AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/233
1 Department of Surgery, Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author: Chukwubuike Kevin Emeka, Department of Surgery, Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
Citation: Chukwubuike K. Emeka, Anijunsi L. Patrick and Onah L. Nnanyereugo. (2022). Incisional Hernia following Abdominal Surgery in Children: A Single Centre Experience. J Clinical Research and Reports, 10(4); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/233
Copyright: © 2022, Chukwubuike Kevin Emeka. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 20 January 2022 | Accepted: 14 February 2022 | Published: 23 February 2022
Keywords: children; incisional hernia; incidence; laparotomy; single center; surgery; ESUTH; Nigerian
Background: Although uncommon, incisional hernia is a well-known complication of abdominal surgery in children and data on incisional hernia in the pediatric age group are sparse. The aim of this study was to evaluate a single center’s experience with regards to the incidence and outcome of incisional hernia in children.
Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of children aged 15 years and younger who developed incisional hernia following abdominal surgery, between January 2013 and December 2017, at the pediatric surgery unit of a tertiary hospital in Enugu, Nigeria.
Results: During the study period, a total of 1004 pediatric abdominal surgeries were performed. Out of this number, 31 patients developed incisional hernia: This accounted for an incidence rate of 3.1%. There was male predominance and the mean age at diagnosis of incisional hernia was 24 months. All the patients presented with a protrusion at or around the site of a previous surgical scar. Non-operative treatment (serial bandaging) was effective in most of the patients. There was no mortality.
Conclusion: Incisional hernia is a well-known complication of abdominal surgery. This study recorded the incisional hernia incidence rate of 3.1%. Non-operative treatment was successful in majority of the patients. Future studies should emphasis on the specific risk factors (surgeon/patient) that may predispose to incisional hernia.
Incisional hernias may be defined as an abnormal defect in the abdominal walls located at areas of post-operative scars which is perceptible or palpable by clinical examination or imaging [1]. Incisional hernia is a well-known complication of abdominal surgery, both in laparoscopic and open surgeries [2]. Unlike in adults where incisional hernia has been extensively studied, such studies in children are sparse. Incidence and other associated factors in children are rarely studied [3]. Similar to all hernia, incarceration, bowel obstruction and strangulation can occur in incisional hernia. Incisional hernia in children may resolve over time but where this fails to happen, operative treatment may be required [3]. While the rate of incisional hernia is documented to be 10-50% in adults, the incidence of incisional hernia in children has been reported to be in the range of 1-3% [2]. Surgery involving stoma formation and neonatal surgeries have been correlated to the development of incisional hernia in children [4]. The wide variations in abdominal approaches, patient’s comorbidities and techniques for surgical closure may lead to broad range of incidence rates [5]. There is paucity of data relating to incisional hernia in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate a single center experience with regards to the incidence and outcome of incisional hernia in children.
This was a retrospective study of children aged 15 years and younger who developed incisional hernia following abdominal surgery, between January 2013 and December 2017, at the pediatric surgery unit of Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH) Enugu, Nigeria. Children who have incisional hernia after abdominal surgery at a peripheral hospital before referral to ESUTH for treatment were also recruited into study. Children who are older than 15 years and those with congenital ventral hernia were excluded from this study. Diagnosis of incisional hernia was made based on clinical and radiological findings. ESUTH is a tertiary hospital located in Enugu, South East Nigeria. The hospital serves the whole of Enugu State, which according to the 2016 estimates of the National Population Commission and Nigerian National Bureau of Statistics, has a population of about 4 million people and a population density of 616.0/km2. The hospital also receives referrals from its neighboring states. The information extracted included the age, gender, presenting symptoms, interval between surgery and incisional hernia development, method of treatment (non-operative/operative), complications of treatment and outcome of treatment. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics and research committee of the hospital. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21 (manufactured by IBM Corporation Chicago Illinois) was used for data entry and analysis. Data were expressed as percentages, mean, and range.
1. Patients’ demographics
During the study period, a total of 1004 pediatric abdominal surgeries were performed. Out of this number, 31 patients developed incisional hernia and form the basis of this report: This accounted for an incidence rate of 3.1%. More males were affected. Details of the patients’ demographics are shown in Table 1.
