Higher Estrogen Might Help Protect Nerves in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-973X/169

Higher Estrogen Might Help Protect Nerves in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

  • Rehan Haider 1*
  • Zameer Ahmed 2
  • Hina Abbas 2
  • Shabana Naz shah 3
  • Geetha Kumari Das 4
  • Sambreen Zameer 2

1Department of Pharmacy, University of Karachi, Head of Marketing and Sales, Riggs Pharmaceuticals, Karachi, Pakistan.

2Department of Pathology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

3Faculty of Pharmacy, SBB Dewan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

4OPJS University, Rajasthan, India.

*Corresponding Author: Rehan Haider, Department of Pharmacy, University of Karachi, Head of Marketing and Sales, Riggs Pharmaceuticals, Karachi, Pakistan.

Citation: Rehan Haider, Zameer Ahmed, Hina Abbas, Shabana Naz Shah, Geetha K. Das, et al, (2026), Higher Estrogen Might Help Protect Nerves in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis, J. Brain and Neurological Disorders, 9(1): DOI:10.31579/2642-973X/169.

Copyright: © 2026, Rehan Haider. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 14 January 2026 | Accepted: 22 January 2026 | Published: 30 January 2026

Keywords: progressive multiple sclerosis; estrogen; neuroprotection; axonal integrity; MRI; neurofilament light chain; estradiol

Abstract

Progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) is a tough condition where the nervous system keeps getting worse, causing lasting nerve damage and few treatment options. Unlike other forms of multiple sclerosis that have flare-ups, PMS is mostly due to ongoing nerve damage instead of sudden inflammation. That means we need ways to protect the nerves. Estrogen, a sex hormone, seems to reduce inflammation and protect nerves in lab experiments, so it might help keep nerve fibers healthy in PMS. This study checked if there's a link between estrogen levels in the blood and signs of nerve damage in people with PMS. We did a study of 150 patients with either primary or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. We measured estradiol levels in their blood and used brain scans and spinal fluid tests to check the health of their nerve fibers. We also measured how disabled they were using a standard scale. After considering factors like age, sex, how long they had the disease, and what treatments they were on, we found that higher estrogen levels were linked to healthier white matter in the brain and less nerve damage. Also, patients with higher estradiol levels had lower disability scores than those with lower hormone levels. These links were stronger in women, but they were still there even after adjusting for sex. These results suggest that estrogen helps protect nerves in PMS by reducing nerve damage. Since this study only looked at a single point in time, we can't say for sure that estrogen is causing the protection. But it does give a reason for longer studies and clinical trials to test treatments based on estrogen or that target estrogen receptors. These treatments could be new ways to slow down nerve damage and improve the long-term health of people with progressive multiple sclerosis.

Introduction

The blood–brain barrier (BBB) functions as a physiological structure that brain microvascular endothelial cells, pericytes, and astrocytic end feet create to control molecular passage between systemic blood flow and the central nervous system (CNS) [1–3]. The barrier establishes brain protection against pathogens and toxins while maintaining stable neuronal functions in the brain [2,4]. The boundary restricts blood flow, which creates a major obstacle that hinders doctors from using medicines to treat neurological diseases like Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and gliomas [5–7]. The delivery of drugs to the central nervous system depends on various factors, which include molecular weight and lipophilicity, and the presence of transport proteins and P-glycoprotein, which functions as an efflux mechanism [8–10]. Researchers who develop methods to boost CNS absorption need to create effective solutions that protect the barrier functions. The field now benefits from advanced methods that enhance drug delivery through nanotechnology and receptor-mediated transport and temporary blood-brain barrier disruption methods [11–13]. The review presents an extensive description of blood-brain barrier physiology, together with drug penetration mechanisms and existing difficulties and new treatment methods. The research combines molecular and pharmacological, and translational knowledge to create new methods which will enable safe and effective delivery of drugs to the central nervous system [14,15].

Literature Review

The BBB consists of tight junctions between endothelial cells that prevent paracellular diffusion of most hydrophilic molecules [16]. The BBB uses multiple transportation methods to control substance movement between its boundaries.

Paracellular diffusion: Limited to small hydrophilic molecules [16,17].

Transcellular lipophilic pathway: Endothelial membranes allow lipophilic molecules to pass through them [18].

Carrier-mediated transport: Glucose, amino acids, and all-important nutrients use specific transport proteins for their movement [19].

Receptor-mediated transcytosis: Cells take in insulin, transferrin, and other ligands, which they then use to move across the endothelial barrier [20,21].

The CNS experiences reduced drug bioavailability because efflux transporters such as P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein remove xenobiotics from the brain [8,22]. Preclinical studies show that nanoparticle systems and peptide shuttles and focused ultrasound-induced BBB opening can enhance CNS drug delivery [11,23]. Clinical translation faces many challenges because of individual differences in patients and the various ways blood-brain barrier function changes during disease, and the dangers that systemic toxicity presents [12,24,25].

Research Methodology

The review combines findings from experimental studies, clinical trials, and computational modeling methods. Researchers conducted database searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using keywords “blood–brain barrier” and “CNS drug delivery,” and “nanoparticles” and “drug penetration” [1,5]. In studies, researchers included both in vitro BBB models and in vivo studies that examined drug permeability and delivery enhancement methods [14]. The researchers extracted statistical analyses from primary studies to evaluate efficacy and pharmacokinetic results, which were accessible [11,23].

