AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/212
1Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini, Naples, Italy.
2Neurosurgery Department, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, Fisciano, SA, Italy.
*Corresponding Author: Stefania Troise, Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Citation: Romano A, Committeri U, Troise S, Maglitto F, Dell'Aversana Orabona G, Norino G, Sani L, Arena A, Barone S, Iaconetta G, Califano L. (2022). Head and Neck Neurothekeoma: Systematic Review of Literature and Presentation of a Lower Lip Aggressive Case Reconstructed with Bengt-Johanson’s Step Technique. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 11(1); DOI: 10.31579/2690-4861/212
Copyright: © 2022 Troise Stefania, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 08 March 2022 | Accepted: 16 March 2022 | Published: 21 March 2022
Keywords: facial neurothekeoma; head and neck; lower lip; Bengt-Johanson’s step technique, S-100 protein
Aim: Neurothekeoma is a benign lesion of superficial tissue mainly localized in the head-neck area. The aim of the article is to provide a systematic literature review on the tumor’s main characteristics and its correct surgical treatment. We support our theory with the report of an aggressive case of the lower lip region which required a large excision and reconstruction with local flaps.
Materials and Methods: The literature review is based on the scientific materials produced from December 1980 to March 2020 on the head and neck neurothekeomas. In total, 76 papers were included in the study. We presented a classic neurothekeoma S-100 protein positive case that required wide local excision with healthy margins and reconstruction with Bengt-Johanson’s step technique.
Results: Most of the papers were case reports (47,4 %) and reviews (19,7 %) with 721 evaluated neurothekeomas. The male to female ratio was 1:1,8 with a mean age of 26,4 years. The most frequent site of lesions was the head (36,1%), and the three subtypes were divided in cellular (65,7%) mixed (17,5%) and classic (16,8%). The classic neurothekeoma resulted more immunoreactive for S-100 Protein while cellular neurothekeomas for NKI/C3. Our case was successful without recurrence at 1 year follow-up.
Conclusion: Our review highlights that neurothekeoma mainly occurs in young women in the superficial planes of the head and neck. The most frequent type is the cellular one, but the most aggressive is the classic type due to a high local recurrence of protein S-100. A local excision is sufficient for the cellular neurothekeoma, while for the classic type a wide local excision with healthy tissue margins is necessary. The treatment of our case demonstrates that by following this guide, relapse can be avoided.
Neurothekeoma is a benign tumor first described by Harkin and Reed in 1969 and classified as “nerve sheath myxoma” [1]. The term neurothekeoma was coined in 1980 by Gallagher and Helwig in their report on 53 dermal tumors with similar features. [2] Argenyi et al [3] further classified neurothekeoma as classic, cellular and mixed type according to cellularity, mucin content, and growth pattern.
The term “classic neurothekeoma” (classic NTK) will be used henceforth when referring to a tumor also known as a nerve sheath myxoma characterized by an abundant myxoid matrix, and scattered collections of epithelioid schwann cells in corded, nested or syncytial- like patterns, and typically S-100 immunoreactive [4].
The “cellular neurothekeoma” (cellular NTK) is a tumor composed of nests and bundles of variably epithelioid-to-spindled cells often separated by dense collagen septae and classically S-100- negative but NKIC3 positive [5].
The so-called “mixed-type” of neurothekeomas shows overlapping features of both variants [6]. The tumors have been subclassified as cellular neurothekeomas when they have <10>10% and <50>50% myxoid matrix [7].
Generally, the neurothekeoma tumor manifests itself as an asymptomatic, solitary, slow-growing nodule that involves the skin and superficial subcutis of the head and neck region, or of the extremities. It usually requires surgical excision that, based on histopathological and immune histochemical features, can be less or more extended.
In this paper, an extensive review of the literature related to head and neck neurothekeomas has been conducted. Furthermore, a case of lower lip classic neurothekeoma, treated by our team, is presented. The aim of the study is to show the clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical features of these tumors, and to offer indications for the different surgical procedures according to the characteristics of the neoplasms.
We report the case report and the literature review process.
Case Report
On February 2020, a 64 years old patient was admitted at the Maxillo-Facial Surgery Unit of Federico II University of Naples. The patient was affected by a neoplasia of the lower lip. The Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast showed a non-homogeneous captive mass of 2 cm in diameter, hypointense in T1 and hyperintense in T2 in the lower lip that was scarcely differentiated between the skin and the deep muscle planes (Figure 1). Further histological examinations based on incisional biopsy showed a neoplasm with appreciable mitotic activity, with prevalent lobulated areas alternating with diffuse areas, composed of fascicles of fusate or epithelioid cells immersed in a myxoid matrix. The neoplasm resulted immunoreactive to S-100 protein but not to CD31, CD34, p63, CK, Mart1, and HMB45.
An elective surgery to remove the tumor and reconstruct the region was performed.
Surgical Procedure
The surgical procedure consisted of 2 steps. Firstly, the tumor removal and after the use of a stairs flap (Bengt-Johanson’s Step Flap [8]) to reconstruct the defect. Antisepsis procedures were performed with iodine-povidone solution and administration of 1g of intravenous Ceftriaxone. Local anesthesia was realized by infiltration of a 2
Study Design
The literature review on head and neck neurothekeomas was realized adhering to recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) [9].
Data Research
The data were collected from December 1980 to March 2020, and the primary source was the online database of the U. S. Library of Medicine (PubMed). The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) used were: Neurothekeoma, Face, Head, Neck, Treatment. For the literature search, keyword Neurothekeoma was paired sequentially with the other 4 keywords, having this final formula: (neurothekeoma AND face OR facial) OR (neurothekeoma AND head) OR (neurothekeoma AND neck) OR (neurothekeoma AND therapy OR treatment OR therapeutics). To avoid the loss of interesting articles, accepted by March 2020, a second research was always carried out on Pubmed using only the keyword neurothekeoma and, later on, the results were crossed.
Eligibility Criteria
The PubMed search results were screened, and duplicate articles were eliminated. Studies conducted on humans and published in English were considered. The titles and abstracts of the records were screened by one author using the inclusion criteria. We found 103 occurrences in the first research and 283 in the second research. Then the PubMed search results were screened by a carefully reading, and 220 papers were excluded for title not inherent or the duplicates; 48 papers were excluded for the absence of abstract. Moreover, among the 118 remaining PubMed studies, 10 papers not in English, 16 not referring to head and neck, and 1 not referred to humans were excluded (elegibility criteria). At the end, among the 91 studies remaining, 10 papers were excluded because of the presence of only abstract and 5 papers were excluded after a complete reading because not interesting for the topic.
The total number of articles included in our review were 76. The selection process was summarized in Figure 6.
Data Extraction
Data extracted from each article included the type of study, total cases, sex and age of cases, sites of lesions, diameter (if reported) of lesions, invaded tissue, histological and cytological features, expressed immunohistochemical markers, type of treatment performed, subtypes of neurothekeoma. For the purposes of this study, the primary outcome was to identify the characteristics of the different neurothekeoma subtypes and to choose the correct surgical treatment according to these features.
All the 76 analyzed papers and their features are shown in Table 1.
The types of study were divided in 36 case reports (47,4 %), 15 reviews 19,7 %), 12 case series (15,8 %), 12 retrospective observational studies (15,8 %) and 1 letter to editor (1,3 %). In total, the evaluated neurothekeomas cases were 721.
| Author/ Year | Type of Study | N° Cases | Sex | Side of Lesion |
| Local Invasion | Cytological Markers | Hystological Features | Surgical Treatment | Final Diagnosis |
| Gallager 2 1980 | observational retrospective | 53 | 44 F 9 M | 15 up ext, 15 face, 1 oral cavity, 3 neck, 5 shoulder, 3 trunk, 5 lower ext , 2 back | 1 cm | 37 subcutis, 26 dermis | / | nests of spindle cells between bundles of dermal collagen with eosinophilic cytoplasm. Frequent atypical hyperchromatic nuclei and mitotic figures varying from none to 5/10 high-power fields.
| Excision | / |
| Barnhill 5 1991 | case series | 11 | 8 f 3m | 2 scalp, 2 back, 2 nose, 1 chin, 1 shoulder, 1 up extremities, 1 Forehead, 1 ear | / | dermis | S-100, Vimentin and SMA | fascicular pattern (cellular neurotek); prominent myxoid stromal change (classic neurotek) | Excision | 8 cellular 3 myxoid |
| Fetsch 7 2007 | observational retrospective | 176 | 112 F 64 M | 17 nose, 15 scalp, 31 face, 4 neck, 70 up ext, 17 trunk, 20 lower ext, 2 not reported | 1,1 cm | 120 subcutis, 5 muscles plane, 51 dermis | Vimentin, NKI/C3, MiTF, PGP9.5, CD10, NSE, CD68, CD99, alfaSMA, Collagen IV, HMB-45 | nests and bundles of epithelioid cells and spindle cells; eosinophilic cytoplasm; dense hyaline collagen. mild cytological atypia; mitotic rate 3/10 high power fields
| 133 Excision, 33 enucleoresection | 63 cellular neurotek, 66 mixed, 47 classic neurotek |
| Almeida 11 2018 | case report and review | 1 | f | multiple localized oral cavity | 2 cm | submucosal | vimentin, CD63, CD56, whereas AE1/AE3, S100, CD34, α-SMA, GFAP, EMA | spindle and epithelioid cells, forming nests and bundles, supported by fibrous stroma. Rare presence of giant cells. | Enucleoresection | classic neurotek |
| Misago 13 2004 | case report | 1 | F | scalp | 1,5 cm | subcutis | S-100A6 protein, PGP9.5, CD10, CD68 (KP1), PG-M1, Vimentin | Nests of epithelioid cells with abundant and pale eosinophilic cytoplasm, surrounded by spirally arranged stellate cells associated with a moderate amount of mucin. The mitosis rate was 2-3 / 10 high-power fields, without atypical mitotic figures The stroma was collagen and often associated with dense, sclerotic, or hyalinized collagen
| Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Maktabi 14 2019 | case report and review | 1 | m | lateral canthus | 1,5 cm | dermis | CD68, Vimentin, D2–40, SMA | nests of epitheli-oid/spindle cells separated by fibrous septae within a myxoid background | Excision | Mixed |
| Safadi 15 2010 | case report and review | 1 | F | Oral cavity | 2 cm | S-100, NSE | fusiform cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, myxoid stroma | enucleoresection | classic neurotek | |
| Park 16 2016 | case report | 1 | f | Scalp | 6 cm | dermis | vimentin, CD68, CD10 | spindled and epithelioid cells arranged in fascicles and nodules separated by a collagen-rich stroma | Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Benbenisty 17 2006 | case report and review | 1 | F | nasal wing | 4 mm | dermis | NSE, MiTF, NKI / C3, PGP9.5, SMA, CD10 vimentin, CD68 | nests of epithelioid cells with abundant vacuolated eosinophilic cytoplasm; nuclei with moderate atypia round or ovoid. frequent mitotic figures (4/10 high power fields) but absence of atypical mitoses.
