Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8892/310
*Corresponding Author: Francesco Crespi, Voltammetry – NIRS Lab., Medicine Center, Verona, Italy
Citation: Francesco Crespi, (2024), Influence of paroxetine (SSRI), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor 641784 and their association upon brain haemoglobin (HbO2); an in vivo NIRS analysis, Psychology and Mental Health Care, 8(5): DOI:10.31579/2637-8892/310
Copyright: © 2024, Francesco Crespi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 07 October 2024 | Accepted: 19 December 2024 | Published: 30 December 2024
Keywords: COX-2 inhibition; SSRI; In vivo NIRS; rat brain
The implication of brain oxygenation within brain functions is well known and oxygen is essential to maintaining normal brain functions. Recent studies showed that anaemia is related to an increased risk of depression either in healthy population and in pathological states. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) supplies a non-invasive, non-ionizing way to measure haemoglobin levels and oxygen saturation in the living tissue and is confirmed as valuable tool to monitor influence(s) of acute drug treatment on metabolic activity of the brain. SSRI/COX-2 inhibitor is a recent dual pharmacology approach to treating major depression. In the present work NIRS has been applied to monitor the influence of COX2 inhibitor 641784 (COX2i) or SSRI paroxetine or this COX2i-SSRI association upon HbO2 levels measured in the brain of anaesthetised rodents.
The implication of brain oxygenation within brain functions is well known and oxygen is essential to maintaining normal brain functions. In particular, an adequate supply of oxygen must be maintained to meet the high rate of oxygen consumption by the brain [Masamoto et al., 2007]. Additionally, a large body of evidence suggests that the partial pressure of oxygen in brain tissue is physiologically maintained within a narrow range in accordance with region-specific brain activity [Masamoto et al., 2009]. Furthermore, recent studies showed that anaemia is related to an increased risk of depression either in healthy population [Vahdat Shariatpanaahi 2007; Lee & Kim 2020] and in pathological states [Steptoe et al. 2012; Chung & Chang 2023].SSRI/COX-2 inhibitor is a recent dual pharmacology approach to treating major depression and published data on depressed patients suggest that the combination of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibition would improve the clinical outcome of the specific serotonin inhibitor (SSRI) paroxetine by alleviating depression symptoms of patients resistant to classical treatment [Kopschina Feltes et al. 2017; Roman & Irwin 2020]. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is becoming a widely used research instrument that supply a non-invasive, non-ionizing way to measure haemoglobin levels and oxygen saturation in the living tissue [Crespi 2007; Crespi 2021]. It has been also confirmed as valuable tool to monitor influence(s) of acute drug treatment on metabolic activity of the brain [Crespi et al. 2018a,b].Therefore, in the present experiment NIRS has been applied to monitor the influence of COX2 inhibitor 641784 (COX2i)or SSRI paroxetine or this COX2i-SSRI association upon HbO2 levels measured in the brain of anaesthetised rodents prepared for NIRS analysis as described earlier [Crespi 2007]. The doses of each compound were selected in function of the recent evidence of their efficacy upon neurochemical signals [Crespi 2024a,b].
Adult male rats (230–250 g) were supplied by Charles-River (Italy) and were kept in temperature- and humidity-controlled rooms (22 oC, 50%, respectively) with lights on from 07.00 h to 19.00 h with water and food available ad labium. All procedures concerning experimentation, transportation and care of the animals were carried out in accordance with the Italian law (Legislative Decree no.116, 27 January 1992), which acknowledges the European Directive 86/609/EEC, and were fully compliant on the care and use of laboratory animal and codes of practice. Furthermore, all efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering. The number of animals has been decided based upon the 3Rs, i.e. Reduction in the number of animals required; Refinement of the methodologies of analysis; Respect of the animals i.e. reducing their suffering as described [Crespi et al. 2019]. The NIRS apparatus used is fully described. Briefly, it integrates six continuous-wave laser diode sources emitting in the near-infrared spectral region and a low-noise detection system based on an avalanche photodiode. The optical probe is based on a compact, reliable, and low-cost fiber based system with four quantitative measuring points.Using this system, the non-invasive in vivo NIRS analysis of HbO2 levels within the whole brain (CNS) was performed in anaesthetized rats: 3% halothane in a 30% -70% O2:N2 gas mixture was used for anaesthesia. Each rat was positioned in a stereotaxic holder (D. Kopf, USA) and the NIRS optic probes were positioned upon the sagittal line as described earlier [Crespi 2007]. NIRS measurements were then performed. At the end of each experiment, the position of the NIRS optical fibers was verified versus bregma.
Treatments
Following a 10 min period of control/control measurements, control rats were treated with vehicle (n=4, 1.4ml saline s.c.). Other rodents received selected doses of COX2 inhibitor 641784 i.e. 10mg/kg s.c. (n=4) or paroxetine 5mg/kg s.c. (n=4). A further group of 4 animals were treated with the combination 641784 10mg/kg s.c. + paroxetine 5mg/kg s.c.
It appeared that the COX2i or SSRI alone were transiently modifying significantly HbO2 parameters when compared to control / control values that were considered as zero µmoles /l. In particular a decrease was noticed 20min after each treatment and it was of approximately -3,5 µmoles/l following COX2i 641784 and more intense i.e. -6 µmoles/l and more persistent following paroxetine injection (Figure 1).
Then again, the association COX2i 641784 + SSRI paroxetine was followed by significant decrease of HbO2 levels down to a minimum of approximately -9.4 µmoles /l after 40min and 60min of treatment with in between a partial recover up to approximately -6 µmoles /l at 50min post treatment (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Time 0: treatment with COX2 inhibitor 641784 10mg/kg s.c. (COXi n=4) or paroxetine 5mg/kg s.c. (n=4). A further group of 4 animals were treated with the combination 641784 10mg/kg s.c. + paroxetine (Par.) 5mg/kg s.c.
Treatment data are compared to control/control values (saline treatment, n=4) that were considered as zero µmoles /l.
Statistical analysis details: mean ±S.D. * p<0>
Discussion
Treatment with COX2i 641784 or SSRI paroxetine alone where showing a temporary, partial influence upon HbO2 levels in the brain of anaesthetised rats. This effect was more pronounced and lasting longer time with their association. This decrease that could be inducing [mild] acute hypoxia [Subudhi et al. 2007; Liu et al. 2021] may be correlated to the adverse effect reported: i.e. significant increase in the rate of vascular events like stroke with COX-2 inhibitors compared with placebo [Roumie et al. 2008; Auriel et al., 2014]. Concerning SSRIs, their common side effects may include nausea, vomiting, insomnia, drowsiness, headache, decreased sex drive, and agitation while some of the less common adverse effects of SSRIs reported in literature are among others extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), serotonin syndrome, QT prolongation [for a review Edinoff et al. 2021].On the other hand, this data may also indicate that such association COX2i 641784 + SSRI paroxetine works synergistically upon brain oxygen use; it could be possible that the observed HbO2 reduction is mirroring the rapid implementation and consumption of oxygen in order to increase brain function(s) so that to possibly antagonise states of depression. Further work will be implemented to verify/support such hypothesis that could be of interest as it has been recently reviewed various work proposing beneficial opposed to harmful influence of hypoxia on the aging brain as well as potential therapeutic applications of hypoxia for neurodegenerative diseases [for a review Burtscher et al. 2021].
F. Congestri for technical assistance.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,