Mini Review | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/019

Heparin and Amyloid ?2-Microglobulin

  • Yuichiro Higashimoto 1
  • Tatsuo Yoneda 2
  • Yoshihiro Motomiya 3*
  • 1 Department of Chemistry, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
  • 2 Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Japan
  • 3* Suiyukai Clinic, Kashihara, Nara, Japan

*Corresponding Author: Yoshihiro Motomiya, Suiyukai Clinic, Kashihara, Nara, Japan

Citation: Higashimoto Y., Yoneda T., Motomiya Y. (2020) Mini-review: Heparin and Amyloid β2-Microglobulin. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 2(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/019

Copyright: © 2020 Yoshihiro Motomiya, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 20 March 2020 | Accepted: 17 April 2020 | Published: 27 April 2020

Keywords: glycosaminoglycans; hemodialysis; microglobulin

Abstract

Heparin is a major component of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), which are components of tissues in the interstitial spaces of the body. Heparin is the most important anticoagulant used in clinical settings, especially for hemodialysis (HD).

Introduction

Heparin is a major component of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), which are components of tissues in the interstitial spaces of the body. Heparin is the most important anticoagulant used in clinical settings, especially for hemodialysis (HD).

Since Gejo’s report in 1985, β2-microglobulin (β2-M) has been recognized as the precursor protein in dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA), which is inevitably associated with long-term HD [1]. In general, this amyloidosis develops in the presence of two essential background conditions, i.e., extremely high concentrations of precursor proteins and amyloidogenic conformation of these precursor proteins. Connors [2] first demonstrated the amyloidogenic potential of β2-M in 1985. Serum β2-M levels in end-stage renal failure were known to be elevated because the kidney is the main organ related to the metabolism of β2-M. In addition, we later proved that the conversion of the native β2-M conformation to the amyloidogenic β2-M conformation was triggered by unfolding of the C-terminal portion from Ile-92 to Met-99 [3, 4] (Figure 1).

Figure1: C-terminal unfolding : destructuring by loss of intram

However, how native β2-M is converted to an amyloidogenic conformer with the unfolded C-terminus in vivo, i.e., in clinical settings such as HD, and how β2-M concentrations in the interstitial space reach as high as millimolar values despite micromolar serum levels of β2-M in patients with HD [5] have not been clarified. In this mini-review, we would like to demonstrate that heparin may be a key molecule for the answers to both of these questions.

Heparin is a mucopolysaccharide with different molecular weights (MWs) when prepared from animal organs, such as the intestine or the lung, and has been used widely as an anticoagulant. In the early 1990s, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMH), less than 6 kD, was introduced in HD to reduce the high risk of bleeding that had been associated with conventional heparin, which had heterogeneous MWs of more than 10 kD, or with high-molecular-weight heparin (HMH) [6]. Our previous study demonstrated a clear difference between HMH and LMH in interactions with β2-M, as follows [7].

Binding of Heparin with β2-M

HMH binds in a dose-dependent manner with DN6β2-M, a well-known highly amyloidogenic variant of β2-M [8]; binds somewhat with D76N β2-M, a natural amyloid variant of β2-M; and demonstrates weak binding with native β2-M (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Analysis of the interaction of β2m variants with high molecular weight heparin.

Biotinylated H.M.H. (0.5 U/mL) was immobilized onto streptavidin biosensor. Protein concentrations were 1.0 µM (A) and 0.1 µM (B), respectively. ΔN6β2m (line, ──), D76N β2m (dashed line, ----) and native β2m (dotted line,).

The kD values for each β2-M species were as follows: 2.07×10-8M, and 1.72×10-7M, 3.71×10-6M respectively. The kD value of DN6β2-M was low, consistent with that of its specific aptamer [7].

LMH, however, did not bind with DN6β2-M or native β2-M (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Analysis of the interaction of β2m variants with low molecular weight heparin.

Biotinylated L.M.H. (5.0 U/mL) was immobilized onto streptavidin biosensor. ΔN6β2m (line, ──) and native β2m (dotted line,) were used as the binding partner. Protein concentration was 4.0 µM.  The real time binding curves were used to compute equilibrium dissociation constant by globally fitting the rate equation for 1:1 kinetics to the data.  Three-independent experiments were performed, respectively.

Because GAGs in the interstitial space have a rich heparin component, β2-M has been trapped in the interstitial space and accumulated in a time-dependent fashion in patients undergoing HD, and their levels of β2-M are expected to reach as high as millimolar values in 10 years or more.

Unfolding of the C-terminus of the β2-M molecule

An intermediate molecule with a partially unfolded structure of precursor proteins was identified as a key molecule in the amyloidogenic process [10]. With regard to β2-M, we confirmed that the unfolding at the C-terminus from Ile-92 to Met-99 was key process for the initiation of amyloidogenicity of this precursor protein (Figures 1–3). Our study of heparin demonstrated that 1 μM HMH could trigger the C-terminal unfolding of β2-M, which was consistent with the serum concentrations of β2-M in patients undergoing HD (Figure 4) [7].

Figure 4 Analysis of the interaction of mAb92-99 with native β2m in the presence of H.M.H.

MAb92-99 (10 µg/mL) was immobilized onto protein a biosensor. After adding native β2m to the reaction drop holder in the presence or absence of H.M.H., the real-time binding was monitored.  Native β2m incubated with H.M.H. (0.5 U/mL) for 24 h was also used as the binding partner.

In addition, given that β2-M concentrations may be much higher in the interstitial space than are concentrations in serum, we may expect more unfolding at the N-terminus than the C-terminus, which is likely to undergo proteolysis at Lys-6 and generate a highly amyloidogenic variant, DN6β2-M [8], because the unfolding process is believed to proceed from the N-terminus of β2-M [11].

GAGs Contain a Majority of the SO3– Moiety

Chemical solvents containing SO3– such as sodium dodecyl sulfate have induced conformational changes in proteins. For β2-M, several studies indicated amyloidogenic conversion that depended on a majority of SO3– moieties being present in GAGs [12,13,14,15]. As is well-known, heparin is a highly negative mucopolysaccharide rich in the SO3– moiety. Although we had not studied the dose-dependent effect of heparin on the C-terminal unfolding of β2-M, we believe that the SO3– majority contained in heparin may affect the results for HMH and LMH. The conformation of the β2-Mmolecule is maintained by multiple intramolecular hydrogen bonds, which may be partially broken by multiple SO3− groups.

Conclusion

Collectively, our studies have indicated two actions of HMH with β2-M: direct binding and induction of C-terminal unfolding. The former may result in an accumulation of β2-M in the interstitial space and the latter may lead to β2-M amyloidogenicity.

LMH showed no clear interactions, even with DN6β2-M, which indicates a superior clinical availability compared with HMH as an anticoagulant during long-term HD, in which DRA is a serious complication.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova