AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/372
1 Nursing Supervisor at Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Spain.
2 Nursing Supervisor at Hospital Severo Ochoa, Spain.
3 Bachelor's Degree in Nursing, Hospital de Fuenlabrada, Nursing Supervisor in Cardiology, Spain.
4 Cardiored Coordinator at Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Spain.
5 Nursing Supervisor in Cardiology at Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Spain.
*Corresponding Author: Maria Dolores Gómez Barriga, Member of the Research Institute of Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IDISSC), Spain. mgbarriga@salud.madrid.org, ORCID: 0000-0001-5973-0823.
Citation: Gómez Barriga, MD, Barrera Hernández L., González Pozuelo A., Bengoa Terrero C., Soriano Rodríguez M. ª Victoria, (2024), Impact on Patient Communication and Information after the Incorporation of white Boards in the Rooms of the Cardiology Hospitalization Units of four Hospitals, J Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 7(6); DOI: 10.31579/2641-0419/372
Copyright: © 2024, Maria Dolores Gómez Barriga. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 18 April 2024 | Accepted: 14 May 2024 | Published: 04 June 2024
Keywords: communication; nurse; whiteboards; information; goals of care; complementary test
Background/Aim: Effective communication between patients and healthcare professionals is crucial to ensuring optimal health outcomes. The study´s objective was to describe the impact on communication and information that patients have after the placement of white boards in the rooms of the Cardiology inpatient units of four hospitals.
Material and Methods: Quasi-experimental multicenter before-after study with a non-equivalent control group to evaluate the improvement in the information and communication received by the patient after the placement of whiteboards in the rooms of the cardiology hospitalization units of 4 hospitals, during the year 2021. All patients were included with the condition that they were over 18 years old of age with a minimum stay of 3 days. The variables to be collected were knowledge of the professionals responsible for their care, care objectives, procedures and/or tests to be performed, with a collection in two phases, and gender/age. The analysis is based on the characteristics of the variables.
Results: Total population =364, 176 prior phase and 188 after implantation, 39,8% women and 51,6% men. In the previous phase, the patients reported knowing the nurses 3,7% vs 96,3%, the nursing assistants 7,4% vs 92,6%, the doctors 31,4% vs 68,6%, the care goals 17% vs 83% and tests 13,8% compared to 86,2% later (p<0,001- Pearson's chi-squared value).
Discussion: The study confirms that whiteboards in patient rooms improve communication and healthcare staff knowledge. While the usefulness of whiteboards is acknowledged, the research couldn't directly compare their effects with other studies. Limitations such as incomplete patient satisfaction analysis and lack of sample randomization are noted. However, the multicenter design of the study strengthens its conclusions.
Conclusions: After placing whiteboards in patient rooms, there is an improvement in communication and in the information that patients admitted to the hospitalization units studied have.
Effective communication between patients and healthcare professionals ensures effective patient care. Therefore, patient-centered communication is fundamental to guarantee optimal health outcomes. Achieving patient-centred care and communication in nurse-patient clinical interactions is complex due to the presence of institutional, communication, environmental, and personal/behavioural barriers.[1]
In this context, it is essential to highlight that effective communication fosters the establishment of trust, interaction, and the nurse-patient relationship[2], as this relationship enables joint decision-making and therefore has a positive impact on health outcomes.[ 3, 4].
Challenges still exist in this research area regarding new strategies that can diagnose and offer alternatives to improve communication between nurses and their patients in daily practice. [5].
The nurse-patient relationship is a helping relationship established with the patient and/or their family based on interaction, communication, respect for ethical values, acceptance, and empathy, aiming to foster introspection and behavior change. Key components include communication, active listening, and respect. Bioethical values and confidentiality must also be present to ensure that the relationship is built on equality and intimacy. [6] The nurse-patient interaction directly affects patient satisfaction and is essential for the delivery of nursing care. [7]
Care today requires a vital reconsideration towards humanising health, where care is situated ethically and professionally.[6]
This professional care is structured and formalized and aimed at meeting the needs of human beings with the purpose of promoting, maintaining, or restoring health. In this sense, it is essential for nursing professionals to demonstrate a high sense of commitment, loyalty, values, and humanism in delivering care to all who require it.[7]
Given the risk of dehumanization in patient care due to the administrative restructuring of most healthcare systems worldwide, it is necessary to reclaim the human aspect in clinical, administrative, educational, and research practices by nursing professionals. Nurses encounter various phenomena in their daily work that focus on the realities of the patients they care for, where, due to various conditions, there often isn't an opportunity for feedback between patient and nurse that would allow for the growth of this dyad and the strengthening of the care provided.[8] Additionally, there is a need to review the conditions under which humanized care is offered, the behaviors, and the perceptions of those involved. [8]. In this sense, it is important to highlight the differences in nurse-patient interaction regarding communication, with significant variability depending on the professional. Therefore, implications for staff development include teaching strategies that enhance symmetric nurse-patient communication.[9,10] For some time now, several scientific publications have demonstrated demonstrating increased patient satisfaction regarding communication and information received from healthcare professionals through the placement of whiteboards in patient rooms during their hospital stay. These whiteboards include the names of the professionals responsible for their care, the tests or procedures to be performed, and even the daily care goals aimed at ensuring the patient's proper progress[11].
This study aimed to assess the impact on patient communication and information following the implementation of whiteboards in the cardiology hospitalization units of four hospitals.
A multicenter quasi-experimental before-after study without a control group was conducted to evaluate the experience of patients treated in the cardiology hospitalization units of the four participating hospitals following the placement of whiteboards in patient rooms. Sample size calculation was based on a reference prevalence of 50% from previous studies[11, 15], anticipating a 15% increase in patient satisfaction after implementation, with a desired power of 80%. This required N=162 patients per group across the four hospitals, with a bilateral alpha error 0.05. All patients over 18 years old voluntarily participating, with a hospital stay of more than three days and willing to answer the provided questions voluntarily, were included. Patients with mental alterations, incapacitated to respond due to health status without caregiver assistance, or incapable or unwilling to understand and sign the informed consent were excluded.
Data collection periods were divided into two phases: the first phase took place from October to December 2019, and due to the Covid-19 pandemic, which caused a project suspension, the second phase was conducted from May to October 2021. Data were collected simultaneously in all four hospitals during both phases.
Variables including gender and age were collected before and after whiteboard placement, along with patient awareness of the healthcare professionals responsible for their care (physician, nurse, nursing assistant), knowledge of planned tests or procedures, and understanding of nursing care goals defined as agreed-upon actions with the patient for daily implementation to improve health status.
Once placed, the whiteboard was to be filled out and reviewed by responsible healthcare professionals during each shift to ensure proper evaluation. Before the intervention, all involved healthcare professionals underwent awareness sessions emphasizing the importance of communication and patient information to enhance the hospitalization experience. Three sessions with the same methodology were conducted in each hospital to achieve this goal.
Statistical analysis involved presenting categorical variables with frequency distributions and 95% confidence intervals. Comparison analysis of variables was conducted using Chi-Square tests. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 software, with a significance level set at 5% (p<0>
All investigators and personnel involved in the project adhered to local and international ethical regulations for human experimentation, including the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, and related documents. Approval was obtained from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Hospital 1 on 23/10/2019, with subsequent approval from the ethics committees of Hospitals 2, 3, and 4 in November of the same year.
Personal data handling complied with the European General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 and the Spanish Data Protection Law 2018. Only the principal investigator accessed to the dataset, and databases were deleted upon study completion. The confidentiality of patient and third-party information was maintained as per Law 41/2002 on patient autonomy, rights, and obligations regarding clinical information and documentation.
Informed consent and information sheets were provided to all study participants.
Figure 1: Image of a whiteboard placed in patient rooms at the different participating hospitals. Created by the authors.
Responses were collected from a total of 364 patients, of which 188 were after the implementation of the intervention and 176 were before to the placement of the whiteboards, with 39.8 Percent sign being women and 60.2 Percent sign men. The age distribution of the sample was as follows: 5.8 Percent sign were under 40 years old, 19.5 Percent sign were between 41-60 years old, 26.1 Percent sign were between 61-70 years old, 28.6 Percent sign were between 71-80 years old, and those over 80 years old accounted for 20.1 Percent sign. The distribution among the four hospitals was 42.9 Percent sign for Hospital 1, 22 Percent sign of the patients belonged to Hospital 2, 20.9 Percent sign to Hospital 3, and 14.3 Percent sign to Hospital 4.
Before the whiteboards were placed, 81.8% of patients denied knowing the nurses responsible for their care, whereas after the placement, 96.3 Percent sign
claimed to know them (p Less-than sign 0.001). Regarding nursing assistants, 82.4 Percent sign stated they did not know them before, while 92.6 Percent sign responded affirmatively after the placement of the whiteboards (p Less-than sign 0.001). After the interventions were implemented, 68.6 Percent sign of patients reported knowing their doctor, compared to 31.4 Percent sign before the whiteboards were installed (p Less-than sign 0.001). After placing the whiteboards, 86.2 Percent sign of patients reported knowing which tests would be performed during their hospital stay, whereas only 13.8 Percent sign previously knew this information (p Less-than sign 0.001). Additionally, 83 Percent sign of patients reported knowing the daily care goals after the whiteboards were placed in the rooms, compared to 17 Percent sign who claimed to know them before this implementation (p Less-than sign 0.001).
| GENDER | Whiteboard Implementation | ||||
| NO | YES | TOTAL | |||
| WOMEN | Absolute frequency | 76 | 69 | 145 | |
| Relative Frequency | 43,2% | 36,7% | 39,8% | ||
| MEN | Absolute frequency | 100 | 119 | 219 | |
| Relative Frequency | 56,8% | 63,3% | 60,2% | ||
| TOTAL | Absolute frequency | 176 | 188 | 364 | |
| Relative Frequency | 100% | 100% | 100% | ||
Table 1: Distribution of the sample by gender. Self-made.
Table 2. Distribution of the sample by age. Self-made.
| Whiteboard Implementation |
Total | |||||
| NO | YES | |||||
| AGE | Under 40 years old | Absolute frequency | 12 | 9 | 21 | |
| Relative Frequency | 6,8% | 4,8% | 5,8% | |||
| Between 41-60 | Absolute frequency | 32 | 39 | 71 | ||
| Relative Frequency | 18,2% | 20,7% | 19,5% | |||
| Between 61-70 | Absolute frequency | 45 | 50 | 95 | ||
| Relative Frequency | 25,6% | 26,6% | 26,1% | |||
| Between 71-80 | Absolute frequency | 48 | 56 | 104 | ||
| Relative Frequency | 27,3% | 29,8% | 28,6% | |||
| Over 80 | Absolute frequency | 39 | 34 | 73 | ||
| Relative Frequency | 22,2% | 18,1% | 20,1% | |||
| Total | Absolute frequency | 176 | 188 | 364 | ||
| Relative Frequency | 100,0% | 100,0% | 100,0% | |||
Table 2: Distribution of the sample by age. Self-made.
Pearson Chi-square Value: p = 0.746
Table 3. Distribution by hospitals of the sample
Implementation | NO | YES |
Total | ||||
| HOSPITAL 1 | Count | 75 | 81 | 156 | |||
| % Within implementation | 42,6% | 43,1% | 42,9% | ||||
| HOSPITAL 3 | Count | 40 | 40 | 80 | |||
| % Within implementation | 22,7% | 21,3% | 22,0% | ||||
| HOSPITAL 3 | Count | 35 | 41 | 76 | |||
| % Within implementation | 19,9% | 21,8% | 20,9% | ||||
| HOSPITAL 4 | Count | 26 | 26 | 52 | |||
| %Within implementation | 14,8% | 13,8% | 14,3% | ||||
| Total | Count | 176 | 188 | 364 | |||
| % Within implementation | 100,0% | 100,0% | 100,0% | ||||
Table 3: Distribution of the sample by age. Self-prepared.
Pearson Chi-square Value: p = 0.95
Outcome variables
Knowledge of nursing professionals by patients before and after the implementation of whiteboards in the rooms.
Table:4 Patient awareness of nursing professionals pre and post implementation of whiteboards in the rooms
| Whiteboard implementation | ||||
| Does not know | Yes, knows | |||
| NURSE | NO | Absolute frequency | 144 | 7 |
| % Within implementation | 81,8% | 3,7% | ||
| YES | Absolute frequency | 32 | 181 | |
| % Within implementation | 18,2% | 96,3% | ||
| Total | Count | 176 | 188 | |
| % Within implementation | 100,0% | 100,0% | ||
Table 4: Patient awareness of nursing professionals pre and post implementation of whiteboards in the rooms. Selfprepared.
Pearson Chi-square Value: p < 0>
Table 5. Patient awareness of nursing care technicians (TCAEs) pre and post- implementation of whiteboards in the rooms. Self-prepared.
| Whiteboard implementation | ||||
| Does not know | Yes, knows | |||
| TCAE | NO | Absolute frequency | 145 | 14 |
| % Within implementation | 82,4% | 7,4% | ||
| YES | Absolute frequency | 31 | 174 | |
| % Within implementation | 17,6% | 92,6% | ||
| Total | Count | 176 | 188 | |
| % Within implementation | 100,0% | 100,0% | ||
Table 5: Patient awareness of nursing care technicians (TCAEs) pre and post- implementation of whiteboards in the rooms. Self-prepared.
Pearson Chi-square Value: 
Table 6 : Knowledge of doctors by patients before and after the implementation of whiteboards in the rooms
| Whiteboard implementation | ||||
| Does not know | Yes, knows | |||
| Médico | NO | Absolute frequency | 128 | 59 |
| % Within implementation | 72,7% | 31,4% | ||
| YES | Absolute frequency | 48 | 129 | |
| % Within implementation | 27,3% | 68,6% | ||
| Total | Count | 176 | 188 | |
| % Within implementation | 100,0% | 100,0% | ||
Table 6: Patient awareness of doctors pre and post implementation of whiteboards in the rooms. Self-prepared.