| Large enucleoresection | neurotekeoma cellulare ATIPICO |
| Campanati 18 2006 | case report and review | 1 | f | chin | 6 cm | skeletal muscle | PGP, Ki-67 | diffusely infiltrative borders, vascular invasion, high mitotic | Large Enucleoresection | Atypical neurotek |
| Wilson 19 2008 | case report | 1 | F | nasal wing | 1 cm | NKI / C3, PGP9.5. | spindle cells, focal atypia, high mitotic activity | Large enucleoresection | Atypical neurotek cellular | |
| Papadopoulos 2004 20 | case report and review | 1 | M | neck | 1 cm | dermis | Splindle in a myxoid stroma and separated by strands of collagen. Tumor cells nuclei were fused and rare mitoses were present. | Excision | neurotek mixed | |
| Hornick 21 2007 | observational retrospective | 133 | 83 F 45 M | 27 up ext, 20 face, 10 nose, 4 lip, 3 scalp, 5 neck, 23lower ext, 16 trunk, 13 shoulder, 12 back | 1.1 cm | 69 dermis, 63 subcutis, 1 not reported | NKI / C3, SMA, NSE | nests and bundles of epithelioid cells and spindle cells with pale eosinophilic cytoplasm; dense hyaline collagen. mild cytological atypia; mitotic rate 3/10 high power fields
| enucleoresection | cellular neurotek |
| Rodriguez 23 2015 | case report | 1 | F | orbit | 2 cm | CD34, S-100 protein | myxoid nodules with spindle-shaped or stellate cells; abundant myxoid matrix; no atypia were observed | enucleoresection | classic neurotek | |
| Sanchez-Orgaz 2011 24 | case report | 1 | M | orbit | 1,5 cm | S-100, vimentin, CD68, CD34 e CD10, EMA. | spindle and stellate cells; abundant myxoid matrix. Ki-67 was less than 1%.
| enucleoresection | classic neurotek | |
| Jaffer 25 2009 | observational retrospective | 43 | 24 f 19 m | 9 upper and 4 lower ext, 7 scalp, 5 face, 5 thorax, 5 shoulder, 1 back 7 not available | / | / | S- 100, Vimentin, CD68, NSE, CD56 | plexiform, multinodular, and diffuse, osteoclast-like giant cells, and little or no myxoid stroma, | Excision and Enucleoresection | 8 Myxoid, 15 Mixed, 20 Cellular |
| See 26 2019 | case series and review | 2 | 2 M | orbit | 1 cm | aSMA, MITF, CD10, CD68 | spindle cells with fusiform to oval nuclei with prominent nucleoli, rare mitotic figures; vascular channels | Excision | cellular neurotek | |
| Murphrey 27 2020 | case series and review | 7 | 4 M 3 F | 3 trunk, 3 upper ext 1 nose | / | CD68, NKI/C3 | nests of epithelioid cells with abundant eosinophilic pale colored cytoplasm, fascicular growth. The cellular stroma has been described as collagenic and dense or fibrous | Excision | cellular neurotek | |
| Barnhill 29 1990 | case series | 5 | 3 F 2 M | 5 head-neck (1 frontal, 2 scalp, 1 neck, 1 chin) | 1 cm | dermis | / | fascicles of spindle and epithelioid cells with nuclear atypia, mitotic figures (2/10 per field) and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, myxoid stroma and sclerotic collagen with the presence of giant cells
| Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Suh 30 1992 | case report | 1 | F | scalp | / | dermis | S-100 | fusiform and stellate cells; abundant myxoid stroma, eosinophilic cytoplasm, vacuolated nuclei
| Excision | neurotek classic |
| Tiffee 31 1996 | case report and review | 1 | F | Lower lip | / | dermis | S-100 | fusiform and stellate cells; abundant myxoid stroma
| enucleoresection | neurotek classico |
| Tomasini 32 1996 | case series | 2 | 1 F 1 M | 1 trunk, 1 frontal | / | dermis | Vimentin, actin, XIIIa Factor | epithelioid or spindle cells organized in plexuses, large vacuolated eosinophilic cytoplasm; myxoid stroma
| Excision | neurotek cellular |
| Breuer 33 1999 | case report | 1 | F | tongue | 2 cm | Muscles plan | vimentin | spindle cells with few mitoses; hyaline collagen
| enucleoresection | cellular neurotek |
| Yee Hang 34 Wong 2001 | case report | 1 | M | Maxillary and ethmoidal sinuses | / | / | S-100 | spindle cells in sclerotic stroma | enucleoresection | neurotek classic |
| Cohen 35 2004 | case report | 1 | M | Superior Alveolar crest | 3,5 cm | Maxillary bone plane | vimentin, NKIC3 | irregular cell nests in a densely fibrotic stroma; vesicular, ovoid or irregularly shaped nuclei; abundant mitotic activity, 15 mitoses for 10 high-power fields
| Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Ward 36 2005 | case series | 13 | 9 F 4 M | 3 scalp, 2 neck, 1 face, 3 up and 1 lower ext, 2 trunk, 1 not reported | 1 cm | Vimentin, actina (1 cases + S-100 like malignant tumor) | fusiform cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, myxoid stroma
| enucleoresection | Classic neurotek | |
| Mahalingam37 2006 | case report and review | 1 | M | face | 3 cm | vimentin, NKI/C3, PGP 9.5, factor XIIIa CD68 | / | Excision | cellular neurotek | |
| lopez capeda38 2007 | case report | 1 | F | nose | 1,5 cm | vimentin, mucina, neurofilament | spindle cells arranged in nests with mitosis and collagen
| Excision | cellular neurotek | |
| Koumanis39 2007 | case report | 1 | M | nose | 1,5 cm | vimentin | / | enucleoresection | classic neurotek | |
| Mathew40 2008 | case report | 1 | M | Lower eyelid | 2 cm | S-100 | fusiform and stellate cells; myxoid stroma with collagen vortices, Schwann cells and elongated mast cells. very low mitotic activity
| enucleoresezion | classic neurotek | |
| Zedek41 2009 | observational retrospective | 12 | 9 F 3 M | 2 face, 1 scalp, 4 up and 2 lower ext, 3 trunk | 2 cm | NKI/C3, laminin, CD68, CD10 | absence of atypia, 0.67 / 10 mitosis, large vacuolated eosinophilic cytoplasm, stromal sclerosis
| Excision | neurotek cellular | |
| Wartchow42 2009 | case series | 1 | M | Mandibular gum (reg. 31) | 1.7 cm | actina, S-100 / CD1a, CD4 e CD68 | 16/10 mitosis per field, myofibroblastic characteristics, ki67 <2>
| Excision | neurotek cellular | |
| Muller43 2009 | case report | 1 | F | Medial canthus (left eye) | 1 cm | NKI / C3, SMA, S100 protein | / | Excision | Neurotek mixed | |
| vered 44 2010 | observational retrospective | 4 | 2 F 2 M | Oral cavity | 8 mm | cellular (S100A6, NSE, PGP9.5, vimentin, NKI ⁄ C3); classic (S100A6, NSE, PGP9.5, vimentin, S-100) | / | Excision | Cellular neurotek | |
| Papalas45 2010 | case series | 3 | 3 F | 2upper eyelid, 1 lower eyelid | 6 mm | 2 casi NKI.C3 CD34 positivi, 1 caso S-100, GFPA, Vimentin positivo. | / | Excision | 2 cellular neurotek, 1 classic neurotek | |
| Sheth46 2011 | observational retrospective | 14 | 11 F 3 M | face 2, art sup 7, art inf 3, tronco 2 | / | classic/myxoid: S100B, aSMA; cellular: NSE, aSMA, F13A, NKIC3, podoplanin D2-40, | / | Enucleoresection | 6 cellular neurotek, 8 classico neurotek | |
| Pan47 2011 | case report | 1 | M | Upper lip | 8 mm | NSE, alfaSMA, cd34 | hypercellular epithelioid cells with diffuse and fascicular growth patterns. Casually focal mitosis. No atypia was found.
| Excision | cellular neurotek | |
| Yamada48 2013 | letter to editor | 1 | F | nose | Vimentin, MiTF, NKI/C3, Glut-1, PGP9.5, CD10, NSE, CD68, CD99. | subcutaneous multi-lobular nodular lesion spindle cells separated by a sclerotic stroma and with eosinophilic cytoplasm, ki67 <1>
| Excision | neurotek cellular | ||
| Suarez 49 2013 | observational retrospective | 18 | 17 F 1 M | 5 nose, 4 upper and 3 lower ext 3 trunk , 2 face, 1 scalp | KBA.62, CD10 | epithelioid cells intercalated between bundles of fibrotic collagen, sclerotic large, pale and eosinophilic cytoplasm with mild pleomorphism
| Excision | 1 neurotek classic; 17 neurotek cellular | ||
| Stratton 50 2013 | observational retrospective | 37 | 21 F 16 M | 13 face, 3 scalp, 11 upper ext 4 trunk 4 shoulders 2 lower ext | NKI/C3, MiTF, CD68, CD10 | epithelioid or spindle cells; large vacuolated eosinophilic cytoplasm; myxoid stroma. 4 cases of perineural invasion. 19 cases of cytological atypia, 2/10 mitosis per field
| Excision | 33 neurotek cellulari 4 neurotek classici | ||
| yun 51 2014 | case report | 1 | F | Left eyebrow skin | CD68, Vimentin | thin spindle-shaped and stellate cells within an abundant myxoid stroma
| Excision | Neurotek mixed | ||
| Wang 52 2016 | observational retrospective | 7 | 4 M 3 F | not avaible | NKI / C3, PGP9.5, CD68 | / | nerotek cellulare | |||
| Tham 53 2016 | case report | 1 | M | Oral cavity | S-100 | fusiform and stellate cells; abundant myxoid stroma | Enucleoresection | neurotek classic | ||
| Boukovalas 54 2016 | case report | 1 | F | Nasal wing | 8 mm | subcutis | MiTF | nests and fascicles of spindle and epithelioid cells with pale eosinophilic cytoplasm and vesicular nuclei; background of dense collagen,
| Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Bartake 55 2017 | case report | 1 | F | hard palate | 1,5 cm | submucosal | S100 | myxomatous tissue, stellate and spindle-shaped cells and nerve fibers.
| Enucleoresection | classic neurotek |
| Mora-Cantallops 56 2020 | case report | 1 | M | Medial rectus muscle | 1 cm | muscolo retto mediale | S-100, CD34, CD56 | myxoid matrix with fusocellular and stellate cells. | enucleoresection | classic neurotek |
| Massimo 57 2020 | case series and review | 2 | 1 M 1 F | 1 wrist, 1 upper lip | 8 mm | dermis | CD10, CD68, SMA, and vimentin; | spindle and epithelioid cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and mild atypia | Excision | 2 cellular neurotek |
| Aronson 58 1985 | case report | 1 | f | scalp | 2,5 cm | dermis | S 100, CEA, DAKO | Polygonal cells; elongated eytoplasmic processes | Excision | classic neurotek |
| Henmi 59 1986 | case report | 1 | f | right nostril | 1 cm | dermis | S- 100 | cell nests consisting of atypical epithelial-like cells | Enucleoresection | classic neurotek |
| Mason 60 1986 | case report | 1 | f | lip | 1 cm | dermis | / | nests and whorls of spindle-shaped cells with abundant myxoid cytoplasm | Excision | Cellular neurotek |
| Pepine 61 1992 | case report | 1 | m | nose | 1 cm | dermis | / | epithelioid and stellate cells in a myxoid stroma | Enucleoresection | classic neurotek |
| Husain 62 1994 | case report and review | 14 | 8 f 6 m | 3lower and 3 up extremities, 2 thorax, 2 scalp, 1 shoulder, 1 lip, 1 face, 1 forhead | / | dermis | S- 100, | stellate and spindle-shaped cells; Nuclear pleomorphism | Excision | 3 myxoid 11 cellular |
| Peñarrocha 63 2000 | case report | 1 | F | tongue | 3 cm | muscles plane | S-100, protein, NSE, and vimentin | fusiform cells with wavy cytoplasm, abundant capillary neovascularization; myxoid stroma | Enucleoresection | classic neurotek |
| Barrett 64 2001 | case report | 1 | m | buccal vestibular sulcus | 1 cm | submucosal | NKI/C3, NSE, SMA PGP, XIIIa, S100 | pale epitheliod cells separated by fasciles of spindle cells | Excision | nerotek cellular |
| Laskin 65 2000 | case series | 11 | 6 f 5m | 2 head, 2neck, 4 lower and 3 up extremities | / | dermis | S100, CIV, SMA, XIIIa | multinodular or lobulated architecture of spinde cells | Excision | classic neurotek |
| Schortinghuis 2001 66 | case report | 1 | m | tongue | 0.8 cm | muscles plane | S- 100, EMA | stellate and spindle-shaped cells with basophilic ovoid vesicular nuclei scattered in a myxoid and avascular stroma |
Enucleoresection | classic neurotek |
| Makino 67 2002 | case report and review | 1 | m | tongue | 1 cm | muscles plane | S100, NSE, VM | spindle- or stellate-shaped cells with a myxoid background. | Enucleoresection | classic neurotek |
| Levin 68 2002 | case report | 1 | m | nose | 4 cm | dermis | S- 100, desmin, vimentin | spindled and ovoid, cells separated by thick collagen bands. | Enucleoresection | classic neurotek |
| Page 69 2004 | case series | 11 | 8 f 3m | 5 nose, 2 neck, 2 lower and 1 upper extremities, 1 shoulder | / | dermis | Mitf, NKI/C3 | spindled and epithelioid cells, | Excision | 2 Cellular 9 Mixed |
| Kim 70 2006 | case report | 1 | f | tongue | 2 cm | muscles plane | CD56, CD68 (clone PG-M1), and desmin | lobules of well-circumscribed oval-to-spindle neoplastic cells in a poor myxoid stroma fibrous connective tissue, | Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Nishioka 71 2009 | case series | 3 | 2 f 1 m | oral cavity | 2 cm | submucosal | S-100 protein, NSE, NGFR | pindle cells admixed with varying amount of myxoid matrix | Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Plaza 72 2009 | observational retrospective | 31 | 23 f 8 m | 10 upper and 5 lower extremities, 4 nose, 4 scalp, 3 thorax, 3 face, 2 shoulder | / | dermis | S100A6, SMA | nests and bundles of epithelioid cells | Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Garcia -Gutiérrez 73 2010 | case report | 1 | m | multiple localized to the face | 2-3cm | dermis | S100A6, CD63 (NKI/C3), CD10, and PGP 9.5 (Figs. 5A–D), XIIIa and vimentin. | spindled to epithelioid cells embedded in a sclerotic stroma with focal areas of stromal hyalinization | Enucleoresection | classic neurotek |
| Kah 74 2011 | case report | 1 | f | palpebral | 1,5 cm | dermis | CD63 | spindle to polygonal cells within a myxoid stroma; eosinophilic cytoplasm | Enucleoresection | classic neurotek |
| Fox 75 2012 | case series | 14 | 6 f 8 m | 3 neck, 4 upper and 2 lower extremities, 2 back, 1 thorax, 1 scalp, 1 shoulder | / | dermis | PAX2, NKI/C3, CD10,MiTF | nests and fascicles of histiocytoid to spindled cells; of nests by collagen bands | Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Emami 76 2013 | case report | 1 | f | oral floor | 0,8 cm | submucosal | CD63, NKI-C3, XIIIa | spindle and epitheloid cells | Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Requena 77 2013 | case series | 9 | 4 f 5 m | lip | / | dermis | S100A6, MiTF, NKI/C3, PGP9.5, EMA, and NSE | plexiform pattern of nests of spindle cells embedded in a slightly myxoid stroma | Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Rozza De Menezes78 2013 | case report and review | 1 | f | right buccal mucosa | 1,5 cm | submucosal | anti-S-100, NSE, EMA | spindle and stellate cells with ovoid vesicular nuclei; myxoid stroma with sparse collagen fibers | Enucleoresection | classic neurotek |
| Bashline 79 2014 | case report and review | 1 | f | scalp | 0,5 cm | dermis | NK1C3 | spindled and epithelioid cells; fascicular growth pattern | Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Fried 80 2014 | observational retrospective | 34 | 20 f 14 m | 7 nose, 11 upper and 5 lower extremities, 3 neck, 3 face, 3 shoulder, 2 thorax, | / | dermis | SOX-10, S100, NKI/C3, SMA, MiTF | spindled and/or epithelioid cells arranged in a fascicular and/or nested pattern with sparse (cellular) or abundant (classic) myxoid component | Excision and Enucleoresection | 25 Cellular 8 mixed 1 NSM |
| Navarrete - Dechent 81 2015 | case report | 1 | m | forehead | 4 mm | dermis | CD10 | spindle cell tumor, including an eosinophilic cytoplasm with mild cellular pleomorphism and moderately dense fibrous stroma | Enucleoresection | classic neurotek |
| Bhat 82 2015 | case report | 1 | f | neck | 4 mm | dermis | S100 | stellate cells with cytoplasmic processes, round to spindle lacking the nuclear atypia and occasional giant cells | Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Gray 83 2016 | case report | 1 | m | eyelid | 4mm | dermis | PGP 9.5, CD68, XIII | nests and bundles of epithelioid to spindled cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, separated by sclerotic collagen | Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Frydrych 84 2017 | case report | 1 | f | tongue | 6 mm | muscles plane | S100, vimentin, | stellate and spindle-shaped cells. Rare Nuclear pleomorphism and mytotic figures | Enucleoresection | classic neurotek |
| Cavacchini 85 2018 | Case series | 2 | 1 f 1 m | forehead, thing | 7 mm | dermis | EMA, NKI/C3 | Spindle cells; abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm with vesicular nuclei and mild atypia | Excision | cellular neurotek |
| Gallo 86 2019 | case series | 2 | 1 f 1 m | 1 wrist, 1 upper lip | 7 mm | dermis | CD10, CD68, vimentin, and SMA | plexiform and multinodular pattern of spindle and epithelioid cells; multinucleated cells and scattered mitotic figures | Excision | cellular neurotek |
Table 1: Paper’s check list
Clinical features
In most cases the female sex was involved (462 F – 64,1%) with a male to female ratio of 1:1,8. The average age of 721 cases was 26,4 years, with the youngest case of 6 months old, and the oldest of 88 years old. 52.1% of cases were aged between 6 months and 25 years, 35.6 percentage between 26 and 50 years, 12.3 percentage between 51 and 88 years. Neurothekeomas typically presented as asymptomatic, solitary, slow-growing lesions with a mean diameter of 1,5 cm (the smaller lesion measured 0,4 cm while the larger 6 cm). The sites of lesions were: 260 head (36,1%), 187 upper extremities (25,9%), 85 trunks (11,8%), 84 lower extremities (11,6%), 36 shoulder (5%), 23 neck (3,2%) and 46 not reported (6,4%). The 260 head cases were divided in 116 face (44,6%), 59 nose (22,7%), 49 scalp (18,8%), 11 oral cavity (4,2%), 10 lip (3,9%), 7 forehead (2,7%), 6 tongue (2,3%), 2 others (1 medial rectus muscle and 1 paranasal sinuses – 0,8%).
Histological and Cytological features
Histologically and cytologically Neurothekeomas were divided in three subtypes: cellular (65,7%) mixed (17,5%) and classic – myxoid (16,8%). All the subtypes presented as dome-shaped masses that most frequently involved the subcutaneous/submucosal plane (55,1% of the total cases) and dermas (41,5%). Skeletal muscle involvement was uncommon (2,9%) and largely restricted to the facial region (mimic muscles and rectus medial muscle). Bone plane involvement was rare (0,5%) and limited to maxillary and mandibular bones. The differences among the 3 subtypes of tumors lied in histology and cytology: 1) Cellular neurothekeoma was characterized by nests of spindle or epithelioid cells immersed in a fibrotic stroma with the presence of sclerotic collagen fibers, and non-tumor multinucleated and osteoclastic giant cells. Tumor cells had abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm with vesicular nuclei, mild atypia and low mitotic rates (ranged from 0 to 16 mitotic figures for mm2 with a mean mitotic rate of 4/mm2). Perineural invasion was uncommon, while vascular invasion was completely absent. Three cases of cellular neurothekeomas were described as atypical because of diffusely infiltrated borders, vascular invasion, severe cellular atypia, and frequent mitosis (until 15/ mm2). 2) Classic neurothekeoma was characterized by bundles of stellate cells immersed in a myxoid stroma without collagen fibers. Tumor cells had abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm with vesicular nuclei, mild atypia and low mitotic rates (mean mitotic rate of 3/mm2). 3) Mixed neurothekeoma was characterized by features of both other subtypes, in particular both myxoid stroma and sclerotic collagen fibers.
Immunohistochemical features
In order of frequency, the neoplastic cells of classic neurothekeomas were immunoreactive for S-100 Protein (86,9% of all cases), vimentin (47,8%), muscle-specific actin, a-smooth muscle actin and EMA (31,8%), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), GFAP, CD10, CD34 and XIIa Factor (18,2%) while NKI/C3 and PGP9.5 in a minor percentage of cases. In order of frequency, the neoplastic cells of cellular neurothekeomas were immunoreactive for NKI/C3 (62,1%), CD68 (55,2%), Vimentin and a-smooth muscle actin (41,4%), CD10 (37,9%), PGP9.5 (34,5%), NSE and microphthalmia transcription factor (MITF) (31,1%), S-100 Protein and XIIa Factor (20,7%) while CD99, collagen IV, HMB45, CD34, NGFR, PAX2, EMA and Podoplanin D2-40 in a minor percentage of cases. In the mixed neurothekeomas, in addition to the markers already mentioned, also CD56 and SOX10 were found.
Surgery and Follow-up
In all cases, the tumors were treated by surgery. In particular, cellular neurothekeomas were treated by a simple excision, while classic and mixed neurothekeomas as well as the atypical cellular forms were treated by enucleoresection with healthy margins and, if necessary, reconstruction.
The reported percentage of recurrence was 7,5% without cases of metastasized tumor. Main features of the three neurothekeomas types are summarized in Table 2.
Neurothekeoma is a slow-growing benign tumor that interests mainly superficial tissues and has been studied since the 1980s. The first author who coined this term was Gallager [2] who, in a retrospective observational study on 53 patients, described a benign tumor of the dermis having a neural origin and a relationship to the Schwann sheath cells of peripheral nerves. The interest in the study of this type of lesion has grown over the years, and several authors dedicated to defining the origin, the etiopathogenesis and the clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical characteristics. Thus, the data obtained from our review were compared with the international literature on this topic. [10] First of all, Neurothekeomas tends to occur in younger age, around the second or third decades with a mild female predominance [10]. Our review, according to literature analysed, highlights a male to female ratio of 1:1,8 and a mean age of 26,4 years [11]. The tumors have been classified in three subtypes based on etiopathogenetic, cyto-histological, and immunohistochemical characteristics: cellular neurothekeomas with <10>50% of myxoid matrix7. The term ‘‘cellular neurothekeoma’’ was first used by Rosati et al.in 1986 to distinguish it from the myxoid variant which was defined as “classic neurothekeoma” [12].
The cell of origin of NSM is controversial: Fetsch et al [7] postulated that SMA and EMA positivity suggests some similarity to histiocytic cells and fibroblasts, while S100 protein and NSE to Schwann cells or other perineural cells. So cellular NTK can origin by histiocytic cells and fibroblasts, while classical NTK by Schwann cells and other perineural cells. Moreover, Misago et al [13] distinguished a histiocytic origin from a fibroblastic or nervous one, based on the expression of different genes: Cellular neurothekeoma expressed genes involved in macrophage differentiation, Cell migration, cytoskeleton organization, Fibroblast growth, tissue remodeling, ECM mineralization such as ADAM12, DPT, FAP, PDPL, MMP1 and TNFAIP6. Classic neurothekeoma expressed genes involved in neural crest development, myelin and axonal growth and neuronal adhesion such as SOX10, MPZ, NTM, SOX2, PMP2, NCAM1, MBP and SORBS1. KP-1 and PG-M1 expression is associated to histiocytic differentiation [13].
Our review, according with the literature [14,15], highlights that the head and neck are the most affected sites (39,3%) with the face and the nose at the highest occurrences. Cases of the oral cavity are rare and mainly concentrated on the area of the lips (3,9%). The most common intraoral site is the tongue.
Several authors [7,14,15] reported that tumors were non-capsulated, located in dermal tissue with a subcutaneous involvement in 85% of the cases, and typically organized in multiple small nodules. Our research confirms that the involvement of the deep planes is rare (3,4%). Mean diameter was 1,5 cm, 90% of lesions between 0,4 cm and 2 cm, but tumor size of 6 cm was described and defined as atypical [16-18]. Wilson et al [19] affirmed that it is characterized by large size of up to 6 cm, penetration into subcutaneous fat or muscle, diffusely infiltrating borders, vascular invasion, a high mitotic rate, and marked cytological pleomorphism. Based on our data, the most common subtype is Cellular Neurothekeoma (65,7%). All the three subtypes of tumors were associated with some sclerotic collagen that was most present in cellular neurothekeomas and least evident in the myxoid examples. Moderate or marked collagen deposition around individual tumor nodules was noted predominantly in cellular neurothekeomas. Osteoclast giant cells are also present, but they are generally sparse and do not appear to be neoplastic [7]. They are identified predominantly in cellular neurothekeomas. The myxoid stroma is more abundant in the classical subtype [20].
In terms of cytomorphology, in accordance with literature [21] cellular neurothekeomas were composed of spindle cells (28%), of epithelioid cells (14%), and of cells with variably epithelioid to spindled features (58%). Classic neurothekeomas were composed of spindle cells (54%), of stellate shaped cells (49%) and of epithelioid cells (7%). The tumor cells contained pale vacuolized eosinophilic cytoplasm and in 70% showed mild atypia in terms of abundant vesicular, ovoid or irregularly shaped nuclei with prominent nucleoli. Cellular neurothekeomas in 10% of cases showed giant cells. The mean mitotic rate was 4 per 10 high power fields (HPF) (range, 0 to 16) for cellular neurothekeomas and 3 per 10 HPF for classic neurothekeomas. Only 4% of total tumors showed perineural invasion, and 3% showed vascular invasion.[ 3 - 7]
In terms of immunohistochemical features, our review showed that the neoplastic cells of classic neurothekeomas were mainly immunoreactive for S-100 Protein (86,9% of all cases), vimentin (47,8%), muscle-specific actin, a-smooth muscle actin and EMA (31,8%) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), GFAP, CD10, CD34 and XIIa Factor (18,2%). The expression of these factors confirms the neuronal or perineuronal origin of the classical neurothekeoma. Moreover, the expression of the S-100 protein is connected with a high local recurrence. [3 - 7] In their observational study, Fetsch et al [22] documented 16 on 34 (47%) recurrent disease on follow-up in classic neurothekeomas S-100 protein positive locally excised. Considering a relatively high local recurrence rate, a complete local excision with a margin of healthy tissue should generally be considered an optimal treatment of the disease. Hence, as the analysis of the literature [15,23,24] revealed, classic neurothekeoma with S-100 protein positivity should be excised with safety margins to prevent local recurrences. This result justifies our aggressive surgical approach with safety margins of 1 cm of healthy tissue.
The neoplastic cells of cellular neurothekeomas were mainly immunoreactive for NKI/C3 (62,1%), CD68 (55,2%), Vimentin and a-smooth muscle actin (41,4%), CD10 (37,9%), PGP9.5 (34,5%), NSE and microphthalmia transcription factor (MITF) (31,1%) confirming the histiocytic and fibroblastic origin. [13,25] The analysis of literature [26,27] showed that in these cases the recurrence rate is low, so the chosen treatment is a local excision with a few millimeters of healthy tissue.
Our case was a classic neurothekeoma with immunoreactivity to the s-100 protein. For this reason, we opted for a surgical treatment of complete excision with margins of 1 cm of healthy tissue. Considering the position and the size of the tumor, this excision required a reconstruction with local flaps. Based on data for the selected case in the literature, the Bengt-Johanson’s step flap was considered the best option. [8,28] This technique has proved to be effective both in terms of functionality and aesthetics for our patient. Furthermore, the large excision with safety margins avoided relapses at the one-year follow-up.
Our review highlights that neurothekeoma is a benign tumor that mainly afflicts young women and mainly occurs in the superficial planes of the head and neck. Among the three types, the cellular type is the most frequent, but the most aggressive is the classic one because the expression of the S-100 protein determines a high local recurrence. For this reason, a local excision treatment is sufficient for the cellular neurothekeoma while in the classic type with the presence of this protein, a wide local excision with healthy tissue margins is required. The treatment of our case demonstrates that, by following this guide, relapse can be avoided.
Funding: Not applicable
Conflicts of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest
Availability of data and material: Not applicable
Code availability: Not applicable
Ethics approval: Only the patient’s consent was requested.
Consent to participate: Patient’s consent was obtained.
Consent for publication: Patient’s consent was obtained.
Financial Disclosure Statement: The authors have no financial interest to declare regarding the content of this article.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
