Clinical Image | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9392/120
President, Member of Pedorthic Association of Canada, Canada.
*Corresponding Author: Gusyev Valentyn, President, Member of Pedorthic Association of Canada, Canada.
Citation: Gusyev Valentyn (2022) Fundamentals of restoring the self-regulating function of the body. J. Archives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study, 5(5); DOI:10.31579/2692-9392/120
Copyright: © 2022 Gusyev Valentyn, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 07 January 2022 | Accepted: 28 April 2022 | Published: 05 May 2022
Keywords: .
.
You should think about what a self-regulating system is, how the question arises, so what does medicine do? In the United States and Canada, medicine is officially recognized as a business.
Nobody says that the body, its organs and tissues consist of cells, and skeletal muscles are responsible for the metabolic processes in them.

But deformities of the feet and spine are tested today in more than 95% of schoolchildren. Even 50 years ago, they were diagnosed in 7-19% of people, mostly the elderly. The reason was seen in the age-related decrease in muscle tone, they could not cope with the loads. But today all diseases have become younger. Their relationship with deformations in the structures of the musculoskeletal framework is seen. Eliminating deformations, the work of the body also normalizes.

Analyzing the actions of medicine in the field of correction of the feet, spine, cardiovascular diseases, you see how unprepared specialists are. They do not have knowledge in the field of mathematics, physics, mechanics, and even anatomy and physiology of the body. Until now, the specialist cannot understand the kinematics of the conjugation of the bones of the arches of the feet. They do not understand that the main supporting arches are external (1-2) and transverse (2-3), from which all types of deformations begin. That the function of the internal arch (3-4), based on the spherical tubercle of the calcaneus, is to dampen the speed of the transfer of the leg. The damping of inertia forces of the order of (3-5)g to the level of 0.5g is necessary to prevent concussion of the brain when placing the foot on the support. To raise and support the internal arch with a hard insole means to form flat feet, disrupt the biomechanics of joint movement, the pumping function of the muscles. The reversal of the internal arch on the subtalar joint occurs for three reasons:




The main and common cause of the development of deformities in the structures of the skeleton is the anatomical difference in the lengths of the limbs. This determines where and how much the body's GCT will deviate relative to the vertical axis of the body, what will be the moments of forces on the contact surfaces of the joints of the legs and spine. The complexity of determining the difference in leg lengths lies in the fact that it is the sum of the anatomical and functional components of the shortening H=Fu+Ay.

Only after eliminating the functional component, which the insoles should do, can the anatomical difference be compensated. And all this should be done in a standing position, with the joints of the feet and spine brought to a neutral position. This is achieved by using a hydrostatic system of communicating vessels. Bringing the joints of the skeleton to a neutral position is the process of correction, which no one does either when making insoles or after replacing joints. These actions determine the success of the correction of the pelvis and spine.

Correction of the feet achieves correction of the iliac-sacral joints, bringing the spine and vestibular apparatus to the vertical. As a result of all such actions, headaches, migraines, symptoms of chronic diseases disappear. Now we can already say that the main therapist of our body is a specialist in the functional correction of the musculoskeletal frame of the body, who is engaged in the normalization of the metabolic processes of body cells.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,