Mini Review | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/1037
International Higher School of Medicine and National Center of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
*Corresponding Author: Abyt Ibraimov, International Higher School of Medicine and National Center of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Citation: Abyt Ibraimov (2026), Mini Review: Human body temperature: what does it really reflect? Mini Review., International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews; 34(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/1037
Copyright: © 2026, Abyt Ibraimov. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 07 January 2026 | Accepted: 21 January 2026 | Published: 05 February 2026
Keywords:
Everyone knows what human body temperature is and what it is normally (36.1–37.2 °C). Physicians know that this temperature is regulated by thermoregulation – the ability of warm-blooded organisms to maintain a constant body temperature, lowering or raising it when necessary.
Everyone knows what human body temperature is and what it is normally (36.1–37.2 °C). Physicians know that this temperature is regulated by thermoregulation – the ability of warm-blooded organisms to maintain a constant body temperature, lowering or raising it when necessary. Temperature can change due to the influence of the external environment, increase with physical activity, consumption of certain foods, stress, feelings of fear, and even intense mental work.
It is known that the first large-scale study of average body temperature was conducted in 1851 by the German physician Carl Wunderlich. At that time, he took about 1 million temperature measurements in the armpit of 25,000 individuals and determined that the average normal body temperature for a healthy person was 36.6°C. Today, nearly 170 years later, the norm is considered not a specific number, but a range from 35.5°C to 37.6°C. It is implied that the figures on the thermometer also reflect the temperature of the dense parts (cells, tissues, and organs) of the body.
However, we believe that the concept of body temperature not only in humans, but also in homeothermic organisms in general, needs to be clarified, since this term does not really correspond to its name. Namely, the temperature measured by existing thermometers can only reflect the temperature of circulating blood, not of cells. The general opinion of experts is as follows: "the analysis of thermal homeostasis in the human body and homeothermic animals. It is shown that the temperature in the internal tissues of the body (the core of the body) is high and relatively consistent because it is maintained via heat transfer through the blood flow" [1]. This statement needs clarification.
The thing is, the heat cannot transfer from the blood to the cells for the following reasons: 1) in homeothermic organisms, the temperature (T) in the cells is higher than in the circulating blood [2]. Therefore, the transfer of heat from circulation system to cells is impossible, because the second law of thermodynamics; 2) cells, with rare exceptions (endothelial cells lining the inner surface of blood vessels) are not in direct contact with blood; 3) the readings of thermometers reflect T only circulating blood, where the thermometry is performed, and not T inside the cells.
We cannot know T inside cells because of diversity of organelles in it. There is no method that allows measuring cell T as a whole, since the existing ones can only work with organelles (nucleus, mitochondria, ribosomes, or ER). In the same way, we cannot speak about human body temperature because of the heterogeneity of its constituent cells, tissues and organs. There are 230 types of cells functioning in the human body, which differ in their metabolic rate, cell cycle and the amount of heat they produce. Therefore, the term human body temperature lacks common sense, since thermometers reflect the T of circulating blood in the capillaries of the part of the body where the thermometry is performed, but not the cells. Since it is impossible to measure the temperature of cells and bodies, the thermophysical characteristics of a human can still be judged by the thermal conductivity of their body [3].
It is accepted that the main task of thermoregulation is to maintain a relatively constant core body temperature, meaning cells, tissues and organs, to ensure their normal function. From the point of view of physiologists, this is accomplished by the transfer of thermal energy from circulating blood to cells [1], a possibility of which we question.
We believe that the task of thermoregulation is not the preservation of optimal T in the body, but the preservation of structural and functional integrity of cell membranes. As indicated above, cellular T cannot be affected by heat from the circulation system. In addition, the generally accepted opinion that maintaining a temperature range of 35-41 ⁰C is acceptable, for example, for the normal functioning of enzymes may be controversial. This is evidenced by the following facts: 1) it is now established that the temperature of mitochondria is about 50 ⁰C [1]; 2) enzymes can work even at T 100 ⁰C and higher (in thermophilic bacteria); 3) the temperature inside cells is not regulated by generally recognized physiological mechanisms, i.e., by transfer of heat from circulating blood [1], but is determined by the laws of physics [3,4,6].
As is known, cell membranes are known to be very sensitive to T fluctuations and their structural and functional integrity depends on it (T). Since the T of the cell in homeothermic organisms is always higher than the T of circulating blood, it is to be expected that cell membranes are under the constant and directed action of thermal energy from the inner side of the cells [6]. Therefore, the only protection of cell membranes from dangerous overheating is the circulating blood, whose temperature is lower than the cell temperature and is regulated by the organ-based (the hypothalamus, the sweat glands, the skin, and the circulatory system) thermoregulatory system. Since intracellular T is unregulated, the task of cell thermoregulation is only to remove excess metabolic heat outside the cell in a timely manner [5].
To the possible question of why this idea has not been discussed until now, the answer may be simple: Until recently, the existence of thermoregulation at the level of individual cells was not known [4-6]. Cell thermoregulation (CT) refers to the process of dissipating excess metabolic heat outside the interphase cell. Since the temperature of the nucleus is higher than that of the cytoplasm, the cell uses a dense layer of condensed chromatin (CC) around the nucleus as a thermal conductor to release excess heat into the cytoplasm. The heat energy is then transferred to the intercellular fluid and further into the circulation system. In this sense, CT is a unidirectional flow of heat energy directed from the nucleus to the cytoplasm through the CC, which consists of chromosomal heterochromatin regions (HRs). The layer of CC around the nucleus is the densest and, accordingly, the most heat conductive structure in the interphase cell. CT refers to the cell's ability to effectively equalize the temperature difference between different areas, primarily between the nucleus and cytoplasm. This ability of cells is determined by the quantitative and qualitative composition of chromosomal HRs in CC.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,