Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5029/053
1 Department of Health Sciences, Division of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math, Friends University, USA.
*Corresponding Author: Prince N. Agbedanu, Department of Health Sciences, Division of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math, Friends University, USA.
Citation: Schafer J., Puga T., Harris P., Strasser N., Branum G., Prince N. Agbedanu (2021). Investigating Increased CO2 concentration on the pH of various plant species. International J. of Biomed Research. 1(9): DOI: 10.31579/2834-5029/053
Copyright: ©2021, Prince N. Agbedanu, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 15 November 2021 | Accepted: 10 December 2021 | Published: 18 December 2021
Keywords: bioremediation; byophyllum pinnatum; ph; acidity; alkalinity; homeostatic system; CO2-rich environment
The concept of bioremediation is quickly becoming the norm in the resolution of environmental issues. The steady increase in carbon dioxide (CO2) levels, as documented by NASA [1], inspired scientists to engineer plants to absorb excess CO2 from the atmosphere. Here, we have explored the consequences of the uptake of excess CO2 by select plants. Carbon dioxide dissolves in H2O to produce H2CO3, which dissociates to yield H+ ions. We hypothesized that increased CO2 absorption results in decrease in pH of plant sap. Three plants (Byophyllum pinnatum, Romaine Lettuce and Nevada Lettuce), exposed to increased CO2 concentrations (15%), demonstrated a consistent increase in pH towards alkalinity compared to control plants. Based on the outcome being opposite of what we have hypothesized, our results suggest Byophyllum pinnatum, Romaine lettuce and Nevada lettuce, all have a unique homeostatic system to prevent over-absorption of CO2 in a CO2-rich environment.
This work is inspired by the concept of bioremediation; the use of naturally occurring or genetically engineered organisms to consume or break down pollutants in the environment. Carbon dioxide levels have steadily increased over the years, raising concerns for individuals who want to solve this problem. In Scientist’s quests to address this problem, the idea of engineering plants to increase the capacity of CO2 absorption from the environment is still in the early stages. Others have pursued the use of a semi-synthetic rubisco, which has the ability to increase the rate of photosynthesis [2]. Apart from the positive side of bioremediation, we contemplate if there may be any negative consequences of increased CO2 in plants; so, we ask the question, what will be the effect of excess CO2 on the pH of plant sap? To our knowledge, there is currently no comprehensive study which specifically addresses the effect of increased CO2 concentration on the pH of plants and how plants potentially regulate the increased levels of CO2.
By principle, when carbon dioxide dissolves in water, carbonic acid is produced according to equation [1].
CO2 (aq) + H2O ⇓∇ H2CO3 (aq) [1]
H2CO3 (aq) ⇓∇ H+ (aq) + HCO3- (aq) [2]
According to equation [2], dissolved CO2 in the form of H2CO3 may lose up to two protons through the acid equilibrium. The relatively small amounts of H+ produced, when built up, is anticipated to decrease the pH of plant cytosol. We hypothesize that the exposure of plants to increased CO2 levels results in a decrease in the pH of plant cytosol.
Plants (e.g. Byophyllum pinnatum, Romaine lettuce, Nevada lettuce) were incubated in the presence of increased CO2 with a light source or under normal atmospheric conditions with a light source. The lighting schedule, temperature, and watering of the two species of plants were kept the same, with the only variable being the difference in CO2 concentration. The control plant was maintained in atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the test plant was maintained in 15% CO2 concentration, using a CO2 incubator. The light sources were on for approximately ten hours per day and the plants were watered once per week. The same set up was observed for 6 stalks each of Romaine lettuce and Nevada lettuce. Every 2 to 3 days, plant sap from leaves were squeezed using garlic press and pH of the sap were measured using the Horiba LAQUAtwin compact pH meter. The pH was measured for triplicate samples each of controls and test plants, and averaged. The results are as follows:
Byophyllum pinnatum
Table 1 shows days of pH measurement of test and control samples on days 3, 5, 7, 11 and 12 of experiment set-up. The pH of the control samples were consistently lower compared to that of the test samples (plants exposed to 15% CO2). The result also shows that sap pH generally increased as the number of days of CO2 exposure increases (Figure 1).
Romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa)
Table 2 shows days of pH measurement of test and control samples on days 4, 7, 11 and 14 of experiment set-up. The pH of the control samples were consistently lower compared to that of the test samples (plants exposed to 15% CO2). The result also shows that sap pH increases as the number of days of CO2 exposure increases (Figure 2).
Nevada lettuce
Table 3 shows days of pH measurement of test and control samples on days 4, 7, 11 and 14 of experiment set-up. The pH of the control samples were consistently lower compared to that of the test samples (plants exposed to 15% CO2). The result also shows that sap pH increases as the number of days of CO2 exposure increases (Figure 3).
Due to the consistent increase in sap pH of all plants exposed to increased CO2 levels, our result demonstrates that edible plants, such as lettuce, share a common mechanism of excess CO2 level regulation with crassulacean acid metabolism plants, such as Bryophyllum pinnatum. Both species of plants have shown a similar response in pH when they were exposed to excess CO2 levels in a controlled environment.
Although increased CO2 concentration in the atmosphere has been a main concern of the general public, there are some merits of excess CO2 to plants. Increased CO2 levels increases the yields of crops such as soybean, wheat and rice by up to 14% [3, 4]. The amount of carbohydrate production measured in unit areas of plant leaf was found to have increased by up to 40%, accompanied by a 13
We have used the chambered method of plant exposure to increased CO2 levels because it is affordable and within our budget. We understand that the chambered method of plant exposure to increased CO2 levels may not mimic the exposure of plants to increased CO2 in a more natural setting. Nevertheless, our result is significant and we welcome fellow scientists with the capability to use Free-Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment (FACE) technique [7] of plant exposure to increase CO2 to monitor plant pH to replicate our data.
We further hypothesize that the exposure of plants to increased CO2 accelerates the rate of plant carbohydrate breakdown.
We thank the Friends University VPAA office, and the division Chair, Dr. Nora Strasser, for the provision of starter funds to support research involving undergraduates. We thank Ms. Amy Morgan for the procurement of equipment and materials needed to execute all projects. We remain indebted to Dr. J.C. Moore for his timely intervention on ideas with experimental set up.
P.N.A. conceived the project. P.N.A, J.S., T.P. and P.H. designed the experiments. J.S., T.P. and P.H. performed all experiments. J.S. and N.S. analyzed the data. J.S. and P.N.A. wrote the manuscript. P.N.A. and G.B. edited and proofread the manuscript. P.N.A. procured funding.
Graphical Abstract
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,