Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.31579/2768-2757/015
*Corresponding Author: Wei Liu, Ph.D., Institute of Digestive Disease, China Three Gorges University, 8 Daxue Road, Yichang 443000, China.
Citation: Z Yang, Li-H Tang, W Liu. (2021) Immune-checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis in a patient with lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research. 2(2) DOI: 10.31579/2768-2757/015
Copyright: © 2021 Wei Liu, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 10 May 2021 | Accepted: 14 May 2021 | Published: 17 May 2021
Keywords: Keywords
Abstract
A 62-year-old man was hospitalized in the emergency room because of severe and persistent abdominal pain with bloody diarrhea (14 stools per day over baseline). He had peritoneal signs, with severe periumbilical tenderness and active bowel sounds. Computed tomography of the abdomen revealed thickened wall of the colon. Laboratory evaluation revealed a hemoglobin level of 11.5 g per deciliter (normal range, 13.5 to 17.5). For the previous 4 weeks, the patient had been taking the immune-checkpoint inhibitor toripalimab (targeting programmed death 1, 240 mg once daily) for small-cell lung cancer. Stool tests for Clostridioides difficile infection and other gastrointestinal pathogens yielded negative results. A colonoscopy revealed numerous erosions/ulcers with marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, and friability (Figure A). Biopsy specimens from the colon confirmed severe inflammatory changes, well differentiated glands, crypt abscess, diffuse inflammatory cell infiltration and plasma cell aggregation (Figure B, H&E, original magnification, ×100). Then, the patient received the diagnosis of immune-checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis based on these findings. After discontinuation of the offending agent with the diagnosis of immune-checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis, treatment with methylprednisolone (120 mg once daily) was initiated. The patient’s symptoms gradually disappeared within 3 weeks and he was discharged from the hospital. 3 months later, a follow-up colonoscopy confirmed that the colonic mucosa had completely healed. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed the treatment landscape for oncology, replacing the prior standard of care for most malignancies, producing durable remissions but also causing extensive inflammatory toxicities, collectively referred to as immune-related adverse events[1, 2]. Colitis, typically presenting as diarrhea, is the single most common gastrointestinal toxicity from immune checkpoint inhibitors, which affects approximately 30% of patients[3, 4]. The clinical characteristics of colitis associated with immune-checkpoint inhibitor have not been documented in detail[5]. Severe colitis may result in severe dehydration and perforation indicating possible surgical intervention[6]. Histopathological features and endoscopic lesions of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis are vividly similar to an inflammatory bowel disease flare[7, 8]. Timely diagnosis and management of immune-checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis depends on valuable endoscopic and histologic information provided by early colonoscopy[9]. Corticosteroid regimen is the first choice for patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diarrhea and colitis. Meanwhile, infliximab may be an alternative in cases of corticosteroid failure[10].
Acknowledgements
Funding: This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31600134).
Footnote
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this “Gastrointestinal Image”.
Author’s contributions
Collection of data: Zhi Yang.
Manuscript preparation and writing: Li-Hua Tang.
Final approval of the manuscript: Wei Liu.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,
