AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9562/045
1Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia PA.
2Department of Anesthesiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
3Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia PA.
*Corresponding Author: Garrett Ni, Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia PA
Citation: Garrett Ni, Adam Kaplon, Ashley Pankey, Brian Reilly, Oneida Arosarena (2022) Factors Contributing To Clinic No-Show at A Safety Net Hospital Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology 4(2); DOI: 10.31579/2692-9562/045
Copyright: © 2022, Garrett Ni. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 17 December 2021 | Accepted: 17 January 2022 | Published: 21 May 2022
Keywords: academic otolaryngology clinics; surgical appointments
Appointment no-show refers to patient nonattendance to previously scheduled clinic or surgical appointments without canceling the appointment in advance. No-shows have been an ongoing issue nationally and incur significant strains on the healthcare system, while negatively impacting health outcomes. Furthermore, when no-shows occur in an academic institution, they can lead to fewer educational opportunities for healthcare trainees such as medical students and residents. Prior studies have demonstrated variable no-show rates depending on the location and the type of healthcare setting, with rates range between 15% and 30% in general medicine clinics and urban community centers. In academic otolaryngology clinics, the no-show rate has been estimated to be around 8.3% [5].
Appointment no-show refers to patient nonattendance to previously scheduled clinic or surgical appointments without canceling the appointment in advance. No-shows have been an ongoing issue nationally and incur significant strains on the healthcare system, while negatively impacting health outcomes [1]. Furthermore, when no-shows occur in an academic institution, they can lead to fewer educational opportunities for healthcare trainees such as medical students and residents. Prior studies have demonstrated variable no-show rates depending on the location and the type of healthcare setting [2, 3], with rates range between 15% and 30% in general medicine clinics and urban community centers. [4] In academic otolaryngology clinics, the no-show rate has been estimated to be around 8.3% [5].
Factors that have been shown to affect no-show rates include insurance status, socioeconomic status, patient ethnicity, and type of clinic visits. Studies have demonstrated that higher no-show rates are associated with patients with Medicaid, Latino or African American ethnicity, lower socioeconomic status, and new patient visits versus follow-up visits[5-8]. Furthermore, barriers to appointment keeping include lack of dependable transportation, financial barriers, and patient work schedule conflicts. Previous studies focused mainly on demographic factors that correlated with outpatient no-shows. This study aims to identify obstacles to appointment keeping and examine factors that contribute to lack of appointment compliance from the patients’ perspectives.
Our institution cares for one of the nation’s most disadvantaged patient populations in North Philadelphia, with approximately 85% of our patients having either Medicaid, Medicare, or no medical insurance. Despite being more vulnerable, we have seen the rate of clinic appointment no-shows remain high in North Philadelphia.
The aim of this study is to explore possible barriers, either personal or systemic, that prevent patients from keeping appointments. Understanding these barriers will provide utility for future studies, and development of policies and procedures that can improve patients’ ability to keep their scheduled appointments.
This protocol was approved by the Temple University Institutional Review Board (Protocol #27148). In this qualitative study we interviewed 50 patients via telephone who failed to keep their scheduled in-person clinic appointments. Patients who did not keep their appointments were identified on the Epic electronic medical record system and subsequently contacted at the end of the week. Patients were contacted between August 2020 and December 2020 until 50 patient interviews were conducted. Patients who were unable to consent, unable to speak colloquially in English with our interviewers, and under 18 years of age were excluded from our study and not interviewed.
The interviews were scripted using a questionnaire (Figure 1) developed for this study. The questions focused on demographic data as well as other factors that potentially affect patients’ ability to keep their scheduled appointments. Patient responses were recorded using Microsoft Excel. Once 50 patient interviews were collected, the excel data was analyzed to generate descriptive statistics.
