Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/291
1 Sangmelima Referral Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, 890 Sangmelima, Cameroon.
2 Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Ebolowa, 16637 Yaoundé, Cameroon.
3 University of Navarra, Department of Health Sciences, Healthcare Research Institute of Navarre, Area of Epidemiology & Public Health, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
4 School of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Central Africa, 1110 Yaoundé, Cameroon.
5. University of Navarra, Department of Preventive Medicine, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
6. Network of Francophone Establishments in Public Health (REFESP), 35043, Rennes, France.
7. Focal Point of the Master in Public Health Harmonization Program in Central Africa (CEMAC), Brazzaville Congo.
*Corresponding Author: Luc Onambele, School of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Central Africa, 1110 Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Citation: Tarcisse Koukolo Biwoele, Annick Nkengue Ndoumba, Ines Aguinaga-Ontoso, Servais Ngo’o, Luc Onambele, et al., (2026), Factors Associated with the Occurrence and Complications of Arterial Hypertension at the Sangmelima Referral Hospital – Cameroon, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports, 8(2); DOI:10.31579/2690-8794/291
Copyright: © 2026, Luc Onambele. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 14 January 2026 | Accepted: 30 January 2026 | Published: 16 February 2026
Keywords: arterial hypertension; cardiovascular diseases; associated factors; Sangmelima referral hospital
Hypertension is a public health problem with serious social, economic, and health consequences. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 1 in 3 adults worldwide suffers from hypertension. In Cameroon, the prevalence of hypertension is estimated at 35%, with nearly 17,000 deaths recorded each year. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with the occurrence and complications of hypertension at the Sangmelima Referral Hospital (SRH). A total of 528 patients treated in the cardiology department of the SRH were identified between January and December 2023. The data were analyzed using SPSS 28 software. Binary logistic regression determined the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals associated with each variable. Differences were statistically significant for a p-value < 0.05. At the SRH, the annual incidence of hypertension was 16.13%. Hypertension was present in 78.8% of patients. The factors associated with the occurrence and complications of hypertension were age (OR=1.028; p=0.003 ), level of education (OR=15.49; p=0.023), marital status (OR=3.859; p=0.04), hypercholesterolemia (OR=2.856; p=0.01), monthly income (OR=0.882; p=0.026), number of dependents (OR=1.231; p=0.025), food security (OR=16.666; p p<0.001), tobacco consumption (OR=8.592; p=0.041), fruit and vegetable consumption (OR=0.027; p=0.031), salt/sugar consumption (OR=8.129; p<0.001), place of residence (OR=4.794; p=0.005), access to essential technologies (OR=8.851; p=0.002), and use of traditional care (OR=3.137; np=0.032). HTA at the HRS is associated with several factors. In order to limit the impact of hypertension, it is crucial to emphasize improving socioeconomic and health conditions.
Hypertension is one of the leading causes of premature death and disability worldwide. It contributes to over 10 million preventable deaths annually, primarily through complications such as stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction and kidney disease [1-3]. Although once considered a condition of high-income countries, hypertension now disproportion-ately affects low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where nearly two-thirds of cases are found [4]. Sub-Saharan Africa is particularly affected, with recent estimates suggesting that 25% to 35% of adults aged 25 to 64 are hypertensive [5,6]. Yet awareness, diagnosis, and control rates remain unacceptably low [7].
The growing burden of hypertension in Africa is largely driven by a complex interplay of factors, including population aging, rapid urbanization, lifestyle transitions, and structural weaknesses in health systems. Dietary shifts toward processed foods high in salt and sugar, physical inactivity, increased alcohol and tobacco consumption, and poor health literacy all contribute to the epidemic [8–10]. At the same time, limited access to essential diagnostic tools, preventive care, and affordable medications hampers early detection and long-term control [11].
In Cameroon, national surveys have documented a rising trend in hypertension prevalence — from 18.5% in 1998 to 29.7% in recent years [12-14]. Almost 35% of the adult population is affected; however, regional disparities persist [14-16]. In the southern region, particularly in towns like Sangmelima, socioeconomic hardship, limited dietary diversity, and reliance on traditional medicine remain common. These conditions may increase vulnerability to both hypertension and its complications, yet data on risk factors in such semi-urban settings are sparse.