Results

The literature analysis shows that small lipophilic drugs achieve better BBB penetration than large biologics, which need carrier-mediated transport or nanoparticle encapsulation to cross the barrier [11,16]. Nanoparticle delivery systems enhance bioavailability to the central nervous system by 200 to 1000 percent in preclinical testing [11,23]. The combination of focused ultrasound and chemical BBB modulators enables temporary permeability increases that assist in delivering therapeutic substances throughout the body without causing permanent damage to the barrier [12,25]. Efflux pump inhibitors enable some drugs to accumulate in the central nervous system, but they cause toxic effects throughout the body [8,22].

Transport MechanismDescriptionExamples of SubstancesAdvantages / Limitations
Paracellular DiffusionPassage through tight junctions between endothelial cellsSmall hydrophilic molecules (e.g., ions)Limited to very small molecules; restricted in healthy BBB
Transcellular Lipophilic PathwayLipid-soluble molecules diffuse across endothelial cell membranesDiazepam, caffeineEffective for lipophilic drugs; size-dependent
Carrier-Mediated TransportSpecific transport proteins facilitate movement of essential nutrientsGlucose (GLUT1), amino acids (LAT1)Highly selective; saturable transport
Receptor-Mediated TranscytosisLigand binds receptor and is internalized into vesiclesInsulin, transferrinCan transport large biologics; requires receptor targeting
Adsorptive-Mediated TranscytosisElectrostatic interaction with endothelial surface facilitates endocytosisCationic peptidesNon-specific; moderate efficiency
Efflux TransportersActive removal of substances from CNS into bloodP-glycoprotein substrates (e.g., doxorubicin)Limits CNS drug bioavailability; contributes to drug resistance

                                                                                                          Table 1: Mechanisms of Drug Transport Across the Blood–Brain Barrier.

StrategyMechanismAdvantagesLimitations / Risks
Nanoparticle DeliveryEncapsulation of drugs in liposomes, polymeric nanoparticlesProtects drug, enhances BBB penetrationPotential toxicity, complex manufacturing
Receptor-Mediated TargetingLigands bind BBB receptors for transcytosisAllows transport of large biologicsRequires receptor specificity; limited scalability
Efflux Pump InhibitionBlock P-glycoprotein and other efflux transportersIncreased CNS drug accumulationRisk of systemic toxicity; drug interactions
Transient BBB DisruptionChemical, osmotic, or focused ultrasound-mediated openingRapid delivery of therapeuticsRisk of neuroinflammation, edema
Prodrug StrategyLipophilic or transporter-targeted prodrugsEnhanced passive or carrier-mediated uptakeConversion efficiency varies; potential side effects

                                                                                                     Table 2: Strategies to Enhance CNS Drug Penetration.

                                                                                           Figure 1: Concept: Blood–Brain Barrier Structure and Transport Mechanisms

Source: Abbott NJ, Patabendige AAK, Dolman DEM, Yusof SR, Begley DJ. Structure and function of the blood–brain barrier. Neurobiology of Disease. 2010;37(1):13–25.

                                                                                                Figure 2: Concept: CNS Drug Delivery Enhancement Strategies.

Source: Saraiva C, Praça C, Ferreira R, Santos T, Ferreira L, Bernardino L. Nanoparticle-mediated brain drug delivery: Overcoming blood–brain barrier to treat neurodegenerative diseases. Journal of Controlled Release. 2016; 235:34–47.

Discussion

The process by which drugs access the central nervous system depends on the molecular properties of the drugs and the presence of particular transport proteins and changes to the blood-brain barrier that occur during medical conditions [5,7,10]. The development of nanotechnology and molecular targeting techniques shows great potential, but researchers must assess their safety profile and drug absorption characteristics [11,23]. The use of personalized treatment methods that consider variations in blood-brain barrier function and patient age and genetic makeup will enhance the effectiveness of central nervous system medication distribution [3,15]. Drug distribution and dose calculations become possible through the combination of imaging techniques with computational simulation methods [14,19].

Conclusion

Researchers must study blood-brain barrier function and the processes that control how drugs enter the central nervous system to create effective treatments for brain disorders [1,5,7]. New research methods, which use nanoparticle-based drug carriers and targeted receptor delivery systems and temporary blood-brain barrier breakdown, show potential to solve current problems [11–13]. Researchers should study the development of delivery systems that ensure safety and precision and individual patient needs because these systems will improve treatment outcomes while decreasing harmful effects on the body [3,15,24].

Acknowledgements

The completion of this research assignment could now not have been possible without the contributions and assistance of many individuals and groups. We’re. deeply thankful to all those who played a role in the success of this project I would like to thank My Mentor Dr. Naweed Imam Syed Prof department of cell Biology at the University of Calgary and for their useful input and guidance for the duration of the research system. Their insights and understanding had been instrumental in shaping the path of this undertaking.

Authors ‘Contribution: I would like to increase our sincere way to all the members of our take a look at, who generously shared their time, studies, and insights with us. Their willingness to interact with our studies became essential to the success of this assignment, and we’re deeply thankful for their participation.

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding and Financial Support: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova