AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/119
1 Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu, Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author: Stella Ngozi Onwubiko, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu.
Citation: Stella Ngozi Onwubiko, Nkiru Zuada Nwachukwu, Chioma Nwabugwu Ehumadu, Factors Associated with and Reasons for Loss to follow-up Among Glaucoma patients at a Nigerian eye Hospital. J Clinical Research and Reports, 5(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/119
Copyright: © 2020 Stella Ngozi Onwubiko. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 13 August 2020 | Accepted: 16 September 2020 | Published: 21 November 2020
Keywords: loss to follow-up; glaucoma; Nigeria
Background: Glaucoma is an emerging vision-threatening disease requiring a life-long management protocol with regular surveillance.
Aim: To explore the factors associated with and reasons for loss to follow-up among glaucoma patients.
Methods: All adult glaucoma patients who attended Bridget medical Centre (BMC) Eye hospital, Enugu during a two-year period (2016 – 2018) were identified via the medical records. Those who had missed an appointment by at least 12 months were reached via their cellular phones to ascertain their reasons. Information on their socio-demographic and clinical characteristics was retrieved from their records. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 21. Chi-square test was done to identify the factors associated with loss to follow-up. The level of significance was at p< 0.05.
Results: A total of 113 patients had glaucoma. They were mainly males, 67(59.3%), retirees with a mean age of 62.0±2SD years. Ninety-four (83.2%) participants were lost to follow-up. The main reasons were forgetfulness, 33(41.2%), and have not noticed any problem in vision, 20(25.0%).
Male gender, advanced age, tertiary education, retiree, normal visual acuity, moderate/advanced stage, IOP of less than 21mmHg, more than 5 years of diagnosis and using more than one medication were associated with loss to follow-up. However, only Retiree and IOP of less than 21mmHg were statistically significant.
Conclusion: The findings from this study emphasized the need for continual glaucoma education and appointment reminder, especially to Retirees with normal intraocular pressure.
Globally, glaucoma is the commonest cause of avoidable, irreversible blindness, with an estimated prevalence of 3.54%. [1] Projections from 2013 into 2040 showed an increase by 74% from 64.3 million to 111.8 million of the global number of people with glaucoma, affecting Africans and Asians disproportionally [1].
Glaucoma is an emerging vision-threatening disease requiring a life-long management protocol with regular surveillance. Documented evidence has shown that while adherence to therapy and appointment schedule delay glaucoma disease progression and reduce vision loss,[2, 3] poor follow up is associated with glaucoma severity and the risk of blindness. [4] However, patients’ adherence with glaucoma follow-up remains a global challenge, with varying rates of loss to follow-up regimen ranging from 3.6% to 60.5% [3, 5, and 6].
Possible factors associated with glaucoma follow-up have been explored across the globe. Male gender,[3] younger age [5, 6], black race [7], mild glaucoma disease [6],lower intraocular pressure [3],lack of formal education [8] and no health insurance [5] were linked with loss to follow-up. Poor understanding of the importance of regular follow-up [3, 8, 9], appointment schedule difficulties [9], long waiting time [9], systemic co-morbidities [9], and lack of accompanying person [8] were the documented reasons for loss to follow-up.
An in-depth understanding of these determinants of non-adherence with glaucoma follow-up offers a useful guide for intervention measures that could improve patients’ clinical outcomes among the studied population. The fore-going background therefore underscores the need for this survey in the study area, which predominantly harbors the ethnic Ibos, a documented risk factor for glaucoma blindness [10].
Background: this study was carried out at the BMC Eye hospital, a private eye specialist hospital located in Enugu state Nigeria, within the tropical rainforest climatic zone. It is staffed by consultant ophthalmologists / subspecialists, optometrists, ophthalmic technicians, and ophthalmic nurses. It provides inpatient and outpatient promotive, preventive, curative and rehabilitative eye care services to the inhabitants of Enugu state and beyond.
Subjects: consecutive, consenting 113 glaucoma patients, aged 18 years and above, who met with the eligibility criteria within the study period, January 2016 to December, 2018.
Eligibility criteria: Glaucoma patients who had missed an appointment by at least 12 months and voluntarily gave informed consent to participation.
Ethics: Prior to the start of the study, ethics clearance compliant with 1964 Helsinki Declaration was obtained from Health Research Ethics Committee (HREC) of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla Enugu (Institutional Review Board).
Study design: This was be a cross-sectional, descriptive, hospital-based survey involving 113 glaucoma patients, who had missed an appointment by at least 12 months. Participants were reached via their cellular phones to ascertain their reasons. Information on their socio-demographic and clinical characteristics was retrieved from their records.
Study instruments: the pre-tested questionnaire comprised of three sections: socio-demography, clinical profile and reasons for loss to follow-up.
