Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8949/013
*Corresponding Author: Cesar Edgar, Department of Dermatology, WA, USA.
Citation: Cesar Edgar, Trey Rafael, Robert Mason and Diego Luis, Giant Cells Tumors of Synovial Sheaths of the Hand are Benign Tumors with a Good Prognosis. J .Dermatology and Dermatitis. Doi:10.31579/2578-8949/013
Copyright: © 2017 Cesar Edgar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 04 October 2017 | Accepted: 01 November 2017 | Published: 10 November 2017
Keywords: giant cells tumors; tendon sheath; recurrence; hand tumors; hand surgery
Introduction: The giant cells tumors (GCT) of the hand are common benign tumors that pose a recurrence problem. The aim of our study is to analyze epidemiological and clinical data, evaluate results and determine the recurrence risk factors.
Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study of 50 patients operated between 2003 and 2015 for a (GCT) of the hand, we observed epidemiological data, clinical outcome (quotation TAM score Kapandji and quick DASH), the appearance of recurrence, the histological appearance, localization, excision margins and invasion of adjacent anatomical structures were analyzed.
Results: We report a retrospective study over thirteen years of 50 cases of GCT of the hand, with a mean age of 42 years and a sex ratio of 1/3. The motive for consulting was the presence of a digital mass, followed by discomfort bending in 20%. Palmar localization was found in 54%, especially at the second ray (30%) and facing the distal phalanx (38%). The radiograph showed soft tissue opacity in 60% of cases. All patients underwent surgery, the macroscopic appearance showed an encapsulated, lobed and yellow chamois tumor in 80% of cases. The mean follow up was 30 months with extremes of 2 months to 10 years. We noted 5 recurrences one of which recurred twice; the average time to recurrence was 22 months and ranged from 6 months to 36 years. In each subsequent offense we noted an intra-articular tumor development in 4 cases and tendon erosion in one case. Functional complications type of stiffness in flexion in 2 cases and hypoesthesia of a finger in 2 cases. The quick way DASH was 2.2 on 100.
Conclusion: The GCT of synovial sheaths of the hand are a benign tumors with a good prognosis, the main problem is the risk of recurrence that depends on the type of tumor, intra articular tumor development and quality of tumor resection.
Giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath represents the localized form of pigmented villonodular synovitis. They are found mostly at the hands (80% of cases) where it is the second soft tissue tumor after arthrosynovial cyst [1]. The diagnosis is clinical, the confirmation is histological. The Treatment is exclusively surgical; it is sometimes difficult due to local extension and invasion of digital noble structures. Recurrences are frequent and pose a management problem of these tumors. The aim of our study is to analyze epidemiological and clinical data, evaluate results and determine the recurrence risk factors.
This is a retrospective study of 50 patients operated on between 2003 and 2015 for a (GCT) of the hand, were observed epidemiological data, clinical outcome (quotation TAM score Kapandji and quick DASH), appearance recurrence, the histological appearance, localization, surgical margins and invasion of adjacent anatomical structures were analyzed.
Our series is made of 50 patients, predominantly female (38 women and 12 men), mean age was 42 years, ranging from 16 to 75 years, the predominant age range was 40 to 50 years with 20 cases . The dominant side is affected in 60% of cases. The tumor location was: thumb: 10 cases, the index: 15 cases, middle finger: 12 cases, the ring finger: 8 cases, the little finger: 4 cases and a distal palmar location at hand, it was in all cases an isolated location. The swelling was palmar in 26 cases, back in 15 cases, latero-digital in 9 cases. The distal interphalangeal localization was the most frequent: 32%. Consultation time was after 3 years on average, ranging from 2 months to 9 years.
The functional signs are dominated by the tumefaction with a slow evolution, spontaneous appearance, painful in 30% of cases. Digital mobility is decreased in (20% of cases). We noted paresthesias in 2 cases. The clinical examination revealed a tumor of firm consistency, multi-lobed, deeply adhering in 30% of cases, painless in 70% of cases and without inflammatory signs. Radiography was associated in 7 cases ultrasound showed soft tissue opacity in 60% of cases, a bone print or juxta articular geode and normal in 20% of cases. No MRI was performed. The clinical suspicion was 50%. The average tumor size was 14 mm with a range of 5 to 30 mm. The macroscopic aspect showed a pseudo-encapsulated lesion coloring: buff yellow (80%), lobed, nodular. The presumed diagnosis: 85%.
