AUCTORES
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.31579/2768-0487/017
Laboratoire de Recherches et Développement des médicaments et des produits naturels, Faculte of Pharmacy, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Lebanese University, Dekwaneh, Lebanon.
*Corresponding Author: Ali Jaber, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Lebanese University, Dekwaneh, Lebanon.
Citation: Z Zahreddine, A Jaber, Simon A Haidar, C Hosri, G Ibrahim et al. (2021) HPLC-DAD multi-residue method for determination of florfenicol, penicillin and tetracycline residues in raw cow milk. Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Research. 2(3) DOI: 10.31579/2768-0487/017
Copyright: © 2021 Ali Jaber. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 29 March 2021 | Accepted: 19 April 2021 | Published: 22 April 2021
Keywords: antibiotics; HPLC-DAD; raw milk; SPE
The existence of antibiotic residues in edible products constitutes a health problem to the consumers. Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection (HPLC–DAD) was optimized and validated for the simultaneous determination of florfenicol (FF), penicillin (PE), and tetracycline (TC) residues in dairy raw milk samples. The determination of these antibiotics was carried out on HP-ODS Hypersil C18 (5μm, 125*4 mm) column at a flow rate (1mL/min) and temperature (35 ⁰C). The extraction method includes deproteinization of the milk sample followed by a solid-phase extraction (SPE) clean-up. The method was validated according to the European Commission Decision 2002/657/EC and the International Conference of Harmonization Guidelines. The recoveries for the studied antibiotics ranged from 82–111.54 % making the method suitable for performing routine analysis. The proposed method was applied for the analysis of antibiotic residues in 50 dairy raw milk samples collected from many regions in Lebanon. The results showed the occurrence of these antibiotics residues in milk collected from different Lebanese regions. The numbers indicate that 22 % of milk samples were found to be positive for FF, 42 % for PE, and 28 % for TC residues.
Antibiotics (ATBs) are vital drugs implemented in the treatment of animal bacterial infections. Their effectiveness is, however, threatened by extensive and imprudent use, not only in cattle but also in human medicine. In veterinary practice, ATBs are utilized at therapeutic levels primarily to treat diseases and to prevent infections [1]. However, they are used at sub-therapeutic levels to increase feed efficiency, promote growth and prevent diseases [2]. Thus the imprudent use of ATBs may be a cause for the presence of ATB residues in dairy products and constitutes a real risk to consumers. Since they can lead to allergic reactions in hypersensitive individuals, and they may result in drug-resistant bacteria [3]. Hence, the ATB residues’ monitoring is needed to guarantee food safety.
To ensure food safety, regulatory authorities such as Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) [4] and the European Union (EU) [5] have enacted strict Maximum Residue Limit (MRL), while the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) establishes the tolerance or safe level [6]. As well as, those authorities’ have imposed strict requirements concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of the results. It should be noted that MRLs in a particular product may differ from one location to another and most developing countries have yet to develop their own MRLs [7].
β-lactam ATB, including penicillin (PE) (Figure 1) derivatives, are among the widely used ATBs in veterinary medicine precisely due to their high specificity, perfect selective toxicity, and potent killing effects [8,9]. Moreover, tetracyclines (TC) (Figure 1) are considered as the first-line drugs in food animals [10]. TC residues can cause harmful effects, such as allergic reactions, liver damage, yellowing of teeth, and gastrointestinal disturbance [11,12]. Likewise, florfenicol (FF) (Figure 1) is a broad‑spectrum antibiotic licensed for use in veterinary medicine. FF demonstrates good tissue penetration, due to its lipophilicity character, increasing its activity against bovine respiratory disease (BRD) [13]. However, this drug was also found to penetrate most body tissues including milk of lactating cattle and goats after intravenous or intramuscular administration[14].
Thus control authorities such as Codex Alimentarius have recommended the MRLs of 100 ppb, 4 ppb, and no value respectively for TC, PE, and FF in milk [4]. The absence of FF from the list is since the FDA establishes that any quantity of FF in milk is considered violative [15,16]. Despite the FF tolerance has not been established by the FDA, some studies suggest that the maximum provisional acceptable residues of FF in milk could be approximately in a range between 80 and 200 ppb [17].
Different methods, such as microbiological and chromatographic methods have been described for monitoring antibiotics in milk. Bioassay techniques are less specific and sometimes, they produce false positives [11]. Chromatographic techniques, such as thin‑layer chromatography, capillary electrophoresis and, high‑performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), have been developed for the quantitative, accurate, and reliable measurements of antibiotics in milk and animal tissues [11]. Despite the development of a wide range of multiclass methods dedicated to simultaneously analysis residues belonging to different ATB families, to the best of our knowledge there is no HPLC method allowing the analysis of FF, TC, and PE concurrently [18,19].
In Lebanon, small farmers are not subject to follow-up by the relevant ministries, and production is marketed directly to citizens without being subject to any medical checks. Moreover, studies dealing with these products are almost non-existent, firstly due to the lack of sufficient awareness by citizens [20] and secondly to the refusal of farmers to cooperate as a result of fear or for personal unknown reasons. Otherwise, some studies only dealt with milk samples from common local brands available in the Lebanese market [21] or with red meat [20]. Moreover, Lebanon is classified to be among the countries which have a high intake of milk defined as per capita milk consumption/year of >150 kg [22]. It’s worth noting that studies reported a high prevalence of resistant bacteria in the Lebanese community, especially penicillin [23].
The aim of this study was first to develop and validate a solid-phase extraction (SPE)-HPLC-diode-array-detector (DAD) method for the simultaneous separation and quantitation of three target ATB in raw cow milk. The applicability of the proposed method was demonstrated later by using it to investigate the incidence of those ATBs in raw milk samples collected from dairy farms in many regions in Lebanon. The samples have been analyzed for 3 ATBs compounds FF, TC, and PE.
Sample collection
A total of 50 raw cows' milk samples, from Lebanese dairy farms, were randomly collected throughout the year in sterile sample containers. Samples were labeled and stored at -20 oC for further analysis.
Chemical and Reagents
HPLC gradient grade acetonitrile and methanol were purchased from VWR chemicals. Oxalic acid and disodium hydrogen orthophosphate anhydrous were obtained from Analar. Citric acid anhydrous was purchased from HIMEDIA Laboratories. Disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), Penicillin G potassium salt, and Formic acid (FA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Tetracycline, Florfenicol was generously provided by Pharmadex S.a.l. (medicine factory, Beirut, Lebanon). Ultra-pure water (TKA, Micromed, Germany) was used for the preparation of all aqueous solutions. The solid-phase extraction procedures were carried out using Waters SupelTM-Select HLB cartridge (200 mg, 6 mL) were provided from Sigma-Aldrich.
Apparatus
All measurements were accomplished using an HP 1100 Series LC system (Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with a quaternary pump, a vacuum degasser, a column compartment, an auto sample, and a diode-array detector, and controlled by the HP Chemstation chromatography software. The analytical column was ODS hypersil C18, 5 μm (125 x 4mm) (from Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Other equipments such as pH meter CG 820 (SCHOTT GERATE, made in West Germany), electronic weighing balance (RADWAG Wagi Electronic, Poland), Spectrafuge 6C compact centrifuge (Edtexison, NJ USA), Ultrasonic cleaner (BRANSON 200, made in Taiwan) and vortex made by Daihan Scientific Co. (Korea) are also used in this study.
Preparation of Standard Solutions
To obtain a final concentration of 1mg/mL, a stock standard solution of FF, TC, and penicillin was prepared by dissolving 1 mg of the compound in 1 mL of acetonitrile (ACN), methanol (MeOH), water/ACN (1/1) respectively. The solutions were stored at + 4 °C until further use. Working solutions were prepared daily by appropriate dilution of aliquots of the standard stock solutions in ultra-pure water. The working solutions were used for sample spiking for the preparation of calibration curves of 6 different concentrations.
Extraction and clean-up procedure
About 10 mL of milk sample was taken in a 50 mL centrifuge tube. Add to it 10 mL of 0.1M EDTA-McIlvaine buffer (pH 4.0) (prepared as described by Cinquina et al.[24]) followed by vigorous shaking for 5 min. The sample was then centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and filtered through a Whatman filter paper 0.45 μm (Whatman, Maidstone, UK) to remove any remaining milk flakes. Clean up of the extract was done by using the SPE method. The filtrate was loaded on a Supel Select HLB (Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balance) cartridge preconditioned with 3 mL of methanol followed by 2 mL of ultra-pure water under pressure. The cartridge containing the sample was washed with 2 mL of water and then antibiotics were eluted with 1.5 mL of MeOH. The obtained elute was filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter and stored in vials for further analysis.
Chromatographic conditions
The LC gradient elution was performed using a mobile phase consisting of solvent A: water (containing 0.1 % FA), solvent B: oxalic acid (0.05 M and pH = 2.6)/ ACN/MeOH (60:30:10), solvent C: 25 % ACN in water (containing 0.1% FA) and solvent D: ACN/MeOH (2:1) (containing 0.1% FA). The mobile phase was mixed and sonicated for 5 min and then vacuum filtered through a 0.45 µm nylon filter.
Chromatographic separation of the analytes was achieved on ODS hypersil C18 column. An elution gradient was chosen that allowed complete analysis in less than fifteen minutes; the characteristics are reported in Table 1 below. The flow rate was adjusted at 1 mL/min and the column thermostat was set at 35 oC. The injection volume was 25 μL and the final run time of the method was 15 min. Detection wavelengths were set at 224 nm for FF, 210 nm for PE, and 350 nm for TC. While data analysis was performed utilizing the Hewlett-Packard ChemStation software.
In-House Validation of the Analytical Method
The characteristics and the procedures used for validation were performed following the recommendations from the Commission Decision 2002/657/CE of the EU[25], for the parameters of retention time, linearity, recovery, and precision. The LOD and LOQ were calculated according to the guideline of the International Conference of Harmonization (ICH) guidelines [26]. The performance criteria; linearity, sensitivity, selectivity, intra-assay and inter-assay precision, accuracy, the limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were determined.
The linearity response was examined by triplicate analysis of milk samples fortified with FF, PE, or TC at seven fortification levels ranging from 0.004 to 5 ppm. The standard calibration curves were generated for each analyte by plotting concentrations against the peak height ratio of the analyte.
The sensitivity of the method, i.e. the change in response on a measuring instrument divided by the corresponding change in stimulus, was represented by the slope of the calibration curve [27].
The selectivity of the method was investigated by analysis of ten different blank milk samples to determine any interfering peaks from endogenous compounds.
LOD and LOQ established for this method were calculated from the standard deviation (σ) of y-intercepts of regression analysis and the calibration curve slope (m), according to equations 1 and 2 respectively [26].
LOD=3.3σm (eq. 1)
LOQ=10σm (eq. 2)
The precision of the method consists of intra-assay precision and inter-assay precision expressed as a percentage of relative standard deviation (% RSD) of peak height measurements. The intra-assay precision was determined by spiking six blank milk samples at a single concentration level of 5 μg.mL-1 and evaluation was done through the results obtained with the method operating over 1 day under the same conditions. The inter-assay precision was determined at three fortification levels, and the analyses were carried out over three consecutive days.
Since no certified reference material was available, the accuracy of the method expressed as % recovery was determined by triplicate analysis of spiked milk samples at three fortification levels. The recoveries were calculated by comparing the mean value of the measured concentration to the mean value of the spiked concentration. The below equation (eq.3) was used to calculate the apparent recovery.
%Recovery = obtained mean valueexpected value . 100 (eq.3)
Optimization of Chromatographic Separation
The development of a simultaneous SPE-HPLC-DAD method to isolate FF, PE, and TC, and separate them from matrices is easier said than done. Since the three targeted ATBs belong to different families, thus they have distinct physic-chemical properties. Optimization of several chromatographic parameters was performed to obtain the best chromatographic conditions. So, a series of experiments concerning modification of mobile phase, stationary phase, column temperature, and absorption spectrum (wavelengths) were evaluated.
First, several mobile phase compositions and gradient profiles were investigated to improve peak separation and to obtain the shortest run time. Our first choice was the elution gradient reported by Karami-Osboo et al. (2016) to FF analysis with a mobile phase consisted of water/acetonitrile 75:25 (vlv) [28]. When used for blank milk samples, the later mobile phase leads to an interfering peak in the retention time-window of FF. To improve the FF elution selectivity we had resorted to adding 0.1% FA to this mobile phase, increasing the retention time of FF. According to literature studies, β-lactam ATB has been separated using acidic mobile phases [29,30]. Also, the problem of tailing peak, due to metal impurities or residual silanols when using reversed‑phase column, can be overcome by adding acid to mobile phase [31]. However, these conditions allowed the elution of PE and FF only. To optimize the TC elution and separation, other experiments were done. The addition of oxalic acid (0.05 M) and 0.1% acetic acid was tried since the buffer type has a critical impact on the protonation of compounds. As result, increasing the percentage of oxalate buffer in the mobile phase provides the best results. Similar findings concerning the effect of oxalic acid were observed [32], and the given explanation was related to the tendency of oxalate to block the residual silanols group on the column. From another side, experiments were done to select the best organic modifier of the mobile phase, and conclusions were drawn that methanol provides superior separation and sensitivity to the antibiotics in comparison to acetonitrile only. Further, it was reported that when the MeOH concentration increased in the mobile phase the elution time becomes short [33].