Independent Variables | N (%) |
Gender | |
| Male | 20 (40%) |
| Female | 30 (60%) |
| Mean Age (Years old) | 49.40 |
Race | |
| White | 4 (8%) |
| Latino | 15 (30%) |
| African American | 29 (58%) |
| Asian | 2 (4%) |
Preferred Language | |
| English | 42 (84%) |
| Spanish | 6 (12%) |
| Other | 2 (4%) |
Education Level Completed | |
| 8th grade or less | 4 (8%) |
| Some high school | 11 (22%) |
| High school graduate or GED | 23 (46%) |
| Some college or 2-year degree | 4 (8%) |
| 4-year college graduate | 5 (10%) |
| More than 4-year college degree | 3 (6%) |
Employment Status | |
| Employed | 12 (24%) |
| Unemployed | 38 (76%) |
Income | |
| 0-20k | 7 (14%) |
| 20-40k | 8 (16%) |
| 40-60k | 4 (8%) |
| 60-100k | 2 (4%) |
| SSID | 15 (30%) |
| Welfare | 14 (28%) |
Appointment Type | |
| New Patient | 23 (46%) |
| Follow-up | 27 (54%) |
Table 1: No-Show Patient Demographics
The next portion of our study involved introducing an intervention in attempts to reduce the no-show rate. Temple University Faculty Practice Plan initially used a voice mail system to remind patients of their appointment 3 days prior to their appointment. From our survey we discovered that patients frequently reported not receiving the reminder either due to missing the phone call, not checking voicemail, or not picking up phone calls from unknown numbers. We implemented a text messaging system (SMS) that reminds patients of their upcoming appointments. The SMS reminder is provided through Televox software. The SMS provides information regarding patients’ upcoming appointment and provides options for patients to cancel or reschedule their appointment.
The Televox SMS reminder service was implemented on March 22, 2021. Clinic visits were tracked 2 months prior and after the intervention from January 19, 2020 to March 15, 2021 and from March 23, 2021 to May 17, 2021. Daily clinic schedules were monitored, and any patient no shows were recorded. The total number of no-show patients were divided by the total number of scheduledpatients over the two-month period before and after the intervention to calculate the pre- and post-intervention no-show rates. The data was analyzed using Fisher exact test with a significance level of 0.05.
Of the 50 patients interviewed, 60% were women and the average age was 49.4 years. Fifty-eight percent of patients identified as African American followed by 30% of patients identifying as Latino. White and Asian patients made up 8% and 4% of the study sample, respectively. Regarding education level, 46% of patients had a high school education or Graduate Equivalency Degree, followed by 22% with some high school education, and 8% with an education level of 8th grade or below (Table 1). Most of our no-show patients were unemployed (76%) with a high percentage of them on Social Security Disability Insurance, Medicaid, or Medicare. New patients made up 46% of the study population.
Most no-show patients had their preferred appointment time and location (78%) and were able to reach the office by telephone. Sixty percent of no-show patients scheduled the appointments themselves and 92% were able to get their preferred appointment time and location. Ninety-two percent of patients who presented to the Temple otolaryngology clinics had a primary care provider and 48% of patients had assistance with health management.
Eighty-eight percent of the no-show patients felt like their needs were met at prior appointments, while 92 percentage felt the advice or treatment provided were beneficial to them. Patient concerns regarding appointments included: cost of appointment (12%, p less than 0.05), wait time at appointment (6%, p less than 0.05), and transportation (12%, p less than 0.05). Eighty percent reported not receiving a reminder (p less than 0.05) and 54% requested a reminder prior to their future appointments (Table 2).
