AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/224
1, 2, 3 Pulmonologist, Resident Physician and Thoracic Surgeon at the National Reference Hospital for Respiratory Diseases,
4 Nutritionist and Epidemiologist, Private Clinic, Guatemala City, Guatemala.Guatemala City, Guatemala.
*Corresponding Author: López-Yepes Luis Alejandro, Pulmonologist, Resident Physician and Thoracic Surgeon at the National Reference Hospital for Respiratory Diseases, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Citation: Luis Alejandro LY, Reyes Z. Karla, Torres Rodríguez ST, Ana Lucia UB, (2024), Giant Mediastinal Teratoma. Case Report and bibliographic revisión, Clinical Research and Clinical Trials, 11(2) ; DOI :10.31579/2693-4779/224
Copyright: © 2024, López-Yepes Luis Alejandro. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 04 August 2024 | Accepted: 12 September 2024 | Published: 18 November 2024
Keywords: giant cell tumor; teratoma; mediastinum
Mature mediastinal teratoma is the most common thoracic germ cell tumor. No specific cause has been detected, although it has been linked to some risk factors, such as maternal exposures to harmful inhalational environmental agents, maternal nutritional deficiencies, cryptorchidism, hypospadias, hemolytic anemia, among others. It is usually a rare entity, without having its prevalence clearly described, it can reach 3% of thoracic pathology, being the 10% of the histological lineage detected in the mediastinal masses. Although some authors have not described differences in the prevalence between males and females, others have detected a clear majority in males, reaching a ratio of 13 to 1. Mature teratoma usually lacks malignant cells and usually has an excellent prognosis after complete surgical excision of the tumor. However, some teratomas may have atypical cells among the diversity of tissues that compose it, which makes it imperative a directed and exhaustive search by the pathologist, to detect this tissue in the tumor mass, since this would imply a worse prognosis and the need to use adjuvant chemotherapy and a follow-up of tumor extension, thus improving the survival of these patients.
Next, a case of mature teratoma of the chest is described and a literature review is performed.
We present the case of a mature teratoma in the left hemithorax, in a 29-year-old man, with classic clinical presentation of chest pain with pleuritic characteristics in the left hemithorax, dyspnea on moderate exertion, right trepopnea (dyspnea with the right lateral decubitus) and occasional dry cough. It has been treated with complete excision of the tumor, without having detected any component of malignancy in the mass, having achieved a complete recovery 6 months after the surgical intervention.
A 29-year-old male patient presented with sudden onset of pain in the left shoulder, radiating to the back, predominantly on the left side, intense, worsening with the right lateral decubitus, cough and deep inspiration, with relief only when taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and spasmolytics. He also reports a feeling of dyspnea that has been increasing until he is resting, which worsens with moderate efforts and with the supine and right lateral position. The symptoms are partially relieved by adopting the left lateral decubitus.
Physical examination revealed a blood pressure of 106/82 mmHg, a temperature of 37°C, SpO2: 94%, a heart rate of 94bpm and a glucometer of 83mg/dl in fasting. Pulmonary auscultation revealed a right lung with a good entrance, a left lung with decreased air entry throughout the pulmonary field without other relevant findings. Laboratory studies of hematology, blood chemistry, coagulation times, hormonal profiles, and tumor markers were normal. Spirometry revealed: LVEF 1.47 l (33%); FVC 1.59 (30%); FEV1/FVC 92% (110%), FEF 25-75% 2.38 l/s (45%), severe restrictive pattern. Chest x-ray showed a rounded, solid-looking opacity without an air bronchogram occupying 2/3 of the left hemithorax, with a slight deviation of the mediastinum to the right. (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Chest X-ray PA.
Computed tomography (CT) of the chest revealed a heterogeneous, solid mass with different densities inside, including densities of fat, calcium, soft tissues and cartilage, sugestivo de ser un teratoma. (Figura 2).
Figure 2: Computed tomography scan of the chest.
A fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed with the only finding of extrinsic compression in the main bronchus and segmental bronchus on the left side, without exophytic endobronchial lesions. With the clinical impression of a thoracic teratoma, it was decided to perform a surgical resection through a left posterolateral thoracotomy, in which the extraction of the entire mass was achieved, with dimensions of 17 x 10 x 6 centimeters, with macroscopic
evidence of epithelial, cartilaginous, adipose tissues, presence of hair follicles and sebaceous material.
