AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research article | DOI: https://doi.org/DOI:10.31579/2642-973X/051
1 Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Public Health and Health Professions, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
2 Jacob's School of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
*Corresponding Author: Ghazala T. Saleem, Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Public Health and Health Professions, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Citation: Wenjie Ji, Madeleine Champagne-Shafer, Jung An, and Ghazala T. Saleem. (2023), Identifying Objective and Field Expedient Markers in Intimate Partner Violence-Related Brain Injury: A Cross-Sectional Study Protocol. J. Brain and Neurological Disorders. 6(2): DOI:10.31579/2642-973X/051
Copyright: © 2023 Ghazala T. Saleem. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 28 January 2023 | Accepted: 18 February 2023 | Published: 28 February 2023
Keywords: intimate partner violence; brain injuries; autonomic nervous system; vestibular function tests
Background: Brain injury (BI) is a serious consequence of intimate partner violence (IPV). However, evidence-based assessments are lacking to properly identify BI sequelae in IPV survivors. This pilot study focuses on identifying an objective marker of BI and physiological alteration among female IPV survivors. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study will compare differences in the effects of BI between two groups of female IPV survivors. A total of 52 survivors will be assigned to either a physically abused group or to an emotionally/psychologically abused group. The primary outcomes will include: 1) BI signs examined by the Buffalo Concussion Physical Examination; 2) the autonomic function assessed by the heart rate variability during an isometric handgrip test, and 3) the vestibular function evaluated through King-Devick devices. Expected Results: Female survivors with physical abuse will demonstrate more BI signs, and autonomic and vestibular dysfunctions compared to those with emotional/psychological abuse. Conclusions: The results of this trial will support the establishment of reliable objective evaluations of BI and physiological function in female survivors of IPV.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is abuse conducted by a former or current intimate partner. IPV may cause severe physical injury, mental health concerns and may even lead to death [1]. Females are more likely to be a victim of IPV than males [2]. Behaviors regarding IPV can be divided into physical and non-physical violence (i.e., sexual violence, stalking, and psychological aggression). Victims of physical IPV are pushed, punched, kicked, and hit on the head, face and jaw, and strangled [3-5]; some of these mechanisms may place the survivors of physical violence at a higher risk of brain injury (BI) than those with non-physical violence [5, 6]. BI from IPV is referred to as “IPV-related BI”.
Previous research focusing on IPV-related BI mostly used subjective assessments (e.g., self-report) to identify BI in the IPV population [4, 7]. Recall bias exist with self-reports and some of the subjective measures may scale-up or diminish the problems based on socio-ecological factors [8]. Therefore, objective measures such as a BI physical examination are needed for accurate diagnosis and prognosis of BI as well as targeted treatment in this population [9]. The Buffalo Concussion Physical Examination (BCPE) is known to reliably differentiate athletes with acute sports-related BI from their healthy controls [10]. Thus, it will be used as the objective physical examination to identify IPV-related BI in survivors of IPV.
Assessments of physiological functions, such as cardiac autonomic and vestibular functions may serve as supplementary evaluations to the physical examination, which may identify sequalae resulted from IPV-related BI [11-17]. Cardiovascular control for homeostasis is regulated by the autonomic nervous system (ANS), which is known to be “autonomic coupling” [18-20]. The central control for the ANS is located in the brain [21, 22], thus, injury to the brain has been linked to “autonomic uncoupling” [13, 23]. Female survivors of IPV have been shown to have altered glucocorticoids (cortisol) and catecholamines concentration [24] as a consequence of potential ANS dysfunction. However, it is unknown whether this ANS alteration is linked to BI and if females with physical abuse demonstrate more autonomic impairments compared to their non-physical IPV cohort after controlling for the confounder of psychological distress [5, 25-28]. Therefore, this study will use heart rate variability (HRV), which is a commonly used marker reflecting ANS regulation [18, 29, 30] to investigate ANS function and its relationship to BI in this population. In addition to ANS deficits, impairments in vestibular function, including oculomotor and balance are often reported after traumatic BI [31-33]. Yet, to date, vestibular function has not been systematically evaluated in IPV survivors reporting physical injuries. Several oculomotor and balance assessments using the King-Devick (K-D) device have reliably evaluated vestibular function in other populations with mild traumatic BI [31-35].
This pilot study aims to 1) examine if survivors with physical IPV demonstrate more BI signs on the Buffalo Concussion Physical Exam (BCPE) compared to non-physical IPV cohort; and 2) examine if female survivors with physical abuse demonstrate worse cardiac autonomic and vestibular functions compared to those with non-physical abuse after adjusting for psychological distress.
Study Design
This cross-sectional study will assess differences in physical examination and physiological/vestibular outcomes in physically-abused (experimental) and non-physically abused (control) group of IPV survivors. The entire study visit will last about 1.5 hours. This study will be approved by the University Institutional Review Board, and all participants will provide informed consent.
Participants
This study will recruit a statistically-valid sample of 52 female survivors of IPV (26 per group). Participants will be recruited from community-based shelters or non-shelter settings around Western New York. The study team will screen survivors’ eligibility based on the following inclusion/exclusion criteria. Physically-abused cohort inclusion criteria are: 1) 18-60 years old [4, 36]; 2) reporting physical injury within the past 2 years from a current or former intimate partner [7]; and 3) proficient in English. Non-physically-abused cohort inclusion criteria are: 1) 18-60 years old [4, 36]; 2) reporting any abuse other than physical abuse within the past 2 years from a current or former intimate partner [7]; 3) not physically-injured for any reason within the past 5 years [37]; 4) no known history of BI within the past 5 years [37]; and 5) proficient in English. Exclusion criteria for both groups are: 1) pregnancy; 2) physical injury resulting in loss of consciousness > 24 hours or post-traumatic amnesia > 7 days [38] ; 3) focal neurological deficit(s) on physical exam [38]; 4) orthopedic injury producing significant balance deficits [38]. Participants’ attribution is shown in Figure. 1.
Figure 1: Flowchart of participants’ attribution to the physical- and non- physical-abuse groups
Figure 2: General Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire [39]
Figure 3: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [40, 41]
Figure 4: Example of The Primary Care PTSD Screen for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 [42-44]
Outcome measures include both subjective and objective assessments: General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). The GAD-7 was developed as a screen for generalized anxiety disorder in primary care settings [39]. It is a seven-item self-report questionnaire, and the score ranges from 0 to 21 (Fig. 2). Participants will report on the frequency of experiencing each GAD-7 symptom (e.g., being on edge or feeling nervous). Response options are “not at all,” “several days,” “more than half the days,” and “nearly every day,” scored as 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A cutoff point of 10 provides a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 82% for the clinical diagnosis of GAD [39]. GAD-7 is known to be particularly useful in assessing symptom severity of anxiety and monitoring change across time [45]. It is widely used in studies in IPV as a standard assessment for anxiety [46-48].
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is a 9-item depression module from the full Patient Health Questionnaire [49]. It includes questions on depression-related symptoms, such as little interest or pleasure in doing things, or feeling down. Response options are “not at all,” “several days,” “more than half the days,” and “nearly every day,” scored as 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The PHQ-9 score ranges from 0 to 27. Cutoff points of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent the thresholds for mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively [40]. A cutoff point of 10 is recommended for a single screening for major depression [41]. PHQ-9 is commonly used in studies in IPV as a standard assessment for depression [46, 48, 50].
PTSD. The Primary Care PTSD Screen for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 will be used to identify female survivors with probable PTSD (Fig. 4). The measure begins with a single item that assesses past exposure to traumatic events. If subjects deny any exposures, the PTSD screen is completed with a score of 0. However, if subjects indicate a trauma history – experiencing a traumatic event over the course of their life – they need to provide responses to five additional yes/no questions about the effects of trauma on their functioning, roles, and routines over the past month [44]. Preliminary results from validation studies suggest that this screen is an accurate tool for assessing PTSD [43] and a cutoff point of 3 on the PTSD screen is optimally sensitive to females with probable PTSD [42, 43].
BCPE. The BCPE is a brief (5–7 min), pertinent physical examination protocol designed for the outpatient setting, assessing subsystems commonly affected after BI (e.g., cervical, balance, and oculomotor) [51]. It was initially designed to diagnose sports-related BI [51], and has been reported to have high sensitivity (82%) and specificity (90%) for identifying symptoms following sports-related BI [10].
HRV Assessment. Heart rate will be collected using the 3-lead electrocardiogram during the 5-minute baseline, and then during an isometric grip testing followed by a 5-minute recovery. For the isometric grip testing, participants will be asked to perform 3 maximum voluntary hand grips using their preferred hand. Then, a 30% of the maximum voluntary contraction will be calculated for each individual, and participants will be asked to maintain it for one minute [52, 53]. This maneuver is to activate cardiac sympathetic activity. Raw electrocardiogram waveforms will be processed to get time- and frequency-domain HRV through the Kubios HRV premium software [54], such as root mean square of successive standard deviation of R-R interval (RMSSD), high frequency (HF), and low frequency (LF) of HRV. RMSSD and HF of HRV are known to reflect changes in parasympathetic activities [55], while LF of HRV is suggested to indicate sympathetic tone [56].
K-D Eye Tracking and Balance Tests. The K-D Eye Tracking System is a quantitative tool to assess oculomotor function after BI. The K-D test involves reading aloud a series of single-digit numbers from left to right on 3 test cards. The sum of the 3 test card time scores will constitute the summary score for the entire test, the K-D time score. Numbers of errors made in reading the test cards will also be recorded. The K-D Balance System assesses three key balance stance metrics: double stance, right tandem stance and left tandem stance. An objective balance score will be automatically derived by detecting the individual’s movements using the device’s internal accelerometer. The intra-rater reliability is good to excellent for K-D Balance testing [57].
The BCPE outcomes will be compared between the groups using a chi-squared test. Multiple ANCOVAs will be used to examine the group differences RMSSD, HF, and LF of HRV during baseline, handgrip test, and recovery while adjusting for psychological distress. Independent t-tests will be utilized to examine the group differences on the K-D Eye Tracking score and the Balance score. We will not adjust for multiple comparisons as this is a pilot study. Significance will be set at p < 0>
We expect that female survivors with physical IPV will demonstrate more atypical findings on BCPE compared to their cohort with psychological/emotional IPV. Resting RMSSD and HF of HRV are expected to be lower in survivors with physical IPV compared to those with non-physical abuse indicating increased parasympathetic dysfunction in survivors of IPV with physical abuse. During hand grip testing, survivors with physical abuse are anticipated to demonstrate lower LF of HRV versus those with non-physical abuse suggesting higher anomalies in the function of sympathetic nervous system in survivors with physical abuse. A higher time score (indicating worse performance) and more errors are expected to be seen for the K-D Eye Tracking testing in female survivors with physical IPV compared to the control cohort with non-physical abuse Survivors with physical abuse are also expected to score higher (worse) on K-D Balance System compared to those with non-physical abuse.
The findings from this study could be useful in establishing rapid, objective tools to identify IPV-related BI in female survivors. It has been recognized, although not properly quantified, that IPV survivors are at a high risk of BI [4, 6, 58]. Symptoms such as anxiety may be heightened in survivors of IPV-related BI. Hence, assessments of BI from other populations should be validated in IPV survivors [7, 59]. Previous studies reporting BI in IPV survivors used subjective measures to assess the prevalence and severity of BI [4, 9, 58, 60]. However, this subjective evaluation may not accurately identify BI as reported symptoms can be misinterpreted for other disorders [4]. For example, in one study, the HELPS questionnaire, a subjective brain injury screen, only identified 40% BI in survivors of IPV who all reported IPV-related BI history on a clinical exam performed by a clinical examiner [61]. Therefore, objective examinations to precisely identify BIs in IPV survivors are critically needed. Focused, objective examinations not only assist clinical providers in accurately identifying BIs but will also help with improving IPV survivors’ well-being as well as access to healthcare [62-64]. This study will use a physical examination (i.e., BCPE) to objectively assess BI in female participants. Notably, mild traumatic BIs can be present without any abnormal signs revealed by imaging or neurological examination. Objective measures will be valuable in identifying dysfunction and guiding treatment and prognosis in survivors of IPV.
Furthermore, as noted before, survivors with physical IPV suffer from a cascade of symptoms that may ensue from physiological impairments [7], such as autonomic [24], and vestibular [65] dysfunctions. Previous research uses steroid levels as an indirect biomarker to identify autonomic dysfunction [24, 66]. However, techniques used for measuring steroid levels can be costly and time-consuming [67]. Therefore, it is critical to establish a valid and rapid assessment for autonomic function that can be easily applied in clinical settings. This study will apply HRV, a well-established methodology for autonomic evaluation in general population [55, 68, 69], to our samples of interest, female survivors of IPV. To this end, we will establish the feasibility of using HRV as a biomarker to assess autonomic function in this underserved population. Similarly, to this date, the deficits in vestibular function have not been evaluated objectively in survivors of IPV-related BI. Though a previous study found deficits associated with vestibular function in survivors of IPV, it lacked a control group [65]. The current study will use multiple balance/gait measures, which have been validated in other populations of BI [10, 57], to provide further evidence on vestibular dysfunction in survivors sustaining physical abuse compared to survivors sustaining psychological/emotional abuse (non-physical abuse cohort).
At the completion of this study, the need will remain to systematically evaluate objective markers of function in survivors of IPV-related BI. Though, through this study, an attempt would be made to identify reliable BI markers, several limitations exist. First, this study uses a convenience sample, and it is likely that our sample may not be representative of the larger IPV population. Future studies using random selection may provide more generalizable results. However, this study is crucial in establishing the groundwork for identifying objective markers of physiological and vestibular dysfunction in survivors of IPV-related BI. Second, the two study groups would not be randomized, and therefore, a possibility of selection bias exists. Future controlled studies with larger sample sizes focusing on BI diagnostic framework in IPV survivors may further characterize BI and its sequelae in this population. Third, this study will use various measures verified in other populations (e.g., sports-related BI) [10, 70]. However, we will not be able to provide cutoff points for these measures in female survivors of IPV due to a small sample size. Future researchers conducting trials with larger samples may identify cutoff points for assessments used in this study to provide a reference point for the diagnosis of BI and/or potential physiological impairments in the IPV population. Lastly, though we will make every attempt to use the same rater to administer assessments to both groups, a possibility exists that the rater may change. We will establish inter-rater reliability to reduce the rater bias [51, 71].
Here, we have provided a detailed description of a research protocol to identify probable BI and physiological markers in female survivors with IPV. We expect the review of this protocol may be useful to other researchers planning studies that investigate IPV-related BI. In addition, a detailed protocol of the physiological assessment trial is presented primarily to provide a reference for critically evaluating the results of this study. The results of this trial will support the establishment of objective evaluations of physiological functions in female survivors of IPV. Furthermore, identifying the utility of these physiological markers in the IPV population will set the stage toward selecting reliable methods when examining the effects of interventions for the IPV-related BI.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