| Patient experience with prior clinic visit | Yes % | No % |
Able to reach office by telephone | 39 (78) | 11 (22) |
Seen by TUH Otolaryngology Department in the past | 36 (72) | 14 (28) |
Appointment scheduled by self | 30 (60) | 20 (40) |
Appointment at preferred time and location | 46 (92) | 4 (8) |
Has assistance managing health | 24 (48) | 26 (52) |
Has primary care provider | 46 (92) | 4 (8) |
Felt like needs were met at last appointment | 44 (88) | 6 (12) |
Felt advice/treatment was beneficial at last appointment | 46 (92) | 4 (8) |
Concerned with cost of appointment | 6 (12) | 46 (92) |
Concerned with wait time at appointment | 3 (6) | 47 (94) |
Concerned with transportation to or from appointment | 6 (12) | 44 (88) |
Received a reminder call prior to appointment | 9 (20) | 36 (80) |
Requested a reminder prior to future appointments | 27 (54) | 23 (46) |
Requested a text message reminder prior to future appointments | 11 (22) | 39 (78) |
Table 2: Patient Experience with Clinic and the Current Reminder System
In terms of patient clinic experience with the Temple Department of Otolaryngology, most had positive experiences with clinic staff and providers, rating these experiences 9.06 out of 10 and 9.12 out of 10, respectively, on average. Most patients expressed moderate concern with their current symptoms, with an average rating of 6.84 out of 10. The most common reason for no-show was forgetting the appointment (60%, p < 0>(Table 3). Post-intervention no-show rates increased across all otolaryngology subspecialties except for general otolaryngology. The overall no-show rate increased from 30.2% to 32.8% post-intervention (Table 4).
| Mean score (1-10) | |
Experience with TUH physicians | 9.12 |
Experience with TUH staff | 9.06 |
Concerns with current symptoms | 6.84 |
Reason for missing appointment | N (%) |
Transportation | 2 (4) |
Schedule |
12 (24) |
Appointment | 1 (2) |
Forgot | 30 (60) |
Changed mind | 1 (2) |
Table 3: No-Show Patient Experience with Otolaryngology Clinic
| Pre-intervention % | Post-intervention % | P value | |
| Rhinology | 31.6 | 38.9 | .29 |
| Laryngology | 23.8 | 27.9 | .88 |
| General | 33.8 | 32.4 | .99 |
| Facial Plastic | 36.8 | 40.8 | .66 |
| Otology | 31.9 | 34.9 | .76 |
| Head and Neck | 23.3 | 27.0 | .62 |
| Total | 30.2 | 32.8 | .87 |
Table 4: Pre- and Post-intervention No-show Rates
Clinic nonattendance negatively impacts patient care and the healthcare system altogether. Due to a forecasted high no-show rate, clinicians often overbook their daily schedules to counter the effect of no-shows. [9,10] However, this method of scheduling often leads to both excessive wait times for patients and prolonged working hours for clinicians when the no-show rate is lower than forecasted. Both of these effects compromise clinicians’ ability to provide optimal care for patients.
Overall, our study demonstrated similar findings for factors associated with clinic no-show that have been identified in previous studies. Patients with either Medicaid or Medicare as their insurance have the highest rates of nonattendance. Other factors associated with high no-show rates demonstrated in prior studies include Latino and African American ethnicity, and low socioeconomic status. Our study found within the no-show population, 88% were either African American or Latino, 76% were unemployed, and 72% had a household income of less than $20,000 per year. Although our study had similar findings, we lacked a control population to compare to our study population. Temple University Hospital (TUH) serves patients of North Philadelphia which consists of mainly low-income neighborhoods, as such there is a selection bias in that most patients who present to TUH are low-income, on Medicaid, and mainly African American and Latino.
A significant portion (76%) of our no-show patients had a twelfth-grade education or less. This finding is consistent with prior studies that examined patient compliance with regards to patient level of education. [10] A lower-level education can contribute to patient nonattendance in a variety of ways. With a lower level of education, patients may lack the foundational and health literacy required to appreciate the necessity for clinic appointments. Furthermore, if patients are unable to gain valuable information because they do not fully comprehend their diagnosis or treatment plan, they are less likely to attend their appointments and may be less likely to comply with medical advice. Furthermore, a lack of higher education may contribute to a lack of understanding of the healthcare system and the burden no-show can inflict upon it. For patients with lower socioeconomic status, it is especially important that clinicians ensure patient understanding prior to closing a clinic visit. Across all aspects of healthcare, studies have shown effective patient education greatly increases compliance [11, 12].