Pearson Chi-square Value:
Table 7: Knowledge of the tests being performed by patients before and after the implementation of whiteboards in the rooms.
| Whiteboard implementation | ||||
| Does not know | Yes, knows | |||
| Test | NO | Absolute frequency | 77 | 26 |
| % Within implementation | 43,8% | 13,8% | ||
| YES | Absolute frequency | 99 | 162 | |
| % Within implementation | 56,3% | 86,2% | ||
| Total | Count | 176 | 188 | |
| % Within implementation | 100,0% | 100,0% | ||
Table 7: Patient awareness of the tests to be performed pre and post implementation of whiteboards in the rooms. Self-prepared.
Pearson Chi-square Value: 
Table 8: Knowledge of care goals by patients before and after the implementation of whiteboards in the rooms.
| Whiteboard implementation | ||||
| Does not know | Yes, knows | |||
Care objectives
| NO | Absolute frequency | 79 | 32 |
| % Within implementation | 44,9% | 17,0% | ||
| YES | Absolute frequency | 97 | 156 | |
| % Within implementation | 55,1% | 83,0% | ||
| Total | Count | 176 | 188 | |
| % Within implementation | 100,0% | 100,0% | ||
Table 8: Patient awareness of the care objectives pre and post implementation of whiteboards in the rooms. Self-prepared.
Following the data analysis, the study´s initial hypothesis is accepted, allowing us to affirm that in the 4 participating hospitals where whiteboards were implemented in the rooms, patients felt better informed, and their knowledge of the healthcare professionals had significantly increased.
The distribution of the sample collected by sex and age is very similar to that reflected in other studies with similar characteristics, such as the one conducted by Goyal A. et al., where men accounted for 55% of the subjects and 69% were over 51 years old. [11], Similarly, these authors analyzed the knowledge of professionals by patients, as more than 95% of the patients found the valuable whiteboard in terms of information received upon whiteboard implementation. In another article by Singh S., et al. [12], they placed whiteboards in each patient room in the medicine wards of their hospital. They asked nurses and doctors to use them to improve communication with hospitalized patients. They subsequently analyzed the effect of these whiteboards by comparing patient satisfaction with communication from medical wards before and after whiteboard placement with patient satisfaction with communication from surgical wards that did not have whiteboards. Patient satisfaction scores (scale 0-100) with communication significantly improved in the medical wards: nursing communication, physician communication, and involvement in decision-making. Patient satisfaction scores did not change significantly in the surgical wards. There was no secular trend, and the authors ruled out a trend in overall patient satisfaction, concluding that whiteboards can be a simple and effective tool to increase hospitalized patient satisfaction with communication. [12]. The placement of electronic whiteboards has been analyzed in other studies, such as the one conducted by Randell R. et al., titled "Electronic whiteboards:a review of the literature," published in Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 210:389-93., [13] in a systematic review conducted by Randell R. et al., they analyze the impact of electronic whiteboards on the care process, concluding that there is a lack of evidence regarding the impact on patient outcomes. Therefore, we cannot directly compare the data reflected in our study. However, they identify that white boards can contribute to improved information dissemination. In another article published by Skaggs M. et al., they analyze the importance of simultaneous interventions to enhance these outcomes. This recommendation is also being implemented in these hospitals but has not been analyzed for the current study [14].
Many limitations exist, methodological Biases mainly of our study would be the analysis of satisfaction among professionals and patients regarding the implementation of the whiteboards and their utility, as analyzed by the authors Sehgal NL. et al..[15], While the analysis of patient satisfaction is underway as part of the complete study, the decision to implement the whiteboards was made by the nursing teams themselves and not by unit leaders. Similarly, our study would have gained greater robustness through sample randomization and the inclusion of a control group. One of the strengths of our study lies in its multicenter design, which was conducted simultaneously in the four hospitalization units of the four hospitals. Additionally, hospital 1 is the only hospital with patients from a single medical specialty in its unit; the other hospitals have hospitalization units with various medical services, allowing us to analyze responses from patients with different health issues.
The placement of whiteboards in patient rooms achieved a dual objective. Firstly, it significantly impacted on patient communication with healthcare professionals and reduced variability in how information was conveyed to hospitalized patients. This led to the humanization of care and improved patient experience during their hospital stay. Similarly, the involvement of the entire healthcare team is a fundamental pillar for the tool's effectiveness, requiring action plans to be developed within the team rather than imposed by management
To all healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses, and nursing assistants) in the hospitalization units of the four hospitals who participated in the development of this work and made its successful implementation possible
To the cardiology research foundation for their support, which made it possible to develop the entire project. Without their assistance, this project would not have been possible. To the research unit of Hospital Number 1 for their assistance with the analysis of all the statistical data.
Cardiovascular Research Foundation.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