Since the arrival of a cardiologist at the Sangmelima Referral Hospital (SRH) in 2018, the number of detected cases of hypertension and cardiovascular disease has markedly increased from 157 cases in 2018 to 625 cases in 2023 [17]. This shift offers a valuable opportunity to explore the individual and contextual determinants of hypertension in a high-risk population.
This study aimed to identify the sociodemographic, clinical, behavioral, environmental, and systemic factors associated with hypertension and its complications among patients treated at the SRH, in order to inform more targeted prevention and management strategies.
This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the Cardiology Department of the SRH, South Cameroon. The study population consisted of 528 patients managed for cardiovascular conditions between January and December 2023.
Data collection was carried out in two complementary phases. The first (passive) phase involved a review of patient medical records to extract sociodemographic, clinical, behavioral, socioeconomic, environmental, and health-related data. In the second (active) phase, structured telephone interviews were conducted with patients or caregivers to collect additional information not available in the records.
Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 28. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the characteristics of the population. Associations between variables and hypertension were assessed using Chi-square tests and Cramer’s V. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify independent factors associated with the occurrence and complications of hypertension. A p-value < 0>
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of the School of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Central Africa (Ref: 2024/020641/CEIRSH/ESS/MSP). The authoriz-ation for data collection was obtained from the Director of the Hospital. Verbal informed consent was also obtained from all p articipants prior to data collection. Data collection lasted 03 months from January 2024.
3.1. Univariate Descriptive Analysis
3.1.1. Sociodemographic factors
A total of 528 patients were included, with a mean age of 59.5 ± 15.4 years (range: 13–92 years). Women represented 58% of the sample, and 62.7% had only primary level education. Most participants (50.6%) were married, with an average of six dependents per household (Table 1, Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4).
| Sociodemographic Factors | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) | Cumulative Percentage (%) | |
| Sex | Men | 222 | 42,0 | 42,0 |
| Women | 306 | 58,0 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
| Marital Status | Single | 136 | 25,8 | 25,8 |
| Married | 267 | 50,6 | 76,3 | |
| Widowed | 110 | 20,8 | 97,2 | |
| Divorce | 15 | 2,8 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
| Study Level | None | 12 | 2,3 | 2,3 |
| Primary | 331 | 62,7 | 65,0 | |
| Secondary | 112 | 21,2 | 86,2 | |
| Superior | 73 | 13,8 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
Note: Values are presented as frequencies and percentages of the study population (n = 528).
Table 1: Distribution of sociodemographic factors in the study population.

Figure 1: Age distribution of the study population.

Figure 2: Weight distribution of the study population.

Figure 3: Weight distribution of the study population.

Figure 4: Distribution of the study population’s number of people in charge.
3.1.2. Clinical and metabolic factors
Clinically and metabolically, 78.8% of the participants were hypertensive, 20.6% were obese, 10% were diabetic, and 18% had hypercholesterolemia (Table 2).
| Clinical and metabolic factors | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) | Cumulative Percentage (%) | |
| Diabetic | No | 475 | 90,0 | 90,0 |
| Yes | 53 | 10,0 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
| Hypertention | No | 112 | 21,2 | 21,2 |
| Yes | 416 | 78,8 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | Slim | 32 | 6,1 | 6,1 |
| Normal | 217 | 41,1 | 47,2 | |
| Overweight | 170 | 32,2 | 79,4 | |
| Obese | 109 | 20,6 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
| Hypercholesterolemia | No | 433 | 82,0 | 82,0 |
| Yes | 95 | 18,0 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
Table 2: Distribution of clinical and metabolic factors in the study population. Note: Values are presented as frequencies and percentages of the study population (n = 528),
3.1.3. Socioeconomic factors
Socioeconomically, 84.8% of patients reported food insecurity, and 54.7% had a very low monthly income between 50,000 and 100,000 FCFA (Table 3).
| Socioeconomic Factors | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) | Cumulative Percentage (%) | |
Profession | Government employee | 66 | 12,5 | 12,5 |
| Private sector employee | 48 | 9,1 | 21,6 | |
| Indépendant employee | 44 | 8,3 | 29,9 | |
| Farmer | 101 | 19,1 | 49,1 | |
| Breeder | 9 | 1,7 | 50,8 | |
| Retailler | 55 | 10,4 | 61,2 | |
| Pupil / Student | 19 | 3,6 | 64,8 | |
| Retired | 95 | 18,0 | 82,8 | |
| Housekeeper | 79 | 15,0 | 97,8 | |
| Unemployee | 12 | 2,2 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
Income Monthly | Less than 50 000F | 75 | 14,2 | 14,2 |
| Between 50 et 100 000F | 289 | 54,7 | 68,9 | |
| Between 100 et 200 000F | 129 | 24,4 | 93,4 | |
| Between 200 et 300 000F | 29 | 5,5 | 98,9 | |
| More than 300 000F | 6 | 1,1 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
Food Safety | Insufficient | 448 | 84,8 | 84,8 |
| Sufficient | 80 | 15,2 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
Note: Values are presented as frequencies and percentages of the study population (n = 528).
Table 3: Distribution of clinical and metabolic factors in the study population. Note: Values are presented as frequencies and percentages of the study population (n = 528),
3.1.4. Behavioral factors
Behaviorally, 5.7% were regular smokers, 33.7% regularly consumed alcohol, 26.1% practiced sports weekly, 22.3% consumed fruits and vegetables regularly,
| Behavioral Factors | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) | Cumulative Percentage (%) | |
Tabacco Consumption | No | 453 | 85,8 | 85,8 |
| Former smoker | 33 | 6,3 | 92,0 | |
| Occasional smoker | 12 | 2,3 | 94,3 | |
| Regular smoker | 30 | 5,7 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
Alcohol Consumption | No | 91 | 17,2 | 17,2 |
| Former consumer | 33 | 6,3 | 23,5 | |
| Occasional consumer | 226 | 42,8 | 66,3 | |
| Regular consumer | 178 | 33,7 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
Practising Sport | No | 125 | 23,7 | 23,7 |
| Former practitioner | 62 | 11,7 | 35,4 | |
| Occasionnal practitioner | 203 | 38,4 | 73,9 | |
| Regular practitioner | 138 | 26,1 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
Fruit and Vegetable Consumption | No | 1 | 0,2 | 0,2 |
| Former consumer | 3 | 0,6 | 0,8 | |
| Occasional consumer | 406 | 76,9 | 77,7 | |
| Regular consumer | 118 | 22,3 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
Salt/Sugar Consumption | No Former consumer | 0 8 | 0 1,5 | 0 1,5 |
| Occasional consumer | 189 | 35,8 | 37,3 | |
| Regular consumer | 331 | 62,7 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
Note: Values are presented as frequencies and percentages of the study population (n = 528).
Table 4: Distribution of behavioral factors in the study population,
3.1.5. Environmental and cultural factors
Regarding environment and culture, 75.8% of participants live in urban areas, 95.5% of patients are Christian, and 81.3?long to the Fang-Beti cultural area (Table 5).
| Environmental and Cultural Factors | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) | Cumulative Percentage (%) | |
| Place of Residence | Urban | 400 | 75,8 | 75,8 |
| Semi-urban | 52 | 9,8 | 85,6 | |
| Rural | 76 | 14,4 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
| Religion | Christian | 504 | 95,5 | 95,5 |
| Muslim | 21 | 4,0 | 99,4 | |
| Others | 3 | ,6 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
| Cultural Area | Fang-Beti | 429 | 81,3 | 81,6 |
| Soudan-Sahel | 16 | 3,0 | 84,3 | |
| GrassFields | 60 | 11,4 | 95,6 | |
| Sawa | 8 | 1,5 | 97,2 | |
| Others | 15 | 2,8 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
Note: Values are presented as frequencies and percentages of the study population (n = 528).
Table 5: Distribution of environmental and cultural factors in the study population.,
3.1.6. Heath factors
In terms of health system access, 83.1% lacked access to essential technologies, and 17.4% reported using traditional medicine. The most common hypertension-related complications were hypertensive heart disease (48.5%), ischemic heart disease (25.2%), heart failure (10.3%), and stroke (4.9%). Housekeepers aged around 60, with primary education, were the most affected by hypertension (Table 6).
| Health factors | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) | Cumulative Percentage (%) | |
| HTA Complications | Hypertensive heart disease | 255 | 48,3 | 48,3 |
| AVC | 26 | 4,9 | 53,2 | |
| Heart failiure | 54 | 10,3 | 63,5 | |
| Ischemic heart diseases | 133 | 25,2 | 88,7 | |
| Others | 60 | 11,3 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
| Early Detection | No | 416 | 78,8 | 78,8 |
| Yes | 112 | 21,2 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
| Access to Technology | No | 439 | 83,1 | 83,1 |
| Yes | 89 | 16,9 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
| Access to Medicine | No | 36 | 6,8 | 6,8 |
| Yes | 492 | 93,2 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
| Acces to Therapeutic Education | No | 53 | 10,0 | 10,0 |
| Yes | 475 | 90,0 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
| Recours to Traditionnal Medicine | No | 436 | 82,6 | 82,6 |
| Yes | 92 | 17,4 | 100,0 | |
| Total | 528 | 100,0 | ||
Note: Values are presented as frequencies and percentages of the study population (n = 528).
Table 6: Distribution of health factors in the study population.,
Overall, hypertension is present in 78.8% of participants. 84.8% of these participants live in unfavorable socioeconomic conditions in urban areas (75.8%), and 62.3% regularly consume salty or sugary foods. 78.6% of diseases are detected late and 17.4% recourse to traditional care.
3.2. Bivariate Analysis
3.2.1. Sociodemographic factors
Sociodemographically, age was strongly associated with the onset of hypertension, while marital status, level of education, and gender were weakly associated with hypertension among the study population (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Strength of association between hypertension and sociodemographic factors (A value of Cramer’s V between 0 and 0.1 indicates a weak association; between 0.1 to 0.3 a moderate association, and above 0.3 a strong association).
3.2.2. Clinical and metabolic factors
In clinical and metabolic terms, there was a weak association between hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia, respectively among the study population (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Strength of association between hypertension and clinical & metabolic factors (A value of Cramer’s V between 0 and 0.1 indicates a weak association; between 0.1 to 0.3 a moderate association, and above 0.3 a strong association).
3.2.3. Socioeconomic factors
Regarding socioeconomic status, there was a moderate association between hypertension and profession and a weak association between hypertension and participants’ income and food security among the study population (Figure 7).

Figure 7: Strength of association between hypertension and socioeconomic factors (A value of Cramer’s V between 0 and 0.1 indicates a weak association; between 0.1 to 0.3 a moderate association, and above 0.3 a strong association).
3.2.4. Behavioral factors
At the behavioral level, there was a weak association between hypertension and smoking, physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption, and a moderate association between hypertension and salt or sugar consumption among the study population (Figure 8).

Figure 8: Strength of association between hypertension and socioeconomic factors (A value of Cramer’s V between 0 and 0.1 indicates a weak association; between 0.1 to 0.3 a moderate association, and above 0.3 a strong association).
3.2.5. Environmental and cultural factors
Regarding the physical and socio-cultural environment, there was no association between hypertension and independent variables tested among the study population.
3.2.6. Health factors
Regarding health, there was a moderate association between hypertension, access to essential technologies, and access to essential medicines, respectively, and a weak association between hypertension and access to therapeutic education among the participants identified (Figure 9).

Figure 9: Strength of the association of hypertension with the health environment (A value of Cramer’s V between 0 and 0.1 indicates a weak association; between 0.1 to 0.3 a moderate association, and above 0.3 a strong association).
Finally, bivariate analysis revealed moderate associations between hypertension and variables such as age, occupation, salt/sugar intake, and access to health technologies. Weaker associations were observed with factors like education level, marital status, income, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking.
3.3. Multivariate Analysis
A binary logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with known hypertension. The full model was significant, χ² (26, N = 528) = 352.51, p < 0>
The following variables were independently associated with hypertension (p < 0 OR=1.028), OR=3.859), OR=15.494), OR=2.856), OR=1.231), OR=16.666), OR=8.592), OR=8.129), OR=0.027), OR=4.794), OR=8.851), OR=3.137). OR=0.882)>
| Factors | Variable | Adjusted OR | 95% CI | p-value |
Independent risk factors (Adjusted OR > 1 and p < 0> | Age | 1.028 | [1.010–1.047] | 0.002** |
| Low education level | 15.494 | [1.791–34.090] | 0.013* | |
| Marital status (Married) | 3.859 | [1.059–14.064] | 0.040* | |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 2.856 | [1.048–7.783] | 0.040* | |
| High number of dependents | 1.231 | [1.030–1.471] | 0.022* | |
| Food insecurity | 16.666 | [3.720–74.640] | < 0> | |
| Regular tobacco use | 8.592 | [1.379–53.523] | 0.021* | |
| Regular salt/sugar intake | 8.129 | [2.412–27.411] | 0.001** | |
| Urban residence | 4.794 | [1.462–15.720] | 0.009** | |
| Poor access to health technology | 8.851 | [2.054–38.148] | 0.003** | |
| Traditional medicine use | 3.137 | [1.043–9.436] | 0.042* | |
Independent protective factors (Adjusted OR < 1> | Regular fruit/vegetable intake | 0.027 | [0.003–0.228] | 0.001** |
| Higher monthly income | 0.882 | [0.793–0.981] | 0.021* |
Note: Only significant variables (p < 0 xss=removed xss=removed>< 0>
Table 7: Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with hypertension.
The final binary logistic regression model predicting the probability p that an individual is hypertensive is:
logit (p) = − 5.333 + 0.028 x age + 2.740 x level education + 1.351 x marital status + 1.049 x level cholesterol + 0.208 x number dependents + 2.812 x food security + 2.150 x smoking + 2.096 x salt/sugar intake + 1.568 x residence + 2.181 x access health technologies + 1.144 x traditional medicine use − 3.612 x fruit/vegetable consumption − 0.126 x monthly income
Where:
This equation makes it possible to calculate, for a given individual, the probability of known hypertension based on their sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioral characteristics.
This study revealed a very high prevalence of hypertension (78.8%) among patients treated at the Cardiology Department of the SRH (representing 16,13% of total outpatients and 8,96% of overall hospitalizations [17]). Nearly half of hypertensive patients experienced hypertensive heart disease complications. These findings underscore the growing burden of hypertension in low-resource settings, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where early detection and management remain limited [5-8]. Unfortunately, these figures are rising with urbanization, the westernization of diets, and the aging of the population.
Age was significantly associated with hypertension. In our context, age is also associated with the onset of hypertension, with an odds ratio of 1.028. This means increasing age by one year increases hypertension by 0.028 (2.8%). These results are consistent with well-documented evidence linking older age to vascular stiffening and cumulative exposure to cardiovascular risk factors [18]. As in other African settings, we found that individuals with limited formal education were more likely to be hypertensive, possibly due to lower health literacy, reduced access to information, and delayed care-seeking behaviours [19]. The increase of hypertension observed among housekeepers (adjusted OR = 15.494) compared to other occupations seems to be linked to their low level of literacy. Concerning marital status, certain groups of individuals are more likely to be victims of social exclusion or discrimination, particularly widows/widowers, and therefore more likely to develop hypertension. Some authors point out that loneliness is mainly responsible for the differences in blood pressure observed in the elderly [20]. Despite these results, we found that being married or in a union appeared to increase the risk of hypertension by 3.9 times, possibly reflecting stress from familial and economic responsibilities in a context of widespread poverty.
Clinically, hypercholesterolemia was a strong predictor of hypertension. Indeed, hypercholesterolemia increases the risk of hypertension by approximately 2.9 times supporting the known interplay between lipid metabolism disorders and cardiovascular dysfunction. The high rate of coexisting obesity and diabetes further highlights the clustering of non-communicable disease risk factors in this population, which reinforces the need for integrated care approaches [8,9,16].
Socioeconomic vulnerability emerged as a major driver of hypertension. Patients with low income, high household dependency ratios, and food insecurity were significantly more likely to be hypertensive. Indeed, each additional dependent increases the likelihood of having known hypertension by 23.1%. In addition, people who are unable to meet their nutritional needs are 16.7 times more likely to have known hypertension. The occupation and the number of dependents in a household therefore, act synergistically on food security, which in turn influences the occurrence of hypertension with an odds ratio of 16.666. This association is directly proportional to the number of dependent children (adjusted OR = 1.231). This may reflect increased stress due to more dependants and limited access to regular medical monitoring. These findings are consistent with the literature showing that poverty limits access to healthy food, preventive services, and regular follow-up, while increasing psychological stress [12-14,21,22].
Behavioural factors such as excessive salt/sugar intake and tobacco use were also independently associated with hypertension, in line with global evidence [6]. People with a low level of education are 15.5 times more likely to have high blood pressure. Indeed, most behavioural factors are related to the level of health education. A higher level of education reflects a better understanding of their health status. Conversely, regular fruit and vegetable consumption was found to be protective, supporting dietary recommendations for cardiovascular health [16,23]. Regular consumption of fruits and vegetables is associated with a 97.3% reduction in the likelihood of hypertension. This means that fruit and vegetable consumption has a protective effect of 0.973 (97.3%) on hypertension, while tobacco and salt/sugar consumption have a multiplier effect of 8.592 and 8.129, respectively, on hypertension. In our study context unfortunately, regular consumption of fruits and vegetables is synonymous with poverty and therefore an obstacle to the prevention of hypertension.