Overall, we found patients generally have positive experiences with the office staff and providers in our practice. Studies have demonstrated that positive interaction between patients, office staff, and care providers increases overall compliance with management and follow up appointments [13].
Overall patients were moderately concerned with their current symptoms, with an average rating of 6.84 out of 10. Prior studies have shown that patient disease severity and beliefs about their symptoms are associated with nonattendance [14]. A large portion of otolaryngology clinic visits are non-urgent and low acuity in nature. This could possibly explain the lower no-show rate with head and neck and laryngology patients as a larger percentage of these visits are high acuity.
Most of our no-show patients reported forgetting their appointment as the main reason for their failure to keep their clinic appointments. This is consistent with prior studies which showed patient forgetfulness as the most common cause for nonattendance [15-17]. Our previous clinic reminder system consisted of an automated reminder call to the number provided by the patient 3 days prior to their scheduled appointment. The phone call does not allow for making changes or cancelling the appointment at the time of the phone call. However, only 20% of our patients reported ever receiving a reminder call. While the exact mechanism for the low rates of patients receiving reminder calls is unclear, it can potentially be due to a combination of factors including outdated contact information, malfunctioning of the reminder system, or patient recall bias.
In attempts to mitigate this issue, we transitioned to a SMS reminder system. The SMS reminder system was provided by Televox and functions similarly to a reminder SMS system for restaurant reservations. When patients receive the SMS, they are reminded of the date and time of their appointment. Additionally, they also have the option to respond to the SMS by replying either to keep, change, or cancel the appointment. Prior studies have shown SMS reminders to be equally as effective as telephone reminders with the added benefit of being more cost effective.18 However, when our SMS reminder went into effect, we did not see any significant changes in nonattendance rates. This is inconsistent with prior studies which examined the effects of SMS reminders on clinic no-show rates. In most studies, the no-show rate decreased after implementing SMS reminder systems. [19] From our patient survey we also found that prior to our intervention, 52% of patients preferred a reminder prior to their appointment and future efforts will be made to investigate and address these logistical issues at TUHS.
This study has several limitations. The surveys relied on participants’ selection of pre-generated answer choices, which does not allow individualized answers and may not detect other reasons for no-show that are not within the answer choices provided. An alternative method is to record interview conversations with participating patients and subsequently analyze the conversation transcriptions using qualitative research software. However, during our interviews we noticed that providing the opportunity to elaborate did not result in more detailed answers, possibly due to time constraints and inconvenience. Due to the lack of detailed responses, relying on conversation transcriptions with subsequent qualitative analysis was not possible.
Furthermore, our study calculated the show and no-show rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic potentially skewed no-show rates and our data may not represent typical clinic attendance prior to the pandemic. It is unknown whether the clinic no-show rate returned to the pre-pandemic rate by the time the pre- and post-intervention no-show rates were recorded.
Lastly, the SMS system was implemented in March 2021, but it is not known if messaging went into effect immediately as there was no reliable way to track if the SMS reminder was received by patients who did not attend clinic.
Community health workers (CHWs) are valuable members of the healthcare team, but they are often underutilized. CHWs can assist the healthcare team and patients in overcoming certain social determinants that limit patients access to healthcare.21 Given the multifactorial nature of the clinic no-show problem, CHWs should be integrated in future efforts at reducing patient clinic no-show as they may offer insight to the solutions for no-shows in addition to factors identified in our study as well as prior studies.
Patient forgetfulness was the most common reported reason contributing to patients’ clinic nonattendance, but other reasons including conflicts and lack of transportation. The SMS reminder system did not significantly improve patient nonattendance as compared to a telephone-based reminder system.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
