for the selection of this Journal, and the following submission process exceeded expectations: fast but highly professional peer review, great support by the editorial office, elegant graphic layout. Exactly what a dynamic research team - also composed by allied professionals - needs!" From, Chiara Beccaluva, PT - Italy.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, we have deeply appreciated the professionalism demonstrated by the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The reviewers have extensive knowledge of our field and have been very efficient and fast in supporting the process. I am really looking forward to further collaboration. Thanks. Best regards, Dr. Claudio Ligresti
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. “The peer review process was efficient and constructive, and the editorial office provided excellent communication and support throughout. The journal ensures scientific rigor and high editorial standards, while also offering a smooth and timely publication process. We sincerely appreciate the work of the editorial team in facilitating the dissemination of innovative approaches such as the Bonori Method.” Best regards, Dr. Matteo Bonori.
I recommend without hesitation submitting relevant papers on medical decision making to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I am very grateful to the editorial staff. Maria Emerson was a pleasure to communicate with. The time from submission to publication was an extremely short 3 weeks. The editorial staff submitted the paper to three reviewers. Two of the reviewers commented positively on the value of publishing the paper. The editorial staff quickly recognized the third reviewer’s comments as an unjust attempt to reject the paper. I revised the paper as recommended by the first two reviewers.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Thank you for publishing our case report: "Clinical Case of Effective Fetal Stem Cells Treatment in a Patient with Autism Spectrum Disorder" within the "Journal of Clinical Research and Reports" being submitted by the team of EmCell doctors from Kyiv, Ukraine. We much appreciate a professional and transparent peer-review process from Auctores. All research Doctors are so grateful to your Editorial Office and Auctores Publishing support! I amiably wish our article publication maintained a top quality of your International Scientific Journal. My best wishes for a prosperity of the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Hope our scientific relationship and cooperation will remain long lasting. Thank you very much indeed. Kind regards, Dr. Andriy Sinelnyk Cell Therapy Center EmCell
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. It was truly a rewarding experience to work with the journal “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. The peer review process was insightful and encouraging, helping us refine our work to a higher standard. The editorial office offered exceptional support with prompt and thoughtful communication. I highly value the journal’s role in promoting scientific advancement and am honored to be part of it. Best regards, Meng-Jou Lee, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital.
Dear Editorial Team, Journal-Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, “Publishing my article with Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions has been a highly positive experience. The peer-review process was rigorous yet supportive, offering valuable feedback that strengthened my work. The editorial team demonstrated exceptional professionalism, prompt communication, and a genuine commitment to maintaining the highest scientific standards. I am very pleased with the publication quality and proud to be associated with such a reputable journal.” Warm regards, Dr. Mahmoud Kamal Moustafa Ahmed
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews’, I appreciate the opportunity to publish my article with your journal. The editorial office provided clear communication during the submission and review process, and I found the overall experience professional and constructive. Best regards, Elena Salvatore.
Dear Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews Herewith I confirm an optimal peer review process and a great support of the editorial office of the present journal
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. I am really grateful for the peers review; their feedback gave me the opportunity to reflect on the message and impact of my work and to ameliorate the article. The editors did a great job in addition by encouraging me to continue with the process of publishing.
Dear Cecilia Lilly, Editorial Coordinator, Endocrinology and Disorders, Thank you so much for your quick response regarding reviewing and all process till publishing our manuscript entitled: Prevalence of Pre-Diabetes and its Associated Risk Factors Among Nile College Students, Sudan. Best regards, Dr Mamoun Magzoub.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is a high quality journal that has a clear and concise submission process. The peer review process was comprehensive and constructive. Support from the editorial office was excellent, since the administrative staff were responsive. The journal provides a fast and timely publication timeline.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, What distinguishes International Journal of Clinical Case Report and Review is not only the scientific rigor of its publications, but the intellectual climate in which research is evaluated. The submission process is refreshingly free of unnecessary formal barriers and bureaucratic rituals that often complicate academic publishing without adding real value. The peer-review system is demanding yet constructive, guided by genuine scientific dialogue rather than hierarchical or authoritarian attitudes. Reviewers act as collaborators in improving the manuscript, not as gatekeepers imposing arbitrary standards. This journal offers a rare balance: high methodological standards combined with a respectful, transparent, and supportive editorial approach. In an era where publishing can feel more burdensome than research itself, this platform restores the original purpose of peer review — to refine ideas, not to obstruct them Prof. Perlat Kapisyzi, FCCP PULMONOLOGIST AND THORACIC IMAGING.
Dear Grace Pierce, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews I appreciate the opportunity to review for Auctore Journal, as the overall editorial process was smooth, transparent and professionally managed. This journal maintains high scientific standards and ensures timely communications with authors, which is truly commendable. I would like to express my special thanks to editor Grace Pierce for his constant guidance, promt responses, and supportive coordination throughout the review process. I am also greatful to Eleanor Bailey from the finance department for her clear communication and efficient handling of all administrative matters. Overall, my experience with Auctore Journal has been highly positive and rewarding. Best regards, Sabita sinha
Dear Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator of the journal IJCCR, I write here a little on my experience as an author submitting to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews (IJCCR). This was my first submission to IJCCR and my manuscript was inherently an outsider’s effort. It attempted to broadly identify and then make some sense of life’s under-appreciated mysteries. I initially had responded to a request for possible submissions. I then contacted IJCCR with a tentative topic for a manuscript. They quickly got back with an approval for the submission, but with a particular requirement that it be medically relevant. I then put together a manuscript and submitted it. After the usual back-and-forth over forms and formality, the manuscript was sent off for reviews. Within 2 weeks I got back 4 reviews which were both helpful and also surprising. Surprising in that the topic was somewhat foreign to medical literature. My subsequent updates in response to the reviewer comments went smoothly and in short order I had a series of proofs to evaluate. All in all, the whole publication process seemed outstanding. It was both helpful in terms of the paper’s content and also in terms of its efficient and friendly communications. Thank you all very much. Sincerely, Ted Christopher, Rochester, NY.