The mean follow up was 30 months and ranged from 2 months to 10 years. We noted 5 recurrences one of which recurred twice. The average time to recurrence was 22 months and ranged from 6 months to 36 years. In each subsequent offense we noted an intraarticular tumor development in 4 cases and tendon erosion in one case. Functional complications type of slight stiffness in bending in 2 cases and hypoesthesia of a finger in 2 cases. The quick way DASH was 2.2 on 100.
GCTs are part of benign soft tissue tumors of the hand, this is the second soft tissue tumor after synovial cysts [1].
In Posh [2] study, it represents 10% of tumors of the hand where it is 13% according to Boyes [3], 4.75% according to Glicenstein et al. [4], 8.9% according to Leclercq [5] and 10.8% according to Marty et al. [6]. It is a tumor that predominantly affects women and occurs between 20 and 60 years [7]. In accordance with the literature we found a female predominance in our series with a mean age of 42 years (Figure 1). GCTs are usually unique and located in more than 80% in the fingers [8]. The index is most often affected followed by little finger; the thumb is the less affected [9]. The tumor develops most often next to the DIP joint or MCP (Table 1). The main problem is the risk of recurrence that depends on the type of tumor (Figure 2), intra articular tumor development and quality of the tumor resection. More rarely it is found near a PIP joint [10]. In our series we found two palmar locations, for the finger locations the ring finger is the most affected. Unusual locations has been reported such a location in the palm of the hand [11]. Subungual localization [12,13] and a double localization on the thumb without contact between the two tumors [14,15]. GCT is as a generally single mass (), painless, slowgrowing that can be spread over twenty years (from a few months to 30 years), variable in size from 0.5 cm to 5 cm, lobed, adherent to the deep structures and mobile compared to superficial level except for distal tumors where it may exist a skin adhesion. The pain was present in 30%, with a period of evolution of 20 months (3 months to 5 years) on average. They measured 2 cm of wide axis on average (1 cm to 5 cm) and they were all movable relative to the superficial and adherent to the deep plan. Standard radiographs allow especially seeing opacity of the soft tissues, cortical erosion, IPD osteoarthritis and periosteal reaction. Intra tumor calcifications and osteolysis are exceptional [16]. Park [14] noted 15 bone lesions in 155 cases and De Schepper et al. [17] reported 4 cases of periosteal erosions and 2 cases of osteolysis. All authors agreed that the existence of bone lesions is correlated with a high rate of recurrence. In our series, all patients had hand radiographs. This has only objectified opacity soft tissue in 30 patients and lack of calcification and bone lesions. Ultrasound confirms the tissular structure of the mass without prejudging its etiology. The GCT is presented in ultrasound as a homogeneous mass, hypo echoic, adjacent to tendons with detection of blood flow to the arterial Doppler (Figure 3). Ultrasonography was performed in ten of our patients, it showed a hypo echoic mass poorly vascularized [18]. MRI has a very interesting contribution to the GCT; it allows establishing a precise lesional assessment of the lesions and local exploration [17]. At MRI, the tumor has welldefined limits in contact with a synovial sheath. We practiced this examination to our patients. The treatment of GCT is the complete surgical excision, which is the only guarantee to prevent recurrence [19,20]. The difficulties in achieving this excision are related to tumor volume, itself related to the consultation delay due to the fact that these tumors are painless and minimally intrusive functionally [21]. The incision is oriented by clinical examination and para-clinical and is adapted to each location. The goal is to allow exposure of the entire tumor and individualization of different noble elements of the finger. The change is mainly dominated by relapses that vary depending on the series from 0% to 26%. Al-Qattan [22] reported 5 recurrences over a series of 43 cases, these tumors are unencapsulated, several factors were implicated in the recurrence of GCT other than the quality of surgical resection, bone and joint damage, cellularity and mitotic activity of the tumor, the tumor: NM23 H1 and negative tumor type II [23,24]. Radiation therapy appears to reduce the risk of recurrence, which decrease from 20% to 4% according to Kotwall et al. [25]. In our series, all our patients had a surgical resection without adjuvant radiotherapy, we noted two recurrences. Histological examination is the only certainty exam.
The GCT of synovial sheaths of the hand are benign tumors with a good prognosis, in fact, a clinical diagnostic presumption and simple radiological assessment, followed by surgical excision biopsy with histological confirmation, is the best approach for the management of these tumors. The main problem is the risk of recurrence that depends on the type of tumor, intra articular tumor development and quality of tumor resection.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,