Study procedure: The medical records of glaucoma patients who attended the hospital from January 2016 to December, 2018 were retrieved. Participants who had missed an appointment by at least 12 months were identified and reached on phone to ascertain their reasons for loss to follow-up. Following a voluntary informed consent, the study questionnaire was administered after documenting the following parameters from the records: visual acuity (VA), perimetry, pachmetry, gonioscopy, tonometry, and optic disc assessment with +90D lens, as well as number of medications in use. The clinical examinations were done by the glaucoma specialist.
VA was done with the log MAR chart. Visual field assessment was done with static automated perimetry (SAP), (Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer 30-2; Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro, California, USA) using a 30-2 threshold program (HFA30-2) with the SITA Standard strategy. The Goldmann applanation tonometer (Haag-Streit 900; Haag Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland) was used to measure the intraocular pressure of each participant in the mornings between 8am and 10am. Gonioscopy was done using a four-mirror goniolens, while optic disc examination was done with +90D lens. The severity of glaucoma was staged according the guidelines of the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Study definitions
Loss to follow-up: missing an appointment by at least 12 months
Mild or early stage glaucoma: optic nerve head abnormalities consistent with glaucoma, but no current defect on the visual field with SAP.
Moderate stage: optic nerve abnormalities consistent with glaucoma and glaucomatous visual field abnormalities in one hemifield and not within 5 degrees of fixation
Severe stage: optic nerve abnormalities consistent with glaucoma, glaucomatous visual field abnormalities in both hemifields and/or loss within 5 degrees of fixation in at least one hemifield.
Data management
Data was cleaned, edited, coded and analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software for windows, version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). It was categorised into socio-demographic variables and clinical profile and subjected to descriptive statistical evaluation to yield frequencies, percentages, and proportions. Bivariate analysis was used to identify the factors associated with loss to follow up. The level of significance was placed at p- value of < 0.05.
A total of 113 patients had glaucoma. They were mainly males, 67(59.3%), married, retirees with tertiary education and a mean age of 62.0±2SD years. See table 1.
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of participants. N = 113
The majority had moderate/advanced stage of primary open angle glaucoma, for more than 5 years, with a mean intraocular pressure (IOP) of 20 ±9 mmHg.
Ninety-four (83.2%) participants were lost to follow-up, among whom 80(85.1%) were successfully reached on phone.
Male gender, age 70 years and above, tertiary education, retiree, normal visual acuity, moderate/advanced stage, IOP of less than 21mmHg, more than 5 years of diagnosis and using more than one medication were associated with loss to follow-up. However, only retiree and IOP of less than 21mmHg were statistically significant. Table 2.
*significant, pri = primary, sec = secondary, mod = moderate.
Table 2: Factors associated with loss to follow up. N = 113
The main reasons for loss to follow-up were forgetfulness, 33(41.2%), and have not noticed any problem in vision, 20(25.0%). Table 3.
Table 3: Reasons for loss to follow-up. N = 80.
Glaucoma is an emerging vision-threatening disease requiring a life-long management protocol with regular surveillance. In this study, 83.2% of the participants were lost to follow-up. This is comparable with 86.5% reported in the rural south India [11], but contrasts with 3.6% in Seoul Korea [3] and other reports made elsewhere in Nigeria [6] and the USA [4]. The variations in the study definitions, participants’ socio-demographic and clinical characteristics may explain this disparity among studies. Nonetheless, interventions aimed at upholding adherence to glaucoma follow-up should get a global attention in order to reduce the burden of irreversible, though avoidable glaucoma blindness.
In this study, retiree and IOP of less than 21mmHg were significantly associated with loss to follow-up. This is consistent with the observation made in Seoul Korea [3] but contrasts with an American study [12], where the advanced age group were adherent to the appointment schedule. In contrast as well, Ngan et al [5] reported an association between the younger age group with loss to follow-up. The Retirees usually have chronic, systemic co-morbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus and, heart diseases to spend on. In this study background, where health insurance is not universally accessible, the cost of treatment therefore becomes so exorbitant and in the end, the eye medications are not bought and the follow up visits are abandoned entirely. Restructuring the health insurance scheme to accommodate all citizens irrespective of their job status is therefore advised. Government should as well make adequate provision in the health budget to cater for these vulnerable groups.
The main reasons for loss to follow-up were forgetfulness and have not noticed any problem in vision, in this study. The south Indian study [8] comparably made similar observations in addition to lack of escort. Contrarily, in the USA [9], long waiting time, difficulty in scheduling appointment, and systemic co-morbidities while in Seoul Korea [3], poor understanding and unawareness were the reported barriers and reasons for inconsistent follow-up. Given these reasons, the need for continual glaucoma patients’ counselling and appointment reminder via telephone calls or text messages to patients’ relatives cannot be underestimated in the study area.
The findings from this study emphasised the need for continual glaucoma education and appointment reminder, especially to Retirees with normal intraocular pressure.
Declarations / Compliance with Ethical Standards
None.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This was obtained from the ethics committee of University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent: informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Data availability: Available.
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by the authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [Stella Ngozi Onwubiko] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