Beyond individual factors, structural barriers were evident. Most patients lacked access to essential medicines and health technologies such as blood pressure monitors or glucometers, and many reported using traditional medicine as a substitute for biomedical care. Access to better healthcare technologies may reflect greater awareness or better diagnosis, but the poverty of the population often complicates this situation. In this study, the recourse to traditional care is estimated at 17.4% which often lead to undiagnosed hypertension. These findings highlight gaps in the health system, particularly in rural and semi-urban areas [12,15] and call for investment in primary healthcare, accessible diagnostics, and culturally sensitive health education.
The integration of multivariate results confirmed the combined influence of sociodemographic, clinical, behavioural, and structural factors on hypertension. The predominant role of food insecurity and low educational attainment underscores the importance of social determinants of health. The strong association with smoking, excessive salt/sugar intake, and limited access to health technologies illustrates the weight of risky behaviours and structural barriers. The protective effects of fruit/vegetable consumption and higher income reinforce nutritional recommendations and the importance of improving socioeconomic conditions to prevent hypertension.
The study limitations its retrospective design that might have introduced missing data or information bias, especially in behavioural variables collected via telephone interviews. Furthermore, as the sample was drawn from a hospital population, findings may not fully represent the general population of southern Cameroon. However, the use of both medical records and patient follow-up interviews strengthens the internal validity of the findings.
Hypertension is highly prevalent (78.8%) and frequently complicated among patients at the SRH (hypertensive heart disease (48.5%), ischaemic heart disease (25.2%), heart failure (10.3%) and stroke (4.9%). These results show that hypertension in the study population is multifactorial, associated with sociodemographic determinants (age, education level, marital status, number of dependents, place of residence), behavioural determinants (smoking, salt/sugar consumption, diet), and determinants related to access to healthcare (health technologies, use of traditional medicine).
This study provides evidence from southern Cameroon, identifying key risk factors such as food insecurity, low educational attainment, and poor access to health technologies in a semi-urban population.It highlights the burden of hypertension-related complications and the role of traditional medicine and health system limitations in disease management. These findings underscore the urgent need for integrated, community-based prevention strategies targeting behavioural risk factors and social determinants of health. Strengthening health literacy, improving access to affordable diagnostic tools, and addressing food insecurity should be prioritized to reduce the burden of hypertension in southern Cameroon and similar settings.
Future research should explore longitudinal and community-level data to better inform public health policies and tailored interventions.
Acknowledgements:
This article is based on research originally conducted as part of Tarcisse Koukolo Biwoele’s master’s thesis titled ‘Factors Associated with the Occurrence and Complications of Arterial Hypertension at the Sangmelima Referral Hospital—Cameroon’, submitted to the School of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Central Africa in 2024. The thesis was supervised by Luc Onambele. The manuscript has since been revised and adapted for journal publication. The original thesis is available upon request from the ESS-UCAC library manager at: https://www.ess-ucac.org/bibliotheque/
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interest.
Authors’ contributions
Research design and conceptualization: Tarcisse Biwoele and Luc Onambele;
Research protocol: Tarcisse Biwoele and Annick Ndoumba;
Investigators: Tarcisse Biwoele, Annick Ndoumba;
Data collection & curation: Tarcisse Biwoele and Annick Ndoumba;
Software & statistical analysis: Tarcisse Biwoele;
Funding and resources acquisition: Ines Aguinaga-Ontoso and Luc Onambele;
Administration and supervision: Luc Onambele and Sylvie Ambomo;
Writing – original draft: Tarcisse Biwoele, Ines Aguinaga-Ontoso, Francisco Guillen-Grima and Luc Onambele;
Revision & edition: Tarcisse Biwoele, Annick Ndoumba, Ines Aguinaga-Ontoso, Francisco Guillen-Grima and Luc Onambele.
All authors have read and validated the final version of the manuscript for publication.
Funding: All authors have read and validated the final version of the manuscript for publication. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-profit sectors.
Data availability: The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the preprints.org (www.preprints.org) at doi: 10.20944/preprints202409. 0548.v1. The complete results of this study can be found in the ESS-UCAC library on the website: www.ess-ucac.org
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of their affiliated institutions, the Auctores Journal, or its publisher.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,