AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2768-0487/122
1 Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Information Technology and Sciences, Dhaka.
2 Professor, Faculty of Business and Communication, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar 01000, Malaysia.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health, Fareast International University.
*Corresponding Author: Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health, Fareast International University
Citation: Md Ashraful Islam, Md. Aminul Islam., Md Monoarul Haque, (2024), Government and Non-Government Employee Perception Towards Sustainable E-Governance: An Empirical Study among Bangladeshi Employees, Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Research. 7(2); DOI: 10.31579/2768-0487/122
Copyright: © 2024, Md Monoarul Haque. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 16 November 2023 | Accepted: 29 December 2023 | Published: 17 January 2024
Keywords: governance; e-governance; executives; perceptions; satisfactions
The focus of this research is to investigate the perceptions and satisfaction levels of both government and non-government employees regarding E-Governance, as well as to establish a connection between employees' perceptions and their satisfaction with the system. A quantitative research methodology was employed to collect data through a survey of 180 executives in Bangladesh's government and non-government offices, using purposive sampling techniques. The survey consisted of a pre-tested, closed-ended questionnaire with a five-point Likert scale. The data was analyzed using SPSS Version 20 software, utilizing descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation, t-test, and one-way ANOVA test. The results demonstrate a positive correlation between employee satisfaction with E-Governance and their perception of the system. Additionally, the findings reveal that demographic variables such as gender, age, and educational level have no impact on E-Governance perception and satisfaction. The study suggests that the current E-Governance system has significant potential for improvement, given the significant relationship between system quality, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user support with user satisfaction in E-Governance.
Exemplary management is always expected. The qualities of e-governance today make it necessary for good governance to exist everywhere in the globe. E-governance is being implemented by regulatory organizations, service providers, and service seekers. The primary goal of this essay is to understand how government and nongovernment personnel, who play crucial roles in the implementation of e-government in the nation, feel about it. E-governance is defined in many ways by several individuals and groups from various backgrounds. A handful of them are listed below: E-governance is a procedure that uses technology to assist deliver government services to the public as quickly as possible so that people don't have to visit a government office. Additionally, employing this method will significantly speed up government operations. (Rahman, 2019; Almarabeh and Ali, 2010). Bangladesh's government started the digitization program in 2001 to bring government services to citizens' doors and to ensure good governance. This was done in order to stay up with the globalized world. To enable the government to become accountable and committed to the welfare of the citizens, good governance includes several fundamental requirements. Being accountable, transparency in all areas, security sector reform, increased service delivery, decentralized governance, political and civil rights, the efficacy and efficiency of governmental operations, the role of the law, and good democracy are among these requirements. (Rahman, 2019). In order to provide information and e-services (i.e., services delivered electronically) to the nation's residents, the government uses Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and its many applications, or "e-governance" in short. E-governance, broadly speaking, may be defined as the uses and applications of ICT in public administration to perform procedures to efficiently manage data and information to increase the delivery of public services for the empowerment of citizens. Web-based services, big data, mobile applications, social media, and cloud computing are just a few of the recent technological advancements that have a significant impact on individuals and the government today. The usage of e-governance can improve services, speed up public administration, and meet transparency and accountability requirements. Through efficient resource management that promotes environmental sustainability, it may assist the government in going green. E-governance encourages the social inclusion of disadvantaged and handicapped groups in society and boosts economic progress. Benefits of e-governance include the creation of new jobs, improvement of health and education outcomes, and capacity strengthening for sustainable development. E-services that are quick and efficient cut-out intermediaries and save time and money. With these internet services, living in our towns and cities would have been more challenging while managing the transportation services would have been possible (Alam, 2012; Chowdhury and Satter, 2012; Gisselquist, 2012; Rahman, 2016).
Selecting the right study design might be beneficial, particularly for properly achieving the research objectives. The setting in which this study was done is described in this section. The technique and factors used in the study are also explained. Employees from 30 Government and Non-Government organizations in Dhaka, Bangladesh who worked at the Top, Mid, and Low levels all participated in the research (n = 180). Data collection took place between August 2020 and December 2020. Purposive sampling is a type of research sampling that allows researchers to utilize their judgment to choose appropriate participants for the sample. (Guarte and Barrios, 2006). Three components make up the designed questionnaire. Social demographic qualities like age, gender, level of education, position, and job history are included in the first section. Two scales that were employed as measuring tools for the research are included in both the second and third portions. The first scale, which measures the system quality, utility, usability, and user support of E-Gov apps, contains four dimensions and nineteen items. The device contained: Four questions assessing perceived utility were taken from Kamir (2015); five were taken from Davis (Karim, 2015); and two were taken from Doll and Torkzadeh (Doll and Torkzadeh, 1988) and Davis (Karim, 2015). Eight items measuring system quality were also taken from these sources. (Voermans and van Veldhoven, 2007). Three questions on the second scale gauge how satisfied users are with e-government. Armstrong et al. (2005), Lin and Lee (2006), and Wang (2008) provided the inspiration for these three user satisfaction questionnaires. In the E-Gov. the setting, every scale item was changed. The user satisfaction and E-Gov perception items were provided using a five-point Likert scale with "1: strongly disagree" and "5: strongly agree." The SPSS for Windows 20.0 package application was used to analyze the data. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was initially employed to assess the normality of the data, and the findings indicated that the data were distributed normally and that parametric tests could be performed. First, descriptive statistics were used to examine the respondents' demographic information. Second, the mean, standard deviation, and reliability of the research instrument were examined. The link between user satisfaction with E-Gov and perception of E-Gov was examined using Pearson correlation tests. The differences according to demographic qualifications were then determined using the t-test and one-way ANOVA test.
Cronbach's alpha coefficients were calculated in this study to determine the reliability of the scales. I discovered reliability scores of 0.815 for the employee satisfaction scale and 0.921 for the employee perception scale. As a result, the findings show that both scales are internally consistent and trustworthy in the social sciences. (Gliem and Gliem, 2003).
| Variable name | Particular | Frequency | (%) |
| Gender | Male Female | 114 66 | 63.33 36.67 |
| Age | 25-31 32-37 38-43 44 and above | 34 61 45 40 | 18.89 33.88 25 22.22 |
| Education | Undergraduate Graduate MPhil/Ph.D. | 30 146 4 | 16.67 81.11 2.22 |
| Position | Top-level Executive Mid-level Executive Low-level Executive | 39 62 79 | 21.66 34.45 43.89 |
| Experience | Less than 2 2-4 year 5-7 year 8-10 year 11 and above | 32 42 47 33 26 | 17.78 23.33 26.11 18.33 14.45 |
Source: Developed by authors
Table 1: Demographic qualifications of participants.
180 employees from both the public and private sectors took part in the study. Table 1 shows that a total of 114 men (63.33%) and 66 women (36.67%) completed the surveys and returned them. The participating employees’ range in age from 25 to 60 years; 34 of them (18.89%) are between the ages of 25 and 31; 61 (33.88%) are between the ages of 32 and 37; 45 (25%) are between the ages of 38 and 43; and 40 (22.22%) are above the age of 43. The participants were 37.56 years old on average. In addition, 16.67% of the participants (30 workers) had a bachelor's degree, 81.11% (146 employees) had a master's degree, and 2.22% (4 employees) among the employees had an M.Phil/PhD degree. 39 people (21.66%) were low-level executives at the firm we discovered, 62 employees (34.45%) were mid-level managers, and 79 employees (43.89%) were top-level executives. The
typical length of time spent working for their present company was 6.25 years.
The mean for the employee perception scale was calculated as 3.78 (SD: 0.73) and the mean for the employee satisfaction scale was 3.69 based on the findings of the descriptive statistical analysis. (SD: 0.69). The mean and standard deviation for each variable is displayed in Table 2. Moderate scores were reported for each variable. These results demonstrate that participants marked "agree" as their response on both measures. The four components of the E-Gov. perception scale is assessed near one another, and participants give E-Gov. activities almost the same priority. (Table 2). Similarly, 3.69 was calculated as the mean for the dimensions of the E-Gov. satisfaction scale. (SD: 0.69). Participants in this study underline the value of electronic government while also expressing satisfaction with the electronic government system they utilize.
| Scales and Dimensions | Mean | SD | N |
| System quality | 3.82 | .71 | 180 |
| Perceived Usefulness | 3.76 | .79 | 180 |
| Perceived Ease of Use | 3.85 | .68 | 180 |
| User Support | 3.61 | .72 | 180 |
| E-Gov. perception (total) | 3.78 | .73 | 180 |
| User Satisfaction with E-Gov. | 3.69 | .69 | 180 |
Source: Developed by authors
H1: There is a relationship between the employee satisfaction of E-Gov. and their perceptions towards E-Gov.
Table 2: Mean, Standard Deviation values of the scales and their dimensions.
Pearson correlation analysis was performed to examine the connection between E-Gov workers' impressions of the organization and their level of satisfaction with it. The findings showed a high and favourable correlation between the perceptions of the E-Gov. and the satisfaction of its employees. The correlation coefficient is 0.857 (p 0.01) as well. H1 is therefore considered true.
| Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 1.System quality | 1 | ||||
2. Perceived Usefulness | .773** | 1 | |||
3. Perceived Ease of Use | .771** | .595** | 1 | ||
| 4. User Support | .588** | .745** | .689** | 1 | |
5. User Satisfaction with E-Gov. | .675** | .771** | .591** | .761** | 1 |
**p<0>
Source: Developed by authors
Table 3: Correlation between E-Gov. perception dimensions and User Satisfaction with E-Gov.
The link between E-Gov. aspects of perception and user satisfaction from E-Gov. was also looked at in order to further understand this beneficial relationship, as seen in Table 3. To determine the substantial impact of the concept, a correlation was conducted between each of the factors and user satisfaction from E-Gov. According to correlation findings, user happiness and system quality are positively connected (r=0.588, p0.01). User satisfaction showed a positive correlation (r=0.666, p0.01) with perceived usefulness. Similar to this, perceived ease of use and user satisfaction had a positive correlation (r=0.588, p0.01). Additionally, user support and user pleasure were positively correlated (r=0.452, p0.01). As anticipated, there was a correlation between user happiness and facilitating conditions (r=0.452, p0.01).
H1a: Employees’ perceptions of E-Gov. show differences according to their job position.
The t-test was performed to determine whether the position variable affected how employees perceived the E-Gov. And a statistically significant difference was discovered between these two variables (p: 0.007 0.05). Thus, the H1a theory is confirmed.
Therefore, we may conclude that there are differences in how employees perceive themselves as top-level executives, mid-level executives, and low-level executives. In the direction of difference, the arithmetic means of the responses were examined. The results show that the perceptions of top-level executives and mid-level executives are statistically and substantially different from those of low-level executives (top-level executives 3.92, mid-level executives 3.67, and low-level executives 3.03).
| Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | ||
| Perception towards E-Gov. | Between Groups | 5.786 | 3 | 1.929 | 6.123 | .009 |
| Within Groups | 32.674 | 56 | .584 | |||
| Total | 38.460 | 69 | ||||
Source: Developed by authors
H1b: Satisfaction of employees from E-Gov. shows differences according to their job position.
Table 4: Results of one-way ANOVA analysis for E-Gov.
In order to determine if employee satisfaction with E-Gov varies by position, a one-way ANOVA test was conducted. The study shows a statistically significant difference (p: 0.0280.05) between these two factors. H1b theory is therefore accepted.
As a result, we may conclude that there are differences in the levels of satisfaction among personnel working as top executives, mid-level executives, and low-level executives. In the direction of difference, the arithmetic means of the responses were examined. The results show that the employee satisfaction of executives at different levels is statistically and substantially different from that of executives in the public and private sectors (top-level executives: 3.87, mid-level executives: 3.61, low-level executives: 3.10). (Table 5).
| Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | ||
| E-Gov. satisfaction | Between Groups | 5.989 | 3 | 1.996 | 4.189 | .028 |
| Within Groups | 43.782 | 56 | .781 | |||
| Total | 49.770 | 69 | ||||
Source: Developed by authors
Table 5: Results of one-way ANOVA analysis for E-Gov. satisfaction.
The t-test and one-way ANOVA tests were used to see if there were any differences in how people saw the government online and how satisfied they were with their experience. The findings show that there
was no statistically significant difference between these factors. Table 6 displays all analysis findings for the study hypotheses.
| Hypothesis | p-value | Result |
| H1: There is a relationship between the employee satisfaction of E-Gov. and their perceptions towards E-Gov. | .000 | Accepted |
| H1a: Employees’ perceptions of E-Gov. show differences according to their job position. | .009 | Accepted |
| H1b: Satisfaction of employees from E-Gov. shows differences according to their job position. | .028 | Accepted |
| H1c: Employees’ perceptions of E-Gov. show differences according to their genders. | 0.189 | Rejected |
| H1d: Satisfaction of employees from E-Gov. shows differences according to their genders. | 0.232 | Rejected |
| H1e: Employees’ perceptions of E-Gov. show differences according to their education levels. | 0.787 | Rejected |
| H1f: Satisfaction of employees from E-Gov. shows differences according to their education levels. | 0.454 | Rejected |
| H1g: Employees’ perceptions of E-Gov. show differences according to their ages. | 0.099 | Rejected |
| H1h: Satisfaction of employees from E-Gov. shows differences according to their ages. | 0.180 | Rejected |
Source: Developed by authors
Table 6: Results of research hypothesize.
This study looked at how government and non-government personnel perceived and felt satisfied with e-government. The findings of the correlation study show that all aspects of e-government, including system performance, quality of information, perceived usability, and user support for e-government, have positive and highly significant connections. Additionally, it has been discovered that employees' opinions of the government as a whole and their level of satisfaction with its employees vary by position. Additionally, the findings revealed no association between demographic factors (gender, age, and educational attainment) and users' perceptions of or satisfaction with using e-government. The study's findings show that employees find E-Gov to be helpful and to provide enough user assistance. They also express satisfaction with the system. Additionally, it was shown that there are differences between how the government perceives and feels about its employees depending on their position. The limited access to E-Gov operations based on staff employment may be the cause of this discovery. There is enough room to continue with a lot more study in order to extend the conclusions of this essay.
If the conclusions are put into practice; they may help the nation's development and implementation of good governance.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
