Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

short communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/265

Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

1 The First College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.

2 Institute of Digestive Disease, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.

3 Department of Gastroenterology, Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang, China.

*Corresponding Author: Wei Liu, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.

Citation: Ling Lu, Wei Liu, (2025), Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma, Clinical Research and Clinical Trials, 12(3); DOI:10.31579/2693-4779/265

Copyright: © 2025, Wei Liu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Received: 18 March 2025 | Accepted: 28 March 2025 | Published: 22 April 2025

Keywords: neuroendocrine; abdominal pain; gastrointestinal

Abstract

A 67-year-old woman presented with a 1-month history of abdominal pain. She received appendectomy due to appendicitis several years ago. Except for a decreased hemoglobin level of 87 g/L (normal, 130–175 g/L), no significant laboratory abnormalities were found

Summary

Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
A 67-year-old woman presented with a 1-month history of abdominal pain. She received appendectomy due to appendicitis several years ago. Except for a decreased hemoglobin level of 87 g/L (normal, 130–175 g/L), no significant laboratory abnormalities were found. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed a giant well-circumscribed elevated ulcerative lesion in gastric fundus with irregularly neighboring mucosa, which overlay a 1-cm area of redundant gastric folds (Figure 1A) 1.

                                                                                                                              Figure 1(A)
The lesion had a hard texture covering with dirty moss and was well-defined by contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (Figure 1B).

                                                                                                                                Figure 1(B)
finding no evidence of any extragastric lesions. Colonoscopy examination was normal. Proximal gastrectomy and esophagogastric anastomosis with celiac regional lymph nodes dissection were performed. Macroscopic examination of the resected specimen confirmed the ulcerative tumor measuring 6.5 × 6.5 cm in diameter. Histopathological examination identified diffuse proliferation of poorly differentiated, large-sized tumor cells arranged in sheets, which infiltrated to outer serosal layer of the stomach and esophageal wall (Figure 1C).

                                                                                              
                                                                                                                          Figure 1(C)
Immunohistochemical staining showed positive immunostaining for CK7 (Figure1D), CD56 (Figure 1E),

                                                                                                                                 Figure 1(D)

                                                                                                                           Figure 1(E)

chromogranin A (CgA, Figure 1F), and synaptophysin (Syn, Figure 1G),

                                                                                                                                   Figure 1(F)

                                                                                                                             Figure 1(G)

consistent with neuroendocrine carcinoma, which was further featured by a high proliferation index Ki67 around 70% in neoplastic cells (Figure 1H).

                                                                                                                              Figure !(H)
Perigastric lymph nodes invasion was also demonstrated. Finally, the patient received the diagnosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma with lymph node metastases. Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma is a rare disease, commonly invades the lymphatic lumens and usually metastasizes to the lymph nodes, has strong malignant potential associated with an extremely poor prognosis.[1] Characteristic endoscopic findings in white-light images include adherent white coat, submucosal tumor-like marginal elevation, and ulceration with a distinct border.[2] There is no clear diagnosis and treatment guidelines because of its rarity.[3] The patient received postoperative chemotherapy and immunotherapy, showing no sign of recurrence 6 months after the surgery. (Figure 1. A.)
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed a giant well-circumscribed elevated ulcerative lesion in gastric fundus with irregularly neighboring mucosa. B. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography review. C. Histopathological examination identified diffuse proliferation of poorly differentiated, large-sized tumor cells arranged in sheets. Immuno-histochemical staining showed positive immunostaining for CK7 (Figure D), CD56 (Figure E), chromogranin A (CgA, Figure F), and synaptophysin (Syn, Figure G), consistent with neuroendocrine carcinoma, which was further featured by a high proliferation index Ki67 around 70% in neoplastic cells (Figure H).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical statement

The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this “GI Image”. Board institutional approval was not required.

Authors' contributions

Collection of data and writing: Wei Liu.

Manuscript preparation: Ling Lu.

Final approval of the manuscript: Ling Lu.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova