Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8808/193

Helicobacter pylori infections

  • Bhattacharyya S

Associate Professor, Microbiology, AIIH&PH, Kolkata, India.

*Corresponding Author: Bhattacharyya S. Associate Professor, Microbiology, AIIH&PH, Kolkata, India

Citation: Bhattacharyya S, (2024), Helicobacter pylori infections, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, 5(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-8808/193

Copyright: ©2024, Bhattacharyya S. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 06 April 2024 | Accepted: 15 April 2024 | Published: 22 April 2024

Keywords: Helicobacter pylori; gastritis; antrum

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori is a Gram-negative intracellular bacterium. It is implicated in many infections like peptic ulcer disease and can also cause gastric carcinoma. Diagnosis relies on various methods. Treatment can be done by various pharmacological methods.

Introduction

Helicobacter pylori is a spiral Gram-negative bacterium. It is implicated in gastritis, gastric ulcer and gastric lymphoma [1]. Apart from this, it is also implicated in other infections, like a potential trigger of gastric autoimmunity, and in particular of autoimmune gastritis [2].   H. pylori may spread by unclean food and water, or through contact with an infected person's saliva and other body fluids [1].

Materials and methods:

Scientific literature search was carried out to collate available information about epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of infections caused y this bacterium. 

Epidemiology:

This bacterium was discovered by Barry J Marshall and Robin Warren who also proposed its roles in peptic ulcer disease and gastritis [3]. Barry J Marshall inoculated himself with oral suspension or ‘brew’ of Helicobacter pylori to establish his idea that H. pylori indeed caused gastritis [4].  Before that, it was believed that stress and lifestyle related factors were the major drivers of peptic ulcer disease. After their discovery, it was established that H. pylori, causes more than 90% of duodenal ulcers and also up to 80% of gastric ulcers. H. pylori infection may be found in more than half the people in the world [5]. H.  pylori infection is responsible for 74.7% of all non-cardia gastric cancer cases [6]. The bacterium spreads from man to man via vomitus and saliva, and can also possibly spread by houseflies [7]. Infections are more commonly seen in countries with low socioeconomic status.

 Besides the above-listed conditions, Helicobacter pylori is also believed to cause a substantial percentage of ITP or Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Pathogenesis

 H. pylori produces urease enzyme which produces Ammonia from urea, and neutralises gastric acid. CagA gene of Helicobacter pylori helps in the intracellular persistence of the bacterium and causes severe disease. Vac A gene produces the vacuolating cytotoxin which also helps in pathogenesis by inducing inflammation and vacuole formation.

Laboratory diagnosis:

Urea breath test can be done to detect the bacterium.  PCR can also be done from stool samples for detecting Helicobacter pylori [5]. Stool antigen tests can also be done. Antibiotics can interfere with the accuracy of testing. In general, retesting is done only after antibiotics have been stopped for four weeks, if possible.

Acid-suppressing drugs known as PPI and Bismuth salicylate can also interfere with accuracy of these tests.

In the routine clinical practice, rapid urease test (RUT) has been the most useful test for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. This is because it is cheap, rapid, easy to do, highly specific and also widely available. Based on the activity of the urease enzyme of H. pylori, the presence of H. pylori in biopsy specimen convert the urea test reagent to ammonia, leading to an increase in the pH and a color change on the pH monitor. Many commercial urease tests like gel-based tests (CLOtest, HpFast), paper-based tests (like PyloriTek, ProntoDry) and liquid-based tests (like UFT300, EndoscHp) are available now.

 Upper gut Endoscopy can also be done. Antrum is the preferred site for biopsy. The sensitivity and specificity for predicting H. pylori-positive corporal gastritis by magnifying endoscopy with indigo carmine staining are 97.6% and 100%, respectively. Peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH), which can be used on histological preparations, is a highly sensitive (97% sensitivity) and specific (100% specificity) technique for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection [6].

Treatment

Treatment is usually instituted by at least a combination of two antibiotics to avoid development of resistance. Along with this, a Proton pump inhibitor is also administered to heal the lesion quickly. Triple as well as quadruple therapy may be given. Quadruple therapy, consisting of a proton pump inhibitor, Tetracycline, metronidazole and a bismuth salt, is a very effective regimen, even in areas with high prevalence of antibiotic resistance, and this may be an alternative first-line treatment.  [8]. Triple therapy consists of Proton pump inhibitor, Amoxicillin and Clarithromycin. Amoxicillin may be replced here with an imidazole. 

Prevention

Improved modalities of food preservatand food transportation has diminished prevalence of H. pylori in the USA [9]. Vaccines are in early stage of development. All H. pylori vaccines currently in development are very early stage. They are in Phase I or preclinical stages. These vaccines are mainly composed of purified or recombinant components of H. pylori antigens with an adjuvant [10].

Discussion:

Helicobacter pylori is the bacterium which is responsible for most of the cases of peptic ulcer disease. This bacterium is also implicated now in many other infections. Diagnostic and treatment methods may be cumbersome. 

Conclusion:

This bacterium is notorious for gastroduodenal disease, and more public health awareness is needed in order to build knowledge among general public about this pathogen. 

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova