case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/221
1General Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Zahedan, Iran.
2Associated professor of nephrology, Department of Internal medicine, Nephrologist, Ali Ibne Abitaleb Hospital, Zahedan University of medical Sciences, Zahedan, I.R. Iran.
3Dentist, Dental faculty, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Zahedan, Iran.
*Corresponding Author: Ahmad Reza Shahraki, General Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Zahedan, Iran.
Citation: Ahmad Reza Shahraki, Elham Shahraki, Elahe Shahraki, (2024), Explosion of cecum with melena in a neglected acute appendicitis: A case report, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports, 6(6); DOI:10.31579/2690-8794/221
Copyright: © 2024, Ahmad Reza Shahraki. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 05 July 2024 | Accepted: 12 July 2024 | Published: 19 July 2024
Keywords: appendicitis; complicated appendicitis; case report; appendectomy; acute abdomen; lower gastrointestinal bleeding; appendix bleeding
Acute appendicitis is the most common presentation of the acute abdomen in the UK. Although in most cases this is an easily reached diagnosis, presentation is not always typical and there are certain other conditions which may mimic appendicitis. Diagnostic adjuncts usually provide the additional information required to make a confident diagnosis; however, in some circumstances, the safest and most reliable course of action is appropriate surgical intervention. Acute appendicitis is the most common presenting condition of the acute abdomen. In the vast majority of cases, the diagnosis is reached on accurate history taking and thorough clinical examination alone without the need of diagnostic adjuncts. Furthermore, if the diagnosis is proving to be troublesome, repeated clinical examination and monitoring of the patient's condition during a period of observation will usually direct the clinician to the correct diagnosis. However, this is not always the case and particular age groups and the sex of the patient may lead to atypical presentations. Blood tests and radiological imaging may provide further clues, but it is only through surgical intervention that confirmation of the diagnosis can be made confidently. Appendicitis is a common disease, and as we have improved in early diagnosis and management of this disease process, late stage complications have become extremely rare, but can have indolent presentations.
Our case was a 22 years male with 7 days abdominal pain and referred to surgery part with peritonitis that we do surgery for him and in laparotomy we find Explosion of cecum with melena in a neglected acute appendicitis and septic shock that we do DCS surgery and discharge him healthy after right hemicolectomty. Acute appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdominal pain requiring urgent surgery. Despite characteristic clinical signs, diagnosis can be challenging, leading to unnecessary appendectomies. However, the source of appendix bleeding is very rare. It is important to distinguish appendiceal bleeding from lower gastrointestinal bleeding and to treat it as soon as possible with less invasiveness.
Acute appendicitis is the most common presentation of the acute abdomen in the UK. Although in most cases this is an easily reached diagnosis, presentation is not always typical and there are certain other conditions which may mimic appendicitis. Diagnostic adjuncts usually provide the additional information required to make a confident diagnosis; however, in some circumstances, the safest and most reliable course of action is appropriate surgical intervention [1]. Acute appendicitis is the most common presenting condition of the acute abdomen. In the vast majority of cases, the diagnosis is reached on accurate history taking and thorough clinical examination alone without the need of diagnostic adjuncts. Furthermore, if the diagnosis is proving to be troublesome, repeated clinical examination and monitoring of the patient's condition during a period of observation will usually direct the clinician to the correct diagnosis. However, this is not always the case and particular age groups and the sex of the patient may lead to atypical presentations. Blood tests and radiological imaging may provide further clues, but it is only through surgical intervention that confirmation of the diagnosis can be made confidently [1]. Appendicitis is a common disease, and as we have improved in early diagnosis and management of this disease process, latestage complications have become extremely rare, but can have indolent presentations [3]. While a ruptured appendicitis can result in an intra-abdominal abscess, peritonitis, and/or shock, the development of a pyogenic hepatic abscess is extremely rare [4].
Our case was a 22 years old male with Abdominal pain and acute abdomen presentation that we admit him and hydrate him and do Laparatomy for him, We find Explosion of cecum (figure 1) with melena(figure2) in a neglected acute appendicitis.

Figure 1: cecal explosion

Figure 2: Melena
Acute appendicitis is more common in teenagers and young adults, although not exclusive to this group. With advancing age, it is important to include other pathologies in the list of differentials, albeit, the clinical signs should
direct the clinician to the correct diagnosis. Acute appendicitis is a very common surgical emergency diagnosed by combining the history, examination, and investigations to build a clinical picture. This presentation can become more complex with abnormal anatomical variations of the appendix [2]. Appendicitis is a common disease, and as we have improved in early diagnosis and management of this disease process, late stage complications have become extremely rare, but can have indolent presentations [3]. Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common surgical emergency in children. Accurate and timely diagnosis is crucial but challenging due to atypical presentations and the inherent difficulty of obtaining a reliable history and physical examination in younger children [5].
This case report presents a rare complication of a common disease process that can present in a multitude of ways. Introduction In the United States (US), appendicitis is the most common acute abdominal emergency requiring surgery. Patients with appendicitis continue to display a complex and atypical range of clinical manifestations, providing a subsequent high risk for emergency physicians to miss acute abdominal pathology on a patient's initial visits. Due to the risk of potential perforation, the proper and timely clinical identification of acute appendicitis is vital [6]. Retrocecal appendicitis usually presents with atypical signs and symptoms which may lead to delayed diagnosis, perforation and serious complications [7]. A triage chief complaint less suggestive of appendicitis was associated with a higher rate of missed appendicitis in a pediatric ED [8]. Acute appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdominal pain requiring urgent surgery. Despite characteristic clinical signs, diagnosis can be challenging, leading to unnecessary appendectomies [9]. A timely diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion, a careful history, and a physical examination. Imaging with ultrasound or computed tomography is recommended if there is a discrepancy between the medical history and physical examination [10]. However, the source of appendix bleeding is very rare [11]. It is important to distinguish appendiceal bleeding from lower gastrointestinal bleeding and to treat it as soon as possible with less invasiveness [11]. Appendiceal bleeding is often difficult to stop endoscopically, so appendectomy should be performed as soon as possible [12]. Although appendiceal bleeding is a rare cause of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding, clinicians should consider it during differential diagnosis [13]. The preoperative detection of appendiceal bleeding is often challenging, colonoscopy is extremely important, bowel preparation is not routinely recommended for patients with acute LGIB or only low-dose bowel preparation is recommended. Laparoscopic appendectomy is the most appropriate treatment for appendiceal bleeding [14].
Case of appendiceal bleeding (11):
| Case | Age | Sex | Clinical findings | Treatment | Case | Age | Sex | Clinical findings | Treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46 | Male | Appendicitis | Appendectomy | 16 | 48 | Male | Diverticular hemorrhage | Appendectomy | ||
| 2 | 33 | Male | Diverticulitis | Appendectomy | 17 | 14 | Male | Appendix abscess | Ileocaecal resection | [ | |
| 3 | 72 | Male | Angiodysplasia | Appendectomy | 18 | 24 | Male | Granulomatous appendicitis | Appendectomy | ||
| 4 | 22 | Male | Granulomatous appendicitis | Appendectomy | 19 | 49 | Male | Acute suppurative appendicitis | Appendectomy | ||
| 5 | 68 | Male | Appendiceal dieulafoy lesion | Appendectomy | 20 | 63 | Male | Diverticulitis | Hemicolectomy | ||
| 6 | 44 | Male | Diverticulitis | Hemicolectomy | 21 | 18 | Female | Intussusception | Appendectomy | ||
| 7 | 51 | Male | Dieulafoy lesion | Appendectomy | 22 | 33 | Female | Cause unknown | Ileocaecal resection | ||
| 8 | 71 | Male | Appendix ulcer | Barium enema | 23 | 36 | Male | Intussusception | Appendectomy | ||
| 9 | 41 | Male | Atypical florid vascular proliferations | Appendectomy | 24 | 38 | Male | Aortoenteric fistula | Appendectomy | ||
| 10 | 59 | Female | Aortoenteric fistula | Hemicolectomy | 25 | 49 | Female | Appendix cancer | Ileocaecal resection | ||
| 11 | 25 | Male | Focal erosion of appendix mucosa | Appendectomy | 26 | 53 | Female | Appendicitis | Appendectomy | ||
| 12 | 42 | Male | Appendiceal mucosal erosion | Appendectomy | 27 | 44 | Male | Cause unknown | Appendectomy | ||
| 13 | 56 | Male | Gastrointestinal stromal tumor | Appendectomy | 28 | 33 | Male | Cause unknown | Appendectomy | ||
| 14 | 76 | Female | Angiodysplasia | Appendectomy | 29 | 70 | Male | Cause unknown | Colonoscopy | ||
| 15 | 32 | Female | Ulcerated appendiceal stump | Appendectomy | our case | 90 | Male | Cause unknown | Appendectomy |
Declarations:
Ethical Approval and Consent to participate:
The content of this manuscript are in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki for Ethics. No committee approval was required. Oral and written consent to participate was granted by her wife.
Consent for publication:
“Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's legal guardian for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.”
- Availability of supporting data
It is available.
Authors' contributions:
Ahmad Reza Shahraki is the surgeon of patient and writes this paper. Elham Shahraki edits paper and Elahe Shahraki collects data’s.
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests and nothing to disclose.
Acknowledgements
Introduction In the United States (US), appendicitis is the most common acute abdominal emergency requiring surgery. Patients with appendicitis continue to display a complex and atypical range of clinical manifestations, providing a subsequent high risk for emergency physicians to miss acute abdominal pathology on a patient's initial visits. Due to the risk of potential perforation, the proper and timely clinical identification of acute appendicitis is vital
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,