AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
case report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/515
1Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC,
2Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, NC,
3Novant Health, Heart & Vascular Institute, Bolivia, NC,
4Intermountain Medical Center, Section of Heart Failure, Transplant and Artificial Heart; Salt Lake City, UT.
*Corresponding Author: Nicole I. Cillis, D.O., M.P.H. 310 Chariot Square, Winston Salem, NC.
Citation: Nicole I. Cillis, Bridget M. Rasmussen, Abigail M. Thomas, Cassidy D. Vigil, Aysha Amjad, et al, (2024), Heart Transplant Rejection in the Setting of Glyphosate Herbicide Exposure; A Case Report., International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 19(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/515
Copyright: © 2024, Nicole I. Cillis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 06 August 2024 | Accepted: 26 September 2024 | Published: 29 October 2024
Keywords: heart transplant; transplant rejection; glyphosate; cardiotoxicity
Glyphosate is a common herbicide utilized worldwide with known exposure related toxicities. Numerous adverse effects related to glyphosate exposure have been documented, specifically in non-human models, however literature is lacking on cardiotoxic effects specific to heart transplant patients. Rejection is the most common post-transplant complication and the diagnosis of such is vital in order to guide immediate and appropriate treatment. In addition to the endomyocardial biopsy, noninvasive genetic testing can aid in rejection diagnosis and distinguish between cell-mediated and antibody-mediated rejection. We describe a case of glyphosate exposure in a post orthotopic heart transplant and the subsequent heart transplant rejection, patient’s clinical course, treatment, and follow up.
| dd-cfDNA : Donor derived cell free DNA | OHT : Orthotopic heart transplantation |
| DSA : Donor specific antibodies | RHC : Right heart catheterization |
| ECG : Electrocardiogram | RV : Right ventricle |
| GBH : Glyphosate-based herbicide | TAC : Tacrolimus |
| HLA : Human leukocyte antigen | TTE : Transthoracic echocardiogram |
| ISHLT : International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation | TR : Tricuspid regurgitation |
| LVEF : Left ventricular ejection fraction | QT : QT wave interval |
| MMF : Mycophenolate mofetil |
Glyphosate is the most common herbicide in the world since the 1970s.[1] It is a non- selective, broad-spectrum herbicide that inhibits the 5-enolpyruvoylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase enzyme utilized in amino acid synthesis in plants, one vertebrate species lack.[1,2] The mixture containing glyphosate and the surfactant polyoxyethyleneamine is found in commercial herbicides such as RoundUpÔ, and associated with cytotoxic, genotoxic, and teratogenic effects.[3]
Although most literature on acute glyphosate-based herbicide (GBH) toxicity has focused on non-human models, acute human toxicity of glyphosate occurs.[4] Specific to cardiotoxicity, glyphosate in both non-human and human models has caused tachycardia or bradycardia, QT wave interval (QT) prolongation, and atrioventricular block.[1,5-7] However, data is limited on cardiotoxic effects in post heart transplants recipients. Here we describe a post orthotopic heart transplant recipient with accidental glyphosate exposure resulting in allograft dysfunction.
A 64-year-old man with chronic kidney disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and recurrent deep vein thromboembolisms presented with 10 days of cough, diarrhea, dyspnea, and weight gain following inadvertent toxin exposure. He had undergone orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) two years prior for nonischemic cardiomyopathy, likely Plaquenil-mediated, withoutsubsequent rejections or development of post transplantation antibodies. At baseline, he had New York Heart Association class 1 symptoms and walked five miles daily. Immunosuppression medications included prednisone (due to coexistent rheumatoid arthritis), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and tacrolimus (TAC). A transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) nine months prior showed normal allograft function and cardiac catheterization showed minimal intimal hyperplasia of the left anterior descending artery and 10% occlusion of the mid right coronary artery.
His inhalation exposure to RoundUp resulted in immediate mucosal irritation and subsequent diarrhea, abdominal pain, cough, six-pound weight gain, and sinus congestion. He presented nine days following exposure for a previously scheduledclinic visit with new dyspnea on exertion. TTE revealed a new reduction in right ventricle (RV) function with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 55-60%. Poison control was contacted, who recommended observation.
On admission, he was afebrile, heart rate 101 bpm, with blood pressure 128/96. Labs significant for B natriuretic peptide 648 pg/ml, creatinine 2.01 mg/dl (baseline 1.2), alkaline phosphatase 177 IU/L (prior 66), tacrolimus level 4.3 ng/ml (at target goal), and remaining labs were unchanged. Infectious workup negative for CMV-PCR, EBV IgM, Rocky Mountain spotted fever IgM/IgG, Lyme disease, and COVID. Presenting electrocardiogram (ECG) noted sinus tachycardia, low voltage, new axis right deviation, incomplete right bundle branch block and poor R wave progression (Figure 1) compared with prior ECG (Figure 2). Physical exam revealed jugular venous distention and peripheral pitting edema.
Figure 1: Presenting ECG: sinus tachycardia, incomplete right bundle branch block, low voltage QRS, poor R wave progression
Figure 2: Baseline ECG: sinus rhythm, incomplete right bundle branch block.
Transplant specific work up included elevated AlloSure Heart (cell-free DNA) at 3.5% (high: > 0.15%); elevated AlloMap (gene expression profiling) at 37 (high: >34 if > six months post-transplant). New class I and II donor specific antibodies (DSA) were identified on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) testing. Right heart catheterization (RHC) noted a right atrial pressure 16 mmHg, pulmonary artery pressure 34/18/23 mmHg, pulmonary capillary occlusive pressure of 16 mmHg with v-waves to 24, pulmonary artery saturation 61.5%, cardiac output and index by Fick 3.4 L/min and 1.7 L/min/m2. Endomyocardial biopsies noted mild acute cellular rejection with International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grade 1R and negative C4d staining. Treatment included intravenous steroids, followed by a prednisone taper, an increase in MMF dose, and TAC continuation. He was discharged following 6L diuresis.
The patient was readmitted 2-weeks later due to tachycardia, a decline in LVEF to 35- 40%, and mild tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Repeat RHC demonstrated persistent elevated intracardiac filling pressures and reduced cardiac output. Readmission labs were similar to prior, AlloMap 39 but AlloSure Heart 0.84%. HLA testing negative for DSAs. Repeat endomyocardial biopsy was ISHLT grade 1R rejection. Pathology showed multifocal vacuolization and ballooning of myocytes concerning for ischemic injury. Coronary angiogram was unchanged.
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed late gadolinium enhancement pattern suggestive of myopericarditis. Treatment included intravenous pulse-dose steroids and oral taper, administration of anti-thymocyte globulin (rabbit), with subsequent allergic reaction, causing a change to anti-thymocyte globulin (equine), increase MMF dose, continuation TAC (target trough 6-8), and intravenous diuresis. At outpatient follow up, repeat TTE noted improved LVEF of 50-55% with normal RV size, trace TR, mild mitral regurgitation, repeat AlloMap and AlloSure showed improvement at 29 and 0.51%, respectively, and RHC noted improved hemodynamics.
Heart transplantation is a common treatment for end-stage heart failure. Despite advanced immunosuppressive therapy, patients are subject to some degree of rejection, with most occurring in the first six months. After one year, the incidence of rejection significantly decreases.[8] In this case, new DSA, elevated cell free DNA, and gene expression profiling, with therapeutic FK level supported the hypothesis of GBH toxicity mediated heart transplant injury, which likely precipitated acute allograft rejection, and subsequent allograft dysfunction.
Cardiac manifestations of GBH toxicity include arrhythmias such as conduction blocks, bradycardia, and ventricular arrhythmia due to interference with calcium homeostasis.[4,5] The mechanism of toxicity is complex but felt to be largely cellular-mediated by surfactant interference that disrupts the mitochondrial wall proton gradient needed for energy production.[4] Oxidative stress and oxidative phosphorylation interruption secondary to GBH, plays a role in coronary artery disease when exposure-related oxidative stress over time induce cardiac subintimal inflammation.[9] Animal models found glyphosate increased myocardial contraction, while the surfactant in GBH decreased cardiac output, left ventricular stroke index, and mean arterial pressure.[10,11]
Heart transplant rejection can manifest as allograft failure with new heart failure, arrhythmias, or death. Invasive diagnosis is made with endomyocardial biopsy and microscopic examination. The ISHLT developed a standardized grading method to quantify rejection based on endomyocardial biopsy severity; 0R, 1R, 2R & 3R.[12] Cellular mediated rejection (CMR) is most commonly T-cell mediated and more common than antibody (B-cell) mediated rejection (AMR).[13] In AMR, antibodies can be DSA against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class 1 or 2, non-DSA, or non-HLA. Together, both AlloMap and Allosure provide a noninvasive means to detect rejection/injury. AlloMap® Molecular Expression Testing assesses the gene expression profile of ribonucleic acid isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. While AlloSure® Heart measures the amount of donor derived cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in the blood. A result >0.15
Here we present the first known case of GBH toxic exposuremediated heart transplant rejection. Our patient had prior OHT presented with symptomatic GBH exposure and clinical evidenceof impaired cardiacfunction with AMR, based on new DSA and a markedly elevated AlloSure. GBH cardiotoxicity is largely cell-mediated with oxidative stress manifesting in arrhythmias. Genetic testing can aid in noninvasive detection of rejection along with endomyocardial biopsy to confirm cellular and/or antibody mediated rejection leading to efficient and effective treatment.
The authors have no fundingto report.
The authorsof this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