Histologically, the presence of multiple mature-looking tissues is detected, including mesenchymal tissue such as striated muscle and cartilage, as well as bone marrow, squamous epithelial tissue, with cutaneous adnexa, adipose and mucoproducing tissue. (Figures 3 and 4).
Figure 3: Macroscopic image of resected mature teratoma, dimensions 17 x 10 x 6 cm.
Figure 4: Histological image (40X) showing striated muscle tissue, cartilage and bone marrow.
A mature teratoma-type germ cell tumor without malignant components is diagnosed. After the resection of the mass, the patient has evolved satisfactorily, achieving the complete expansion of his left lung and is currently in rehabilitation therapy in respiratory physiotherapy.
Germ cell tumors account for about 10-15% of mediastinal tumors. They consist of neoplasms formed by germ cells that have migrated aberrantly during early embryonic development. There are several theories: some propose that there is an error in the migration of primitive germ cells along the urogenital crest1; Others propose that these tumors originate from totipotent cells that remained in the blastula or morula state during embryogenesis. The mediastinum is the most common extragonadal location of approximately 1-3% of all giant cell tumors. They can be subdivided into three main groups: teratoma, seminomatous tumors, and nonseminomatous tumors. The predominant histologic type is mature teratoma, followed by seminoma, nonseminoma giant cell tumors, and finally mixed giant cell tumors. Teratoma is the most common mediastinal germ cell tumor, approximately 75% of which are mature teratomas2. We have not found in the review risk factors described for mediastinal teratomas, however, there are described risk factors for testicular teratomas, including low birth weight, cryptorchidism, advanced maternal age, neonatal jaundice, retained placenta3, and ovarian teratoma, advanced age and postmenopause4. Its appearance is more frequent in young adults, but it has been reported in all ages; Men and women are affected with equal frequency. However, a descriptive study conducted between 1986 and 2012 in Costa Rica found a
more frequent gender ratio in men than in women, a ratio of 13.5:1 and an average age of 26 years5.
Most patients will be symptomatic at diagnosis, with only a third of cases being asymptomatic. The most frequent symptoms are chest pain of restrosternal location, dyspnea and cough; other symptoms may include dysphonia, diaphragmatic paralysis, hemoptysis, and inferior vena cava syndrome5. If the tumor fistulizes into the bronchial system, the patient may expectorate different types of tissues that make up the tumor. By definition, the teratoma is made up of tissues different from those in the area where it has grown. It may have mature tissues from any of the three primary germ lines: the mesoderm (bone, cartilage, and muscle), the endoderm (respiratory, gastrointestinal, and mucous gland tissues), and the ectoderm (nerve fibers, epidermal appendages)6. Ectoderm derivatives are the most frequent and if there are only epidermal derivatives, it is called a dermoid cyst.
Teratomas are classified as mature, which are usually well differentiated and benign; immature, those with fetal tissue and are malignant, and teratomas with a malignant component. Giant teratomas are those that occupy half or more of the hemithorax. The most common symptoms are chest or shoulder pain, dyspnea, cough, fever, pleural effusion, and bulging of the chest wall.7
On x-rays, the teratoma usually looks solid, rounded, lobed, and asymmetrical. It can have cystic images, calcium and heterogeneity of densities that are usually differentiated with greater precision, with chest
axial tomography, being able on many occasions to guide a fairly accurate diagnosis before surgical resection.
The treatment consists of surgical resection, obtaining excellent results after it. All teratomas should be resected because of their compressive effect on neighboring vital structures, in addition to their potential for progressive growth and malignancy.
Teratomas should be carefully studied by the pathologist throughout the entire extension of the mass to rule out the presence of a malignant neoplasm component, since this would worsen its prognosis, due to its potential to infiltrate adjacent organs or even metastasize; If malignant cells are detected, treatment should be accompanied by adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to surgical resection, which will improve patient survival. In addition, extension studies such as PET CT should be performed to rule out metastatic lesions at other levels.8
Mature teratoma of the chest is a rare entity. The risk factors that predispose to its development are poorly described. A thorough histological study of the full extent of the mass should be performed to rule out the presence of malignancy in the heterogeneity of tissues that make up the teratoma. All teratomas should be surgically removed and if malignancy is detected, adjuvant chemotherapy and tumor extension study should be considered.
None of the authors has a conflict of interest.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