A column choice is another important step in the development of multi-residue HPLC methods. Three different LC columns (HP ODS Hypersil C18 (5μm, 200*4.6 mm), HP ODS Hypersil C18 (5μm, 125*4 mm), and Nucleosil C18 (125*4mm) were compared and used during the initial elaboration of the method. The ODS Hypersil C18 (5μm, 125*4 mm) column indicated a rapid and better chromatographic separation of the analytes and gave the best sensitivity with the chosen compositions of the mobile phase. This column was used for all further method development and validation experiments.
Other conditions namely the column temperature and maximum absorption wavelength were optimized to incorporate FF, PE, and TC. Thereby, once adjusting the column temperature to 35 °C, excellent separation for these 3 antibiotics was achieved on the ODS Hypersil C18 column using a photodiode array detector. The detection wavelengths used to attain maximum sensitivity were 224 nm for FF, 210 nm for PE, and 350 nm for TC. Finally, the overall optimized conditions have been applied using a mixed standard solution and showed a good selectivity in chromatograms of raw milk samples for three ATB. Very low variation was observed in the retention times, with RSD values not exceeding 1.65%. Thus, the optimized method resulted in an effective separation of the three antibiotics belonging to three different groups in a single run with adequate resolution.
Pre-cleaning of milk samples
Sample preparation is a critical technical stage of the development of multi-detection and multi‑class methods, as it is important to ensure good purification providing maximum removal of interferences and enhance the recovery of the analytes.
As mentioned earlier, the development of a multi-class method is a difficult task due to different physicochemical properties between classes. This requires pre-treatment as well as clean-up of samples to eliminate specific interferences from the milk matrix facilitating analytical determination of each analyte with adequate resolution. The four main steps evaluated were precipitation of milk proteins, extraction of ATB from milk matrix, cleanup using solid-phase cartridges, and concentration of eluting. For extraction studies, the known blank milk samples fortified with ATB standard solutions (1 µg.ml-1) were employed.
In order to evaluate the precipitations’ step of milk proteins, different solutions such as trichloroacetic acid, acetonitrile, and EDTA Mcllvaine buffer have been evaluated. The best results were obtained from sodium EDTA-Mcllvaine buffer that resulted in simultaneous extraction of all targeted antibiotics from milk with good recoveries. The sodium EDTA-Mcllvaine [34] buffer has been used by many researchers for the extraction of antibiotic residues from milk [35]. The extracts that had undergone the protein precipitation were subsequently cleaned up using Speed SPE C18 solid‑phase extraction cartridges.
For the selection of SPE sorbent, the extraction efficiency of two SPE columns (Waters Sep-Pak Vac and Supel Select HLB) were tested and they give roughly the same recovery values. Supel Select HLB cartridge was used for the accomplishment of the work. After loading, 2 mL of ultra-pure water was used for the washing step. The final elution step was carried out using 1.5 mL of methanol, then filtered through 0.45 µm syringe filters and transferred into vials for HPLC analysis.
Validation of Method
The optimized HPLC-DAD method was validated for the determination of the three ATBs (FF, PE, and TC) and results are presented in Table 2.
The linearity and the sensitivity were established by the calibration curves by plotting the peak height against concentrations of each analyte ranging from 0.004 to 5 ppm. Each concentration level was injected three times (n = 3). Good linearity was obtained for all ATB and highly correlated with the amounts injected, the correlation coefficients (r2) ranged from 0.997 to 0.999.
The food matrix imposes a lot of interferences and the ability of the method to quantify a particular analyte despite all interferences is measured by the selectivity [36]. The application of the method to different blank milk samples demonstrated that no potential interferences from the matrix were detected at the retention time-windows of three analytes. Therefore, the optimized method presents adequate selectivity for the determination of the studied ATB. Representative chromatograms of blank samples and fortified samples are shown in Figure 2.
To fulfill the requirements of the legislated MRLs, the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were calculated using the aforementioned (eq. 1) and (eq. 2) respectively. As presented in Table 2, the LOD for the studied antibiotics ranged from 6 to 12.4 ppb, while the LOQ ranged from 18 to 45 ppb.
To assess the precision of the method, intra-assay and inter-assay (expressed as % RSD) were checked. Repeatability of the method was tested by six replicate injections of spiked milk. Intra- and inter-day variations of retention times and concentrations, expressed in RSD %, are summarized in Table 2. % RSD values for antibiotic concentration ranged from 0.77 and 1.68 %. According to the European Commission Decision 2002/657/EC [37], the intra-assay precision and inter-assay precision should be lower than 15 % and 23 %, respectively, and the observed values are in agreement with the EU guidelines.
Accuracy was established based on ATB recovery, which was determined by triplicate analysis of spiked milk samples at three fortification levels (low, medium, and high). The recovery for studied antibiotics ranged from 82 to 111.54 %, and the results are reported in Table 2. The recovery values are under the EU guidelines, which established a range of 80–120 % for these concentration levels [37]. Consequently, it can be noticed that the proposed method is accurate and precise enough for the determination of ATB residues in raw milk.
Milk Samples Analysis
To verify the performance of the proposed method, 50 samples of pooled raw milk procured from randomly selected dairy farms located in Lebanon, were analyzed for the presence of targeted ATB. The obtained HPLC results (Figure 3) indicate that 22 % of milk samples were found to be positive for FF, 42 % for PE, and 28 % for TC residues.
Results were categorized according to the obtained concentrations and with levels above the established MRLs values [37]. Positive samples could be probably due to the misuse of antibiotics in food animal production in the Lebanese farms, together with the violation of the withdrawal period regulation.
Our results showed that PE was the most prevalent ATB in milk samples. The occurrence of β-lactam ATB can be attributed to their frequent use in the treatment of mastitis and other systemic diseases [38]. The obtained result, (42 % of samples positive for PE) was in correlation with studies conducted in Italy [39] and Turkey [40], which have shown the presence of β-lactams residues at concentrations higher than the MRLs. In addition to the above studies, results are enhanced by another study conducted in Northern Italy, as most of the ATB residues found belonged to the group of β-lactams [41].
In Kuwait, Alomirah et al. [42] collected samples from approximately 1000 locally produced and imported milk and dairy product at different seasonal periods from different farms and retail outlets and screened for the presence of four antimicrobial residues (beta-lactams, tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and chloramphenicol). Results indicated that 29.1% of the analyzed local fresh milk samples were above the MRL for tested residues with TC as predominant residue [42]. Similar results were found in a study conducted in Macedonia [43]. Controversy, Bilandzic et al. [44] performed a study on 119 raw milk samples (in Croatia) and the measured mean value for TC was 2.83 μg/l where none of the samples analyzed showed the presence of veterinary drug residues above the MRL. Despite the few studies examining the presence of FF residues in raw milk, we can find two interesting studies in the last five years. A study done by Karami et al. [28] on 15 real milk samples analyzed for florfenicol and chloramphenicol and the results were only one sample was contaminated with florfenicol and contamination to chloramphenicol was not detected. A similar result was obtained recently by Wang et al. [45]. Following our results, the prevalence of FF residue has a limited presence in raw milk.
On the other hand, the prevalence of multi-class residues in one sample might be due to several reasons, such as the use of medicated feed or simultaneous use of different types of antibiotics intravenously/systemically or locally at the udder [46].
Based on this work, urgent stricter rules turn out to be a must on the use of ATB in animal husbandry if the authorities have the firm intention to decrease the level of residues in milk samples. This study emphasized the importance of education and awareness programs concerning the respect of the withdrawal periods of antimicrobials as well as stress the importance of the supervisory role of institutions concerned with food safety.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which a fast and reliable method has been developed and validated for simultaneous detection and quantification of FF, PE, and TC in raw milk. The developed method provided good performance and satisfactory recovery, thus results showed the applicability for routine analysis of raw cow milk. Then, the validated method had served to detect and quantify FF, PE, and TC residues in a reduced number of samples from Lebanese farms. The overall results showed that the prevalence of these antibiotics residues in milk was high in terms of contamination among the collected samples due to a lack of surveillance and monitoring system from the concerned authorities. Our findings highlight the need for antibiotic monitoring among small farms and this study would serve as baseline data on the prevalence of antibiotics residue in raw milk.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from Lebanese University (Faculty of Pharmacy).
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.