Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2768-2757/205
1Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Marrakech, Morocco.
2Laboratory of Childhood, Health and Development, Cadi Ayyad University.
*Corresponding Author: F Bennaoui., Laboratory of Childhood, Health and Development, Cadi Ayyad University.
Citation: A. Ibnouzaki, F. Bennaoui, A. Lalaoui, K. Abilalaa, G. Kassal, et al, (2026), Incidental Discovery of an Amniotic Band in a Newborn: A Case Report, Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research, 7(3); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/205
Copyright: © 2026, F Bennaoui. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 01 May 2026 | Accepted: 15 May 2026 | Published: 18 May 2026
Keywords: amniotic band; congenital anomaly; neonatal surgery; newborn; vascular compression
Amniotic band syndrome (ABS) is a rare condition, with an incidence of about 1 in 1,200 to 1 in 15,000 live births. It results from fibrous strands of the amniotic membrane that can trap fetal parts, causing congenital anomalies of varying severity. We report the case of a full-term male newborn admitted at 3 days of life for neonatal jaundice in the context of early-onset bacterial infection. Physical examination revealed a circumferential amniotic band located at the distal third of the right leg, initially without functional impairment. The clinical outcome was complicated by signs of distal vascular compression, prompting surgical intervention consisting of simple release of the band, with a favorable evolution.
Amniotic bands, also known as amniotic band syndrome (ABS), constitute a rare condition with an estimated incidence ranging from 1 in 1,200 to 1 in 15,000 live births [1]. They are characterized by fibrous strands originating from the amniotic membrane that may entrap fetal parts, leading to congenital anomalies of highly variable severity [2]. Diagnosis is usually made during the antenatal period through routine morphological ultrasound examination. However, localized or less severe forms may escape prenatal detection and be identified only during neonatal clinical assessment [4]. The severity of involvement depends on the anatomical location of the band, the degree of constriction, and the presence or absence of neurovascular compromise [5]. This case aims to emphasize the importance of meticulous neonatal examination at birth and the need for ongoing clinical surveillance to prevent functional complications.
We report the case of a 3-day-old male newborn, born at term by vaginal delivery, with a birth weight of 1,900 g. Antenatal follow-up was insufficient, and no prenatal morphological ultrasound identified any congenital anomalies. On admission to the neonatal unit, the infant presented with jaundice. Physical examination revealed a circumferential amniotic band located at the distal third of the right leg, responsible for a cutaneous indentation without initial signs of distal ischemia or functional deficit. The remainder of the clinical examination was unremarkable. The newborn was hospitalized for management of neonatal jaundice associated with early-onset bacterial infection. Close clinical monitoring of the amniotic band was initiated. On day 14 of hospitalization, the clinical course was marked by the development of swelling of the right foot associated with delayed capillary refill, suggesting distal vascular compromise (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Complicated amniotic band syndrome
Surgical management was therefore indicated and consisted of simple release of the amniotic band. Postoperative evolution was favorable, with resolution of compression signs and preservation of limb function (Figure 2).

Figure 2: After surgical treatment
This case illustrates a localized form of amniotic band that was initially minimally symptomatic but later progressed to vascular compromise, thereby requiring surgical intervention. The pathophysiology of amniotic bands is classically explained by two main theories. The exogenous theory, which is the most widely accepted, attributes band formation to early rupture of the amnion, resulting in free-floating fibrous strands capable of constricting fetal parts. The endogenous theory proposes an intrinsic defect in embryonic development or localized vascular disruption, which may account for complex forms without identifiable amniotic rupture [2]. To date, no single theory fully explains the entire clinical spectrum, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms are likely multifactorial [3]. Although ABS may be suspected on prenatal ultrasound through visualization of its consequences such as limb defects or segmental anomalies the bands themselves are often difficult to detect using standard ultrasonography [4]. Advanced imaging modalities, including three-dimensional ultrasound and fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy in selected cases [6]. Prenatal diagnosis allows anticipation of postnatal management and, in selected cases, consideration of fetal intervention. Nevertheless, as illustrated in the present case, minor forms may remain undiagnosed, highlighting the crucial role of systematic neonatal clinical examination. Management depends primarily on the degree of constriction, functional impairment, and the presence of vascular or neurological compromise. Simple forms without complications may be managed conservatively with close monitoring, whereas the appearance of vascular or neurological compromise necessitates early surgical intervention [7]. Several recent studies report favorable functional outcomes following simple release of the band, particularly when performed before irreversible damage occurs. In the present case, multidisciplinary collaboration between neonatologists and pediatric surgeons enabled timely intervention and resulted in a favorable functional outcome.
The incidental discovery of an amniotic band in a newborn underscore the importance of thorough and repeated clinical examination at birth. Even in the absence of initial functional impairment, close follow-up is essential to detect early signs of complications. Timely and appropriate surgical management generally leads to favorable functional outcomes.
Informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the patient’s parents.
None
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,