Parameters Value |
Gender Male 23 (74.2%) Female 8 (25.8%) Mean age at primary abdominal surgery 12 months (5 -14) Mean age at diagnosis of incisional hernia 18 months (13-36) Mean interval between surgery and incisional hernia development 6 months (3-12) |
Table 1: Patients demographics (n=31)
2. Presenting symptoms
All the patients presented with a protrusion at the area of a previous surgical incision. In addition, 2 (6.5%) patients had pain at the area of the incisional hernia. All the hernias were reducible; there was neither an obstruction nor incarceration. None of the patients presented as an emergency.
3. Method of treatment
Thirty (96.8%) patients were treated non-operatively which involved serial bandaging for a period of 12 weeks and 4 weekly reviews in the outpatient clinic. One (3.2%) patient had operative treatment. The operative treatment entailed primary approximation of the widened fascia. Synthetic material (mesh) was not used for the repair.
4. Complications of treatment
The patients who had non-operative treatment had no complications. They were treated on outpatient basis. The single patient who had surgery developed post-operative surgical site infection that required prolonged wound dressing and antibiotics.
5. Outcome of treatment.
All the patients achieved good recovery and were discharged home. There was no mortality.
Incisional hernia is a well-known complication of abdominal surgery and its incidence has been reported to increase when there is post-operative wound infection [6]. Incisional hernia is a type of ventral hernia and results from weakness of abdominal fascial covering [7]. Generally, incisional hernias result from failure of proper wound healing which may result from wound infections, midline incisions, anaemia and poor nutritional status. The pathogenesis of inguinal hernia development is that a traumatized tissue loses its structural integrity, allowing protrusion of an organ or viscera into a region that is not the normal position. Repeat trauma of tissues, as seen with redo/reversal surgeries, would cause weakening of the abdominal wall increasing the risk of incisional hernia formation. Brook et al reported the increased occurrence of incisional hernia following closure of loop ileostomy [8].
In the present study, the incidence of incisional hernia is comparable to that of Mullassery et al [2]. However, Schattenkerk recorded a higher incidence while Tanaka et al recorded a lower incidence of incisional hernia [3, 4]. The differences in the incidence of incisional hernia may be explained by the different cohort of patients recruited by the studies. For instance, emergency septic cases such as typhoid intestinal perforation are more likely to lead to higher incidence of incisional hernias. In the index study, there were more incisional hernias in males. This is consistent with the report of other series on incisional hernia in children [3, 4]. The exact reason for the male predominance is not known. However, the fact that more males were operated upon during the study period may offer an explanation. The mean age of the patients at primary surgery of 12 months recorded in the present study is comparable to the report of a study conducted in United Kingdom [2]. The age at initial surgery may be dependent on the pathology involved. For instance, intussusception is known to be more common in infants. The interval between the initial surgery and development of incisional hernia varies widely depending on a number of factors. Generally, incisional hernias are most likely to occur within 3 to 6 months post-surgery but can happen at any time.
All the patients presented with a swelling at or around the area of the previous surgical scar. The occurrence of incisional hernia indicates the development of weakness of the sutured abdominal wall caused by mechanical overload, defective wound healing, and/or inadequate scar formation [7]. Other clinical features which may be found include abdominal pain, tenderness, vomiting and abdominal distension especially when there are complications such as obstruction and strangulation.
Incisional hernia in children may not require operative treatment. One study from Netherlands discussed the role of an initial non-operative treatment [3]. The high level of growth hormone in children is believed to be important in the healing of incisional hernia. When operative treatment is performed, primary approximation of the healthy fascia and muscles can be performed. However, when the fascial defect is wide, synthetic material (mesh) may be used. Non-operative treatment of incisional hernia was successful in most of our patients. The drawback of non-operative treatment of incisional hernia is the prolonged period of treatment and the risk of hernia complications such as obstruction or strangulation during the period. Surgical site infection may result from operative treatment of incisional hernia, as recorded in the index study. Juvany et al documented the impact of surgical site infection on the outcome incisional hernia repair [9]. Outcome of incisional hernia repair is generally good. None of our patients expired. Other studies also did not register mortalities following incisional hernia repair [3, 4].
Incisional hernia is a well-known complication of abdominal surgery. This study recorded the incisional hernia incidence rate of 3.1%. Non-operative treatment was successful in majority of the patients.
1. Specific abdominal pathologies necessitating the initial surgeries that led to the incisional hernia were not documented. Risk factors were missing.
2. This is a single center experience which may not be generalized.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
