Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2768-2757/171
Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Medicine, Grodno State Medical University, Grodno, Belarus.
*Corresponding Author: Maksimovich Yelizaveta., Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Medicine, Grodno State Medical University, Grodno, Belarus.
Citation: Maksimovich Yelizaveta, (2025), Factors of Myocardial Infarction in Surgery, Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research, 6(3); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/171
Copyright: © 2025, Maksimovich Yelizaveta. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 03 March 2025 | Accepted: 19 March 2025 | Published: 01 April 2025
Keywords: coronary bypass; hemolysis; myocardial infarction
The material for the research was the conclusion of the Grodno (Belarus) regional pathoanatomical bureau of patients with coronary artery disease after coronary bypass surgery. The cohort comprises patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of ischemic heart disease who underwent CABG and subsequently experienced a fatal myocardial infarction. Autopsy reports will be reviewed to collect data on various pre-, intra-, and postoperative factors potentially contributing to MI. This includes, but is not limited to, patient demographics, co-morbidities, coronary anatomy, surgical technique, graft patency, and histopathological findings. The aim was to investigate the factors of the developing of myocardial infarction after coronary bypass grafting surgery.
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), including the use of internal mammary artery grafts, remains a cornerstone in the management of ischemic heart disease (IHD). CABG offers significant benefits for patients with critical coronary artery stenosis, demonstrably improving angina symptoms and long-term survival. While CABG effectively restores myocardial perfusion in many patients, postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) remains a serious complication that can adversely affect patient outcomes [1-3]. A deeper understanding of the factors contributing to peri-operative MI is crucial for refining surgical techniques, improving patient selection, and optimizing perioperative care.
This study aims to identify and analyze the factors associated with the development of myocardial infarction following coronary artery bypass grafting [4].
This study utilizes a retrospective analysis of autopsy reports from the Grodno Regional Pathoanatomical Bureau (Belarus). The cohort comprises patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of IHD who underwent CABG and subsequently experienced a fatal myocardial infarction. Autopsy reports will be reviewed to collect data on various preintra-, and postoperative factors potentially contributing to MI. This includes, but is not limited to, patient demographics, co-morbidities, coronary anatomy, surgical technique, graft patency, and histopathological findings [5-7].
Myocardial infarction (MI) was the predominant postoperative complication (43.8%) observed in this cohort of CABG patients. Thrombosis of the bypass grafts was identified as the primary cause of MI in these cases. Notably, the majority of these infarctions (71.4%) were classified as secondary MIs, suggesting the presence of pre-existing myocardial damage. Pulmonary edema was the most frequently observed accompanying complication in patients who experienced postoperative MI, occurring in 85% of cases. Ventricular fibrillation and cardiogenic shock were also noted, present in 28.6% and 16.6% of MI cases, respectively. All patients who developed postoperative MI died in the early postoperative period due to progressive heart failure and systemic venous congestion [8-9]. Evidence of chronic heart failure was observed in a substantial proportion of patients who died from MI. These findings included hydrothorax (37.5%), hydropericardium (25%), ascites (6.3%), and anasarca (6.3%). Myocardial hypertrophy was a prevalent finding, present in 88% of these patients, while cerebral edema was observed in 25%. Preoperative coronary angiography revealed that all patients who subsequently experienced fatal MI had stenosis affecting the left coronary artery and its branches. A high prevalence of hypertension was also noted among these patients, with 87.5% having a pre-existing diagnosis of hypertension. This included stage 2 hypertension in 71.5% and stage 3 hypertension in 28.5% of the patients [9-12].
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,