Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathML/content-mathml.js

Ichthyosiform Mycosis Fungoides: An Atypical Variant Of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma : About A Case And Literature Review

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/030

Ichthyosiform Mycosis Fungoides: An Atypical Variant Of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma : About A Case And Literature Review

  • Elharrouni Alaoui Aicha *
  • Elloudi Sara, Douhi Zakia
  • Baybay Hanane
  • Mernissi Fz

 Department of Dermatology, CHU Hassan II, FES, Morocco.

*Corresponding Author: Elharrouni Alaoui Aicha, Department of dermatology, CHU Hassan II, FES, Morocco

Citation: Elharrouni Alaoui Aicha, Elloudi Sara, Douhi Zakia, Baybay Hanane,Mernissi Fz (2020) Ichthyosiform Mycosis Fungoides: An Atypical Variant Of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma : About A Case And Literature Review. J Clinical Research and Reports, 2(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/030

Copyright: © 2020 Elharrouni Alaoui Aicha. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 30 January 2020 | Accepted: 12 February 2020 | Published: 17 February 2020

Keywords: cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; mycosis fungoides ; ichthyosiform variant

Abstract

Acquired ichthyosis is a known paraneoplastic sign of lymphoproliferative malignancies, with histopathologic findings that are nonspecific, revealing no insinuation of the underlying neoplasm.

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a skin malignancy of T helper lymphocytes with a wide clinical spectrum. Among the atypical variants of MF, there is an ichthyosis- like presentation. However, to date, rare  cases of ichthyosiform MF has been reported. We report here the clinical and histopathological features of patient with IMF.

Introduction

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and is characterized by the clonal expansion of skin-homing T lymphocytes. Various clinical and histological variants of MF have been reported .

Ichthyosiform MF (IMF) is not as well-known as other variants of MF. We report here the clinical and histopathological features of patient with IMF.

Case report 

A 56-year-old man  had consulted for ichthyosiform eruption (figure1) of the lower extremities evolving for 2 years associated with maculopapules discreetly pruritic trunk of more recent appearance and polyadenopathy. Cutaneous biopsy revealed Ichthyosiform mycosis fungoides on lesions of ichthyosis and the appearance of a MF classic on the trunk lesions (figure2). The labeling of lymphocytes was strongly positive for CD3 and CD4 and weakly positive for CD8. There was no histological lymph node involvement. The Thoracoabdominopelvic TDM was normal. The selected diagnosis was that of a stage IIa MF in its classic form on the trunk and the upper limbs and ichthyosiform type on the legs. A methotrexate  was indicated in the patient  , whose evolution is in progress.

Discussion

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and MF is a malignant lymphoma that’s characterized by the expansion of a clone of the CD4+ (or helper) memory T cells that frequently lacks other normal T-cell antigens (CD7). It usually begins as flat patches, which may or may not be histologically diagnosed as MF. Many variations of MF have been described, such as the follicular, granulomatous, hypo- or hyperpigmented and unilesional varients1-2. Moreover, ichthyosis-like eruption may very rarely be the first sign of MF. A few cases have recently been reported in which the ichthyosiform eruption proved to be a specific manifestation of MF (3-4). Ichthyosiform MF differs from acquired ichthyosis associated with cutaneous lymphoma. Aram first reported ichthyosiform lesions as a clinical manifestation of MF(5).

Ichthyosiform states are rarely associated with cutaneous lymphomas. Isolated, they would often suggest first the paraneoplastic hypothesis. In the particular situation  of MF, ichthyosiform eruption may also in rare cases, like that of our patient, correspond to a particular entity : MF ichthyosiform. This new, rare variant of MF is defined by a clinical aspect suggestive of ichthyosis vulgaris and a histology associating the specific appearance of mycosis fungoides  and that of ichthyosis vulgaris. Ichthyosiform MF can be divided into 3 types: 1) ichthyosiform eruption as the sole manifestation of the disease, 2) ichthyosiform eruption in conjunction with additional atypical findings of MF and 3) ichthyosiform eruption in combination with the classic types of MF(6). Marzano et al. and  Hodak et al. are  the previous studies have reported IMF accompanied by classical MF or follicular MF (7. 8), but there have been no reports of IMF accompanied by primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Our patient had the ichthyosiform eruption in combination with the hypo- or hyperpigmented types of MF. Ichthyosiform MF has similar histopathologic findingsto classic MF combined with features of ichthyosis, suchas hypogranulosis and hyperkeratosis. The detection offeatures from both entities in the same biopsy specimennarrows the differential diagnosis down to ichthyosiform MF and paraneoplastic ichthyosis in a patient with known MF (8).

Conclusion

IMF can be considered as a rare type of early MF with a comparatively favorable prognosis, which is common in young patients. When examining patients with ichthyosiform lesions, careful evaluation including skin biopsy is necessary to rule out the possibility of IMF.

References

a